14.02.2013 Views

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and even in hell. It is his presence in <strong>the</strong>m that gives <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>ir existence. God<br />

creates nothing to which he does not present and communicate himself. He is<br />

everywhere, <strong>the</strong> complete essence of all things. He so contains in himself <strong>the</strong><br />

essence of all things that by his own essence alone, without ano<strong>the</strong>r creature, he<br />

can here manifest himself as fire, as air, as stone, as amber, as a twig, as a<br />

flower, as whatever else you will. 52<br />

Small wonder that in view of such teachings Servetus should have been set<br />

down as a pan<strong>the</strong>ist; <strong>for</strong> though he does not indeed identify God with <strong>the</strong><br />

created universe, but ra<strong>the</strong>r makes <strong>the</strong> universe a manifestation of God dwelling<br />

within it, yet pan<strong>the</strong>ism is <strong>the</strong> nearest system of thought to which most would<br />

incline to assign it. 53 Of course in such a doctrine of God <strong>the</strong>re was no room <strong>for</strong><br />

anything like <strong>the</strong> accepted doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Trinity. In his <strong>for</strong>mer works, as we<br />

have seen in a previous chapter, Servetus still accepted belief in a Trinity, not<br />

in <strong>the</strong> traditional sense, indeed, but as a threefold manifestation of divinity in<br />

three wonderful ‘dispositions.’ Here, however, even this view has faded away<br />

be <strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> grander conception of a God who is manifested in everything. His<br />

previous views of <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit and of Christ are retained in somewhat<br />

expanded <strong>for</strong>m, but actually <strong>the</strong>y stand in <strong>the</strong> shadow of <strong>the</strong> all-embracing<br />

doctrine of God. The God-man of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologians has disappeared from <strong>the</strong><br />

plan; though as an object of religious worship in mystical devotion Christ<br />

continues to be <strong>the</strong> centre of Servetus’s personal religious experience.<br />

Turning from speculative doctrine to practical, Servetus finds in baptism<br />

<strong>the</strong> second cardinal doctrine calling <strong>for</strong> re<strong>for</strong>mation. In <strong>the</strong> practice of infant<br />

baptism he sees <strong>the</strong> source of all <strong>the</strong> corruption in <strong>the</strong> life of <strong>the</strong> Church; <strong>for</strong> as<br />

it is baptism that is supposed to regenerate one and introduce him into <strong>the</strong><br />

kingdom of heaven, infant baptism is a delusion, <strong>for</strong>mally admitting into <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!