Status report on sugar cane agrochemicals ... - Sucre Ethique

More documents

Recommendations

Info

46 Cheesman, Oliver D. 2005. Environmental impacts of sugar production. WWF and CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK & Cambridge, MA, USA. Cory-Slechta, D.A., Thiruchelvam, M. and Di Monte, D.A. 2008. Letter regarding: "Paraquat: The Red Herring of Parkinson's Disease Research". Toxicological Sciences 2008 103(1): 215-216. CPT. 2003. Uso indiscriminado de herbicidas está dani� cando culturas em propriedades da região Norte. Comissão Pastoral da Terra do Paraná. 28/05/2003. http://www.cpt.org.br/?system=news&action=read&id=112&eid=128 Dasgupta, S., Meisner, C. and Huq, M. 2007. A Pinch or a Pint? Evidence of Pesticide Overuse in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1): 91-114. Dinham, Deborah. 2004. Why paraquat should be banned. PAN – Pesticide Action Network. Outlooks on Pest Management, December 2004. DOI: 10.1564/15dec10. http://panap.net/uploads/media/paraquatdinham.pdf D’Souza U.J., Zain A, Raju S. 2005. Genotoxic and cytotoxic e� ects in the bone marrow of rats exposed to a low dose of paraquat via the dermal route. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 581(1-2): 187-190. ECHA. 2009. Guidance Fact Sheet. Inclusion of substances in annex XIV. European Chemicals Agency. ECHA-09-GF-01- EN. http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/fact_sheets/factsheet_inclusion_annexXIV_en.pdf Ecobichon, D.J. 2001. Pesticide use in developing countries. Toxicology 160(1-3): 27-33. EPA. 2003. Health E� ects Support Document for Metribuzin. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 822-R-03-004. February. Ereno, D. 2002. Spittlebug attacks: Biological control kills the insect that has become a pest due to the mechanized cutting of the sugarcane. Pesquisa Fapesp, 81 - 11. 2002. http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/?art=766&bd=1&pg=1&lg=en EU. 2007. Judgement of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), 11 July 2007. (Directive 91/414/EEC – Plant protection products – Paraquat as an active substance – Marketing authorisation – Authorisation procedure – Protection of human and animal health). Case T 229/04. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=CELEX:62004A0229:EN:HTML Evenson, R.E. and Gollin, D. 2003. Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300(5620): 758 – 762. Fairchild, J.F. and Sappington, L.C. 2002. Fate and E� ects of the Triazinone Herbicide Metribuzin in Experimental Pond Mesocosms. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 43(2): 198–202. FAO. 2003. International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides (Revised Version), adopted by the Hundred and Twenty-third Session of the FAO Council in November 2002. Rome: FAO. FIBGE 2002. Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel – Brasil 2002. FIBGE 6 Estudos e Pesquisas. Informação Geográ� ca. Diretoria de Geociências. Rio de Janeiro. <strong>Status</strong> <strong>report</strong> on sugar cane agrochemicals management - ETHICAL-SUGAR
47 FoE & CFS. 2008..Who Bene� ts from GM Crops: The Rise in Pesticide Use. Friends of the Earth International & Center for Food Safety. p. 6. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/FoE%20I%20Who%20Bene� ts%202008%20-%20 Full%20Report%20FINAL%202-6-08.pdf. Frey, Sydney. 2008. Nicaraguans demand justice from World Bank � nanced sugar cane company. Upside Down World, 11 July. http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/1374/1/ Galt, R.E. 2008. Beyond the circle of poison: Signi� cant shifts in the global pesticide complex. Global Environmental Change 18: 786-799. Garcia, A.M., Benavides, F.G., Fletcher, T. and Orts, E. 1998. Paternal exposure to pesticides and congenital malformations. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health 24(6): 473-480. Garnier R. 1995. Paraquat poisoning by inhalation or skin absorption, In: Bismuth C, and Hall AH (eds), Paraquat poisoning: mechanisms, prevention, treatment, 211-234, New York: Marcel Dekker. Guevara Jerez, F.A. 2007. Nicaragua - A Thirsty Country with Lots of Water. Revista Envío, no 310, May 2007. http:// www.envio.org.ni/articulo/3558 Guivant, J. S. 2003. Pesticide use, risk perception and hybrid local knowledge: a case study from southern Brazil. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 11(1): 41-51. Goebel R., Tabone E., Rochat J., Fernandez E., 2001. Biological control of the sugarcane stem borer Chilo sacchariphagus (Lep: Pyralidae) in Reunion Island. Current and future studies on the use of Trichogramma spp. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association. 75: 171-174. Hardell, L. and Eriksson, M. 1988. The association between soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, Cancer, 62: 652-656. Hardell, L., Sandstrom, A, 1979. Case-control study: soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and chlorophenols. British Journal of Cancer 39(): 711-17. Hausburg, M.A., Dekrey, G.K., Salmen, J.J., Palic, M.R., and Gardiner, C.S. 2005. E� ects of paraquat on development of preimplantation embryos in vivo and in vitro, Reproductive Toxicology 20(2): 239-244. Hirata, Flavio. 2006. Sugarcane’s Sweet Success. Farm Chemicals International.com. December. http://www.fc-international.com/magazine/?storyid=49 Hoar, S.K., Blair, A., Holmes, F.F., et al. 1986. Agriculture herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma, Journal of the American Medical Association 256: 1141-1147. ICRISAT-WWF. 2009. Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI). Improving Sugarcane Cultivation in India: Training Manual. March. Iglesias, Enildo. 2009. European cars know nothing about ethics. REL-UITA, 13 March 13. http://www.rel-uita.org/agricultura/agrocombustibles/automoviles_europeos_etica-eng.htm IJM. 2007. Memorandum; International Justice Mission, 23 May 2007. http://www.sucre-ethique.org/Human-Rights- Abuses-Sugarcane,816?var_recherche=nicaraguaLe <strong>Status</strong> <strong>report</strong> on sugar cane agrochemicals management - ETHICAL-SUGAR
Page 1 and 2: For a sugar which respects human be
Page 3 and 4: 3 About Ethical Sugar This research
Page 5 and 6: 5 Executive summary While the intro
Page 7 and 8: 7 Developing countries often lack t
Page 9 and 10: 9 Adopting best practices To foster
Page 11 and 12: 11 legislation and regulation, with
Page 13 and 14: 13 Table 1. Potential health impact
Page 15 and 16: 15 International action on agrochem
Page 17 and 18: 17 Agrochemicals used in sugarcane
Page 19 and 20: 19 • In the Annual Regional Healt
Page 21 and 22: 21 A summary list of the most probl
Page 23 and 24: 23 North-South trade in chemical re
Page 25 and 26: 25 Examples of inappropriate use of
Page 27 and 28: 27 ucts are often stored in unsuita
Page 29 and 30: 29 some examples of cases where far
Page 31 and 32: 31 Reasons for “bad practices”
Page 33 and 34: 33 major problem is that the respon
Page 35 and 36: 35 Voluntary e� orts: internation
Page 37 and 38: 37 In the state of São Paulo, a sy
Page 39 and 40: 39 the purposes of the present pape
Page 41 and 42: 41 GMOs: friend or foe? E� orts t
Page 43 and 44: 43 Table 3. Summary of the recommen
Page 45: 45 References ALVES, Francisco - Po
Page 49 and 50: 49 Oray, Michael. 2009. Dole Claims
Page 51 and 52: 51 Example of a civil society campa
Page 53 and 54: 53 In these � rst hours in Managu
Page 55 and 56: 55 Appendix Better sugarcane initat
Page 57 and 58: 57 4.2 Criterion - To implement mea

Status report on sugar cane agrochemicals ... - Sucre Ethique

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?