12.02.2013 Views

THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House

THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House

THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 TYNDALE BULLET<strong>IN</strong><br />

III. <strong>THE</strong> <strong>IMAGE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>GOD</strong>: PHILOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

We must look afresh at the precise way in which the image<br />

doctrine is expressed, and consider whether the usual translation<br />

of the text is justifiable.<br />

I. It is clear that the key term is םֶלֶצ ‘image’; the word תּ ומּד<br />

‘likeness’ has an explanatory significance but is not essential to<br />

the concept, for it does not need to be repeated after 'in his<br />

image', 'in the, image of God'. 80 It cannot be denied that the<br />

most natural meaning for the phrase םיִהֹלֶא םֶלֶצְּב<br />

is 'in the<br />

image of God', that is, that God has an image, and that man is<br />

created in conformity with this image. The beth in םֶלֶצְּב<br />

is then<br />

a beth of the norm, 81 and the word is to be translated 'according<br />

(to the pattern, or model, of our image'. Such an image would<br />

normally, speaking from the point of view of Ancient Near<br />

Eastern thought, be conceived of as (a) a physical form, but we<br />

can also examine the possibility that the image is to be understood<br />

metaphorically as (b) a spiritual quality or character.<br />

(a) Has God an 'image', then, in this sense, according to the<br />

Old Testament? 82 There is no denying that God is recurrently<br />

spoken of in the Old Testament as if He were a man: parts of<br />

the human body, such as hands, eyes, ears, were attributed to<br />

Him, as also physical actions such as laughing, smelling,<br />

whistling; He was also spoken of as feeling the emotions of<br />

hatred, anger, joy, regret. 83 Such anthropomorphisms cannot<br />

easily be dismissed as merely metaphors, 84 since everywhere else<br />

in the Ancient Near East these terms were understood to be<br />

literally true of the gods, and it is difficult to believe that Israel<br />

would have run the risk to faith of using such terminology if<br />

she had believed that Yahweh was pure spirit, without parts<br />

or passions. Nevertheless, it is significant that the anthropomorphisms<br />

used of Yahweh in the Old Testament do not<br />

enable us to construct an identi-kit picture of Yahweh’s physical<br />

appearance, 85 as is the case, for example, with Greek deities<br />

80<br />

Cf. also Gn. 9:6, where םלצ alone is used. On 5:1, see below, n. 117.<br />

81<br />

So e.g. H. Gunkel, Genesis 111; W. Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament<br />

II 122 n. 6.<br />

82<br />

'Israel conceived even Jahweh himself as having human form' (G. von Rad,<br />

Old Testament Theology II 145); so also L. Koehler, TZ 4 (1948) 19.<br />

83<br />

Cf. W. Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament I 211.<br />

84<br />

As is done by H. H. Rowley, The Faith of Israel 75.<br />

85<br />

Even Dn. 7:9 is somewhat reticent (H. Wildberger, TZ 21 (1965) 248<br />

n. 15). If W. Herrmann (‘Gedanken zur Geschichte des altorientalischen Beschreibungsliedes',<br />

ZAW 75 (1963) 176-197) is correct in identifying the existence in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!