14.02.2013 Views

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

A HISTORY OF UNITARIANISM - Starr King School for the Ministry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 cf. J. F. Kiessling, Das Lehrgebaude der Wiedertauffer (Leipzig, 1776), p.<br />

xiii f.<br />

41 cf. his Testamentum in Sandius, Biblio<strong>the</strong>ca, p. 195.<br />

42 cf. Lubieniecius, p. 192.<br />

Book II, Chapter XXIV<br />

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

1 cf. Wotschke, Briefwechsel, pp. 246—274.<br />

2 cf. Krajewski to Hosius, Lublin, May 31, 1566, in Wotschke, op. cit., p. 272,<br />

n. 1.<br />

3 The statement of Lubieniecius (Historia, p. 194), repeated by many historians<br />

during all <strong>the</strong> generations since, that at <strong>the</strong> Diet of Lublin in 1566 a decree was<br />

promulgated by <strong>the</strong> Senate by which all Trideists and Anabaptists were<br />

proscribed, and required to leave <strong>the</strong> country within a month, must be definitely<br />

denied. The earliest sources until recently accessible are scanty and confused.<br />

The written draft of a decree, discussed in <strong>the</strong> Senate and acceptable to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>King</strong>, has been mistaken <strong>for</strong> a valid decree, but it was never adopted. The term<br />

Trideists here applied to <strong>the</strong> Antitrinitarians refers to a view that had an early<br />

but short-lived currency among <strong>the</strong>m, which held to <strong>the</strong> essential deity of<br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>r, Son, and Holy Spirit as three distinct persons, without also asserting<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir hypostatical unity Hence Catholic writers of this period called <strong>the</strong>m<br />

(strangely enough) Trinitarii. The earliest printed sources <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘Decree of<br />

Lublin’ are in Schomann’s Testamentum (in Sandius, Biblio<strong>the</strong>ca, p. 194), and<br />

Lubieniecius, op. cit., p. 194. Passing by many mistaken accounts of it, cf. <strong>the</strong><br />

correct account in Teodor Wierzbowski, Uchansciana (Warszawa, 1890), iii,<br />

132, 134; id., Uchanski, p. 445 f; and <strong>the</strong> very conclusive review of <strong>the</strong> subject<br />

by Stanislaw Bodniak, ‘Sprawa wygnania Arjan w r. 1566’ (The matter of <strong>the</strong><br />

banishment of Arians in 1566), Re<strong>for</strong>macja w Polsce, v (1928), 52—59.<br />

4 cf. Schomann, Testamentum, in Sandius, Biblio<strong>the</strong>ca, p. 194; Sandius, id. op.,<br />

p. 82; Lauterbach, Socinismus, p. 28; Lukaszewicz, Geschichte, p. 18, n. 27;<br />

Friese, Kirchengesch., ii, 243.<br />

5 For <strong>the</strong> above episodes, cf. Lubieniecius, op. cit., pp. 194—197.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!