PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice
PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice
PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A scientific tool supported by dAnone<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE qUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
NOTEWORTHY PUBLICATIONS<br />
Manufacturing process modifies L. rhamnosus original in vitro properties<br />
intestinal mucosa responses to probiotics differ from one strain to another:<br />
results of transcriptome analysis<br />
intake of probiotics seems to prevent nec in preterm infants<br />
Issue N°4<br />
Jan. 2011<br />
This probiotics watch is designed as a time-saving tool for scientists and clinicians interested in<br />
probiotic research. <strong>In</strong> an interactive format, the quarterly report provides timely, quasi-exhaustive<br />
lists of the scientific publications of the previous three months. It sorts them by topic and highlights<br />
some of the most relevant results. Readers can also check out upcoming scientific events and<br />
regular bibliometric analyses.<br />
Objectivity is a strong commitment, that’s why the articles are selected by an editorial committee,<br />
composed of renowned scientists in the field. Editorial committee members also comment on<br />
what they believe are the quarter’s most relevant publications.<br />
Last but not least each issue features an editorial by a probiotic expert, which offers special insight<br />
into this fascinating field of science.<br />
Method<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
A THOUGHT FOR FOOD: TIME HEALTH CLAIM<br />
STUDIES HAD OWN METHODOLOGY?<br />
by Pr. Francisco Guarner<br />
Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain<br />
« <strong>In</strong>appropriate food habits rank on the top of the list of causes<br />
of disease and early death in developed societies. Obesity, type II<br />
diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancer, among others, are<br />
obvious examples of modern world epidemics ... »<br />
intestinal lactobacilli protects children from developping allergies: a species-dependent effect<br />
Multispecies probiotic intervention alleviates bacterial alterations in ibs patients<br />
L. rhamnosus GG relieves symptoms of abdominal pain in ibs children<br />
A mechanism explaining the preventive effect of probiotics against colitis<br />
L. reuteri consumption improves colic symptoms in breastfed newborns<br />
control of mothers’ diet during pregnancy benefits infants metabolic health<br />
> read more<br />
Mothers’ weight or weight gain during pregnancy impacts the intestinal flora composition of the infants<br />
> Monitoring period : 28/07/2010 to 15/11/2010 > Database : Medline > Result : 371 publications<br />
> Keywords : probiotic / lactic acid bacteria / streptococcus thermophilus / lactobacilli / fermented milk / bifidobacteria<br />
1
A SCIENTIFIC TOOL SUPPORTED BY DANONE<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY KEY DATES > Home page<br />
A THOUGHT FOR FOOD: TIME HEALTH CLAIM<br />
STUDIES HAD OWN METHODOLOGY?<br />
by Pr. Francisco Guarner<br />
Hospital Vall d’Hebron,<br />
Barcelona, Spain.<br />
More info about health claims related to gut and immune function:<br />
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/fr/<br />
p p<br />
events/event/nda101202.htm events/event/nda101202.htm http://www.gut-health.eu/<br />
p g<br />
Issue N°4<br />
Jan. 2011<br />
<strong>In</strong>appropriate food habits rank on the top of the list of causes of<br />
disease and early death in developed societies. Obesity, type II<br />
diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancer, among others, are<br />
obvious examples of modern world epidemics. These pathological<br />
conditions of high prevalence are all certainly associated with bad<br />
food habits. There is no reason that this pernicious trend should<br />
not be amenable to shift towards a healthier course, provided<br />
that knowledge about the risks and benefits associated with food<br />
consumption are satisfactorily transmitted to the population. One<br />
simple way of doing this, among many others, is the intelligent use<br />
of the information included in food product labelling. A few years<br />
ago, a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of<br />
the European Union on nutrition and health claims made on foods<br />
was promulgated (EC 1924/2006). The regulation states that health<br />
claims for food labelling must be based on scientific evidence.<br />
<strong>In</strong> order to ensure that the claims made are truthful and can<br />
be understood by consumers, they must undergo a specific<br />
assessment and authorization procedure involving consultation<br />
with the European Food Safety Authority.<br />
Researchers have been developing novel methodologies aimed at proper substantiation of healthy effects of foods other than their<br />
inherent nutritional value. As compared with studies on pharmaceuticals, particular challenges for the investigation of health benefits<br />
of foods are the length of the studies and the need for adequate control products. Drugs may induce rapid-onset effects but, as<br />
shown by observational studies, foods usually have a strongly defined impact on health after long-term exposure as opposed to nonexposure.<br />
<strong>In</strong>tervention studies carried out over a long period of time may have intrinsic difficulties in terms of compliance and drop-out<br />
of participants during the follow-up. Likewise, drugs studies are controlled by a pharmacologically inert placebo matrix supplied in pills,<br />
which are indistinguishable from the pills containing the active drug. This provision is not always fully suitable within the design framework<br />
of a prospective intervention study evaluating food.<br />
Unfortunately, recent opinions cast by the EFSA-NDA panel after the assessment of beneficial health effects of probiotics raise doubts<br />
about whether such differences are being perceived by the experts in the panel. Ignoring the outcome of long-term studies on the basis<br />
of drop-out rates and disputing the validity of ‘per protocol analysis’ makes little sense for the progression of the field. As opposed to<br />
medicines, it is probably more relevant to identify long-term effects in subjects with confirmed exposure to the tested food product (per<br />
protocol population), rather than applying statistical criteria validated for short term studies on acute effects. Likewise, long term studies<br />
are less susceptible to influences from potential confounding factors such as diet or concomitant drug intake, as these factors tend to be<br />
stable over the long term. <strong>In</strong> other words, such issues may be very relevant in short term studies, but not necessarily critical in long term<br />
studies, and should not be used as criteria for rejecting the information obtained in well-designed and conducted studies. However, these<br />
reasons were claimed by the panel in order to reject an application of a specific mixture of probiotic strains that was tested in two longterm<br />
studies (5 and 6 months) showing significant reduction of scores of abdominal discomfort.<br />
Another interesting point is that study designs for interventions with food products should be able to compare ‘apples and pears’, without<br />
claiming violation of the ‘double-blind’ rule for randomized controlled intervention trials. The critical issue here is to ensure that participants<br />
do not know whether they are in the active or control arm (even if products are fully distinguishable), and investigators analyzing samples<br />
and data deal only with coded information. This may be a difficult matter in some settings but it is clearly achievable. Our minds should<br />
be open to identifying valid procedures for the adequate investigation of food effects on health. It is unfortunate that disputing the validity<br />
of the ‘double blind’ design of a randomized controlled trial testing a probiotic strain in fermented milk as compared with acidified milk<br />
was the reason given by the panel for rejecting the study. This particular study was peer-reviewed, accepted, and published a few years<br />
ago in the British Journal of Medicine; a highly competitive scientific forum. The simplistic approach of ignoring outcomes and rejecting<br />
procedures that do not fulfil ad integrum methodologies validated for drug studies is not the best way to evaluate research on food.<br />
Moreover, the negative approach is likely to compromise future developments of this interesting field of nutritional science.<br />
The legacy of these NDA-panel opinions will be the favour of nutritional supplements in the form of pills or sachets, as they share physical<br />
characteristics with drugs. These supplements are optimal for conducting research studies that are fully compliant with the criteria being<br />
applied by the panel. Eventually, supplements may end up flooding our “food” market. However, this was not the spirit or aim of the EC<br />
regulation, and it is certainly not what consumers need and expect from the food sciences or marketplace.<br />
2
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 THE MAIN POINTS OF THE QUARTER<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Adults<br />
The elderly<br />
Children<br />
A quarter with many in vitro studies<br />
Meta-analysis 0,7%<br />
Clinical<br />
19,9%<br />
Animal<br />
26,7%<br />
<strong>In</strong> vitro<br />
52,7%<br />
371 publications were retrieved from Medline for the last quarter of 2010,<br />
including 25% of reviews. This survey period (like the preceding ones) is<br />
characterised by the publication of a majority of in vitro studies and a higher<br />
number of reviews than in the preceding quarters.<br />
<strong>Probiotics</strong> in clinical trials are mainly assayed against infections<br />
A total of 55 clinical trials were published in the last quarter; 37 were performed in adults, 1 in the elderly and 17 in<br />
children. Probiotic intake is mainly assayed against infections (gastro-intestinal, respiratory, genito-urinary, etc.) in<br />
adults and children.<br />
IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> INTAKE<br />
PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION<br />
WITH THE HOST<br />
DISTRIBUTION OF CLINICAL STUDIES ACCORDING TO THEMATIC FIELD<br />
Clinical trials are mainly performed with Lactobacillus<br />
Clinical trials focused on the health effects of probiotics were mainly performed with Lactobacillus (74.5% of the<br />
studies). These trials mainly investigated the effects of three species of probiotics: Lactobacillus rhamnosus (21.8%<br />
of the studies, half of which were related to the strain L. rhamnosus GG), L. acidophilus (16.4%), and Bifidobacterium<br />
breve (12.7%).<br />
L. rhamnosus<br />
L. acidophilus<br />
L. plantarum<br />
L. casei<br />
L. paracasei<br />
L. helveticus<br />
B. breve<br />
B. lactis<br />
B. longum<br />
S. thermophilus<br />
Nutrition: obesity, cholesterol, etc.<br />
IBD & other inflammatory diseases<br />
Effects of probiotics on immunity<br />
Mucosa response to probiotics<br />
NUMBERS OF QUOTATIONS (IN % OF TOTAL CLINICAL STUDIES)<br />
3,6<br />
3,6<br />
3,6<br />
5,5<br />
IBS & functional GI disorders<br />
Allergy & atopy<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
Numbers of papers<br />
7,3<br />
Other physiological effects<br />
Effects of probiotics on microbiota<br />
9,1<br />
9,1<br />
12,7<br />
16,4<br />
<strong>In</strong>fections<br />
21,8<br />
Others<br />
21,8%<br />
Bifidobacteria<br />
34,5%<br />
0 5 10 15 20<br />
25<br />
Numbers of papers<br />
New applications<br />
& other<br />
Lactobacillus<br />
74,5%<br />
3
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
> The studies performed in humans<br />
are highlighted using the following<br />
symbols :<br />
for the GENERAL POPULATION<br />
for CHILDREN<br />
for the ELDERLY<br />
<strong>In</strong> VITRO/ANIMALS<br />
studies are highlighted<br />
with the symbol :<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
1.1. TECHNOLOGY OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
Manufacturing process modifies L. rhamnosus original in vitro<br />
properties<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Production and manufacturing methods and the food carrier may influence the properties of probiotic<br />
strains, and have an impact on the outcome of clinical intervention studies. The aim of the present study<br />
was to establish whether the properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus may differ depending on the product<br />
and source of the strain.<br />
METHODS & MEASURES<br />
Fifteen different L. rhamnosus isolates, of which fourteen were labelled as L. rhamnosus GG, were<br />
isolated from specific probiotic products. The micro-organisms were phenotypically and genotypically<br />
characterised. Their adhesion properties were compared using the human intestinal mucus model, and<br />
the ability of the isolates to influence model pathogen adhesion to human colonic mucus was assessed.<br />
All L. rhamnosus isolates used were confirmed as members of the species L. rhamnosus.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Except the reference strain OL, all L. rhamnosus isolates showed randomly-amplified polymorphic DNA,<br />
enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles identical to<br />
that of L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103). All L. rhamnosus isolates showed similar tolerance to acid and<br />
were able to bind to human colonic mucus. However, pathogen exclusion by inhibition and competition<br />
varied significantly among the different L. rhamnosus isolates and pathogens tested.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The results suggest that different sources of the same probiotic strain may have significantly modified<br />
strain properties. This should be considered in in vivo studies on human subjects and also for quality<br />
control of probiotic products.<br />
Grzeskowiak L, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Gueimonde M. Manufacturing process influences properties of probiotic bacteria. Br J Nutr. 2010 Nov 9:1-8.<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
from Bruno Pot, <strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, France<br />
« <strong>In</strong> the past, technological properties were considered to be important selection criteria for probiotics,<br />
because strains need to be grown reproducibly, remain viable in high amounts for longer time periods and<br />
remain genetically stable. Besides helping to preserve a genetically stable culture, the preservation matrix was<br />
also shown to influence survival during GIT passage and to determine some aspects of probiotic functionality.<br />
<strong>In</strong>teractions with the host have, for example, been shown to depend on the growth phase of the culture<br />
administered (1) , and several papers have discussed the importance of metabolic compounds in probiotic<br />
effects (2,3) .<br />
The authors of this new paper also point out that technological conditions in production and preservation may<br />
have an impact on the expected outcome of human clinical studies. Although these findings seem logical, they<br />
are rarely considered in clinical trial setups. While numbers and mode of delivery are always defined, batch<br />
production history is rarely detailed.<br />
The authors compared thirteen Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG strains used in clinical intervention studies. All<br />
strains proved to be identical using RAPD, REP-PCR and PFGE typing, showed similar tolerance to acid<br />
and were able to adhere to human colonic mucus. <strong>In</strong> pathogen exclusion experiments, however, inhibition<br />
and competition of pathogens varied significantly. These indings suggested that different sources of the<br />
same probiotic strain may result in varying properties which may help to explain earlier differences in clinical<br />
outcomes, linked to different production schedules.<br />
Although this paper gives no explanation for the variations observed, one can easily expect that the results<br />
obtained may actually be dampened by the fact that all strains were regrown under identical laboratory<br />
conditions, eliminating some of the physiological differences before being tested.<br />
<strong>In</strong> any case, it seems a good idea to consider production history in studies on human subjects and also to<br />
define suitable quality control measures for probiotic products, as suggested by the authors. »<br />
1. Van Baarlen P, FJ. Troost, S van Hemert, C van der Meer, W M de Vos, P J de Groot, GJEJ Hooiveld, R-J M Brummer and M<br />
Kleerebezem. Differential NF-kB pathways inductionby Lactobacillus plantarum in the duodenum of healthy humans correlating with<br />
immune tolerance. 2009 roc Natl Acad Sci USA doi:10.1073/pnas.0809919106.<br />
2. Sokol Harry, Benedicte Pigneur, Laurie Watterlot, Omar Lakhdari, Luis G. Bermu-dez-Humaran, Jean-Jacques Gratadoux, Sebastien<br />
Blugeon, Chantal Bridonneau, Jean-Pierre Furet, Gerard Corthier, Corinne Grangette, Nadia Vasquez, Philippe Pochart, Germain<br />
Trugnan, Ginette Thomas, Herve M. Blottiere, Joël Doré, Philippe Marteau, Philippe Seksik, Philippe Langella. Faecalibacterium<br />
prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. 2008. Proc<br />
Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16731–16736.<br />
3. Heuvelin Elise, Lebreton Corinne, Grangette Corinne, Pot Bruno, Cerf-Bensussan Nadine, Heyman Martine.<br />
Mechanisms involved in alleviation of inflammation by Bifidobacterium breve soluble factors (2009). PlosOne 4(4), e5184.<br />
4
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGIAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />
2.1. MUCOSA RESPONSE TO <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> (TROPHYCITY & STRUCTURE)<br />
<strong>In</strong>testinal mucosa responses to probiotics differ from one strain to<br />
another: results of transcriptome analysis<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />
Probiotic bacteria are proposed to deliver health benefits to the consumer by modulation of intestinal<br />
function through largely unknown molecular mechanisms. The aim of this study is to explore in vivo<br />
mucosal responses of healthy adults to probiotics via analyses of duodenal transcriptomes.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
Seven healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (aged 24±4 years), with no history of gastrointestinal symptoms<br />
and free of any form of medication, were investigated on four separate occasions: 3 bacterial interventions<br />
each with one of the 3 strains (Lactobacillus acidophilus Lafti-L10, L. casei CRL-431, and L. rhamnosus<br />
GG) and one placebo. <strong>In</strong>terventions were separated by a 2 week wash-out period. Volunteers fasted<br />
overnight and were administered a maltodextrin solution at the start of the intervention, after which<br />
they were provided every 30 min with a preparation containing reconstituted freeze-dried bacteria<br />
resuspended in maltodextrin solution or a preparation only containing the maltodextrin solution (placebo)<br />
for a period of 6 h. Tissue samples were obtained from the horizontal part of the duodenum. Total RNA<br />
extracted from these biopsies was hybridized to Affymetrix whole genome expression arrays.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Analysis of the transcriptome of duodenal biopsies.<br />
RESULTS<br />
<strong>In</strong> the mucosa of the proximal small intestine of healthy volunteers, each strain of the probiotics induced<br />
differential gene-regulatory networks and pathways in the human mucosa. Comparison of these specific<br />
expression profiles with response profiles associated with pharmaceutical and other biologically-active<br />
compounds showed that the responses to probiotic strains correlated significantly with responses to<br />
compounds active in the regulation of immune responses, the cell cycle, blood pressure, and water and<br />
ion homeostasis. Mucosal responses to L. acidophilus mainly involve regulation of immune response,<br />
hormonal regulation of tissue growth and development, and ion homeostasis, those for L. casei involve<br />
proliferation, Th1/Th2 balance, and hormonal regulation of blood pressure and those for L. rhamnosus<br />
involve wound healing, IFN response, and ion homeostasis. Transcriptomes clustered per person, not<br />
per intervention, show that person-to-person variation in gene expression was the largest determinant<br />
of differences between transcriptomes. Nevertheless, the consumption of different probiotic lactobacilli<br />
led to markedly different expression profiles in vivo in human mucosa.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
This study elucidates how the intestinal mucosa of healthy humans perceives different probiotics and<br />
anticipates that responsiveness to probiotics is not only determined by the characteristics of the bacterial<br />
strain consumed but also by genetic background, resident microbiota, diet, and lifestyle. This study<br />
could, therefore, be among the first steps to investigate the interplay between microbiota, probiotic, or<br />
other nutritional supplements and human genetics towards personalized nutrition.<br />
van Baarlen P, Troost F, van der Meer C, Hooiveld G, Boekschoten M, Brummer RJ, Kleerebezem M. Microbes and Health Sackler Colloquium:<br />
Human mucosal in vivo transcriptome responses to three lactobacilli indicate how probiotics may modulate human cellular pathways.<br />
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7.<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
from James Versalovic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston US<br />
« This study (van Baarlen et al.) described the differential effects of three different Lactobacillus species on cell<br />
signaling pathways in the duodenum of healthy adults. The study included three commonly used commercial<br />
Lactobacillus strains, and the study was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study<br />
(7 human adults with 4 interventions each). Each individual consumed Lactobacillus acidophilus (5,2 x 10 10<br />
organisms), Lactobacillus casei (3.2 x 10 10 organisms), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (1.68 x 10 10 organisms), or<br />
a control maltodextrin solution during a 6-hour period prior to collection of total human RNA from duodenal<br />
biopsies. Consumption of L. acidophilus induced the expression of immune response genes, genes involved<br />
in hormonal regulation of tissue growth and development, and genes involved in water and ion homeostasis.<br />
Consumption of L. casei resulted in enhanced expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell proliferation,<br />
balance of Th1/Th2 immune responses, metabolism, and hormonal activity involved in blood pressure<br />
regulation. Consumption of L. rhamnosus resulted in differential gene expression in pathways involved in<br />
wound repair and healing, angiogenesis, interferon responses, calcium signaling, and ion homeostasis. This<br />
ground-breaking study describes the detailed differences of short-term (acute) effects by probiotics on human<br />
signaling pathways (administration time of 6 hours with 2-week long wash-out periods). The results point the<br />
way towards targeted use of probiotics for specific applications in human nutrition and medicine. »<br />
5
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 2. PHYSIOLOGICAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
2.2. EFFECTS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> ON MICROBIOTA<br />
Probiotic and nutrient intakes generate specific metabolite<br />
procuction in mice<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
The complex association of gut flora collectively extends the processing of undigested food to the benefit<br />
of the host through metabolic capacities not encoded in mammalian genomes. At present, metabolic<br />
insights into gut microbiota metabolism remain limited due to the inaccessibility of the intestinal habitat<br />
and gut microbiota complexity. Over the past few decades, the practice of metabonomics has evolved<br />
from diagnosis and identification of biomarkers for a clinical condition towards deciphering the metabolic<br />
predisposition and responses to different individual dietary modulations. The present work monitored<br />
faecal metabolic changes during microbial establishment collected from various groups of mice<br />
supplemented with probiotics or nutrients.<br />
METHODS & MEASURES<br />
1 H-NMR-based metabolic profiling of mouse feces was carried out over time in different microbiome<br />
mouse models, including conventional (n=9), conventionalized (n=10), and “humanized” gnotobiotic<br />
mice inoculated with a model of human baby microbiota (HBM, n=17). HBM mice were supplemented<br />
with Lactobacillus paracasei with (n=10) and without (n=7) prebiotics. Animals not supplemented with<br />
prebiotics received a diet enriched in glucose and lactose as placebo.<br />
RESULTS<br />
<strong>In</strong> conventionalized animals, microbial populations and activities converged in terms of multivariate<br />
mapping toward conventional mice. Both groups decreased bacterial processing of dietary proteins<br />
when switching to a diet enriched in glucose and lactose, as described with low levels of 5-aminovalerate,<br />
acetate, and propionate and high levels of lysine and arginine. The HBM model differs from conventional<br />
and conventionalized microbiota in terms of type, proportion, and metabolic activity of gut bacteria (lower<br />
short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), lactate, 5-aminovalerate, and oligosaccharides, higher bile acids and<br />
choline). The probiotic supplementation of HBM mice was associated with a specific amino acid pattern<br />
that can be linked to L. paracasei proteolytic activities. The combination of L. paracasei with galactosyloligosaccharide<br />
prebiotics was related to the enhanced growth of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, and a<br />
specific metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and SCFAs.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The present study describes how the assessment of metabolic changes in feces may provide information<br />
for studying nutrient-microbiota relationships in different microbiome mouse models.<br />
Martin FP, Sprenger N, Montoliu I, Rezzi S, Kochhar S, Nicholson JK. Dietary modulation of gut functional ecology studied by faecal metabonomics.<br />
J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5284-95.<br />
6
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
3.1. INFECTIONS (GI, RESPIRATORY INCL. FLU, GENITO-URINARY, OTHER)<br />
<strong>In</strong>take of probiotics seems to prevent NEC in preterm infants<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
The objective was to assess whether the combined use of probiotics may prevent the occurrence of<br />
necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stage ≥2, by Bell’s criteria, in preterm infants.<br />
DESIGN<br />
A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
The trial was conducted in 231 preterm infants weighing from 750 to 1499 g at birth. The intervention group<br />
was composed of 119 infants who received human milk with probiotic supplementation (Bifidobacterium<br />
breve and Lactobacillus casei) and a control group of 112 infants who received human milk containing no<br />
probiotics. The intervention was initiated on the second day of life of all infants and was maintained until<br />
the 30th day of life, a diagnosis of NEC, discharge from the hospital, or death, whichever occurred first.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
The primary outcome was the occurrence of NEC stage ≥2 as defined by Bell’s modified criteria.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Four confirmed cases of NEC (Bell’s stage ≥2) were observed in the control group and none in the<br />
probiotic group. Although no differences were observed between the groups in relation to the beginning<br />
of enteral feeding and advancements for enteral feeding volume, infants in the probiotics group achieved<br />
full enteral feeding faster than did those in the control group (P=0.02). The survival curve, determined<br />
with the Kaplan-Meier method for evaluating the complete transition time from orogastric feeding tube<br />
to breastfeeding, showed a shorter time in the probiotics group (P=0.03).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Oral supplementation of B. breve and L. casei reduced the occurrence of NEC (Bell’s stage ≥2). As this<br />
study considers the transition time from orogastric tube feeding to breastfeeding as a further indicator of<br />
the maturation of digestive tract motor function in newborns, it was concluded that an improvement in<br />
intestinal motility might have contributed to this result.<br />
Braga TD, da Silva GA, de Lira PI, Carvalho Lima M. Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei oral supplementation on necrotizing<br />
enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
from Hania Szajewska, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland<br />
« Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most serious, life-threatening gastrointestinal diseases, with<br />
a high mortality rate. The significance of the problem of NEC justifies any attempt to prevent this condition.<br />
A recent, updated meta-analysis by Deshpande et al. (1) (search date: March 2009) identified 11 randomized<br />
controlled trials (RCTs)(n=2176) and concluded that there are significant benefits of probiotic supplementation<br />
in reducing the risk of NEC (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.55) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29 to<br />
0.62) in preterm neonates. The authors also concluded that ‘probiotics should be now offered as a routine<br />
(2) (3)<br />
therapy for preterm infants’. This opinion is not universally shared, including by some scientific societies.<br />
One of the reservations is that it is still not clear which products should be administered, at what dosage, and<br />
for how long. <strong>In</strong> this respect, the study by Braga et al. that evaluated probiotics not yet investigated for the<br />
prevention of NEC is of interest. <strong>In</strong> line with previous studies, the risk of NEC was significantly lower in the<br />
probiotic group (although this was of borderline statistical significance). <strong>In</strong> contrast to many earlier studies, the<br />
risk of death did not differ significantly between the probiotic and control groups.<br />
Demonstrating the efficacy of the combination of B. breve & L. casei given to preterm infants for the prevention<br />
of NEC through a well-conducted RCT would be a praiseworthy goal. Such evidence would be appreciated<br />
in settings where this probiotic combination is available. Unfortunately, there is one major limitation to the<br />
interpretation of this study. The calculated sample size was 564 infants. However, the study was interrupted by<br />
the External Study Committee one year after the intervention began when they observed ‘a major benefit in one<br />
of the groups’. At this time, there were 231 participants. <strong>In</strong> my opinion, the results demonstrating prevention<br />
of NEC were not yet so striking as to interrupt the study. Similar views were expressed by the authors of the<br />
accompanying editorial. (4) This criticism does not invalidate the study; it merely indicates that, as so often is<br />
the case, further studies are needed before the effectiveness of the combination of B. breve & L. casei given to<br />
preterm infants for the prevention of NEC is established. »<br />
1. Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S, Bulsara M. Updated meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm<br />
neonates. Pediatrics 2010;125:921-30.<br />
2. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition: Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, De Curtis M, Darmaun D, Decsi T, Domellöf M, Embleton<br />
ND, Fusch C, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Goulet O, Kalhan SC, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Lapillonne A, Mihatsch W, Moreno L, Neu J,<br />
Poindexter B, Puntis J, Putet G, Rigo J, Riskin A, Salle B, Sauer P, Shamir R, Szajewska H,Thureen P, Turck D, van Goudoever JB, Ziegler<br />
EE; ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric<br />
Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;50:85-91.<br />
3. Thomas DW, Greer FR; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition; American Academy of Pediatrics<br />
Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and prebiotics in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2010;126:1217-31.<br />
4. Rushing J, Neu J. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for pregnant women and preterm neonates. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:3-4.<br />
7
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
An efficacious bifidobacterium against respiratory infections in infants<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
The impact of the administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (BB-12) on the risk of<br />
acute infectious diseases was studied in healthy infants.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
109 infants (1 month old) were assigned to a probiotics group receiving a tablet containing BB-12 (n=55)<br />
or to a control group receiving a control tablet (n=54). Tablets were administered from the age of 1-2<br />
months to 8 months with a slow-release dummy or a spoon. Breastfeeding habits, dummy use, dietary<br />
habits, medication and all signs and symptoms of acute infections were registered. At the age of 8<br />
months, faecal samples were collected for BB-12 determination.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
The primary outcome measures were the cumulative reported incidence of acute respiratory infections<br />
and doctor-diagnosed acute otitis media occurring before the age of 8 months. Successful intestinal<br />
passage of BB-12 was chosen as the secondary outcome measure.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, as was the duration of exclusive breastfeeding.<br />
BB-12 was recovered in the faeces of 62% of the infants receiving the BB-12 tablets. The daily duration of<br />
dummy sucking was not associated with the occurrence of acute otitis media. No significant differences<br />
between the groups were observed in reported gastrointestinal symptoms, otitis media or use of<br />
antibiotics. However, the infants receiving BB-12 were reported to have experienced fewer respiratory<br />
infections (65 vs. 94 %; RR 0·69; 95% CI 0·53, 0·89; P=0.014) than the control infants.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Controlled administration of B. lactis BB-12 in early childhood may reduce respiratory infections. The<br />
children participating in the present study were remarkably healthy, apart from respiratory-infections.<br />
Thus, for the other infectious and non-infectious diseases, the number of infants should have been<br />
higher to be able to detect any differences between the groups. With regard to these diseases, the<br />
present study did not even detect a trend for differences between the groups.<br />
Taipale T, Pienihäkkinen K, Isolauri E, Larsen C, Brockmann E, Alanen P, Jokela J, Söderling E. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in<br />
reducing the risk of infections in infancy. Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep 24:1-7.<br />
8
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Symbiotic in preventing morbidities in young children<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
This study reports a large randomized controlled trial, evaluating effect of providing combination of<br />
prebiotic and probiotic in milk for one year on both gut and non-gut related illnesses among children in<br />
a community based setting in <strong>In</strong>dia.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
Children 1-3 years of age were randomly allocated to receive either control milk (n=312) or the same<br />
milk fortified with prebiotic oligosaccharide and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 (n=312). The intervention<br />
was carried out for 1 year. Biweekly household surveillance was conducted to gather information on<br />
compliance and morbidity.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Primary outcomes were not explicitly prespecified in the protocol; the intent was to evaluate impact on<br />
common childhood illnesses including diarrhoea, pneumonia, and febrile illness. Diarrhoea was defined<br />
as ≥3 loose or watery stools in 24 hours, and diarrhoeal episodes were considered recovered on first day<br />
of 3 diarrhoea free days.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhoea (6% reduction, 95% CI: -1 to 12%;<br />
P=0.08). <strong>In</strong>cidence of dysentery episodes was reduced by 21% (95% CI: 0 to 38%; P=0.05). <strong>In</strong>cidence<br />
of pneumonia was reduced by 24% (95% CI: 0 to 42%; P=0.05) and severe acute lower respiratory<br />
infection by 35% (95% CI: 0 to 58%; P=0.05). Compared to control group, children in probiotic/prebiotic<br />
group had 16% (95% CI: 5 to 26%, P=0.004) and 5% (95% CI: 0 to 10%; P=0.05) reduction in days with<br />
severe illness and high fever respectively.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
This trial shows that consumption of a symbiotic resulted in a significant reduction of dysentery,<br />
respiratory morbidity and febrile illness in young children and in a lack of effect against diarrhoea. This<br />
finding suggests that fortification with prebiotic and probiotic together may provide one of the potential<br />
interventions to reduce the burden of common childhood morbidities.<br />
Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta A, Verma P, Menon VP, Black RE. Prebiotic and probiotic fortified milk in prevention<br />
of morbidities among children: community-based, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 13;5(8):e12164.<br />
9
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
3.2. ALLERGY & ATOPY<br />
<strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli protects children from developing allergies:<br />
a species-dependent effect<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
Diminished exposure to harmless micro-organisms, such as lactobacilli, has been suggested to play<br />
a role in the increased prevalence of allergic disorders in Westernized communities. The development<br />
of allergies depends on both environmental factors and genetic variations, including polymorphisms<br />
in genes encoding pattern recognition receptors. The present study examines the effects of both<br />
colonization with specific Lactobacillus species and genetic variations in DC-SIGN, a pattern recognition<br />
receptor on dendritic cells that recognizes lactobacilli, on the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) and<br />
sensitization in infancy.<br />
DESIGN<br />
The participants of this study are a subcohort of the KOALA Birth Cohort Study and they are all children<br />
for whom both a faecal sample, at age 1 month, and a buccal swab sample were available. The KOALA<br />
Birth Cohort Study is a prospective cohort in the Netherlands,described in detail by Kummeling et al.<br />
(2005).<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
Faecal samples of 681 one-month-old infants were collected and quantitatively screened for five<br />
Lactobacillus species: L. casei, L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri. Eleven haplotypetagging<br />
polymorphisms in the DC-SIGN gene were genotyped in these children. <strong>In</strong>formation on AD was<br />
available for all 506 children, whereas information on atopic sensitization was available for 492 children.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Faecal microbiota composition, clinical diagnosis of AD and sensitization (specific IgE) at 2 years of age.<br />
RESULTS<br />
L. rhamnosus (31.5%), L. paracasei (31.3%) and L. acidophilus (14.4%) were frequently detected in<br />
the faecal samples of one-month-old infants, whereas L. casei (2.5%) and L. reuteri (1%) were rare.<br />
Colonization with L. paracasei decreased the risk of AD significantly (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.32- 0.99,<br />
P=0.04), whereas effects of L. acidophilus were of borderline statistical significance (0.46, 0.20-1.04,<br />
P=0.06). Two DC-SIGN polymorphisms, rs11465413 and rs8112555, were statistically significantly<br />
associated with atopic sensitization.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
These results support the ‘‘old friends’’ hypothesis suggesting that certain health-beneficial microorganisms<br />
protect the host from developing allergies and that these protective effects are speciesdependent.<br />
Firm conclusions on the potential interaction between Lactobacillus colonization and genetic<br />
variations in DC-SIGN in association with the development of allergic disorders cannot be drawn.<br />
Penders J, Thijs C, Mommers M, Stobberingh EE, Dompeling E, Reijmerink NE, van den Brandt PA, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, Postma<br />
DS. <strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli and the DC-SIGN gene for their recognition by dendritic cells play a role in the aetiology of allergic manifestations.<br />
Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3298-305.<br />
Kummeling I., Thijs C., Penders J., Snijders B. E., Stelma F., Reimerink J., Koopmans M., Dagnelie PC., Huber M. & other authors (2005). Etiology<br />
of atopy in infancy: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 16, 679–684.<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
from Bruno Pot, <strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, France<br />
«This study examined the effect of five common intestinal Lactobacillus species (of 17 species that can be<br />
present in the human GIT) in early infancy and looked into genetic variations in DC-SIGN, both in association<br />
with development of atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic sensitization in early childhood, based on a clinical<br />
diagnosis of AD and sensitization (specifi IgE) at the age of 2. From the KOALA Birth Cohort Study, faecal<br />
samples from 681 one-month-old infants were quantitatively screened for Lactobacillus casei, L. paracasei,<br />
L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri. Contrary to what is stated in the discussion section, results show<br />
that colonization with L. paracasei significantly decreased the risk of AD (odds ratio 0.57, p= 0.04), whereas<br />
effects of L. acidophilus were of borderline statistical significance (0.46, p=0.06).<br />
The paper suggested that protective effects are species-dependent during childhood, but when considering<br />
probiotic applications, one is tempted to go even further and consider strain specificity rather than species<br />
specificity. Strain specificity could explain why, contrary to what is suggested in the paper, there are<br />
L. rhamnosus strains that do seem to have an effect on AD while L. acidophilus strain LAVRI-A1 e.g. did not<br />
show any effect in clinical trials.<br />
<strong>In</strong> the same population, two recognition receptor DC-SIGN SNPs, rs11465413 and rs8112555, were found to<br />
be significantly associated with atopic sensitization.<br />
Given the increased knowledge on mechanisms of interaction between the microbiota and the host, and the<br />
importance of these interactions at an early age when the immune system is maturing, it would be extremely<br />
interesting to examine possible associations between host genetics and microbiota composition in other<br />
populations in the future. »<br />
10
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
<strong>In</strong> at risk children, LGG failed to prevent allergic manifestations<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Probiotics</strong> are perceived to exert beneficial effects in the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases.<br />
However the data from studies as to an impact on allergic sensitization and asthma is still conflicting.<br />
This trial examined the impact of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on atopic dermatitis,<br />
asthma, and allergic sensitization in at risk children.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
131 children (6-24 months old) with at least two wheezing episodes and a first-degree family history of<br />
atopic disease were assigned to 6 months of LGG or placebo. Atopic dermatitis and asthma-related<br />
events (e.g. need of inhalation, symptom-free days) were documented throughout the intervention and<br />
6-month follow-up. The laboratory measures taken were: IgE, specific IgE, eosinophils, eosinophilic<br />
cationic protein, and TGF-b before, at the end of intervention, and after 6 months of follow-up.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Primary outcome measures were the SCORAD and asthma-related clinical events, including an asthma<br />
symptom score defined by coughing, wheezing, and need of intervention. Secondary measures were<br />
allergic sensitization to common dietary and respiratory allergens.<br />
RESULTS<br />
There were no significant differences as to atopic dermatitis or asthma-related events. <strong>In</strong> a subgroup with<br />
antecedent allergic sensitizations, asthmatic complaints were even slightly worse. Fewer sensitizations<br />
towards aeroallergens were seen after 6 months of LGG (P=0.027) and after 6 months of follow-up<br />
(P=0.03). Supplementation was well-tolerated and no severe adverse events occurred.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
<strong>In</strong> young children with recurrent wheezing and an atopic family history, oral L. rhamnosus GG had no<br />
clinical effect on atopic dermatitis or asthma-related events, and only mild effects on allergic sensitization.<br />
This effect persisted 6 months after the cessation of the supplementation.<br />
Rose MA, Stieglitz F, Köksal A, Schubert R, Schulze J, Zielen S. Efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus GG on allergic sensitization and asthma in<br />
infants at risk. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010 Sep;40(9):1398-405.<br />
11
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3.3. IBS & FUNCTIONAL GI DISORDERS<br />
Multispecies probiotic intervention alleviates bacterial alterations<br />
in IBS patients<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
The current hypothesis is that probiotics can alleviate the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS),<br />
possibly by stabilizing the intestinal microbiota. The aim of this work was to determine whether IBSassociated<br />
bacterial alterations were reduced during multispecies probiotic intervention.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
42 IBS patients (mean age 46 yrs; 29 females and 13 males) received daily (during 6 monts) either a<br />
probiotic capsule consisting of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), L. rhamnosus Lc705 (DSM<br />
7061), Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS (DSM 7067) and Bifidobacterium breve Bb99<br />
(DSM 13692) or a placebo capsule. Faecal samples were analysed using quantitative real-time polymerase<br />
chain reaction (qPCR). Eight bacterial targets within the gastrointestinal microbiota with a putative IBS<br />
association were measured (Bacteroides intestinalis-like, Clostridium cocleatum 88%, Clostridium<br />
thermosuccinogenes, Collinsella aerofaciens-like, Coprococcus eutactus-like, Ruminococcus torques<br />
91%, R. torques 93% and R. torques 94%)<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Analysis of faecal microbiota.<br />
RESULTS<br />
A phylotype with 94% similarity to R. torques remained abundant in the placebo group, but was decreased<br />
in the probiotic group during the intervention (P=0.02 at 6 months). <strong>In</strong> addition, the clostridial phylotype,<br />
C. thermosuccinogenes 85%, remained elevated during the intervention (P=0.00 and P=0.02 at 3 and 6<br />
months, respectively). The bacterial alterations detected were in line with previously discovered alleviation<br />
of symptoms.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The intervention has previously been shown to successfully alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms of IBS.<br />
The probiotic supplement was now shown to exert specific alterations in the IBS-associated microbiota<br />
towards the bacterial 16S rDNA phylotype quantities described previously for subjects free of IBS. These<br />
changes may have value as non-invasive biomarkers in probiotic intervention studies.<br />
Lyra A, Krogius-Kurikka L, Nikkilä J, Malinen E, Kajander K, Kurikka K, Korpela R, Palva A. Effect of a multispecies probiotic supplement on<br />
quantity of irritable bowel syndrome-related intestinal microbial phylotypes. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 19;10:110.<br />
12
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
L. rhamnosus GG relieves symptoms of abdominal pain in IBS<br />
children<br />
OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />
Recurrent abdominal pain is primarily a functional disorder that affects 10% to 15% of school-aged<br />
children and is one of the most common reasons for referral to a pediatric gastroenterologist. Data on<br />
the possible use of probiotics in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have hypothetisized their<br />
possible efficacy. The aim of the present study is to determine whether Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG<br />
(LGG) relieves symptoms in children with recurrent abdominal pain.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
A total of 141 children (5-14 years) with IBS or functional pain were enrolled in 9 primary care sites.<br />
Children received LGG or a placebo for 8 weeks and entered follow-up for 8 weeks. At the start and at<br />
the end of the trial, children underwent a double-sugar intestinal permeability test.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
The primary outcome was overall pain at the end of the intervention period.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Compared with baseline, LGG, but not placebo, caused a significant reduction in both the frequency<br />
(P
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3.4. IBD AND OTHER INFLAMMATORY DISEASES<br />
A mechanism explaining the preventive effect of probiotics against colitis<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
<strong>In</strong>testinal health requires the coexistence of the host’s own cells with the gut microbiota, and dysregulated<br />
host-microbial interactions can result in intestinal inflammation. This study used a murine model of colitis to<br />
gain insight into how a defined probiotic-containing food reduces intestinal inflammation, and focused on the<br />
microbiota and its response to host consumption of specific probiotics.<br />
METHODS & MEASURES<br />
T-bet −/− Rag2 −/− mice consumed a fermented milk product (BFMP) containing Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173<br />
010, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Lactococcus lactis or a nonfermented milk<br />
product (MP) starting at 4 wk of age for 4 wk.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The BFMP reduced colitis scores in the majority of mice both at early stages and at late stages of disease when<br />
intestinal inflammation was more severe. Colitis scores in the live BFMP were lower than those of the irradiated<br />
product (P=0.03).<br />
BFMP consumption decreased faecal levels of Enterobacteriaceae sevenfold (P=0.0132) compared to MP.<br />
The cecal pH of T-bet −/− Rag2 −/− mice was markedly lower after BFMP consumption (P
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Identification of a set of microbial species specific to Crohn’s<br />
disease condition<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a multifactorial disease of the human digestive tract whose etiology is still unclear.<br />
Several studies suggest that gastrointestinal microbes play a part in this pathogenesis and hypothesized<br />
that intestinal dysbiosis may lead to this condition. The aim of this study was to provide new insights into<br />
CD-associated dysbiosis by combining molecular approaches.<br />
METHOD & MEASURES<br />
Faecal samples were collected from 16 healthy individuals and 16 CD patients. The DNA extracted<br />
from these samples was subjected to two different methods of microbiome analysis. Specific bacterial<br />
groups were quantified by RT-PCR methods using primers designed using a high-throughput in-house<br />
bioinformatics pipeline. The same DNA extracts were also used to produce fluorescently-labelled cRNA<br />
amplicons to interrogate a custom-designed phylogenetic microarray for intestinal bacteria.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Even though the intersubject variability was high, differences in the faecal microbiomes of healthy and<br />
CD patients were detected. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Escherichia coli were more represented in<br />
healthy and ileal CD patients, respectively. Additionally, probes specific for Ruminococcus bromii,<br />
Oscillibacter valericigenes, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Eubacterium rectale produced stronger<br />
hybridization signals with the DNA samples from healthy subjects. Conversely, species overrepresented<br />
in CD patients were E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and species from the Proteobacteria not normally<br />
found in the healthy human GI tract. Furthermore, ‘‘healthy specific’’ molecular species or operational<br />
taxonomic units that are not closely-related to any known species (Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum,<br />
and Oscillospora species) were detected, indicating that the phylogenetic dysbiosis is broader than at<br />
strain or species level.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
These two techniques of microbiome analysis provided a statistically-robust new picture of the dysbiosis<br />
in faecal microbiota from ileal CD patients. Specifically, a set of six species discriminant for CD was<br />
determined, which provides a preliminary diagnostic tool.<br />
Mondot S, Kang S, Furet JP, Aguirre de Carcer D, McSweeney C, Morrison M, Marteau P, Doré J, Leclerc M. Highlighting new phylogenetic<br />
specificities of Crohn’s disease microbiota. <strong>In</strong>flamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Aug 18.<br />
15
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
L. reuteri consumption improves colic symptoms in breastfed<br />
newborns<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>In</strong>fantile colic, defined as paroxysmal, excessive, and inconsolable crying without an identifiable cause<br />
in an otherwise healthy newborn infant, is common in the first 3 months of life. The role of an aberrant<br />
intestinal microflora has recently been reproposed to affect gut motor function and gas production that<br />
lead to colicky behaviour. This work aimed to test the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri on infantile colic<br />
and to evaluate its relationship with gut microbiota.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
Fifty exclusively breastfed colicky infants (aged 2-16 weeks, 29 boys and 21 girls), diagnosed according<br />
to modified Wessel’s criteria, were randomly assigned to receive either L. reuteri DSM 17 938 (108 CFU)<br />
or a placebo daily for 21 days. Parental questionnaires monitored daily crying time and adverse effects.<br />
Stool samples were collected for microbiologic analysis.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
Primary outcome was defined as a reduction of average crying time to
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3.5. NUTRITION: OBESITY, CHOLESTEROL, ETC.<br />
<strong>Probiotics</strong> against central adiposity in pregnant women<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGOUND<br />
The objective of this trial was to establish whether probiotic supplemented dietary counselling influences<br />
maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
At the first trimester of pregnancy, 256 women were randomly assigned to receive nutrition counselling to<br />
modify dietary intake according to current recommendations or as controls. Dietary intervention groups<br />
were further randomized to receive Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) and Bifidobacterium<br />
lactis (diet/probiotics) or placebo (diet/placebo) capsules, whilst the controls received placebo (control/<br />
placebo). The intervention lasted until the end of exclusive breastfeeding for up to six months.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
The primary outcome measures were mothers’ anthropometric measurements, most importantly BMI<br />
and adiposity defined as a waist circumference of 80 cm or more, and the proportion of body fat over<br />
the 12-month postpartum period. Secondary outcomes were dietary intakes of foods and nutrients and<br />
a healthy eating index during the postpartum period.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The risk of central adiposity was lowered in women in the diet/probiotics group compared with the<br />
control/placebo group (OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.11-0.85, P=0.023 adjusted for baseline BMI), whilst the<br />
diet/placebo group did not differ from the controls (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38-2.68, P=0.994) at 6 months<br />
postpartum. The number needed to treat with diet/ probiotics to prevent one woman from developing a<br />
waist circumference ≥80 cm was 4. Healthy eating pattern at 12 months postpartum (P=0.001) and BMI<br />
prior to pregnancy (P
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Control of mothers’ diet during pregnancy benefits metabolic<br />
health of infants<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />
This trial aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal diet and intensive dietary counselling during pregnancy<br />
and breastfeeding on the infant’s metabolic status.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
At the first trimester of pregnancy, 256 women were randomized into a control/placebo group and two<br />
dietary counselling (diet/probiotics and diet/placebo). The counselling, with double-blind randomization<br />
with probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis) or placebo, targeted excessive<br />
saturated fat and low fibre consumption. Maternal diet was evaluated repeatedly during pregnancy and<br />
postpartum by means of 3-day food diaries. Metabolic markers, serum 32-33 split and intact proinsulin,<br />
leptin/adiponectin ratio, skinfold thickness and waist circumference were measured of 194 healthy infants<br />
at the age of 6 months, and the high levels were taken to mirror adverse metabolic status.<br />
MAIN OUTCOME<br />
The serum 32-33 split and intact proinsulin concentrations were primary outcome variables, leptin and<br />
adiponectin concentrations, waist circumference and supra-iliac skinfold were secondary outcome<br />
variables. Any 32-33 split and intact proinsulin values above the 85 th percentile of the concentrations (7.9<br />
and 6.64 pmol/l, respectively) were considered high values.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The proportion of infants with a high 32-33 split proinsulin was significantly lower in dietary counselling<br />
groups with probiotics (n=6/62, 9.7%) or placebo (n=7/69, 10.1%) compared with the control/placebo<br />
group (n=17/63, 27.0%). The high split proinsulin was associated with larger skinfold thickness, waist<br />
circumference and higher leptin/adiponectin ratios in the infants (P
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
Mothers’ weight or weight gain during pregnancy impacts the<br />
intestinal flora composition of the infants<br />
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />
It has been reported that deviations in gut microbiota composition may predispose to obesity, and<br />
specific groups of commensal gut bacteria may harvest energy from food more efficiently than others.<br />
Alterations in microbiota compositions of mothers may be transferred to infants and lead to an increased<br />
risk of overweight. The aim of this study is to analyze the faecal microbiota composition of infants of<br />
overweight and normal-weight mothers and assess the relations of weight and excessive weight gain of<br />
mothers during pregnancy on the microbiota of infants.<br />
DESIGN<br />
Obervational study.<br />
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />
Mothers (n=16) whose pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) was ≥25 were selected with their infants<br />
from a prospective follow-up study of 256 women. Women with a BMI
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
CHARACTERISATION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
STRAIN IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION<br />
Büchl NR, Hutzler M, Mietke-Hofmann H, Wenning M, Scherer S.<br />
Differentiation of probiotic and environmental Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />
strains in animal feed. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep;109(3):783-91. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04705.x.<br />
Cai Y, Yang J, Pang H, Kitahara M. Lactococcus fujiensis sp nov., a<br />
lactic acid bacterium isolated from vegetable. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol.<br />
2010 Jul 30.<br />
Chen YS, Miyashita M, Suzuki K, Sato H, Hsu JS, Yanagida F.<br />
Lactobacillus pobuzihii sp. nov., isolated from pobuzihi (fermented<br />
cummingcordia). <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Aug;60(Pt 8):1914-7.<br />
De Bruyne K, Camu N, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P. Weissella fabaria sp.<br />
nov., from a Ghanaian cocoa fermentation. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol.<br />
2010 Sep;60(Pt 9):1999-2005.<br />
Di Cagno R, Minervini G, Sgarbi E, Lazzi C, Bernini V, Neviani E, Gobbetti<br />
M. Comparison of phenotypic (Biolog System) and genotypic (random<br />
amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction, RAPD-PCR,<br />
and amplified fragment length polymorphism, AFLP) methods for<br />
typing Lactobacillus plantarum isolates from raw vegetables and fruits.<br />
<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):246-53.<br />
Ehrmann MA, Preissler P, Danne M, Vogel RF. Lactobacillus<br />
paucivorans sp. nov., isolated from a brewery environment. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst<br />
Evol Microbiol. 2010 Oct;60(Pt 10):2353-7.<br />
Fujimoto J, Tanigawa K, Kudo Y, Makino H, Watanabe K.<br />
Identification and quantification of viable Bifidobacterium breve<br />
strain Yakult in human faeces by using strain-specific primers<br />
and propidium monoazide. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep 27. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04873.x.<br />
Gilad O, Jacobsen S, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Pedersen MB, Garrigues<br />
C, Svensson B. Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis<br />
of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 grown on xylooligosaccharides<br />
and a model of their utilization. Appl Environ<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7285-91.<br />
Huang CH, Lee FL. The dnaK gene as a molecular marker for the<br />
classification and discrimination of the Lactobacillus casei group.<br />
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010 Aug 11.<br />
Killer J, Kopecný J, Mrázek J, Havlík J, Koppová I, Benada O, Rada<br />
V, Kofrocová O. Bombiscardovia coagulans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new<br />
member of the family Bifidobacteriaceae isolated from the digestive<br />
tract of bumblebees. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 13.<br />
Lai D, Yang X, Wu G, Liu Y, Nardini C. <strong>In</strong>ference of Gene Networks -<br />
application to Bifidobacterium. Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 12.<br />
Markiewicz LH, Biedrzycka E, Wasilewska E, Bielecka M. Rapid<br />
molecular identification and characteristics of Lactobacillus strains.<br />
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Sep;55(5):481-8.<br />
Marques AP, Zé-Zé L, San-Romão MV, Tenreiro R. A novel molecular<br />
method for identification of Oenococcus oeni and its specific detection<br />
in wine. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):251-5.<br />
Samelis J, Bleicher A, Delbès-Paus C, Kakouri A, Neuhaus K, Montel<br />
MC. FTIR-based polyphasic identification of lactic acid bacteria<br />
isolated from traditional Greek Graviera cheese. Food Microbiol. 2011<br />
Feb;28(1):76-83.<br />
Sarmiento-Rubiano LA, Berger B, Moine D, Zúñiga M, Pérez-Martínez<br />
G, Yebra MJ. Characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species closely<br />
related to Lactobacillus johnsonii using a combination of molecular<br />
and comparative genomics methods. BMC Genomics. 2010 Sep<br />
17;11:504.<br />
Sato H, Teramoto K, Ishii Y, Watanabe K, Benno Y. Ribosomal protein<br />
profiling by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight<br />
mass spectrometry for phylogenety-based subspecies resolution of<br />
Bifidobacterium longum. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep 7.<br />
Wang CY, Lin PR, Ng CC, Shyu YT. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus<br />
strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese<br />
pickled cabbage. Anaerobe. 2010 Oct 15.<br />
STRAIN METABOLISM AND PHYSIOLOGY<br />
Arai T, Kino K. New L-amino Acid ligases catalyzing oligopeptide<br />
synthesis from various microorganisms. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem.<br />
2010 Aug 23;74(8):1572-7.<br />
Candela M, Fiori J, Dipalo S, Brigidi P. Development of a highperformance<br />
affinity chromatography-based method to study the<br />
biological interaction between whole micro-organisms and target<br />
proteins. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 6. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-<br />
765X.2010.02953.x.<br />
Carvalheiro F, Moniz P, Duarte LC, Esteves MP, Gírio FM. Mannitol<br />
production by lactic acid bacteria grown in supplemented carob syrup.<br />
J <strong>In</strong>d Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 5.<br />
Chu W, Lu F, Zhu W, Kang C. Isolation and characterization of new<br />
potential probiotic bacteria based on quorum-sensing system. J Appl<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Sep 27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04872.x.<br />
Endo A, Futagawa-Endo Y, Sakamoto M, Kitahara M, Dicks LM.<br />
Lactobacillus florum sp. nov., a fructophilic species isolated from<br />
flowers. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Oct;60(Pt 10):2478-82.<br />
Fukiya S, Sugiyama T, Kano Y, Yokota A. Characterization of an insertion<br />
sequence-like element, ISBlo15, identified in a size-increased cryptic<br />
plasmid pBK283 in Bifidobacterium longum BK28. J Biosci Bioeng.<br />
2010 Aug;110(2):141-6.<br />
Garneau JE, Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval<br />
P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S. The CRISPR/Cas<br />
bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA.<br />
Nature. 2010 Nov 4;468(7320):67-71..<br />
Ge XY, Yuan J, Qin H, Zhang WG. Improvement of L: -lactic acid<br />
production by osmotic-tolerant mutant of Lactobacillus casei at high<br />
temperature. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 21.<br />
Goffin P, van de Bunt B, Giovane M, Leveau JH, Höppener-Ogawa S,<br />
Teusink B, Hugenholtz J. Understanding the physiology of Lactobacillus<br />
plantarum at zero growth. Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Sep 21;6:413.<br />
Hancock V, Vejborg RM, Klemm P. Functional genomics of probiotic<br />
Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and 83972, and UPEC strain CFT073:<br />
comparison of transcriptomes, growth and biofilm formation. Mol<br />
Genet Genomics. 2010 Oct 1.<br />
Harris PT, Raghunathan K, Spurbeck RR, Arvidson CG, Arvidson DN.<br />
Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies<br />
of Lactobacillus jensenii enolase. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol<br />
Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt 8):938-40.<br />
Horsham M, Saxby H, Blake J, Isaacs NW, Mitchell TJ, Riboldi-<br />
Tunnicliffe A. Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary<br />
X-ray crystallographic data from TktA, a transketolase from the lactic<br />
acid bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct<br />
Biol Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt 8):899-901.<br />
Ismail B, Nampoothiri KM. Production, purification and structural<br />
characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 9510. Arch Microbiol. 2010 Oct 19.<br />
Jeon JM, Lee HI, Han SH, Chang CS, So JS. Partial purification and<br />
characterization of glutaminase from Lactobacillus reuteri KCTC3594.<br />
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):146-54.<br />
Jia J, Mu W, Zhang T, Jiang B. Bioconversion of phenylpyruvate to<br />
phenyllactate: gene cloning, expression, and enzymatic characterization<br />
of D- and L1-lactate dehydrogenases from Lactobacillus plantarum<br />
SK002. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):242-51.<br />
Jiménez E, Martín R, Maldonado A, Martín V, Gómez de Segura<br />
A, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM. Complete genome sequence of<br />
Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713, a probiotic strain isolated from<br />
human milk and infant feces. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5266-7.<br />
Jin J, Liu S, Zhao L, Ge K, Mao X, Ren F. Changes in ffh, uvrA, groES<br />
and dnaK mRNA Abundance as a Function of Acid-Adaptation and<br />
Growth Phase in Bifidobacterium longum BBMN68 Isolated from<br />
Healthy Centenarians. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Sep 11.<br />
Kimoto-Nira H, Suzuki C, Sasaki K, Kobayashi M, Mizumachi K. Survival<br />
of a Lactococcus lactis strain varies with its carbohydrate preference<br />
under in vitro conditions simulated gastrointestinal tract. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):226-9.<br />
Kiyohara M, Tanigawa K, Chaiwangsri T, Katayama T, Ashida H,<br />
Yamamoto K. An exo-{alpha}-sialidase from bifidobacteria involved in<br />
the degradation of sialyloligosaccharides in human milk and intestinal<br />
glycoconjugates. Glycobiology. 2010 Oct 29.<br />
Koskenniemi K, Laakso K, Koponen J, Kankainen M, Greco D,<br />
Auvinen P, Savijoki K, Nyman TA, Surakka A, Salusjärvi T, de Vos WM,<br />
Tynkkynen S, Kalkkinen N, Varmanen P. Proteomic and transcriptomic<br />
characterization of bile stress response in probiotic Lactobacillus<br />
rhamnosus GG. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Nov 15.<br />
Kullisaar T, Songisepp E, Aunapuu M, Kilk K, Arend A, Mikelsaar<br />
M, Rehema A, Zilmer M. Complete glutathione system in probiotic<br />
Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2010 Sep-<br />
Oct;46(5):527-31.<br />
Kuratsu M, Hamano Y, Dairi T. Analysis of the Lactobacillus metabolic<br />
pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7299-301.<br />
Lagaert S, Pollet A, Delcour JA, Lavigne R, Courtin CM, Volckaert G.<br />
Substrate specificity of three recombinant �-l-arabinofuranosidases<br />
from Bifidobacterium adolescentis and their divergent action on<br />
arabinoxylan and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides. Biochem Biophys<br />
Res Commun. 2010 Oct 28.<br />
Łaniewska-Trokenheim Ł, Olszewska M, Miks-Krajnik M, Zadernowska<br />
A. Patterns of survival and volatile metabolites of selected Lactobacillus<br />
strains during long-term incubation in milk. J Microbiol. 2010<br />
Aug;48(4):445-51.<br />
20
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Li H, Qiu T, Huang G, Cao Y. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid<br />
by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912 using fed-batch fermentation. Microb<br />
Cell Fact. 2010 Nov 12;9(1):85.<br />
Locascio RG, Desai P, Sela DA, Weimer B, Mills DA. Broad Conservation<br />
of Milk Utilization Genes in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis<br />
as Revealed by Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Appl Environ<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(22):7373-81.<br />
López de Felipe F, Curiel JA, Muñoz R. Improvement of the<br />
fermentation performance of Lactobacillus plantarum by the flavanol<br />
catechin is uncoupled from its degradation. J Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />
Aug;109(2):687-97.<br />
Luo LH, Seo JW, Baek JO, Oh BR, Heo SY, Hong WK, Kim DH, Kim<br />
CH. Identification and characterization of the propanediol utilization<br />
protein PduP of Lactobacillus reuteri for 3-hydroxypropionic acid<br />
production from glycerol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Oct 2.<br />
Mackenzie DA, Jeffers F, Parker ML, Vibert-Vallet A, Bongaerts RJ,<br />
Roos S, Walter J, Juge N. Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding<br />
proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus<br />
reuteri. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3368-78.<br />
Maischberger T, Leitner E, Nitisinprasert S, Juajun O, Yamabhai<br />
M, Nguyen TH, Haltrich D. Beta-galactosidase from Lactobacillus<br />
pentosus: purification, characterization and formation of galactooligosaccharides.<br />
Biotechnol J. 2010 Aug;5(8):838-47.<br />
Mathias A, Duc M, Favre L, Benyacoub J, Blum S, Corthésy B.<br />
Potentiation of polarized intestinal Caco-2 cell responsiveness to<br />
probiotics complexed with secretory IgA. J Biol Chem. 2010 Oct<br />
29;285(44):33906-13.<br />
Nakai H, Petersen BO, Westphal Y, Dilokpimol A, Abou Hachem M,<br />
Duus JØ, Schols HA, Svensson B. Rational engineering of Lactobacillus<br />
acidophilus NCFM maltose phosphorylase into either trehalose or<br />
kojibiose dual specificity phosphorylase. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2010<br />
Oct;23(10):781-7.<br />
Nakanishi Y, Fukuda S, Chikayama E, Kimura Y, Ohno H, Kikuchi J.<br />
A dynamic omics approach identifies nutrition-mediated microbial<br />
interactions. J Proteome Res. 2010 Nov 9.<br />
Nam SH, Choi SH, Kang A, Kim DW, Kim RN, Kim A, Park HS. Genome<br />
Sequence of Leuconostoc argentinum KCTC 3773. J Bacteriol. 2010<br />
Oct 15.<br />
Neves AR, Pool WA, Solopova A, Kok J, Santos H, Kuipers OP.<br />
Towards enhanced galactose utilization by Lactococcus lactis. Appl<br />
Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7048-60.<br />
O’Flaherty SJ, Klaenhammer TR. Functional and phenotypic<br />
characterization of a protein from Lactobacillus acidophilus involved<br />
in cell morphology, stress tolerance and adherence to intestinal cells.<br />
Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3360-7.<br />
Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal<br />
SM. New method for electroporation of Lactobacillus species grown in<br />
high salt. J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Nov;83(2):164-7.<br />
Parente E, Ciocia F, Ricciardi A, Zotta T, Felis GE, Torriani S. Diversity<br />
of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus pentosus<br />
and Lactobacillus paraplantarum: A multivariate screening study. <strong>In</strong>t J<br />
Food Microbiol. 2010 Oct 27.<br />
Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G. Bioconversion of isoflavone glycosides to<br />
aglycones, mineral bioavailability and vitamin B complex in fermented<br />
soymilk by probiotic bacteria and yeast. J Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />
Oct;109(4):1198-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04745.x.<br />
Rodríguez N, Torrado A, Cortés S, Domínguez JM. Use of waste<br />
materials for Lactococcus lactis development. J Sci Food Agric. 2010<br />
Aug 15;90(10):1726-34.<br />
Scharl M, Geisel S, Vavricka SR, Rogler G. Dying in Yoghurt: The Number<br />
of Living Bacteria in Probiotic Yoghurt Decreases under Exposure to<br />
Room Temperature. Digestion. 2010 Sep 14;83(1-2):13-17.<br />
Scheu PD, Kim OB, Griesinger C, Unden G. Sensing by the<br />
membrane-bound sensor kinase DcuS: exogenous versus endogenous<br />
sensing of C(4)-dicarboxylates in bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2010<br />
Sep;5:1383-402.<br />
Schwab C, Sørensen KI, Gänzle MG. Heterologous expression<br />
of glycoside hydrolase family 2 and 42 �-galactosidases of lactic<br />
acid bacteria in Lactococcus lactis. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />
Oct;33(6):300-7.<br />
Shimoda K, Hamada H. Synthesis of beta-maltooligosaccharides of<br />
glycitein and daidzein and their anti-oxidant and anti-allergic activities.<br />
Molecules. 2010 Jul 29;15(8):5153-61.<br />
Sieuwerts S, Molenaar D, van Hijum SA, Beerthuyzen M, Stevens MJ,<br />
Janssen PW, <strong>In</strong>gham CJ, de Bok FA, de Vos WM, van Hylckama Vlieg<br />
JE. Mixed culture transcriptome analysis reveals molecular basis of<br />
mixed culture growth in Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus<br />
bulgaricus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct 1.<br />
Söderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL. Probiotic Lactobacilli<br />
<strong>In</strong>terfere with Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation <strong>In</strong> Vitro. Curr<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Sep 11.<br />
Stephenson DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE. Transformation of, and<br />
heterologous protein expression in, Lactobacillus agilis and<br />
Lactobacillus vaginalis isolated from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.<br />
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov 12.<br />
Streit F, Athès V, Bchir A, Corrieu G, Béal C. Microfiltration conditions<br />
modify Lactobacillus bulgaricus cryotolerance in response to<br />
physiological changes. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2010 Aug 28.<br />
Sudiarta IP, Fukushima T, Sekiguchi J. bacillus subtilis CwlP of the<br />
SP-beta prophage has two novel peptidoglycan hydrolase domains,<br />
muramidase and cross-linkage digesting D,D-endopeptidase. J Biol<br />
Chem. 2010 Oct 27.<br />
Suzuki R, Kim BJ, Shibata T, Iwamoto Y, Katayama T, Ashida H,<br />
Wakagi T, Shoun H, Fushinobu S, Yamamoto K. Overexpression,<br />
crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of xylulose-5-phosphate/<br />
fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase from Bifidobacterium breve.<br />
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt<br />
8):941-3.<br />
Takahashi K, Tagami U, Shimba N, Kashiwagi T, Ishikawa K, Suzuki<br />
E. Crystal structure of Bifidobacterium Longum phosphoketolase; key<br />
enzyme for glucose metabolism in Bifidobacterium. FEBS Lett. 2010<br />
Sep 24;584(18):3855-61.<br />
Tang AL, Wilcox G, Walker KZ, Shah NP, Ashton JF, Stojanovska L.<br />
Phytase Activity from Lactobacillus spp. in calcium-fortified soymilk. J<br />
Food Sci. 2010 Aug 1;75(6):M373-6.<br />
Turroni F, Bottacini F, Foroni E, Mulder I, Kim JH, Zomer A, Sánchez B,<br />
Bidossi A, Ferrarini A, Giubellini V, Delledonne M, Henrissat B, Coutinho<br />
P, Oggioni M, Fitzgerald GF, Mills D, Margolles A, Kelly D, van Sinderen<br />
D, Ventura M. Genome analysis of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010<br />
reveals metabolic pathways for host-derived glycan foraging. Proc Natl<br />
Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 9;107(45):19514-9.<br />
Vebø HC, Solheim M, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. Comparative<br />
genomic analysis of pathogenic and probiotic Enterococcus faecalis<br />
isolates, and their transcriptional responses to growth in human urine.<br />
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 31;5(8):e12489.<br />
Vélez MP, Petrova MI, Lebeer S, Verhoeven TL, Claes I, Lambrichts I,<br />
Tynkkynen S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Characterization<br />
of MabA, a modulator of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG adhesion<br />
and biofilm formation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010<br />
Aug;59(3):386-98.<br />
Waldherr FW, Doll VM, Meissner D, Vogel RF. Identification and<br />
characterization of a glucan-producing enzyme from Lactobacillus<br />
hilgardii TMW 1.828 involved in granule formation of water kefir. Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Aug;27(5):672-8.<br />
Wang G, Yin S, An H, Chen S, Hao Y. Coexpression of bile salt<br />
hydrolase gene and catalase gene remarkably improves oxidative<br />
stress and bile salt resistance in Lactobacillus casei. J <strong>In</strong>d Microbiol<br />
Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 21.<br />
Wang Y, Chen C, Ai L, Zhou F, Zhou Z, Wang L, Zhang H, Chen W, Guo<br />
B. Complete genome sequence of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum<br />
ST-III. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />
Wasko A, Kordowska-Wiater M, Podlesny M, Polak-Berecka M,<br />
Targonski Z, Kubik-Komar A. The Plackett-Burman design in optimization<br />
of media components for biomass production of Lactobacillus<br />
rhamnosus OXY. Acta Biol Hung. 2010 Sep;61(3):344-55.<br />
Wasko A, Polak-Berecka M, Targonski Z. A new protein of alphaamylase<br />
activity from Lactococcus lactis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010<br />
Sep;20(9):1307-13.<br />
Weidmann S, Rieu A, Rega M, Coucheney F, Guzzo J. Distinct amino<br />
acids of the Oenococcus oeni small heat shock protein Lo18 are<br />
essential for damaged protein protection and membrane stabilization.<br />
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;309(1):8-15.<br />
Wentworth CC, Jones RM, Kwon YM, Nusrat A, Neish AS. Commensal-<br />
Epithelial Signaling Mediated via Formyl Peptide Receptors. Am J<br />
Pathol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />
Wu R, Sun Z, Wu J, Meng H, Zhang H. Effect of bile salts stress on protein<br />
synthesis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang revealed by 2-dimensional gel<br />
electrophoresis. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3858-68.<br />
Yang EJ, Chang HC. Construction and evaluation of shuttle vector,<br />
pGYC4�, based on pYC2 from Lactobacillus sakei. Biotechnol Lett.<br />
2010 Nov 12.<br />
Zhang C, Gänzle MG. Metabolic pathway of �-ketoglutarate in<br />
Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis and Lactobacillus reuteri during<br />
sourdough fermentation. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1301-10.<br />
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04753.x.<br />
Zhang H, Hao Y, Zhang D, Luo Y. Characterization of the cryptic plasmid<br />
pTXW from Lactobacillus paracasei TXW. Plasmid. 2010 Aug 13.<br />
21
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Zhang W, Yu D, Sun Z, Wu R, Chen X, Chen W, Meng H, Hu S, Zhang<br />
H. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new<br />
probiotic strain isolated from traditional homemade koumiss in <strong>In</strong>ner<br />
Mongolia, China. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5268-9.<br />
Zhurina D, Zomer A, Gleinser M, Brancaccio VF, Auchter M, Waidmann<br />
MS, Westermann C, van Sinderen D, Riedel CU. Complete genome<br />
sequence of Bifidobacterium bifidum S17. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />
TECHNOLOGY OF PROBIOTIC AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
Albenzio M, Santillo A, Caroprese M, Marino R, Trani A, Faccia M.<br />
Biochemical patterns in ovine cheese: influence of probiotic strains. J<br />
Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3487-96.<br />
Bolla PA, de Los Angeles Serradell M, de Urraza PJ, De Antoni GL.<br />
Effect of freeze-drying on viability and in vitro probiotic properties of<br />
a mixture of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from kefir. J Dairy<br />
Res. 2010 Sep 8:1-8.<br />
Brachkova MI, Duarte MA, Pinto JF. Preservation of viability and<br />
antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus spp. in calcium alginate beads.<br />
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010 Aug 26.<br />
Burns P, Molinari F, Beccaria A, Páez R, Meinardi C, Reinheimer J,<br />
Vinderola G. Suitability of buttermilk for fermentation with Lactobacillus<br />
helveticus and production of a functional peptide-enriched powder<br />
by spray-drying. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1370-8. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04761.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.<br />
Champagne CP, Tompkins TA, Buckley ND, Green-Johnson JM.<br />
Effect of fermentation by pure and mixed cultures of Streptococcus<br />
thermophilus and Lactobacillus helveticus on isoflavone and<br />
B-vitamin content of a fermented soy beverage. Food Microbiol. 2010<br />
Oct;27(7):968-72.<br />
Chávarri M, Marañón I, Ares R, Ibáñez FC, Marzo F, Villarán Mdel C.<br />
Microencapsulation of a probiotic and prebiotic in alginate-chitosan<br />
capsules improves survival in simulated gastro-intestinal conditions.<br />
<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):185-9.<br />
Di Criscio T, Fratianni A, Mignogna R, Cinquanta L, Coppola R,<br />
Sorrentino E, Panfili G. Production of functional probiotic, prebiotic,<br />
and synbiotic ice creams. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4555-64.<br />
Grzeskowiak L, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Gueimonde M. Manufacturing<br />
process influences properties of probiotic bacteria. Br J Nutr. 2010<br />
Nov 9:1-8.<br />
Islam MA, Yun CH, Choi YJ, Cho CS. Microencapsulation of live<br />
probiotic bacteria. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;20(10):1367-77.<br />
Meng XC, Pang R, Wang C, Wang LQ. Rapid and direct quantitative<br />
detection of viable bifidobacteria in probiotic yogurt by combination<br />
of ethidium monoazide and real-time PCR using a molecular beacon<br />
approach. J Dairy Res. 2010 Nov;77(4):498-504.<br />
Vanhee LM, Goemé F, Nelis HJ, Coenye T. Quality control of<br />
fifteen probiotic products containing Saccharomyces boulardii.<br />
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Nov;109(5):1745-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />
2672.2010.04805.x.<br />
PHYSIOLOGICAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />
SURVIVAL & PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> WITH MUCOSA<br />
Alp G, Aslim B, Suludere Z, Akca G. The role of hemagglutination and<br />
effect of exopolysaccharide production on bifidobacteria adhesion to<br />
Caco-2 cells in vitro. Microbiol Immunol. 2010 Nov;54(11):658-65. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00227.x..<br />
Burns P, Sánchez B, Vinderola G, Ruas-Madiedo P, Ruiz L, Margolles<br />
A, Reinheimer J, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG. <strong>In</strong>side the adaptation<br />
process of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis to bile. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):132-41.<br />
Del Piano M, Carmagnola S, Andorno S, Pagliarulo M, Tari<br />
R, Mogna L, Strozzi GP, Sforza F, Capurso L. Evaluation of<br />
the intestinal colonization by microencapsulated probiotic<br />
bacteria in comparison with the same uncoated strains. J Clin<br />
Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S42-6.<br />
Du L, Liu F, Ju X, Huo G. Adhesion capability of first two domains<br />
at N terminus of NP_785232 protein and their interaction with a UVabsorbing<br />
component from human mucus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />
Oct;51(4):400-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02911.x.<br />
Grimoud J, Durand H, Courtin C, Monsan P, Ouarné F, Theodorou<br />
V, Roques C. <strong>In</strong> vitro screening of probiotic lactic acid bacteria<br />
and prebiotic glucooligosaccharides to select effective synbiotics.<br />
Anaerobe. 2010 Oct;16(5):493-500.<br />
Hsueh HY, Yueh PY, Yu B, Zhao X, Liu JR. Expression of Lactobacillus<br />
reuteri Pg4 Collagen-Binding Protein Gene in Lactobacillus casei<br />
ATCC 393 <strong>In</strong>creases Its Adhesion Ability to Caco-2 Cells. J Agric Food<br />
Chem. 2010 Nov 11.<br />
Iguchi A, Umekawa N, Maegawa T, Tsuruta H, Odamaki T, Xiao JZ,<br />
Osawa R. Polymorphism and distribution of putative cell-surface<br />
adhesin-encoding ORFs among human faecal isolates of Bifidobacterium<br />
longum subsp. longum. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010 Sep 24.<br />
Martín R, Olivares M, Pérez M, Xaus J, Torre C, Fernández L, Rodríguez<br />
JM. Identification and evaluation of the probiotic potential of lactobacilli<br />
isolated from canine milk. Vet J. 2010 Aug;185(2):193-8.<br />
Martins AK, Martins FS, Gomes DA, Elian SD, Vieira AT, Teixeira MM,<br />
Cara DC, Nardi RM, Nicoli JR. Evaluation of in vitro antagonism and<br />
of in vivo immune modulation and protection against pathogenic<br />
experimental challenge of two probiotic strains of Bifidobacterium<br />
animalis var. lactis. Arch Microbiol. 2010 Sep 17.<br />
Peleg M, Normand MD, Horowitz J, Corradini MG. Expanded fermi<br />
solution for estimating the survival of ingested pathogenic and probiotic<br />
microbial cells and spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov 5.<br />
Samonis G, Falagas ME, Lionakis S, Ntaoukakis M, Kofteridis DP,<br />
Ntalas I, Maraki S. Saccharomyces boulardii and Candida albicans<br />
experimental colonization of the murine gut. Med Mycol. 2010 Nov<br />
15.<br />
Shen D, Zhu Y, Hao Y, Lu J. Polymerase chain reaction detection of<br />
Lactobacillus acidophilus in human oral cavity and faecal samples after<br />
2-week consumption of yoghurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Sep 23.<br />
Stephenson DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE. Lactobacillus strain ecology and<br />
persistence within broiler chickens fed different diets: identification of<br />
persistent strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6494-503.<br />
Takemura N, Hagio M, Ishizuka S, Ito H, Morita T, Sonoyama K.<br />
<strong>In</strong>ulin prolongs survival of intragastrically administered Lactobacillus<br />
plantarum No. 14 in the gut of mice fed a high-fat diet. J Nutr. 2010<br />
Nov;140(11):1963-9.<br />
Vlková E, Grmanová M, Killer J, Mrázek J, Kopecný J, Bunesová<br />
V, Rada V. Survival of bifidobacteria administered to calves. Folia<br />
Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jul;55(4):390-2.<br />
INTERACTION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> WITH PATHOGENS<br />
Belguesmia Y, Choiset Y, Prévost H, Dalgalarrondo M, Chobert JM,<br />
Drider D. Partial Purification and Characterization of the Mode of<br />
Action of Enterocin S37: A Bacteriocin Produced by Enterococcus<br />
faecalis S37 Isolated from Poultry Feces. J Environ Public Health.<br />
2010;2010. pii: 986460.<br />
Bøhle LA, Brede DA, Diep DB, Holo H, Nes IF. Specific degradation<br />
of the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus<br />
reuteri to an antimicrobial peptide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010<br />
Nov;76(21):7306-9.<br />
Chiodo PG, Sparo MD, Pezzani BC, Minvielle MC, Basualdo JA. <strong>In</strong> vitro<br />
and in vivo effects of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 on Toxocara<br />
canis. Mem <strong>In</strong>st Oswaldo Cruz. 2010 Aug;105(5):615-20.<br />
Dicks LM, Granger M, van Reenen CA. Survival and adherence of<br />
antimicrobial peptide ST4SA, produced by Enterococcus mundtii,<br />
at conditions found in the human gastro-intestinal tract. J Basic<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Oct 21.<br />
Eom JE, Moon SK, Moon GS. Heterologous production of pediocin<br />
PA-1 in Lactobacillus reuteri. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010<br />
Aug;20(8):1215-8.<br />
Gong HS, Meng XC, Wang H. Mode of action of plantaricin MG, a<br />
bacteriocin active against Salmonella typhimurium. J Basic Microbiol.<br />
2010 Oct 21.<br />
Malago JJ, Nemeth E, Koninkx JF, Tooten PC, Fajdiga S, van Dijk JE.<br />
Microbial products from probiotic bacteria inhibit Salmonella enteritidis<br />
857-induced IL-8 synthesis in Caco-2 cells. Folia Microbiol (Praha).<br />
2010 Jul;55(4):401-8.<br />
Murzyn A, Krasowska A, Augustyniak D, Majkowska-Skrobek G,<br />
Łukaszewicz M, Dziadkowiec D. The effect of Saccharomyces boulardii<br />
on Candida albicans-infected human intestinal cell lines Caco-2 and<br />
<strong>In</strong>testin 407. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Sep 1;310(1):17-23.<br />
Murzyn A, Krasowska A, Stefanowicz P, Dziadkowiec D, Łukaszewicz<br />
M. Capric acid secreted by S. boulardii inhibits C. albicans filamentous<br />
growth, adhesion and biofilm formation. PLoS One. 2010 Aug<br />
10;5(8):e12050.<br />
Ruas-Madiedo P, Medrano M, Salazar N, De Los Reyes-Gavilán CG,<br />
Pérez PF, Abraham AG. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus<br />
and Bifidobacterium strains abrogate in vitro the cytotoxic effect of<br />
bacterial toxins on eukaryotic cells. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug 19. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04839.x.<br />
Sadowska B, Walencka E, Wieckowska-Szakiel M, Rózalska B. Bacteria<br />
competing with the adhesion and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus<br />
aureus. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Sep;55(5):497-501.<br />
Smaoui S, Elleuch L, Bejar W, Karray-Rebai I, Ayadi I, Jaouadi B,<br />
Mathieu F, Chouayekh H, Bejar S, Mellouli L. <strong>In</strong>hibition of fungi and<br />
gram-negative bacteria by bacteriocin BacTN635 produced by<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum sp. TN635. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010<br />
Oct;162(4):1132-46.<br />
22
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Stöber H, Maier E, Schmidt H. Protective effects of Lactobacilli,<br />
Bifidobacteria and Staphylococci on the infection of cultured HT29<br />
cells with different enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotypes are<br />
strain-specific. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov 15;144(1):133-40.<br />
Todorov SD, Wachsman M, Tomé E, Dousset X, Destro MT, Dicks LM,<br />
Franco BD, Vaz-Velho M, Drider D. Characterisation of an antiviral<br />
pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Oct;27(7):869-79.<br />
Zihler A, Gagnon M, Chassard C, Hegland A, Stevens MJ, Braegger<br />
CP, Lacroix C. Unexpected consequences of administering<br />
bacteriocinogenic probiotic strains for Salmonella populations,<br />
revealed by an in vitro colonic model of the child gut. Microbiology.<br />
2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3342-53.<br />
Zoumpopoulou G, Papadimitriou K, Polissiou MG, Tarantilis PA,<br />
Tsakalidou E. Detection of changes in the cellular composition<br />
of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the presence of<br />
antimicrobial compound(s) of Lactobacillus strains using Fourier<br />
transform infrared spectroscopy. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov<br />
15;144(1):202-7.<br />
MUCOSA RESPONSE TO <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> (TROPHICITY & STRUCTURE)<br />
Anderson RC, Cookson AL, McNabb WC, Kelly WJ, Roy NC.<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that<br />
enhances intestinal barrier function. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Aug<br />
1;309(2):184-92.<br />
Chen HQ, Yang J, Zhang M, Zhou YK, Shen TY, Chu ZX, Zhang M,<br />
Hang XM, Jiang YQ, Qin HL. Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorates<br />
colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction by modulating the apical<br />
junctional complex and PepT1 in IL-10 knockout mice. Am J Physiol<br />
Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Sep 30.<br />
Generoso SV, Viana ML, Santos RG, Arantes RM, Martins FS, Nicoli JR,<br />
Machado JA, Correia MI, Cardoso VN. Protection against increased<br />
intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation induced by intestinal<br />
obstruction in mice treated with viable and heat-killed Saccharomyces<br />
boulardii. Eur J Nutr. 2010 Oct 10.<br />
Zou XP, Chen M, Wei W, Cao J, Chen L, Tian M. Effects of enteral<br />
immunonutrition on the maintenance of gut barrier function and<br />
immune function in pigs with severe acute pancreatitis. JPEN J<br />
Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):554-66.<br />
Van Baarlen P, Troost F, van der Meer C, Hooiveld G, Boekschoten<br />
M, Brummer RJ, Kleerebezem M. Microbes and Health Sackler<br />
Colloquium: Human mucosal in vivo transcriptome responses to three<br />
lactobacilli indicate how probiotics may modulate human cellular<br />
pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7.<br />
EFFECTS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> ON MICROBIOTA<br />
Brignardello J, Morales P, Diaz E, Romero J, Brunser O,<br />
Gotteland M. Pilot study: alterations of intestinal microbiota in<br />
obese humans are not associated with colonic inflammation<br />
or disturbances of barrier function. Aliment Pharmacol<br />
Ther. 2010 Dec;32(11-12):1307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />
2036.2010.04475.x.<br />
Kong Q, He GQ, Jia JL, Zhu QL, Ruan H. Oral Administration of<br />
Clostridium butyricum for Modulating Gastrointestinal Microflora in<br />
Mice. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15.<br />
Malinen E, Krogius-Kurikka L, Lyra A, Nikkilä J, Jääskeläinen A,<br />
Rinttilä T, Vilpponen-Salmela T, von Wright AJ, Palva A. Association of<br />
symptoms with gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome.<br />
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 28;16(36):4532-40.<br />
Martin FP, Sprenger N, Montoliu I, Rezzi S, Kochhar S, Nicholson<br />
JK. Dietary modulation of gut functional ecology studied by faecal<br />
metabonomics. J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5284-95.<br />
Nakashimada Y, Michinaka A, Watanabe K, Nishio N, Fujii T. Brewer’s<br />
yeast cell wall affects microbiota composition and decreases<br />
Bacteroides fragilis populations in an anaerobic gut intestinal model. J<br />
Biosci Bioeng. 2010 Oct 5.<br />
Roger LC, Costabile A, Holland DT, Hoyles L, McCartney AL.<br />
Examination of faecal Bifidobacterium populations in breast- and<br />
formula-fed infants during the first 18 months of life. Microbiology.<br />
2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3329-41.<br />
Salazar N, Binetti A, Gueimonde M, Alonso A, Garrido P, González<br />
Del Rey C, González C, Ruas-Madiedo P, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG.<br />
Safety and intestinal microbiota modulation by the exopolysaccharideproducing<br />
strains Bifidobacterium animalis IPLA R1 and<br />
Bifidobacterium longum IPLA E44 orally administered to Wistar rats.<br />
<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov 13.<br />
Samli HE, Dezcan S, Koc F, Ozduven ML, Okur AA, Senkoylu N.<br />
Effects of Enterococcus faecium supplementation and floor type on<br />
performance, morphology of erythrocytes and intestinal microbiota in<br />
broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;51(4):564-8.<br />
Sánchez E, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y.<br />
<strong>In</strong>testinal Bacteroides species associated with coeliac disease.<br />
J Clin Pathol. 2010 Oct 23.<br />
EFFECTS OF PROBIOTIC ON IMMUNITY (MUCOSAL & SYSTEMIC)<br />
Borthakur A, Anbazhagan AN, Kumar A, Raheja G, Singh V, Ramaswamy<br />
K, Dudeja PK. The probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum counteracts TNF-<br />
{alpha}-induced downregulation of SMCT1 expression and function.<br />
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Oct;299(4):G928-34.<br />
Brisbin JT, Gong J, Parvizi P, Sharif S. Effects of lactobacilli on cytokine<br />
expression by chicken spleen and cecal tonsil cells. Clin Vaccine<br />
Immunol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1337-43.<br />
Cazzola M, Tompkins TA, Matera MG. Immunomodulatory impact of a<br />
synbiotic in T(h)1 and T(h)2 models of infection. Ther Adv Respir Dis.<br />
2010 Oct;4(5):259-70.<br />
D’<strong>In</strong>cà R, Barollo M, Scarpa M, Grillo AR, Brun P, Vettorato<br />
MG, Castagliuolo I, Sturniolo GC. Rectal Administration of<br />
Lactobacillus casei DG Modifies Flora Composition and Toll-<br />
Like Receptor Expression in Colonic Mucosa of Patients with<br />
Mild Ulcerative Colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug 25.<br />
Dos Santos LM, Santos MM, de Souza Silva HP, Arantes RM, Nicoli JR,<br />
Vieira LQ. Monoassociation with probiotic Lactobacillus delbrueckii<br />
UFV-H2b20 stimulates the immune system and protects germfree<br />
mice against Listeria monocytogenes infection. Med Microbiol<br />
Immunol. 2010 Sep 14.<br />
Edwards LA, Lucas M, Edwards EA, Torrente F, Heuschkel RB, Klein<br />
NJ, Murch SH, Bajaj-Elliott M, Phillips AD. Aberrant response to<br />
commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in Crohn’s disease: An ex<br />
vivo human organ culture study. <strong>In</strong>flamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Nov 4.<br />
Foligné B, Deutsch SM, Breton J, Cousin FJ, Dewulf J, Samson M,<br />
Pot B, Jan G. Promising immunomodulatory effects of selected strains<br />
of dairy propionibacteria evidenced in vitro and in vivo. Appl Environ<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />
Fredriksen L, Mathiesen G, Sioud M, Eijsink VG. Cell wall anchoring<br />
of the 37-kilodalton oncofetal antigen by Lactobacillus plantarum<br />
for mucosal cancer vaccine delivery. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010<br />
Nov;76(21):7359-62.<br />
Grimoud J, Durand H, de Souza S, Monsan P, Ouarné F, Theodorou V,<br />
Roques C. <strong>In</strong> vitro screening of probiotics and synbiotics according to<br />
anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol.<br />
2010 Nov 15;144(1):42-50.<br />
Gueniche A, Benyacoub J, Philippe D, Bastien P, Kusy N, Breton L,<br />
Blum S, Castiel-Higounenc I. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116<br />
(ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates<br />
skin barrier function recovery in vitro. Eur J Dermatol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />
Guglielmetti S, Taverniti V, Minuzzo M, Arioli S, Zanoni I, Stuknyte<br />
M, Granucci F, Karp M, Mora D. A dairy bacterium displays in vitro<br />
probiotic properties for the pharyngeal mucosa by antagonizing group<br />
A streptococci and modulating the immune response. <strong>In</strong>fect Immun.<br />
2010 Nov;78(11):4734-43.<br />
Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo MS. Effect of probiotics enriched<br />
diet on Paralichthys olivaceus infected with lymphocystis disease virus<br />
(LCDV). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Nov;29(5):868-74.<br />
Hua MC, Lin TY, Lai MW, Kong MS, Chang HJ, Chen CC. Probiotic<br />
Bio-Three induces Th1 and anti-inflammatory effects in PBMC and<br />
dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 28;16(28):3529-40.<br />
Igarashi T. Study of the Relationship between Changes in Lactic Acid<br />
Bacterial Cell Components and Stimulation of IL-12 Production under<br />
Salt-Stressed Conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Nov 7.<br />
Jain S, Yadav H, Sinha PR, Kapila S, Naito Y, Marotta F. Anti-allergic<br />
effects of probiotic Dahi through modulation of the gut immune<br />
system. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;21(3):244-50.<br />
Jung BG, Ko JH, Lee BJ. Dietary Supplementation with Probiotic<br />
Fermented Tetra-Herbal Combination Enhances Immune Activity<br />
in Broiler Chicks and <strong>In</strong>creases Survivability against Salmonella<br />
Gallinarum in Experimentally <strong>In</strong>fected Broiler Chicks. J Vet Med Sci.<br />
2010 Jul 28.<br />
Kato-Mori Y, Orihashi T, Kanai Y, Sato M, Sera K, Hagiwara<br />
K. Fermentation Metabolites from Lactobacillus gasseri and<br />
Propionibacterium freudenreichii Exert Bacteriocidal Effects<br />
in Mice. J Med Food. 2010 Oct 18.<br />
AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Stimulates Colony-Stimulating<br />
Factor 3 (Granulocyte) (CSF3) Output in Placental Trophoblast Cells in<br />
a Fetal Sex-Dependant Manner. Biol Reprod. 2010 Sep 1.<br />
23
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Kotani Y, Shinkai S, Okamatsu H, Toba M, Ogawa K, Yoshida<br />
H, Fukaya T, Fujiwara Y, Chaves PH, Kakumoto K, Kohda N.<br />
Oral intake of Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 accelerates<br />
salivary immunoglobulin A secretion in the elderly: A<br />
randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Immun<br />
Ageing. 2010 Aug 26;7:11.<br />
Lee TY, Kim YH, Lee KS, Kim JK, Lee IH, Yang JM, Sung MH, Park<br />
JS, Poo H. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6-specific antitumor<br />
immunity is induced by oral administration of HPV16 E6-expressing<br />
Lactobacillus casei in C57BL/6 mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother.<br />
2010 Nov;59(11):1727-37.<br />
Liu Y, Fatheree NY, Mangalat N, Rhoads JM. Human-derived probiotic<br />
Lactobacillus reuteri strains differentially reduce intestinal inflammation.<br />
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):G1087-96.<br />
Mair C, Plitzner C, Pfaffl MW, Schedle K, Meyer HH, Windisch W.<br />
<strong>In</strong>ulin and probiotics in newly weaned piglets: effects on intestinal<br />
morphology, mRNA expression levels of inflammatory marker genes<br />
and haematology. Arch Anim Nutr. 2010 Aug;64(4):304-21.<br />
Mohamadzadeh M, Durmaz E, Zadeh M, Pakanati KC, Gramarossa M,<br />
Cohran V, Klaenhammer TR. Targeted expression of anthrax protective<br />
antigen by Lactobacillus gasseri as an anthrax vaccine. Future<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1289-96.<br />
Sharifuzzaman SM, Abbass A, Tinsley JW, Austin B. Subcellular<br />
components of probiotics Kocuria SM1 and Rhodococcus SM2 induce<br />
protective immunity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum)<br />
against Vibrio anguillarum. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Nov 12.<br />
Sohail MU, Ijaz A, Yousaf MS, Ashraf K, Zaneb H, Aleem M, Rehman H.<br />
Alleviation of cyclic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of<br />
mannan-oligosaccharide and Lactobacillus-based probiotic: dynamics<br />
of cortisol, thyroid hormones, cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and<br />
humoral immunity. Poult Sci. 2010 Sep;89(9):1934-8.<br />
Tao L, Pavlova SI, Ji X, Jin L, Spear G. A novel plasmid for delivering<br />
genes into mammalian cells with noninvasive food and commensal<br />
lactic acid bacteria. Plasmid. 2010 Sep 9.<br />
Tsai YT, Cheng PC, Pan TM. Immunomodulating Activity of Lactobacillus<br />
paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia<br />
coli O157H7-<strong>In</strong>fected Mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Oct 13.<br />
Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Kleerebezem M, Wichers HJ,<br />
Savelkoul HF. strains differentially modulate cytokine production by<br />
hPBMC Lactobacillus from pollen-allergic patients. FEMS Immunol<br />
Med Microbiol. 2010 Sep 24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00741.x.<br />
Yamamoto S, Wada J, Katayama T, Jikimoto T, Nakamura M,<br />
Kinoshita S, Lee KM, Kawabata M, Shirakawa T. Genetically modified<br />
Bifidobacterium displaying Salmonella-antigen protects mice from<br />
lethal challenge of Salmonella Typhimurium in a murine typhoid fever<br />
model. Vaccine. 2010 Sep 24;28(41):6684-91.<br />
Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR,<br />
Bocking AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1-induced IL-10 production<br />
in human placental trophoblast cells involves activation of JAK/STAT<br />
and MAPK pathways. Reprod Sci. 2010 Nov;17(11):1043-51.<br />
Zhou X, Tian Z, Wang Y, Li W. Effect of treatment with probiotics as<br />
water additives on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance<br />
and immune response. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010 Sep;36(3):501-9.<br />
OTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS<br />
Aronsson L, Huang Y, Parini P, Korach-André M, Håkansson J,<br />
Gustafsson JÅ, Pettersson S, Arulampalam V, Rafter J. Decreased<br />
fat storage by Lactobacillus paracasei is associated with increased<br />
levels of angiopoietin-like 4 protein (ANGPTL4). PLoS One. 2010 Sep<br />
30;5(9). pii: e13087.<br />
Bloise E, Torricelli M, Novembri R, Borges LE, Carrarelli P, Reis FM,<br />
Petraglia F. Heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG modulates<br />
urocortin and cytokine release in primary trophoblast cells. Placenta.<br />
2010 Oct;31(10):867-72.<br />
Caglar E, Sandalli N, Kuscu OO, Durhan MA, Pisiriciler R, Caliskan<br />
EA, Kargul B. Viability of fibroblasts in a novel probiotic storage<br />
media. Dent Traumatol. 2010 Oct;26(5):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-<br />
9657.2010.00914.x.<br />
Capcarova M, Chmelnicna L, Kolesarova A, Massanyi P, Kovacik<br />
J. Effects of Enterococcus faecium M 74 strain on selected blood<br />
and production parameters of laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2010<br />
Oct;51(5):614-20.<br />
Chen HQ, Shen TY, Zhou YK, Zhang M, Chu ZX, Hang XM, Qin HL.<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Consumption <strong>In</strong>creases PepT1-Mediated<br />
Amino Acid Absorption by Enhancing Protein Kinase C Activity in<br />
Spontaneously Colitic Mice. J Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />
Di Cagno R, Mazzacane F, Rizzello CG, Vincentini O, Silano M, Giuliani G, De<br />
Angelis M, Gobbetti M. Synthesis of isoflavone aglycones and equol in soy<br />
milks fermented by food-related lactic acid bacteria and their effect on human<br />
intestinal Caco-2 cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Oct 13;58(19):10338-46.<br />
Fordjour L, D’Souza A, Cai C, Ahmad A, Valencia G, Kumar D, Aranda<br />
JV, Beharry KD. Comparative effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and<br />
synbiotics on growth factors in the large bowel in a rat model of<br />
formula-induced bowel inflammation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.<br />
2010 Oct;51(4):507-13.<br />
Giorgini E, Conti C, Ferraris P, Sabbatini S, Tosi G, Rubini C, Vaccari<br />
L, Gioacchini G, Carnevali O. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus<br />
on zebrafish oocyte maturation: an FTIR imaging and biochemical<br />
analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Oct 9.<br />
Kelley R, Soon Park J, O’Mahony L, Minikhiem D, Fix A. Safety and<br />
Tolerance of Dietary Supplementation With a Canine-Derived Probiotic<br />
(Bifidobacterium animalis Strain AHC7) Fed to Growing Dogs. Vet Ther.<br />
2010 Fall;11(3):E1-E14.<br />
Khailova L, Mount Patrick SK, Arganbright KM, Halpern MD, Kinouchi<br />
T, Dvorak B. Bifidobacterium bifidum reduces apoptosis in the intestinal<br />
epithelium in necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver<br />
Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):G1118-27.<br />
Kim Y, Oh S, Yun HS, Oh S, Kim SH. Cell-bound exopolysaccharide<br />
from probiotic bacteria induces autophagic cell death of tumour cells.<br />
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug;51(2):123-30.<br />
Kumar R, Grover S, Batish VK. Hypocholesterolaemic effect of dietary<br />
inclusion of two putative probiotic bile salt hydrolase-producing<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum strains in Sprague-Dawley rats. Br J Nutr.<br />
2010 Oct 6:1-12.<br />
Lieske JC, Tremaine WJ, De Simone C, O’Connor HM, Li X,<br />
Bergstralh EJ, Goldfarb DS. Diet, but not oral probiotics,<br />
effectively reduces urinary oxalate excretion and calcium<br />
oxalate supersaturation. Kidney <strong>In</strong>t. 2010 Aug 25.<br />
Lin YW, Mou YC, Su CC, Chiang BH. Antihepatocarcinoma activity of<br />
lactic acid bacteria fermented Panax notoginseng. J Agric Food Chem.<br />
2010 Aug 11;58(15):8528-34.<br />
Ma EL, Choi YJ, Choi J, Pothoulakis C, Rhee SH, Im E. The anticancer<br />
effect of probiotic Bacillus polyfermenticus on human colon cancer<br />
cells is mediated through ErbB2 and ErbB3 inhibition. <strong>In</strong>t J Cancer.<br />
2010 Aug 15;127(4):780-90.<br />
Ooi LG, Ahmad R, Yuen KH, Liong MT. Lactobacillus acidophilus<br />
CHO-220 and inulin reduced plasma total cholesterol and lowdensity<br />
lipoprotein cholesterol via alteration of lipid transporters.<br />
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Nov;93(11):5048-58..<br />
Ooi LG, Bhat R, Rosma A, Yuen KH, Liong MT. A synbiotic<br />
containing Lactobacillus acidophilus CHO-220 and inulin<br />
improves irregularity of red blood cells. J Dairy Sci. 2010<br />
Oct;93(10):4535-44.<br />
Osman A, Tzortzis G, Rastall RA, Charalampopoulos D. A comprehensive<br />
investigation of the synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides by<br />
whole cells of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171. J Biotechnol.<br />
2010 Oct 1;150(1):140-8.<br />
Pan DD, Zeng XQ, Yan YT. Characterisation of Lactobacillus fermentum<br />
SM-7 isolated from koumiss, a potential probiotic bacterium with<br />
cholesterol-lowering effects. J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Oct 28.<br />
Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta<br />
A, Menon VP, Black RE. Effects of Bifidobacterium lactis<br />
HN019 and prebiotic oligosaccharide added to milk on iron<br />
status, anemia, and growth among children 1 to 4 years old. J<br />
Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Sep;51(3):341-6.<br />
Sengül N, Isık S, Aslım B, Uçar G, Demirbag AE. The Effect of<br />
Exopolysaccharide-Producing Probiotic Strains on Gut Oxidative<br />
Damage in Experimental Colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug 4.<br />
Shen Q, Zhang B, Xu R, Wang Y, Ding X, Li P. Antioxidant activity<br />
in vitro of the selenium-contained protein from the Se-enriched<br />
Bifidobacterium animalis 01. Anaerobe. 2010 Aug;16(4):380-6.<br />
Shin HS, Park SY, Lee do K, Kim SA, An HM, Kim JR, Kim MJ, Cha<br />
MG, Lee SW, Kim KJ, Lee KO, Ha NJ. Hypocholesterolemic effect<br />
of sonication-killed Bifidobacterium longum isolated from healthy<br />
adult Koreans in high cholesterol fed rats. Arch Pharm Res. 2010<br />
Sep;33(9):1425-31.<br />
Shirasawa Y, Shibahara-Sone H, Iino T, Ishikawa F. Bifidobacterium<br />
bifidum BF-1 suppresses Helicobacter pylori-induced genes in human<br />
epithelial cells. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4526-34.<br />
Truusalu K, Kullisaar T, Hütt P, Mahlapuu R, Aunapuu M, Arend A,<br />
Zilmer M, Mikelsaar RH, Mikelsaar M. Immunological, antioxidative,<br />
and morphological response in combined treatment of ofloxacin and<br />
Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3 probiotic in Salmonella Typhimurium<br />
murine model. APMIS. 2010 Nov;118(11):864-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-<br />
0463.2010.02672.x.<br />
Wind RD, Tolboom H, Klare I, Huys G, Knol J. Tolerance<br />
and safety of the potentially probiotic strain Lactobacillus<br />
rhamnosus PRSF-L477: a randomised, double-blind placebocontrolled<br />
trial in healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug<br />
9:1-11.<br />
24
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Wu MH, Pan TM, Wu YJ, Chang SJ, Chang MS, Hu CY. Exopolysaccharide<br />
activities from probiotic bifidobacterium: Immunomodulatory effects<br />
(on J774A.1 macrophages) and antimicrobial properties. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Nov 15;144(1):104-10.<br />
Wutzke KD, Lotz M, Zipprich C. The effect of pre- and<br />
probiotics on the colonic ammonia metabolism in humans as<br />
measured by lactose-[(15)N(2)]ureide. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010<br />
Oct;64(10):1215-21.<br />
Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, Bocking<br />
AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Stimulates Colony-Stimulating<br />
Factor 3 (Granulocyte) (CSF3) Output in Placental Trophoblast Cells in<br />
a Fetal Sex-Dependant Manner. Biol Reprod. 2010 Sep 1.<br />
IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> INTAKE<br />
INFECTIONS (GI, RESPIRATORY, GENITO-URINARY, OTHER)<br />
Asahara T, Shimizu K, Takada T, Kado S, Yuki N, Morotomi M, Tanaka<br />
R, Nomoto K. Protective effect of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota<br />
against lethal infection with multi-drug resistant Salmonella enterica<br />
serovar Typhimurium DT104 in mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15.<br />
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04884.x.<br />
Berggren A, Lazou Ahrén I, Larsson N, Onning G. Randomised,<br />
double-blind and placebo-controlled study using new probiotic<br />
lactobacilli for strengthening the body immune defence against<br />
viral infections. Eur J Nutr. 2010 Aug 28.<br />
Braga TD, da Silva GA, de Lira PI, de Carvalho Lima M.<br />
Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei oral<br />
supplementation on necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birthweight<br />
preterm infants: a double-blind, randomized, controlled<br />
trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />
Cazzola M, Pham-Thi N, Kerihuel JC, Durand H, Bohbot S.<br />
Efficacy of a synbiotic supplementation in the prevention of<br />
common winter diseases in children: a randomized, doubleblind,<br />
placebo-controlled pilot study. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010<br />
Oct;4(5):271-8.<br />
Chiu CH, Cheng CH, Gua WR, Guu YK, Cheng W. Dietary administration<br />
of the probiotic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae P13, enhanced the growth,<br />
innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper,<br />
Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Dec;29(6):1053-9.<br />
Donders GG, Van Bulck B, Van de Walle P, Kaiser RR, Pohlig G,<br />
Gonser S, Graf F. Effect of Lyophilized Lactobacilli and 0.03 mg<br />
Estriol (Gynoflor®) on Vaginitis and Vaginosis with Disrupted<br />
Vaginal Microflora: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind,<br />
Active-Controlled Pilot Study. Gynecol Obstet <strong>In</strong>vest. 2010 Oct<br />
16;70(4):264-272.<br />
Eaton KA, Honkala A, Auchtung TA, Britton RA. Probiotic Lactobacillus<br />
reuteri ameliorates disease due to Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli<br />
in germ free mice. <strong>In</strong>fect Immun. 2010 Oct 25.<br />
Ferrie S, Daley M. Lactobacillus GG as Treatment for Diarrhea<br />
During Enteral Feeding in Critical Illness: Randomized<br />
Controlled Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Oct 26.<br />
Geier MS, Mikkelsen LL, Torok VA, Allison GE, Olnood CG, Boulianne<br />
M, Hughes RJ, Choct M. Comparison of alternatives to in-feed<br />
antimicrobials for the prevention of clinical necrotic enteritis. J<br />
Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1329-1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />
2672.2010.04758.x.<br />
Grandy G, Medina M, Soria R, Terán CG, Araya M. <strong>Probiotics</strong><br />
in the treatment of acute rotavirus diarrhoea. A randomized,<br />
double-blind, controlled trial using two different probiotic<br />
preparations in Bolivian children. BMC <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Aug<br />
25;10:253.<br />
Guthmann F, Kluthe C, Bührer C. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for prevention of<br />
necrotising enterocolitis: an updated meta-analysis. Klin Padiatr. 2010<br />
Sep;222(5):284-90.<br />
Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo MS. Lactobacillus sakei BK19<br />
enriched diet enhances the immunity status and disease resistance to<br />
streptococcosis infection in kelp grouper, Epinephelus bruneus. Fish<br />
Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Dec;29(6):1037-43.<br />
Krause DO, Bhandari SK, House JD, Nyachoti CM. Response of nursery<br />
pigs to a synbiotic preparation of starch and an anti-Escherichia coli<br />
K88 probiotic. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15.<br />
Oudhuis GJ, Bergmans DC, Dormans T, Zwaveling JH, Kessels<br />
A, Prins MH, Stobberingh EE, Verbon A. <strong>Probiotics</strong> versus<br />
antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract: infection and<br />
mortality. <strong>In</strong>tensive Care Med. 2010 Aug 19.<br />
Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta A,<br />
Verma P, Menon VP, Black RE. Prebiotic and probiotic fortified<br />
milk in prevention of morbidities among children: communitybased,<br />
randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. PLoS One.<br />
2010 Aug 13;5(8):e12164.<br />
Sur D, Manna B, Niyogi SK, Ramamurthy T, Palit A, Nomoto<br />
K, Takahashi T, Shima T, Tsuji H, Kurakawa T, Takeda Y, Nair<br />
GB, Bhattacharya SK. Role of probiotic in preventing acute<br />
diarrhoea in children: a community-based, randomized, doubleblind<br />
placebo-controlled field trial in an urban slum. Epidemiol<br />
<strong>In</strong>fect. 2010 Jul 30:1-8.<br />
Taipale T, Pienihäkkinen K, Isolauri E, Larsen C, Brockmann<br />
E, Alanen P, Jokela J, Söderling E. Bifidobacterium animalis<br />
subsp. lactis BB-12 in reducing the risk of infections in infancy.<br />
Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep 24:1-7.<br />
Ya W, Reifer C, Miller LE. Efficacy of vaginal probiotic capsules<br />
for recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double-blind, randomized,<br />
placebo-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010<br />
Aug;203(2):120.e1-6.<br />
Yasar B, Abut E, Kayadıbı H, Toros B, Sezıklı M, Akkan<br />
Z, Keskın Ö, Övünç Kurdas O. Efficacy of probiotics in<br />
Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Turk J Gastroenterol.<br />
2010 Sep;21(3):212-7.<br />
ALLERGY & ATOPY<br />
Huang J, Zhong Y, Cai W, Zhang H, Tang W, Chen B. The effects of<br />
probiotics supplementation timing on an ovalbumin-sensitized rat<br />
model. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010 Nov;60(2):132-41. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00727.x.<br />
Koyama T, Kirjavainen PV, Fisher C, Anukam K, Summers K,<br />
Hekmat S, Reid G. Development and pilot evaluation of a novel<br />
probiotic mixture for the management of seasonal allergic<br />
rhinitis. Can J Microbiol. 2010 Sep;56(9):730-8.<br />
Nagata Y, Yoshida M, Kitazawa H, Araki E, Gomyo T.<br />
Improvements in seasonal allergic disease with Lactobacillus<br />
plantarum No. 14. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Sep<br />
23;74(9):1869-77.<br />
Penders J, Thijs C, Mommers M, Stobberingh EE, Dompeling<br />
E, Reijmerink NE, van den Brandt PA, Kerkhof M, Koppelman<br />
GH, Postma DS. <strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli and the DC-SIGN gene<br />
for their recognition by dendritic cells play a role in the aetiology<br />
of allergic manifestations. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt<br />
11):3298-305.<br />
Rose MA, Stieglitz F, Köksal A, Schubert R, Schulze J,<br />
Zielen S. Efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus GG on allergic<br />
sensitization and asthma in infants at risk. Clin Exp Allergy.<br />
2010 Sep;40(9):1398-405.<br />
Schiavi E, Barletta B, Butteroni C, Corinti S, Boirivant M, Di Felice<br />
G. Oral therapeutic administration of a probiotic mixture suppresses<br />
established Th2 responses and systemic anaphylaxis in a murine<br />
model of food allergy. Allergy. 2010 Nov 8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-<br />
9995.2010.02501.x.<br />
Schwarzer M, Repa A, Daniel C, Schabussova I, Hrncir T, Pot B,<br />
Stepankova R, Hudcovic T, Pollak A, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H,<br />
Wiedermann U, Kozakova H. Neonatal colonization of mice with<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum producing the aeroallergen Bet v 1 biases<br />
towards Th1 and T-regulatory responses upon systemic sensitization.<br />
Allergy. 2010 Sep 29. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02488.x.<br />
Shah MM, Miyamoto Y, Yamada Y, Yamashita H, Tanaka H, Ezaki T,<br />
Nagai H, <strong>In</strong>agaki N. Orally supplemented Lactobacillus acidophilus<br />
strain L-92 inhibits passive and active cutaneous anaphylaxis as<br />
well as 2,4-dinitroflurobenzene and mite faecal antigen induced<br />
atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in mice. Microbiol Immunol. 2010<br />
Sep;54(9):523-33.<br />
Torii S, Torii A, Itoh K, Urisu A, Terada A, Fujisawa T, Yamada K,<br />
Suzuki H, Ishida Y, Nakamura F, Kanzato H, Sawada D, Nonaka<br />
A, Hatanaka M, Fujiwara S. Effects of Oral Administration of<br />
Lactobacillus acidophilus L-92 on the Symptoms and Serum<br />
Markers of Atopic Dermatitis in Children. <strong>In</strong>t Arch Allergy<br />
Immunol. 2010 Sep 21;154(3):236-245.<br />
Van de Pol MA, Lutter R, Smids BS, Weersink EJ, van der Zee<br />
JS. Synbiotics reduce allergen-induced T-helper 2 response<br />
and improve peak expiratory flow in allergic asthmatics.<br />
Allergy. 2010 Aug 17.<br />
IBS & FUNCTIONAL GI DISORDERS<br />
Del Piano M, Carmagnola S, Anderloni A, Andorno S, Ballarè<br />
M, Balzarini M, Montino F, Orsello M, Pagliarulo M, Sartori M,<br />
Tari R, Sforza F, Capurso L. The use of probiotics in healthy<br />
volunteers with evacuation disorders and hard stools: a<br />
double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin<br />
Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S30-4.<br />
Francavilla R, Miniello V, Magistà AM, De Canio A, Bucci N,<br />
Gagliardi F, Lionetti E, Castellaneta S, Polimeno L, Peccarisi<br />
L, <strong>In</strong>drio F, Cavallo L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of<br />
Lactobacillus GG in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain.<br />
Pediatrics. 2010 Nov 15.<br />
25
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Jeon JR, Choi JH. Lactic acid fermentation of germinated barley fiber<br />
and proliferative function of colonic epithelial cells in loperamideinduced<br />
rats. J Med Food. 2010 Aug;13(4):950-60.<br />
Lee H, Kim YH, Kim JH, Chang DK, Kim JY, Son HJ, Rhee PL,<br />
Kim JJ, Rhee JC. A feasibility study of probiotics pretreatment<br />
as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy in constipated<br />
patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug;55(8):2344-51.<br />
Lyra A, Krogius-Kurikka L, Nikkilä J, Malinen E, Kajander<br />
K, Kurikka K, Korpela R, Palva A. Effect of a multispecies<br />
probiotic supplement on quantity of irritable bowel syndromerelated<br />
intestinal microbial phylotypes. BMC Gastroenterol.<br />
2010 Sep 19;10:110.<br />
Nakabayashi I, Nakamura M, Kawakami K, Ohta T, Kato I,<br />
Uchida K, Yoshida M. Effects of synbiotic treatment on serum<br />
level of p-cresol in haemodialysis patients: a preliminary study.<br />
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Oct 7.<br />
IBD AND OTHER INFLAMMATORY DISEASES<br />
Amdekar S, Singh V, Singh R, Sharma P, Keshav P, Kumar A.<br />
Lactobacillus casei reduces the <strong>In</strong>flammatory Joint Damage<br />
Associated with Collagen-<strong>In</strong>duced Arthritis (CIA) by Reducing the Pro-<br />
<strong>In</strong>flammatory Cytokines : Lactobacillus casei: COX-2 inhibitor. J Clin<br />
Immunol. 2010 Sep 14.<br />
Chu ZX, Chen HQ, Ma YL, Zhou YK, Zhang M, Zhang P, Qin HL.<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum prevents the upregulation of adhesion<br />
molecule expression in an experimental colitis model. Dig Dis Sci.<br />
2010 Sep;55(9):2505-13.<br />
Claes IJ, Lebeer S, Shen C, Verhoeven TL, Dilissen E, De Hertogh<br />
G, Bullens DM, Ceuppens JL, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts<br />
P, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Impact of lipoteichoic<br />
acid modification on the performance of the probiotic Lactobacillus<br />
rhamnosus GG in experimental colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010<br />
Nov;162(2):306-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04228.x. Epub<br />
2010 Aug 20.<br />
Grijó NN, Borra RC, Sdepanian VL. Proinflammatory and antiinflammatory<br />
cytokines present in the acute phase of experimental<br />
colitis treated with Saccharomyces boulardii. Dig Dis Sci. 2010<br />
Sep;55(9):2498-504.<br />
Hegazy SK, El-Bedewy MM. Effect of probiotics on proinflammatory<br />
cytokines and NF-kappaB activation in ulcerative<br />
colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 7;16(33):4145-51.<br />
Mondot S, Kang S, Furet JP, Aguirre de Carcer D, McSweeney<br />
C, Morrison M, Marteau P, Doré J, Leclerc M. Highlighting new<br />
phylogenetic specificities of Crohn’s disease microbiota. <strong>In</strong>flamm<br />
Bowel Dis. 2010 Aug 18.<br />
Savino F, Cordisco L, Tarasco V, Palumeri E, Calabrese R, Oggero R,<br />
Roos S, Matteuzzi D. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infantile colic:<br />
a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2010<br />
Sep;126(3):e526-33.<br />
Steed H, Macfarlane GT, Blackett KL, Bahrami B, Reynolds<br />
N, Walsh SV, Cummings JH, Macfarlane S. Clinical trial:<br />
the microbiological and immunological effects of synbiotic<br />
consumption - a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled<br />
study in active Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010<br />
Oct;32(7):872-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04417.x.<br />
Veiga P, Gallini CA, Beal C, Michaud M, Delaney ML, DuBois<br />
A, Khlebnikov A, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Punit S, Glickman JN,<br />
Onderdonk A, Glimcher LH, Garrett WS. Bifidobacterium animalis<br />
subsp. lactis fermented milk product reduces inflammation by altering<br />
a niche for colitogenic microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct<br />
19;107(42):18132-7.<br />
Watterlot L, Rochat T, Sokol H, Cherbuy C, Bouloufa I, Lefèvre F,<br />
Gratadoux JJ, Honvo-Hueto E, Chilmonczyk S, Blugeon S, Corthier<br />
G, Langella P, Bermúdez-Humarán LG. <strong>In</strong>tragastric administration of<br />
a superoxide dismutase-producing recombinant Lactobacillus casei<br />
BL23 strain attenuates DSS colitis in mice. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010<br />
Nov 15;144(1):35-41.<br />
NUTRITION: OBESITY, CHOLESTEROL…<br />
Aaltonen J, Ojala T, Laitinen K, Poussa T, Ozanne S, Isolauri E.<br />
Impact of maternal diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding<br />
on infant metabolic programming: a prospective randomized<br />
controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 13.<br />
Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Böhm J. Effect of addition of a probiotic<br />
micro-organism to broiler diet on intestinal mucosal architecture and<br />
electrophysiological parameters. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010<br />
Aug 1;94(4):486-94.<br />
Capcarova M, Hascik P, Kolesarova A, Kacaniova M, Mihok<br />
M, Pal G. The effect of selected microbial strains on internal<br />
milieu of broiler chickens after peroral administration. Res Vet<br />
Sci. 2010 Aug 17.<br />
Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Effect<br />
of mother’s weight on infant’s microbiota acquisition,<br />
composition, and activity during early infancy: a prospective<br />
follow-up study initiated in early pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr.<br />
2010 Nov;92(5):1023-30.<br />
Gebru E, Lee JS, Son JC, Yang SY, Shin SA, Kim B, Kim MK, Park SC.<br />
Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented<br />
feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acutephase<br />
response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with<br />
Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. J Anim Sci. 2010 Aug 20.<br />
Ilmonen J, Isolauri E, Poussa T, Laitinen K. Impact of<br />
dietary counselling and probiotic intervention on maternal<br />
anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy: A<br />
randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 21.<br />
Kang JH, Yun SI, Park HO. Effects of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 on<br />
body weight and adipose tissue mass in diet-induced overweight rats.<br />
J Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(5):712-4.<br />
Kondo S, Xiao JZ, Satoh T, Odamaki T, Takahashi S, Sugahara<br />
H, Yaeshima T, Iwatsuki K, Kamei A, Abe K. Antiobesity effects<br />
of bifidobacterium breve strain B-3 supplementation in a mouse<br />
model with high-fat diet-induced obesity. Biosci Biotechnol<br />
Biochem. 2010 Aug 23;74(8):1656-61.<br />
Sefcíková Z, Kmet V, Bujnáková D, Racek L, Mozes S. Development<br />
of gut microflora in obese and lean rats. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010<br />
Jul;55(4):373-5.<br />
Taheri HR, Moravej H, Tabandeh F, Zaghari M, Shivazad M. Efficacy of<br />
combined or single use of Lactobacillus crispatus LT116 and L. johnsonii<br />
LT171 on broiler performance. Br Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;51(5):580-5.<br />
NEW APPLICATION & OTHER<br />
Andreasen AS, Larsen N, Pedersen-Skovsgaard T, Berg RM,<br />
Møller K, Svendsen KD, Jakobsen M, Pedersen BK. Effects of<br />
Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM on insulin sensitivity and the<br />
systemic inflammatory response in human subjects. Br J Nutr.<br />
2010 Sep 6:1-8.<br />
Castro MS, Molina MA, Di Sciullo P, Azpiroz MB, Leocata Nieto F,<br />
Sterín-Speziale NB, Mongini C, Manghi MA. Beneficial activity of<br />
Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in the anti-lymphoma protective<br />
response. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1234-43. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04747.x.<br />
Desbonnet L, Garrett L, Clarke G, Kiely B, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Effects<br />
of the probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis in the maternal separation<br />
model of depression. Neuroscience. 2010 Nov 10;170(4):1179-88.<br />
Doi A, Nakajo K, Kamiya T, Ohkusu K. Splenic abscess caused<br />
by Lactobacillus paracasei. J <strong>In</strong>fect Chemother. 2010 Jul 29.<br />
Gioacchini G, Maradonna F, Lombardo F, Bizzaro D, Olivotto I, Carnevali<br />
O. <strong>In</strong>crease of fecundity by probiotic administration in zebrafish (Danio<br />
rerio). Reproduction. 2010 Sep 10.<br />
Hammad AM, Shimamoto T. Towards a compatible probiotic-antibiotic<br />
combination therapy: assessment of antimicrobial resistance in the<br />
Japanese probiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1349-60. doi:<br />
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04762.x.<br />
Iwamoto T, Suzuki N, Tanabe K, Takeshita T, Hirofuji T. Effects<br />
of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius WB21 on halitosis and oral<br />
health: an open-label pilot trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol<br />
Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Aug;110(2):201-8.<br />
Jenks K, Stebbings S, Burton J, Schultz M, Herbison<br />
P, Highton J. Probiotic therapy for the treatment of<br />
spondyloarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol.<br />
2010 Oct;37(10):2118-25.<br />
Lee KC, Liu CF, Lin TH, Pan TM. Safety and risk assessment of the<br />
genetically modified Lactococci on rats intestinal bacterial flora. <strong>In</strong>t J<br />
Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):164-9.<br />
Liu JE, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Dong PL, Chen M, Duan ZP. Probiotic<br />
yogurt effects on intestinal flora of patients with chronic liver<br />
disease. Nurs Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;59(6):426-32..<br />
Lu YC, Yin LT, Chang WT, Huang JS. Effect of Lactobacillus reuteri<br />
GMNL-263 treatment on renal fibrosis in diabetic rats. J Biosci Bioeng.<br />
2010 Aug 4.<br />
Luong ML, Sareyyupoglu B, Nguyen MH, Silveira FP, Shields RK,<br />
Potoski BA, Pasculle WA, Clancy CJ, Toyoda Y. Lactobacillus<br />
probiotic use in cardiothoracic transplant recipients: a link to<br />
invasive Lactobacillus infection? Transpl <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Oct<br />
7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00580.x.<br />
Mayrhofer S, van Hoek AH, Mair C, Huys G, Aarts HJ, Kneifel W,<br />
Domig KJ. Antibiotic susceptibility of members of the Lactobacillus<br />
acidophilus group using broth microdilution and molecular<br />
identification of their resistance determinants. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol.<br />
2010 Nov 15;144(1):81-7.<br />
26
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Messaoudi M, Lalonde R, Violle N, Javelot H, Desor D,<br />
Nejdi A, Bisson JF, Rougeot C, Pichelin M, Cazaubiel M,<br />
Cazaubiel JM. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of<br />
a probiotic formulation ( Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and<br />
Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects.<br />
Br J Nutr. 2010 Oct 26:1-9.<br />
Munakata S, Arakawa C, Kohira R, Fujita Y, Fuchigami<br />
T, Mugishima H. A case of D-lactic acid encephalopathy<br />
associated with use of probiotics. Brain Dev. 2010<br />
Sep;32(8):691-4.<br />
Myhre R, Brantsæter AL, Myking S, Gjessing HK, Sengpiel V,<br />
Meltzer HM, Haugen M, Jacobsson B. <strong>In</strong>take of probiotic food<br />
and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010<br />
Oct 27.<br />
Qiao GH, Shan AS, Ma N, Ma QQ, Sun ZW. Effect of supplemental<br />
Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese<br />
Holstein cows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010 Aug<br />
1;94(4):429-36.<br />
Ranganathan N, Ranganathan P, Friedman EA, Joseph A,<br />
Delano B, Goldfarb DS, Tam P, Rao AV, Anteyi E, Musso CG.<br />
Pilot study of probiotic dietary supplementation for promoting<br />
healthy kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease.<br />
Adv Ther. 2010 Sep;27(9):634-47.<br />
Robin F, Paillard C, Marchandin H, Demeocq F, Bonnet R,<br />
Hennequin C. Lactobacillus rhamnosus meningitis following<br />
recurrent episodes of bacteremia in a child undergoing<br />
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Nov;48(11):4317-9.<br />
Szabo NJ, Dolan LC, Burdock GA, Shibano T, Sato SI, Suzuki<br />
H, Uesugi T, Yamahira S, Toba M, Ueno H. Safety evaluation of<br />
Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010<br />
Nov 5.<br />
Uchida M, Shimizu K, Kurakazu K. Yogurt containing Lactobacillus<br />
gasseri OLL 2716 (LG21 yogurt) accelerated the healing of acetic acidinduced<br />
gastric ulcer in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Sep<br />
23;74(9):1891-4.<br />
Weizman Z. <strong>Probiotics</strong> Use in Childhood Acute Diarrhea: A Web-based<br />
Survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 8.<br />
Zhang MM, Cheng JQ, Lu YR, Yi ZH, Yang P, Wu XT. Use of pre-,<br />
pro- and synbiotics in patients with acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.<br />
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 21;16(31):3970-8.<br />
REVIEWS<br />
Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB, Gálvez A. Diversity and applications<br />
of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul 31.<br />
Allen SJ, Martinez EG, Gregorio GV, Dans LF. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for treating<br />
acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov<br />
10;11:CD003048..<br />
Allgeyer LC, Miller MJ, Lee SY. Sensory and microbiological quality<br />
of yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. J Dairy Sci. 2010<br />
Oct;93(10):4471-9.<br />
Al-Mendalawi MD, Heydarian F. Comparison between traditional<br />
yogurt and probiotic yogurt in non-inflammatory acute gastroenteritis.<br />
Saudi Med J. 2010 Sep;31(9):1071-2; author reply 1071-2.<br />
Badel S, Bernardi T, Michaud P. New perspectives for Lactobacilli<br />
exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol Adv. 2010 Aug 31.<br />
Beattie LM, Hansen R, Barclay AR. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for preterm<br />
infants: confounding features warrant caution. Pediatrics. 2010<br />
Sep;126(3):e742-3; author reply e743-5.<br />
Bernaola Aponte G, Bada Mancilla CA, Carreazo Pariasca NY, Rojas<br />
Galarza RA. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for treating persistent diarrhoea in children.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;11:CD007401..<br />
Bernstein CN. New insights into IBD epidemiology: are there any<br />
lessons for treatment? Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):406-10.<br />
Bischoff SC, Zeitz M. Scientific evidence for the medical use of<br />
probiotics. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:1-5.<br />
Blaut M, Bischoff SC. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and obesity. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57<br />
Suppl:20-3.<br />
Boyle RJ. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for preventing eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2010<br />
Sep;163(3):450.<br />
Braegger CP. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis.<br />
Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:14-5.<br />
Buts JP, De Keyser N. <strong>In</strong>teraction of Saccharomyces boulardii with<br />
intestinal brush border membranes: key to probiotic effects? J Pediatr<br />
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Oct;51(4):532-3.<br />
Cabana MD. Evidence increasing that probiotics reduce incidence of<br />
necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2010<br />
Nov;157(5):864-5..<br />
Camilleri M, Tack JF. Current medical treatments of dyspepsia<br />
and irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010<br />
Sep;39(3):481-93.<br />
Capurso L, Morelli L. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and European Food Safety Authority<br />
health claims. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S1.<br />
Cottone M, Orlando A, Renna S. <strong>In</strong>vestigational agents for Crohn’s<br />
disease. Expert Opin <strong>In</strong>vestig Drugs. 2010 Oct;19(10):1147-59.<br />
Coudeyras S, Forestier C. Microbiote et probiotiques : impact en sante<br />
humaine. Can J Microbiol. 2010 Aug;56(8):611-50.<br />
Del Giudice MM, Leonardi S, Maiello N, Brunese FP. Food allergy<br />
and probiotics in childhood. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl<br />
1:S22-5.<br />
Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Calasso M, Gobbetti M. Proteomics of the<br />
bacterial cross-talk by quorum sensing. J Proteomics. 2010 Oct 15.<br />
Diamant M, Blaak EE, de Vos WM. Do nutrient-gut-microbiota<br />
interactions play a role in human obesity, insulin resistance and type 2<br />
diabetes? Obes Rev. 2010 Aug 13.<br />
Dimitroglou A, Merrifield DL, Carnevali O, Picchietti S, Avella M,<br />
Daniels C, Güroy D, Davies SJ. Microbial manipulations to improve fish<br />
health and production - A Mediterranean perspective. Fish Shellfish<br />
Immunol. 2010 Aug 27.<br />
Ducrotté P. [Microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome]. Gastroenterol<br />
Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S52-6.<br />
Falagas ME, Korbila IP, Karageorgopoulos DE. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for the<br />
prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Expert Rev Respir<br />
Med. 2010 Oct;4(5):567-71.<br />
Finch J, Munhutu MN, Whitaker-Worth DL. Atopic dermatitis and<br />
nutrition. Clin Dermatol. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):605-14..<br />
Fölster-Holst R. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in the treatment and prevention of atopic<br />
dermatitis. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:16-9.<br />
Foster KJ, Lin S, Turck CJ. Current and emerging strategies for<br />
treating hepatic encephalopathy. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2010<br />
Sep;22(3):341-50.<br />
Friswell M, Campbell B, Rhodes J. The role of bacteria in the<br />
pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Liver. 2010<br />
Sep;4(3):295-306.<br />
Gareau MG, Sherman PM, Walker WA. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and the gut<br />
microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol<br />
Hepatol. 2010 Sep;7(9):503-14.<br />
Garland SM, Jacobs SE, Tobin JM, Opie GF, Donath S; ProPrems<br />
study group. A cautionary note on instituting probiotics into routine<br />
clinical care for premature infants. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e741-2;<br />
author reply e743-5.<br />
Gobbetti M, Cagno RD, De Angelis M. Functional microorganisms<br />
for functional food quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010<br />
Sep;50(8):716-27.<br />
Gómez-Llorente C, Muñoz S, Gil A. Role of Toll-like receptors in the<br />
development of immunotolerance mediated by probiotics. Proc Nutr<br />
Soc. 2010 Aug;69(3):381-9.<br />
Goulet O, Joly F. [<strong>In</strong>testinal microbiota in short bowel syndrome].<br />
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S37-43.<br />
Guéniche A, Bastien P, Ovigne JM, Kermici M, Courchay G, Chevalier<br />
V, Breton L, Castiel-Higounenc I. Bifidobacterium longum lysate, a new<br />
ingredient for reactive skin. Exp Dermatol. 2010 Aug;19(8):e1-8.<br />
Guslandi M. Medical treatment of uncomplicated diverticular disease<br />
of the colon: any progress? Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2010<br />
Sep;56(3):367-70.<br />
Hajela N, Nair GB, Ganguly NK. Are probiotics a feasible intervention<br />
for prevention of diarrhoea in the developing world? Gut Pathog. 2010<br />
Aug 29;2(1):10.<br />
Hall J, Hammerich K, Roberts P. New paradigms in the management of<br />
diverticular disease. Curr Probl Surg. 2010 Sep;47(9):680-735.<br />
Håvarstein LS. <strong>In</strong>creasing competence in the genus Streptococcus.<br />
Mol Microbiol. 2010 Nov;78(3):541-4..<br />
Hummelen R, Vos AP, van’t Land B, van Norren K, Reid G. Altered<br />
host-microbe interaction in HIV: a target for intervention with pro- and<br />
prebiotics. <strong>In</strong>t Rev Immunol. 2010 Oct;29(5):485-513.<br />
Im E, Pothoulakis C. [Recent advances in Saccharomyces boulardii<br />
research]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S62-70.<br />
27
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />
<strong>WATCH</strong><br />
ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />
Contents :<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />
THE QUARTER<br />
1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />
<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />
PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
INTERACTION WITH THE<br />
HOST<br />
3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />
PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />
REFERENCES<br />
KEY DATES<br />
Jack L, Coyer F, Courtney M, Venkatesh B. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and diarrhoea<br />
management in enterally tube fed critically ill patients-What is the<br />
evidence? <strong>In</strong>tensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Aug 6.<br />
Kachaamy T, Bajaj JS. Diet and cognition in chronic liver disease. Curr<br />
Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 21.<br />
Klein G. Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Characterization of<br />
Probiotic and Clinical Lactobacillus Strains in Relation to Safety<br />
Aspects of <strong>Probiotics</strong>. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Oct 29.<br />
Koteyko N. Balancing the good, the bad and the better: a discursive<br />
perspective on probiotics and healthy eating. Health (London). 2010<br />
Nov;14(6):585-602..<br />
Lakhan SE, Kirchgessner A. Gut inflammation in chronic fatigue<br />
syndrome. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Oct 12;7:79.<br />
Lee JH, O’Sullivan DJ. Genomic insights into bifidobacteria. Microbiol<br />
Mol Biol Rev. 2010 Sep;74(3):378-416.<br />
Marteau P. [The clinical importance of intestinal microbiota].<br />
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S93-7.<br />
McFarland LV. Lactobacillus GG prevented nosocomial gastrointestinal<br />
and respiratory tract infections. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010<br />
Oct 19.<br />
McFarland LV. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and diarrhea. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57<br />
Suppl:10-1.<br />
Meier R. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in irritable bowel syndrome. Ann Nutr Metab.<br />
2010;57 Suppl:12-3.<br />
Meuer S. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and respiratory tract diseases. Ann Nutr Metab.<br />
2010;57 Suppl:24-6.<br />
Millar M, Wilks M, Fleming P, Costeloe K. Should the use of probiotics<br />
in the preterm be routine? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010<br />
Sep 24.<br />
Moayyedi P. ACP Journal Club: probiotics improve symptoms in<br />
adults with the irritable bowel syndrome. Ann <strong>In</strong>tern Med. 2010 Sep<br />
21;153(6):JC3-7.<br />
Montgomery JY, Bajaj JS. Advances in the Evaluation and Management<br />
of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Oct 6.<br />
Moore SR. Update on prolonged and persistent diarrhea in children.<br />
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 10.<br />
Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Obesity, diabetes, and gut<br />
microbiota: the hygiene hypothesis expanded? Diabetes Care. 2010<br />
Oct;33(10):2277-84.<br />
Neu J, Shuster J. Nonadministration of routine probiotics unethical-really?<br />
Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e740-1; author reply e743-5.<br />
Patel AK, Singhania RR, Pandey A, Chincholkar SB. Probiotic bile salt<br />
hydrolase: current developments and perspectives. Appl Biochem<br />
Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):166-80.<br />
Payne D. Sticky labels. BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5861. doi: 10.1136/<br />
bmj.c5861.<br />
Pham LC, Hoogenkamp MA, Exterkate RA, Terefework Z, de Soet JJ,<br />
Ten Cate JM, Crielaard W, Zaura E. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus<br />
GG on saliva-derived microcosms. Arch Oral Biol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />
Prado S, Romalde JL, Barja JL. Review of probiotics for use in bivalve<br />
hatcheries. Vet Microbiol. 2010 Oct 26;145(3-4):187-97.<br />
Preidis GA, Hill C, Guerrant RL, Ramakrishna BS, Tannock GW,<br />
Versalovic J. <strong>Probiotics</strong>, Enteric and Diarrheal Diseases, and Global<br />
Health. Gastroenterology. 2010 Nov 11.<br />
Quigley EM. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in gastrointestinal disorders. Hosp Pract<br />
(Minneap). 2010 Nov;38(4):122-9..<br />
Rastmanesh R. High polyphenol, low probiotic diet for weight loss<br />
because of intestinal microbiota interaction. Chem Biol <strong>In</strong>teract. 2010<br />
Oct 15.<br />
Rayes N, Soeters PB. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in surgical and critically ill patients.<br />
Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:29-31.<br />
Roberfroid M, Gibson GR, Hoyles L, McCartney AL, Rastall R, Rowland<br />
I, Wolvers D, Watzl B, Szajewska H, Stahl B, Guarner F, Respondek F,<br />
Whelan K, Coxam V, Davicco MJ, Léotoing L, Wittrant Y, Delzenne NM,<br />
Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Meheust A. Prebiotic effects: metabolic and<br />
health benefits. Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104 Suppl 2:S1-63.<br />
Rosenstiel P, Stange EF. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and intestinal diseases. Ann Nutr<br />
Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:27-8.<br />
Sánchez B, Urdaci MC, Margolles A. Extracellular proteins secreted<br />
by probiotic bacteria as mediators of effects that promote mucosabacteria<br />
interactions. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3232-42.<br />
Savino F, Tarasco V. New treatments for infant colic. Curr Opin Pediatr.<br />
2010 Sep 21.<br />
Scarpellini E, Campanale M, Leone D, Purchiaroni F, Vitale G, Lauritano<br />
EC, Gasbarrini A. Gut microbiota and obesity. <strong>In</strong>tern Emerg Med. 2010<br />
Oct;5 Suppl 1:S53-6.<br />
Schölmerich J. Evolving concepts in IBD therapy: what should be<br />
studied in the future? Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):472-7.<br />
Schwartz M, Regueiro M. Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative<br />
Crohn’s Disease Recurrence: An Update for a New Decade. Curr<br />
Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Nov 2.<br />
Settanni L, Moschetti G. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used to<br />
improve cheese quality and provide health benefits. Food Microbiol.<br />
2010 Sep;27(6):691-7.<br />
Shah SB. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for ulcerative colitis ... Are the good bugs back?<br />
Gastroenterology. 2010 Sep;139(3):1054-6; discussion 1056.<br />
Shanahan F, Collins SM. Pharmabiotic manipulation of the microbiota<br />
in gastrointestinal disorders, from rationale to reality. Gastroenterol<br />
Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;39(3):721-6.<br />
Shanahan F. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in Perspective. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct 19.<br />
Shanahan F. The colonic microflora and probiotic therapy in health and<br />
disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 1.<br />
Sherman MP. New concepts of microbial translocation in the<br />
neonatal intestine: mechanisms and prevention. Clin Perinatol. 2010<br />
Sep;37(3):565-79.<br />
Slattery L, O’Callaghan J, Fitzgerald GF, Beresford T, Ross RP. <strong>In</strong>vited<br />
review: Lactobacillus helveticus--a thermophilic dairy starter related to<br />
gut bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4435-54.<br />
Sleator RD. <strong>Probiotics</strong> -- a viable therapeutic alternative for enteric<br />
infections especially in the developing world. Discov Med. 2010<br />
Aug;10(51):119-24.<br />
Smith TJ, Margolis LM, Young AJ. Should military dining facilities offer<br />
and promote consumption of probiotic-containing foods? Mil Med.<br />
2010 Oct;175(10):770-83.<br />
Stoidis CN, Misiakos EP, Patapis P, Fotiadis CI, Spyropoulos BG.<br />
Potential benefits of pro- and prebiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity<br />
and intestinal barrier in short bowel syndrome. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Oct<br />
21:1-9.<br />
Surawicz CM. [The microbiota and infectious diarrhea]. Gastroenterol<br />
Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S29-36.<br />
Szajewska H. Advances and limitations of evidence-based medicine-impact<br />
for probiotics. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:6-9.<br />
Tang ML, Lahtinen SJ, Boyle RJ. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and prebiotics: clinical<br />
effects in allergic disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Oct;22(5):626-34.<br />
Tangney M. Gene therapy for cancer: dairy bacteria as delivery vectors.<br />
Discov Med. 2010 Sep;10(52):195-200.<br />
Trebichavsky I, Splichal I, Rada V, Splichalova A. Modulation of natural<br />
immunity in the gut by Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917. Nutr Rev.<br />
2010 Aug;68(8):459-64.<br />
Turner P. Providing optimal nutritional support on the intensive care<br />
unit: key challenges and practical solutions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010<br />
Nov;69(4):574-81.<br />
Turpin W, Humblot C, Thomas M, Guyot JP. Lactobacilli as multifaceted<br />
probiotics with poorly disclosed molecular mechanisms. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />
Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):87-102.<br />
Venugopalan V, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. Regulatory oversight and<br />
safety of probiotic use. Emerg <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Nov;16(11):1661-5..<br />
Visich KL, Yeo TP. The prophylactic use of probiotics in the prevention<br />
of radiation therapy-induced diarrhea. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010<br />
Aug;14(4):467-73.<br />
Widhalm K, Ghods E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a challenge for<br />
pediatricians. <strong>In</strong>t J Obes (Lond). 2010 Oct;34(10):1451-67.<br />
Yao TC, Chang CJ, Hsu YH, Huang JL. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for allergic diseases:<br />
realities and myths. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Sep;21(6):900-19.<br />
Zivkovic AM, German JB, Lebrilla CB, Mills DA. Microbes and Health<br />
Sackler Colloquium: Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the<br />
infant gastrointestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 4.<br />
28
probiotics<br />
watch<br />
issUE N°4<br />
KEY DATES<br />
<strong>In</strong>ternational Human<br />
Microbiome Congress<br />
METHOD<br />
> Monitoring period : 28/07/2010 to 15/11/2010<br />
> Database : Medline<br />
> Result : 371 publications<br />
THE EDITORIAL COMMITTE<br />
February 26<br />
March 1<br />
March 9-11<br />
May 7-10<br />
May 13-17<br />
May 20-24<br />
> Keywords : probiotic / lactic acid bacteria /<br />
streptococcus thermophilus / lactobacilli / fermented<br />
milk / bifidobacteria<br />
this probiotics watch is designed as a time-saving tool for scientists and clinicians interested in probiotic research.<br />
in an interactive format, the quarterly report provides timely, quasi-exhaustive lists of the scientific publications of<br />
the previous three months. it sorts them by topic and highlights some of the most relevant results. readers can<br />
also check out upcoming scientific events and regular bibliometric analyses.<br />
objectivity is a strong commitment, that’s why the articles are selected by an editorial committee, composed of<br />
renowned scientists in the field. Editorial committee members also comment on what they believe are the quarter’s<br />
most relevant publications.<br />
Last but not least each issue features an editorial by a probiotic expert, which offers special insight into this<br />
fascinating field of science.<br />
Bruno Pot,<br />
<strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, FRANCE.<br />
Hania Szajewska,<br />
The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, POLAND.<br />
James Versalovic,<br />
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.<br />
April 14-16<br />
The members : Its missions :<br />
Vancouver, Canada<br />
http://www.cag-acg.org<br />
Vancouver, Canada<br />
http://www.cvent.com/EVENTS/<strong>In</strong>fo/<br />
Summary.aspx?e=c4aa192c-e47c-44fbb1dc-15dd34e5b2c2<br />
Chicago, USA<br />
http://www.ddw.org<br />
San Francisco, USA<br />
http://www.immunology2011.org<br />
Washington, USA<br />
http://gm.asm.org/<br />
Providing international and multidisciplinary<br />
vision.<br />
Selecting the articles of interest in the<br />
probiotics field.<br />
Commenting the most relevant publications.<br />
HEALTH AFFAIRS<br />
probioticswatch@danone.com<br />
www.e-probioticswatch.com<br />
San Fransisco, USA<br />
http://www.nature.com/<br />
natureconferences/mmi2011/index.html<br />
Realized with iNTUiTiO and Strat & Gérie, 2010<br />
29