THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House
THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House
THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN - Tyndale House
- TAGS
- tyndale
- tyndalehouse.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>IMAGE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>GOD</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>MAN</strong> 87<br />
The body is 'not an object which we possess, but which stands<br />
outside our real being . . . . It is the living form of our essential<br />
self, the necessary expression of our individual existence, in<br />
which the meaning of our life must find its realization.' 157 The<br />
doctrine of the image is thus the protological counterpart of the<br />
eschatological doctrine of the resurrection of the body; like<br />
eschatology, protology (the doctrine of the beginning) is<br />
basically concerned to depict a truth of existential significance, 158<br />
in this case, that of the indivisible unity of man's nature. In<br />
turn, this doctrine of the union of physical and spiritual in the<br />
nature of man has far-reaching implications in the sphere of<br />
man's relation with the world and with God, on the under-<br />
standing of sin and redemption, on the validity and significance<br />
of the cult, on the development of the importance of the<br />
individual; 159 but these broader issues can only be mentioned<br />
here.<br />
As far as concerns this aspect of the image, namely that it<br />
denotes the corporeal existence of man, we have to stress that<br />
what makes man the image of God is not that corporeal man<br />
stands as an analogy of a corporeal God; 160 for the image does<br />
not primarily mean similarity, but the representation of the<br />
one who is imaged in a place where he is not. If God wills His<br />
image to be corporeal man—union of physical and spiritual<br />
(or psychical)—He thereby wills the manner of His presence<br />
in the world to be the selfsame uniting of physical and spiritual.<br />
At this point, where the doctrine of the incarnation lies close at<br />
hand, together with the rejection of ultimate dichotomy<br />
between sacred and secular, we must leave the exploration of<br />
the repercussions of the image doctrine in so far as they stem<br />
from the corporeal aspect of the image.<br />
2. Reference has already been made to the function of the<br />
image as representative of one who is really or spiritually pre-<br />
sent, though physically absent. The king puts his statue in a con-<br />
quered land to signify his real, though not his physical, presence<br />
there. The god has his statue set up in the temple to signify<br />
his real presence there, though he may be in heaven, on the<br />
157<br />
W Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament II 149.<br />
158<br />
'We can only know of the beginning in the true sense as we hear of it in the<br />
middle between beginning and ending' (D. Bonhoeffer, Creation and Fall 12).<br />
159<br />
Cf. W. Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament I 404f., II 149; R. Niebuhr,<br />
The Nature and Destiny of Man I 54-92.<br />
160<br />
The function of the image is not to depict but to express (K. H. Bernhardt,<br />
Gott und Bild 55).