14.02.2013 Views

Miško Šuvaković Epistemology of Art - TkH

Miško Šuvaković Epistemology of Art - TkH

Miško Šuvaković Epistemology of Art - TkH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68··· ··· 69<br />

The text addresses the problem <strong>of</strong> methodology, namely, validating<br />

methodology as the research program. The first analogy refers to a<br />

textbook or a textbook programme. On the first level <strong>of</strong> consideration,<br />

the textbook is conceived as a map <strong>of</strong> indexes whose system structure<br />

is set against non-systematic (conventional) priorities. The index<br />

structure is situated around the interior dynamics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Art</strong>&Language<br />

community; in other words, around the concept <strong>of</strong> interior dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> a community as an essential determinant <strong>of</strong> a paradigm. This<br />

proposition frames the analysis <strong>of</strong> the index problem as pertaining<br />

to Thomas Kuhn’s concept <strong>of</strong> paradigms in scientific communities,<br />

implying that cognitive problems, meanings <strong>of</strong> the discourse, texts,<br />

conversations, or mutual learning are determined through interior<br />

relations between the members and associates <strong>of</strong> <strong>Art</strong>&Language. The<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> textbook structure, i.e. index structure, is not rendered as<br />

a general methodological scheme, but rather as a tool or set <strong>of</strong> tools<br />

for research in theoretical domains <strong>of</strong> conversation, learning, writing,<br />

etc. The purpose <strong>of</strong> establishing the index structure is a systematic<br />

methodological observation <strong>of</strong> the ways <strong>of</strong> employing, on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

the community, the mapping analytical machinery. Determining the<br />

method is rendered in five steps: (1) by way <strong>of</strong> a map (review), intuitive<br />

or informal understanding is systematized and summed up into a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> criteria <strong>of</strong> adequacy, e.g. <strong>of</strong> procedures <strong>of</strong> teaching and learning,<br />

(2) these criteria <strong>of</strong> adequacy delimit the temporary formulations <strong>of</strong><br />

an explicit theory (3) formal theory is tested against the criteria <strong>of</strong> adequacy<br />

to ascertain that necessary demands <strong>of</strong> each theory have been<br />

observed, (4) consequences <strong>of</strong> the proposed and developed theories<br />

are established, while a possibility <strong>of</strong> verifying theories pertaining to<br />

individual standpoints is taken into consideration, and (5) theory can<br />

be applied to the main problems in the researched and established<br />

domain. Procedural sequence from (1) to (5) demonstrates how the<br />

interior dynamics <strong>of</strong> the paradigm is developing, from location <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

intuitions, through systematizations assuming a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

basic criteria <strong>of</strong> adequacy, to a formal, relatively general theory which<br />

can further be applied to seeking individual solutions. The process<br />

described features an intertextual, namely, inter-discursive map, network,<br />

or grid <strong>of</strong> individual contributions: suggestions and responses.<br />

Individual contribution to this analogous textbook system is always<br />

an unperfected order <strong>of</strong> elements, while network, mapping, or grid<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the order dictate the value and meaning <strong>of</strong> individual elements.<br />

Conceptual and semantic superposition <strong>of</strong> structure to the element<br />

indicates that <strong>Art</strong>&Language theory <strong>of</strong> indexes is devised from<br />

holistic principles. Individual conventions establish an unperfected<br />

empirical order, while two types <strong>of</strong> generalizations can be acknowledged:<br />

(a) first are abstract or hierarchical and establish difference<br />

in type, and (b) other pertain to analogies and establish difference in<br />

degree. The grid structure is based on a polar concept:<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> a lath is a polar concept, it registers the continuous<br />

polarity rather than discrete separation, <strong>of</strong> the formal and, as it<br />

were ‘intuitional’ or ‘material’ modes <strong>of</strong> experience. The determinate<br />

characterisation <strong>of</strong> either pole requires some kind <strong>of</strong> reference<br />

to the other. The status <strong>of</strong> the indices compatible with the propositional<br />

attitudes <strong>of</strong> a single contributor is essentially ideological. The<br />

institute may be looked at as a corpus <strong>of</strong> ideological commitments<br />

compromising a field. The problems are essentially regarded as ‘objective’.<br />

The Activity may be regarded as a generally focused search<br />

for methodologies: i.e. for a general methodological horizon. 113<br />

This quote underlines three crucial positions <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> indexes:<br />

(1) holistic character <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> polarities establishing correlative<br />

references; namely, semantic value <strong>of</strong> one polarity is determined<br />

by its place in the structure <strong>of</strong> indexes and relations with other<br />

polarities <strong>of</strong> the network, (2) ideological position (ideological body<br />

pertaining to the community) is derived from individual positions, circumscribed<br />

in the pattern <strong>of</strong> propositional utterances – statements<br />

comprising a premise (position, viewpoint) and a proposition, and (3)<br />

acting in the locale (discursive space) <strong>of</strong> holistic structuration and<br />

ideological demarcation <strong>of</strong> procedures means searching for a method.<br />

These three positions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Art</strong>&Language feature juxtaposed concerns<br />

<strong>of</strong> analytical philosophy (structural semantic holism, methodology)<br />

113 <strong>Art</strong>&Language, „The <strong>Art</strong>-Language Institute: Sugestions for a Map“, pp. 17.16-<br />

17.18.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!