10.02.2013 Views

Life and Scientific Work of Peter Guthrie Tait - School of Mathematics ...

Life and Scientific Work of Peter Guthrie Tait - School of Mathematics ...

Life and Scientific Work of Peter Guthrie Tait - School of Mathematics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE PHYSICS OF GOLF 27<br />

experimentally by Magnus in 1852 but already made clear by Newton in<br />

1666, that, when a spherical ball is rotating <strong>and</strong> at the same time advancing<br />

in still air, it will deviate from a straight path in the same direction as that in<br />

which the front side is being carried by the rotation. Thus (to quote <strong>Tait</strong>)<br />

" in topping, the upper part <strong>of</strong> the ball is made to move forward faster than<br />

does the centre, consequently<br />

the front <strong>of</strong> the ball descends in virtue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rotation, <strong>and</strong> the ball itself skews in that direction. When a ball is undercut<br />

it gets the opposite spin to the last, <strong>and</strong>, in consequence, it tends to deviate<br />

upwards instead <strong>of</strong> downwards. The upward tendency <strong>of</strong>ten makes the path<br />

<strong>of</strong> a ball (for a part <strong>of</strong> its course) concave upwards in spite <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

but<br />

gravity...."<br />

This last sentence contains the germ <strong>of</strong> the whole ; explanation<br />

it<br />

was not developed by <strong>Tait</strong> till four or five years later. Neither here nor in<br />

any <strong>of</strong> his writings on the subject is any rash statement made as to the greatest<br />

possible distance attainable by a well-driven golf ball. In his first article " On<br />

the Physics <strong>of</strong> Golf" {Nature, Vol. XLii, August 28, 1890) <strong>Tait</strong> calculates by an<br />

approximate formula the range <strong>of</strong> flight <strong>of</strong> a golf ball for a particular elevation<br />

<strong>and</strong> various speeds <strong>of</strong> projection, the ball being assumed to have no rotation.<br />

In this way by comparison with known lengths <strong>of</strong> "carry" he finds a probable<br />

value for the initial speed <strong>of</strong> projection. He also points out that, to double<br />

the " carry," the ball because <strong>of</strong> atmospheric resistance must set out with nearly<br />

quadruple energy. About a year later (Sept. 24, 1891, Nature, Vol. XLiv,<br />

p. 497), he treats more particularly <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> flight. He finds that,<br />

although we may approximate to the observed value <strong>of</strong> the range<br />

<strong>of</strong> a well-<br />

driven ball by proper assumptions as to speed <strong>and</strong> elevation, it is impossible,<br />

along those lines, to arrive at anything like the time <strong>of</strong> flight. The non-rotating<br />

golf ball will according to calculation remain in the air a little more than half<br />

" The only way <strong>of</strong><br />

the time the ball is known from experience to do.<br />

reconciling<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> calculation with the observed data is to assume that<br />

for some reason the effects <strong>of</strong> gravity are at least partially counteracted.<br />

This, in still air, can only be a rotation due to undercutting."<br />

Thus he comes back to the rotation <strong>of</strong> the ball as the feature which not<br />

only explains the faults <strong>of</strong> slicing, pulling <strong>and</strong> topping, but is the great secret<br />

<strong>of</strong> long driving. When the rotation is properly applied as an underspin about<br />

a truly horizontal axis, the ball goes unswervingly towards its goal ; but, when<br />

owing to faulty striking the axis <strong>of</strong> rotation is tilted from the horizontal one<br />

way or the other, there is a component spin about a vertical axis <strong>and</strong> the ball<br />

4—2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!