09.02.2013 Views

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

what is already a reality between the various Identity groups would give further incentive for<br />

continuing in a non-violent manner.<br />

293<br />

A likely roadblock to an attempt utilizing the described methods at reducing violence and<br />

distinguishing between types would likely come from the watch-dog groups. These groups stand<br />

to collect more money from supporters by presenting each <strong>of</strong> the four varied types <strong>of</strong> Identity as<br />

a monolithic movement, ready and likely to attack at any moment.<br />

The distinctions between these varied groups are real. They are documented through their<br />

writings as well as interviews with both leaders and adherents with the various groups. The<br />

groups themselves would like to known for their particular understanding <strong>of</strong> the biblical text and<br />

how that impacts their social actions, rather than being lumped imprecisely under the pejorative<br />

“terrorist” or “extremist” labels. Despite the fact that these groups do differ significantly and<br />

their actions vary widely—the received view and comfortable stereotype will likely make it very<br />

difficult to change the categories in which these groups currently find themselves.<br />

Beginnings rather than conclusions<br />

What then is to be made <strong>of</strong> this argument against imprecise labeling and pejorative<br />

stereotyping <strong>of</strong> Identity adherents? Several issues come immediately to the forefront. First, the<br />

‘terrorism studies’ community—that community which has been primarily responsible for<br />

research on Identity theology has been inaccurate—likely in part because <strong>of</strong> the distance from<br />

which they view their research subjects. The failure <strong>of</strong> many previous researchers to interact with<br />

the actual subject <strong>of</strong> their research and primary sources, rather than secondary sources, which<br />

have <strong>of</strong>ten been based on particular biases, has contributed to the existing inaccuracies related to<br />

Identity theology. Social Identity Theory as used in this dissertation is but one <strong>of</strong> potentially<br />

many frameworks that might be used to more accurately uncover truth as it relates to the people,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!