09.02.2013 Views

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

David Brannan PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

89<br />

adherents with the violence perpetrated in their name in Northern Ireland. Clearly this would be<br />

an illegitimate attribution <strong>of</strong> violence to many who oppose it yet still call themselves nationalists.<br />

An exploration <strong>of</strong> the theoretical difficulties past researchers have faced will assist in outlining<br />

how we might move toward a more productive and accurate investigation <strong>of</strong> the matter at hand.<br />

Analytical frameworks or prejudicial mandates?<br />

Beyond the definitional difficulties –and yet closely related– are the more general<br />

problems with existing analytical frameworks. As stated above, the current use <strong>of</strong> the term<br />

‘terrorism’ as emanating from the Terrorism <strong>St</strong>udies community is at once recognized as a<br />

negative label. Thus, when researchers attempt to study these ‘terrorists’ they are essentially<br />

compelled to assume a negative posture toward them. To do otherwise makes the researcher<br />

immediately suspect as a probable spokesman for the groups or ideologies in question or at least<br />

dangerously, insouciant to the peril they pose. More specifically as it applies to this context, a<br />

close association with Identity adherents is seen as a foolishly dangerous practice, which is<br />

unnecessary because <strong>of</strong> the existing literature. 229<br />

Thus definitional problems already mentioned are not the only challenge for an accurate<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> Identity theology. Theoretical difficulties have also challenged this research.<br />

Two <strong>of</strong> the most popular analytical frameworks currently used for explaining “terrorist”<br />

behavior are critically discussed in some detail below. Such a discussion is necessary in this<br />

dissertation since the frameworks in which Identity theology is generally viewed contribute<br />

significantly to the current misinformation and lack understanding concerning it. These<br />

229 This belief has been driven home to the author on numerous occasions by “terrorism studies”<br />

researchers who suggest that a researcher who talks to “terrorists” is likely to become a spokesman for the<br />

“terrorists.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!