09.02.2013 Views

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

October 2000 Newsletter - Naval Postgraduate School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MICRO-AIR VEHICLE AERODYNAMICS, continued from page 42<br />

shown in Figure 4.<br />

Since the resultant force must be normal to the incident<br />

flow, the resultant force vector must be tilted forward, as<br />

shown in Figure 4, which provides both a lift component and<br />

a thrust component. Knoller and Betz went one step further,<br />

and they noted that if the wing was flapped (plunging it up<br />

and down vertically in an oscillatory fashion) while the lift<br />

force would be both positive and negative during the cycle,<br />

averaging to zero, the thrust force would always be<br />

non-negative, so the average thrust would be a<br />

positive value. (For an animated demonstration of<br />

this phenomenon, visit our online version of this<br />

article at www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/research/<br />

unsteady/propulsion/theory/).<br />

Prandtl’s student Birnbaum (1924) first presented a<br />

solution for incompressible flow past flapping airfoils,<br />

while Katzmayr (1922) in Vienna produced the first<br />

wind tunnel measurements which conclusively showed that<br />

an airfoil mounted in an oscillating wind stream experiences a<br />

thrust force. In the 1940’s and 50’s Schmidt (1965) in East<br />

Germany started to conduct systematic experiments on<br />

flapping foil propellers which led him to the development of<br />

the wave propeller and its demonstration on a catamaran<br />

boat. Classical oscillatory thin airfoil theory shows that the<br />

propulsive efficiency of a single harmonically plunging airfoil<br />

is only about 50 percent unless the airfoil oscillates rather<br />

slowly (which in turn requires a large airfoil in order to obtain<br />

Figure 5. Thrust Indicative Vortex Street.<br />

FEATURED PROJECT<br />

Figure 4. Induced velocity<br />

and the resultant<br />

tilting of the normal-force<br />

vector.<br />

significant thrust values). Schmidt sought to overcome this<br />

deficiency by arranging two airfoils in tandem, where the<br />

forward foil is oscillating and the rear-ward foil is stationary.<br />

This makes it possible to convert the vortical energy generated<br />

by the forward foil into additional thrust rather than being<br />

wasted. Schmidt claimed that his wave propeller achieved<br />

efficiencies comparable to those of conventional propellers<br />

and had the additional advantage of enabling operation in<br />

shallow waters.<br />

Flapping Wings Generate Vortices<br />

It is a well known fact that a vortex is generated<br />

whenever an airfoil changes its angle of attack.<br />

Therefore, a flapping airfoil continuously sheds<br />

vortices from its trailing edge. We have made extensive<br />

studies of this vortex shedding phenomenon. Two<br />

examples are shown in Figures 5 and 6, where the<br />

lower image is a photograph of the water-tunnel<br />

experiment, and the upper image is a schematic<br />

representation of the vortices. If one measures the<br />

time-average of the flow at some station downstream<br />

of the trailing edge (as we did using the previously<br />

described LDV instrumentation), one obtains the jetlike<br />

distribution schematically shown in the upper<br />

part of Figure 5. Hence the flapping wing generates a<br />

jet similar to the jet produced by a conventional<br />

propeller or jet engine.<br />

It is interesting to note, however, that when we flap<br />

--continued on page 44<br />

NPS Research page 43<br />

<strong>October</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!