15.02.2013 Views

PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice

PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice

PROBIOTICS WATCH - Probiotics In Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A scientific tool supported by dAnone<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE qUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

NOTEWORTHY PUBLICATIONS<br />

Manufacturing process modifies L. rhamnosus original in vitro properties<br />

intestinal mucosa responses to probiotics differ from one strain to another:<br />

results of transcriptome analysis<br />

intake of probiotics seems to prevent nec in preterm infants<br />

Issue N°4<br />

Jan. 2011<br />

This probiotics watch is designed as a time-saving tool for scientists and clinicians interested in<br />

probiotic research. <strong>In</strong> an interactive format, the quarterly report provides timely, quasi-exhaustive<br />

lists of the scientific publications of the previous three months. It sorts them by topic and highlights<br />

some of the most relevant results. Readers can also check out upcoming scientific events and<br />

regular bibliometric analyses.<br />

Objectivity is a strong commitment, that’s why the articles are selected by an editorial committee,<br />

composed of renowned scientists in the field. Editorial committee members also comment on<br />

what they believe are the quarter’s most relevant publications.<br />

Last but not least each issue features an editorial by a probiotic expert, which offers special insight<br />

into this fascinating field of science.<br />

Method<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

A THOUGHT FOR FOOD: TIME HEALTH CLAIM<br />

STUDIES HAD OWN METHODOLOGY?<br />

by Pr. Francisco Guarner<br />

Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain<br />

« <strong>In</strong>appropriate food habits rank on the top of the list of causes<br />

of disease and early death in developed societies. Obesity, type II<br />

diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancer, among others, are<br />

obvious examples of modern world epidemics ... »<br />

intestinal lactobacilli protects children from developping allergies: a species-dependent effect<br />

Multispecies probiotic intervention alleviates bacterial alterations in ibs patients<br />

L. rhamnosus GG relieves symptoms of abdominal pain in ibs children<br />

A mechanism explaining the preventive effect of probiotics against colitis<br />

L. reuteri consumption improves colic symptoms in breastfed newborns<br />

control of mothers’ diet during pregnancy benefits infants metabolic health<br />

> read more<br />

Mothers’ weight or weight gain during pregnancy impacts the intestinal flora composition of the infants<br />

> Monitoring period : 28/07/2010 to 15/11/2010 > Database : Medline > Result : 371 publications<br />

> Keywords : probiotic / lactic acid bacteria / streptococcus thermophilus / lactobacilli / fermented milk / bifidobacteria<br />

1


A SCIENTIFIC TOOL SUPPORTED BY DANONE<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY KEY DATES > Home page<br />

A THOUGHT FOR FOOD: TIME HEALTH CLAIM<br />

STUDIES HAD OWN METHODOLOGY?<br />

by Pr. Francisco Guarner<br />

Hospital Vall d’Hebron,<br />

Barcelona, Spain.<br />

More info about health claims related to gut and immune function:<br />

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/fr/<br />

p p<br />

events/event/nda101202.htm events/event/nda101202.htm http://www.gut-health.eu/<br />

p g<br />

Issue N°4<br />

Jan. 2011<br />

<strong>In</strong>appropriate food habits rank on the top of the list of causes of<br />

disease and early death in developed societies. Obesity, type II<br />

diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancer, among others, are<br />

obvious examples of modern world epidemics. These pathological<br />

conditions of high prevalence are all certainly associated with bad<br />

food habits. There is no reason that this pernicious trend should<br />

not be amenable to shift towards a healthier course, provided<br />

that knowledge about the risks and benefits associated with food<br />

consumption are satisfactorily transmitted to the population. One<br />

simple way of doing this, among many others, is the intelligent use<br />

of the information included in food product labelling. A few years<br />

ago, a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of<br />

the European Union on nutrition and health claims made on foods<br />

was promulgated (EC 1924/2006). The regulation states that health<br />

claims for food labelling must be based on scientific evidence.<br />

<strong>In</strong> order to ensure that the claims made are truthful and can<br />

be understood by consumers, they must undergo a specific<br />

assessment and authorization procedure involving consultation<br />

with the European Food Safety Authority.<br />

Researchers have been developing novel methodologies aimed at proper substantiation of healthy effects of foods other than their<br />

inherent nutritional value. As compared with studies on pharmaceuticals, particular challenges for the investigation of health benefits<br />

of foods are the length of the studies and the need for adequate control products. Drugs may induce rapid-onset effects but, as<br />

shown by observational studies, foods usually have a strongly defined impact on health after long-term exposure as opposed to nonexposure.<br />

<strong>In</strong>tervention studies carried out over a long period of time may have intrinsic difficulties in terms of compliance and drop-out<br />

of participants during the follow-up. Likewise, drugs studies are controlled by a pharmacologically inert placebo matrix supplied in pills,<br />

which are indistinguishable from the pills containing the active drug. This provision is not always fully suitable within the design framework<br />

of a prospective intervention study evaluating food.<br />

Unfortunately, recent opinions cast by the EFSA-NDA panel after the assessment of beneficial health effects of probiotics raise doubts<br />

about whether such differences are being perceived by the experts in the panel. Ignoring the outcome of long-term studies on the basis<br />

of drop-out rates and disputing the validity of ‘per protocol analysis’ makes little sense for the progression of the field. As opposed to<br />

medicines, it is probably more relevant to identify long-term effects in subjects with confirmed exposure to the tested food product (per<br />

protocol population), rather than applying statistical criteria validated for short term studies on acute effects. Likewise, long term studies<br />

are less susceptible to influences from potential confounding factors such as diet or concomitant drug intake, as these factors tend to be<br />

stable over the long term. <strong>In</strong> other words, such issues may be very relevant in short term studies, but not necessarily critical in long term<br />

studies, and should not be used as criteria for rejecting the information obtained in well-designed and conducted studies. However, these<br />

reasons were claimed by the panel in order to reject an application of a specific mixture of probiotic strains that was tested in two longterm<br />

studies (5 and 6 months) showing significant reduction of scores of abdominal discomfort.<br />

Another interesting point is that study designs for interventions with food products should be able to compare ‘apples and pears’, without<br />

claiming violation of the ‘double-blind’ rule for randomized controlled intervention trials. The critical issue here is to ensure that participants<br />

do not know whether they are in the active or control arm (even if products are fully distinguishable), and investigators analyzing samples<br />

and data deal only with coded information. This may be a difficult matter in some settings but it is clearly achievable. Our minds should<br />

be open to identifying valid procedures for the adequate investigation of food effects on health. It is unfortunate that disputing the validity<br />

of the ‘double blind’ design of a randomized controlled trial testing a probiotic strain in fermented milk as compared with acidified milk<br />

was the reason given by the panel for rejecting the study. This particular study was peer-reviewed, accepted, and published a few years<br />

ago in the British Journal of Medicine; a highly competitive scientific forum. The simplistic approach of ignoring outcomes and rejecting<br />

procedures that do not fulfil ad integrum methodologies validated for drug studies is not the best way to evaluate research on food.<br />

Moreover, the negative approach is likely to compromise future developments of this interesting field of nutritional science.<br />

The legacy of these NDA-panel opinions will be the favour of nutritional supplements in the form of pills or sachets, as they share physical<br />

characteristics with drugs. These supplements are optimal for conducting research studies that are fully compliant with the criteria being<br />

applied by the panel. Eventually, supplements may end up flooding our “food” market. However, this was not the spirit or aim of the EC<br />

regulation, and it is certainly not what consumers need and expect from the food sciences or marketplace.<br />

2


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 THE MAIN POINTS OF THE QUARTER<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Adults<br />

The elderly<br />

Children<br />

A quarter with many in vitro studies<br />

Meta-analysis 0,7%<br />

Clinical<br />

19,9%<br />

Animal<br />

26,7%<br />

<strong>In</strong> vitro<br />

52,7%<br />

371 publications were retrieved from Medline for the last quarter of 2010,<br />

including 25% of reviews. This survey period (like the preceding ones) is<br />

characterised by the publication of a majority of in vitro studies and a higher<br />

number of reviews than in the preceding quarters.<br />

<strong>Probiotics</strong> in clinical trials are mainly assayed against infections<br />

A total of 55 clinical trials were published in the last quarter; 37 were performed in adults, 1 in the elderly and 17 in<br />

children. Probiotic intake is mainly assayed against infections (gastro-intestinal, respiratory, genito-urinary, etc.) in<br />

adults and children.<br />

IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> INTAKE<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION<br />

WITH THE HOST<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF CLINICAL STUDIES ACCORDING TO THEMATIC FIELD<br />

Clinical trials are mainly performed with Lactobacillus<br />

Clinical trials focused on the health effects of probiotics were mainly performed with Lactobacillus (74.5% of the<br />

studies). These trials mainly investigated the effects of three species of probiotics: Lactobacillus rhamnosus (21.8%<br />

of the studies, half of which were related to the strain L. rhamnosus GG), L. acidophilus (16.4%), and Bifidobacterium<br />

breve (12.7%).<br />

L. rhamnosus<br />

L. acidophilus<br />

L. plantarum<br />

L. casei<br />

L. paracasei<br />

L. helveticus<br />

B. breve<br />

B. lactis<br />

B. longum<br />

S. thermophilus<br />

Nutrition: obesity, cholesterol, etc.<br />

IBD & other inflammatory diseases<br />

Effects of probiotics on immunity<br />

Mucosa response to probiotics<br />

NUMBERS OF QUOTATIONS (IN % OF TOTAL CLINICAL STUDIES)<br />

3,6<br />

3,6<br />

3,6<br />

5,5<br />

IBS & functional GI disorders<br />

Allergy & atopy<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />

Numbers of papers<br />

7,3<br />

Other physiological effects<br />

Effects of probiotics on microbiota<br />

9,1<br />

9,1<br />

12,7<br />

16,4<br />

<strong>In</strong>fections<br />

21,8<br />

Others<br />

21,8%<br />

Bifidobacteria<br />

34,5%<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

25<br />

Numbers of papers<br />

New applications<br />

& other<br />

Lactobacillus<br />

74,5%<br />

3


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

> The studies performed in humans<br />

are highlighted using the following<br />

symbols :<br />

for the GENERAL POPULATION<br />

for CHILDREN<br />

for the ELDERLY<br />

<strong>In</strong> VITRO/ANIMALS<br />

studies are highlighted<br />

with the symbol :<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

1.1. TECHNOLOGY OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

Manufacturing process modifies L. rhamnosus original in vitro<br />

properties<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Production and manufacturing methods and the food carrier may influence the properties of probiotic<br />

strains, and have an impact on the outcome of clinical intervention studies. The aim of the present study<br />

was to establish whether the properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus may differ depending on the product<br />

and source of the strain.<br />

METHODS & MEASURES<br />

Fifteen different L. rhamnosus isolates, of which fourteen were labelled as L. rhamnosus GG, were<br />

isolated from specific probiotic products. The micro-organisms were phenotypically and genotypically<br />

characterised. Their adhesion properties were compared using the human intestinal mucus model, and<br />

the ability of the isolates to influence model pathogen adhesion to human colonic mucus was assessed.<br />

All L. rhamnosus isolates used were confirmed as members of the species L. rhamnosus.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Except the reference strain OL, all L. rhamnosus isolates showed randomly-amplified polymorphic DNA,<br />

enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles identical to<br />

that of L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103). All L. rhamnosus isolates showed similar tolerance to acid and<br />

were able to bind to human colonic mucus. However, pathogen exclusion by inhibition and competition<br />

varied significantly among the different L. rhamnosus isolates and pathogens tested.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The results suggest that different sources of the same probiotic strain may have significantly modified<br />

strain properties. This should be considered in in vivo studies on human subjects and also for quality<br />

control of probiotic products.<br />

Grzeskowiak L, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Gueimonde M. Manufacturing process influences properties of probiotic bacteria. Br J Nutr. 2010 Nov 9:1-8.<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

from Bruno Pot, <strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, France<br />

« <strong>In</strong> the past, technological properties were considered to be important selection criteria for probiotics,<br />

because strains need to be grown reproducibly, remain viable in high amounts for longer time periods and<br />

remain genetically stable. Besides helping to preserve a genetically stable culture, the preservation matrix was<br />

also shown to influence survival during GIT passage and to determine some aspects of probiotic functionality.<br />

<strong>In</strong>teractions with the host have, for example, been shown to depend on the growth phase of the culture<br />

administered (1) , and several papers have discussed the importance of metabolic compounds in probiotic<br />

effects (2,3) .<br />

The authors of this new paper also point out that technological conditions in production and preservation may<br />

have an impact on the expected outcome of human clinical studies. Although these findings seem logical, they<br />

are rarely considered in clinical trial setups. While numbers and mode of delivery are always defined, batch<br />

production history is rarely detailed.<br />

The authors compared thirteen Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG strains used in clinical intervention studies. All<br />

strains proved to be identical using RAPD, REP-PCR and PFGE typing, showed similar tolerance to acid<br />

and were able to adhere to human colonic mucus. <strong>In</strong> pathogen exclusion experiments, however, inhibition<br />

and competition of pathogens varied significantly. These indings suggested that different sources of the<br />

same probiotic strain may result in varying properties which may help to explain earlier differences in clinical<br />

outcomes, linked to different production schedules.<br />

Although this paper gives no explanation for the variations observed, one can easily expect that the results<br />

obtained may actually be dampened by the fact that all strains were regrown under identical laboratory<br />

conditions, eliminating some of the physiological differences before being tested.<br />

<strong>In</strong> any case, it seems a good idea to consider production history in studies on human subjects and also to<br />

define suitable quality control measures for probiotic products, as suggested by the authors. »<br />

1. Van Baarlen P, FJ. Troost, S van Hemert, C van der Meer, W M de Vos, P J de Groot, GJEJ Hooiveld, R-J M Brummer and M<br />

Kleerebezem. Differential NF-kB pathways inductionby Lactobacillus plantarum in the duodenum of healthy humans correlating with<br />

immune tolerance. 2009 roc Natl Acad Sci USA doi:10.1073/pnas.0809919106.<br />

2. Sokol Harry, Benedicte Pigneur, Laurie Watterlot, Omar Lakhdari, Luis G. Bermu-dez-Humaran, Jean-Jacques Gratadoux, Sebastien<br />

Blugeon, Chantal Bridonneau, Jean-Pierre Furet, Gerard Corthier, Corinne Grangette, Nadia Vasquez, Philippe Pochart, Germain<br />

Trugnan, Ginette Thomas, Herve M. Blottiere, Joël Doré, Philippe Marteau, Philippe Seksik, Philippe Langella. Faecalibacterium<br />

prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. 2008. Proc<br />

Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16731–16736.<br />

3. Heuvelin Elise, Lebreton Corinne, Grangette Corinne, Pot Bruno, Cerf-Bensussan Nadine, Heyman Martine.<br />

Mechanisms involved in alleviation of inflammation by Bifidobacterium breve soluble factors (2009). PlosOne 4(4), e5184.<br />

4


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGIAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />

2.1. MUCOSA RESPONSE TO <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> (TROPHYCITY & STRUCTURE)<br />

<strong>In</strong>testinal mucosa responses to probiotics differ from one strain to<br />

another: results of transcriptome analysis<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />

Probiotic bacteria are proposed to deliver health benefits to the consumer by modulation of intestinal<br />

function through largely unknown molecular mechanisms. The aim of this study is to explore in vivo<br />

mucosal responses of healthy adults to probiotics via analyses of duodenal transcriptomes.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

Seven healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (aged 24±4 years), with no history of gastrointestinal symptoms<br />

and free of any form of medication, were investigated on four separate occasions: 3 bacterial interventions<br />

each with one of the 3 strains (Lactobacillus acidophilus Lafti-L10, L. casei CRL-431, and L. rhamnosus<br />

GG) and one placebo. <strong>In</strong>terventions were separated by a 2 week wash-out period. Volunteers fasted<br />

overnight and were administered a maltodextrin solution at the start of the intervention, after which<br />

they were provided every 30 min with a preparation containing reconstituted freeze-dried bacteria<br />

resuspended in maltodextrin solution or a preparation only containing the maltodextrin solution (placebo)<br />

for a period of 6 h. Tissue samples were obtained from the horizontal part of the duodenum. Total RNA<br />

extracted from these biopsies was hybridized to Affymetrix whole genome expression arrays.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Analysis of the transcriptome of duodenal biopsies.<br />

RESULTS<br />

<strong>In</strong> the mucosa of the proximal small intestine of healthy volunteers, each strain of the probiotics induced<br />

differential gene-regulatory networks and pathways in the human mucosa. Comparison of these specific<br />

expression profiles with response profiles associated with pharmaceutical and other biologically-active<br />

compounds showed that the responses to probiotic strains correlated significantly with responses to<br />

compounds active in the regulation of immune responses, the cell cycle, blood pressure, and water and<br />

ion homeostasis. Mucosal responses to L. acidophilus mainly involve regulation of immune response,<br />

hormonal regulation of tissue growth and development, and ion homeostasis, those for L. casei involve<br />

proliferation, Th1/Th2 balance, and hormonal regulation of blood pressure and those for L. rhamnosus<br />

involve wound healing, IFN response, and ion homeostasis. Transcriptomes clustered per person, not<br />

per intervention, show that person-to-person variation in gene expression was the largest determinant<br />

of differences between transcriptomes. Nevertheless, the consumption of different probiotic lactobacilli<br />

led to markedly different expression profiles in vivo in human mucosa.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

This study elucidates how the intestinal mucosa of healthy humans perceives different probiotics and<br />

anticipates that responsiveness to probiotics is not only determined by the characteristics of the bacterial<br />

strain consumed but also by genetic background, resident microbiota, diet, and lifestyle. This study<br />

could, therefore, be among the first steps to investigate the interplay between microbiota, probiotic, or<br />

other nutritional supplements and human genetics towards personalized nutrition.<br />

van Baarlen P, Troost F, van der Meer C, Hooiveld G, Boekschoten M, Brummer RJ, Kleerebezem M. Microbes and Health Sackler Colloquium:<br />

Human mucosal in vivo transcriptome responses to three lactobacilli indicate how probiotics may modulate human cellular pathways.<br />

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7.<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

from James Versalovic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston US<br />

« This study (van Baarlen et al.) described the differential effects of three different Lactobacillus species on cell<br />

signaling pathways in the duodenum of healthy adults. The study included three commonly used commercial<br />

Lactobacillus strains, and the study was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study<br />

(7 human adults with 4 interventions each). Each individual consumed Lactobacillus acidophilus (5,2 x 10 10<br />

organisms), Lactobacillus casei (3.2 x 10 10 organisms), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (1.68 x 10 10 organisms), or<br />

a control maltodextrin solution during a 6-hour period prior to collection of total human RNA from duodenal<br />

biopsies. Consumption of L. acidophilus induced the expression of immune response genes, genes involved<br />

in hormonal regulation of tissue growth and development, and genes involved in water and ion homeostasis.<br />

Consumption of L. casei resulted in enhanced expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell proliferation,<br />

balance of Th1/Th2 immune responses, metabolism, and hormonal activity involved in blood pressure<br />

regulation. Consumption of L. rhamnosus resulted in differential gene expression in pathways involved in<br />

wound repair and healing, angiogenesis, interferon responses, calcium signaling, and ion homeostasis. This<br />

ground-breaking study describes the detailed differences of short-term (acute) effects by probiotics on human<br />

signaling pathways (administration time of 6 hours with 2-week long wash-out periods). The results point the<br />

way towards targeted use of probiotics for specific applications in human nutrition and medicine. »<br />

5


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 2. PHYSIOLOGICAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

2.2. EFFECTS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> ON MICROBIOTA<br />

Probiotic and nutrient intakes generate specific metabolite<br />

procuction in mice<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

The complex association of gut flora collectively extends the processing of undigested food to the benefit<br />

of the host through metabolic capacities not encoded in mammalian genomes. At present, metabolic<br />

insights into gut microbiota metabolism remain limited due to the inaccessibility of the intestinal habitat<br />

and gut microbiota complexity. Over the past few decades, the practice of metabonomics has evolved<br />

from diagnosis and identification of biomarkers for a clinical condition towards deciphering the metabolic<br />

predisposition and responses to different individual dietary modulations. The present work monitored<br />

faecal metabolic changes during microbial establishment collected from various groups of mice<br />

supplemented with probiotics or nutrients.<br />

METHODS & MEASURES<br />

1 H-NMR-based metabolic profiling of mouse feces was carried out over time in different microbiome<br />

mouse models, including conventional (n=9), conventionalized (n=10), and “humanized” gnotobiotic<br />

mice inoculated with a model of human baby microbiota (HBM, n=17). HBM mice were supplemented<br />

with Lactobacillus paracasei with (n=10) and without (n=7) prebiotics. Animals not supplemented with<br />

prebiotics received a diet enriched in glucose and lactose as placebo.<br />

RESULTS<br />

<strong>In</strong> conventionalized animals, microbial populations and activities converged in terms of multivariate<br />

mapping toward conventional mice. Both groups decreased bacterial processing of dietary proteins<br />

when switching to a diet enriched in glucose and lactose, as described with low levels of 5-aminovalerate,<br />

acetate, and propionate and high levels of lysine and arginine. The HBM model differs from conventional<br />

and conventionalized microbiota in terms of type, proportion, and metabolic activity of gut bacteria (lower<br />

short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), lactate, 5-aminovalerate, and oligosaccharides, higher bile acids and<br />

choline). The probiotic supplementation of HBM mice was associated with a specific amino acid pattern<br />

that can be linked to L. paracasei proteolytic activities. The combination of L. paracasei with galactosyloligosaccharide<br />

prebiotics was related to the enhanced growth of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, and a<br />

specific metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and SCFAs.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The present study describes how the assessment of metabolic changes in feces may provide information<br />

for studying nutrient-microbiota relationships in different microbiome mouse models.<br />

Martin FP, Sprenger N, Montoliu I, Rezzi S, Kochhar S, Nicholson JK. Dietary modulation of gut functional ecology studied by faecal metabonomics.<br />

J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5284-95.<br />

6


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

3.1. INFECTIONS (GI, RESPIRATORY INCL. FLU, GENITO-URINARY, OTHER)<br />

<strong>In</strong>take of probiotics seems to prevent NEC in preterm infants<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

The objective was to assess whether the combined use of probiotics may prevent the occurrence of<br />

necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stage ≥2, by Bell’s criteria, in preterm infants.<br />

DESIGN<br />

A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

The trial was conducted in 231 preterm infants weighing from 750 to 1499 g at birth. The intervention group<br />

was composed of 119 infants who received human milk with probiotic supplementation (Bifidobacterium<br />

breve and Lactobacillus casei) and a control group of 112 infants who received human milk containing no<br />

probiotics. The intervention was initiated on the second day of life of all infants and was maintained until<br />

the 30th day of life, a diagnosis of NEC, discharge from the hospital, or death, whichever occurred first.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

The primary outcome was the occurrence of NEC stage ≥2 as defined by Bell’s modified criteria.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Four confirmed cases of NEC (Bell’s stage ≥2) were observed in the control group and none in the<br />

probiotic group. Although no differences were observed between the groups in relation to the beginning<br />

of enteral feeding and advancements for enteral feeding volume, infants in the probiotics group achieved<br />

full enteral feeding faster than did those in the control group (P=0.02). The survival curve, determined<br />

with the Kaplan-Meier method for evaluating the complete transition time from orogastric feeding tube<br />

to breastfeeding, showed a shorter time in the probiotics group (P=0.03).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Oral supplementation of B. breve and L. casei reduced the occurrence of NEC (Bell’s stage ≥2). As this<br />

study considers the transition time from orogastric tube feeding to breastfeeding as a further indicator of<br />

the maturation of digestive tract motor function in newborns, it was concluded that an improvement in<br />

intestinal motility might have contributed to this result.<br />

Braga TD, da Silva GA, de Lira PI, Carvalho Lima M. Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei oral supplementation on necrotizing<br />

enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

from Hania Szajewska, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland<br />

« Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most serious, life-threatening gastrointestinal diseases, with<br />

a high mortality rate. The significance of the problem of NEC justifies any attempt to prevent this condition.<br />

A recent, updated meta-analysis by Deshpande et al. (1) (search date: March 2009) identified 11 randomized<br />

controlled trials (RCTs)(n=2176) and concluded that there are significant benefits of probiotic supplementation<br />

in reducing the risk of NEC (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.55) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29 to<br />

0.62) in preterm neonates. The authors also concluded that ‘probiotics should be now offered as a routine<br />

(2) (3)<br />

therapy for preterm infants’. This opinion is not universally shared, including by some scientific societies.<br />

One of the reservations is that it is still not clear which products should be administered, at what dosage, and<br />

for how long. <strong>In</strong> this respect, the study by Braga et al. that evaluated probiotics not yet investigated for the<br />

prevention of NEC is of interest. <strong>In</strong> line with previous studies, the risk of NEC was significantly lower in the<br />

probiotic group (although this was of borderline statistical significance). <strong>In</strong> contrast to many earlier studies, the<br />

risk of death did not differ significantly between the probiotic and control groups.<br />

Demonstrating the efficacy of the combination of B. breve & L. casei given to preterm infants for the prevention<br />

of NEC through a well-conducted RCT would be a praiseworthy goal. Such evidence would be appreciated<br />

in settings where this probiotic combination is available. Unfortunately, there is one major limitation to the<br />

interpretation of this study. The calculated sample size was 564 infants. However, the study was interrupted by<br />

the External Study Committee one year after the intervention began when they observed ‘a major benefit in one<br />

of the groups’. At this time, there were 231 participants. <strong>In</strong> my opinion, the results demonstrating prevention<br />

of NEC were not yet so striking as to interrupt the study. Similar views were expressed by the authors of the<br />

accompanying editorial. (4) This criticism does not invalidate the study; it merely indicates that, as so often is<br />

the case, further studies are needed before the effectiveness of the combination of B. breve & L. casei given to<br />

preterm infants for the prevention of NEC is established. »<br />

1. Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S, Bulsara M. Updated meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm<br />

neonates. Pediatrics 2010;125:921-30.<br />

2. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition: Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, De Curtis M, Darmaun D, Decsi T, Domellöf M, Embleton<br />

ND, Fusch C, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Goulet O, Kalhan SC, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Lapillonne A, Mihatsch W, Moreno L, Neu J,<br />

Poindexter B, Puntis J, Putet G, Rigo J, Riskin A, Salle B, Sauer P, Shamir R, Szajewska H,Thureen P, Turck D, van Goudoever JB, Ziegler<br />

EE; ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric<br />

Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;50:85-91.<br />

3. Thomas DW, Greer FR; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition; American Academy of Pediatrics<br />

Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and prebiotics in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2010;126:1217-31.<br />

4. Rushing J, Neu J. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for pregnant women and preterm neonates. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:3-4.<br />

7


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

An efficacious bifidobacterium against respiratory infections in infants<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

The impact of the administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (BB-12) on the risk of<br />

acute infectious diseases was studied in healthy infants.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

109 infants (1 month old) were assigned to a probiotics group receiving a tablet containing BB-12 (n=55)<br />

or to a control group receiving a control tablet (n=54). Tablets were administered from the age of 1-2<br />

months to 8 months with a slow-release dummy or a spoon. Breastfeeding habits, dummy use, dietary<br />

habits, medication and all signs and symptoms of acute infections were registered. At the age of 8<br />

months, faecal samples were collected for BB-12 determination.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

The primary outcome measures were the cumulative reported incidence of acute respiratory infections<br />

and doctor-diagnosed acute otitis media occurring before the age of 8 months. Successful intestinal<br />

passage of BB-12 was chosen as the secondary outcome measure.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, as was the duration of exclusive breastfeeding.<br />

BB-12 was recovered in the faeces of 62% of the infants receiving the BB-12 tablets. The daily duration of<br />

dummy sucking was not associated with the occurrence of acute otitis media. No significant differences<br />

between the groups were observed in reported gastrointestinal symptoms, otitis media or use of<br />

antibiotics. However, the infants receiving BB-12 were reported to have experienced fewer respiratory<br />

infections (65 vs. 94 %; RR 0·69; 95% CI 0·53, 0·89; P=0.014) than the control infants.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Controlled administration of B. lactis BB-12 in early childhood may reduce respiratory infections. The<br />

children participating in the present study were remarkably healthy, apart from respiratory-infections.<br />

Thus, for the other infectious and non-infectious diseases, the number of infants should have been<br />

higher to be able to detect any differences between the groups. With regard to these diseases, the<br />

present study did not even detect a trend for differences between the groups.<br />

Taipale T, Pienihäkkinen K, Isolauri E, Larsen C, Brockmann E, Alanen P, Jokela J, Söderling E. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in<br />

reducing the risk of infections in infancy. Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep 24:1-7.<br />

8


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Symbiotic in preventing morbidities in young children<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

This study reports a large randomized controlled trial, evaluating effect of providing combination of<br />

prebiotic and probiotic in milk for one year on both gut and non-gut related illnesses among children in<br />

a community based setting in <strong>In</strong>dia.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

Children 1-3 years of age were randomly allocated to receive either control milk (n=312) or the same<br />

milk fortified with prebiotic oligosaccharide and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 (n=312). The intervention<br />

was carried out for 1 year. Biweekly household surveillance was conducted to gather information on<br />

compliance and morbidity.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Primary outcomes were not explicitly prespecified in the protocol; the intent was to evaluate impact on<br />

common childhood illnesses including diarrhoea, pneumonia, and febrile illness. Diarrhoea was defined<br />

as ≥3 loose or watery stools in 24 hours, and diarrhoeal episodes were considered recovered on first day<br />

of 3 diarrhoea free days.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhoea (6% reduction, 95% CI: -1 to 12%;<br />

P=0.08). <strong>In</strong>cidence of dysentery episodes was reduced by 21% (95% CI: 0 to 38%; P=0.05). <strong>In</strong>cidence<br />

of pneumonia was reduced by 24% (95% CI: 0 to 42%; P=0.05) and severe acute lower respiratory<br />

infection by 35% (95% CI: 0 to 58%; P=0.05). Compared to control group, children in probiotic/prebiotic<br />

group had 16% (95% CI: 5 to 26%, P=0.004) and 5% (95% CI: 0 to 10%; P=0.05) reduction in days with<br />

severe illness and high fever respectively.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

This trial shows that consumption of a symbiotic resulted in a significant reduction of dysentery,<br />

respiratory morbidity and febrile illness in young children and in a lack of effect against diarrhoea. This<br />

finding suggests that fortification with prebiotic and probiotic together may provide one of the potential<br />

interventions to reduce the burden of common childhood morbidities.<br />

Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta A, Verma P, Menon VP, Black RE. Prebiotic and probiotic fortified milk in prevention<br />

of morbidities among children: community-based, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 13;5(8):e12164.<br />

9


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

3.2. ALLERGY & ATOPY<br />

<strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli protects children from developing allergies:<br />

a species-dependent effect<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

Diminished exposure to harmless micro-organisms, such as lactobacilli, has been suggested to play<br />

a role in the increased prevalence of allergic disorders in Westernized communities. The development<br />

of allergies depends on both environmental factors and genetic variations, including polymorphisms<br />

in genes encoding pattern recognition receptors. The present study examines the effects of both<br />

colonization with specific Lactobacillus species and genetic variations in DC-SIGN, a pattern recognition<br />

receptor on dendritic cells that recognizes lactobacilli, on the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) and<br />

sensitization in infancy.<br />

DESIGN<br />

The participants of this study are a subcohort of the KOALA Birth Cohort Study and they are all children<br />

for whom both a faecal sample, at age 1 month, and a buccal swab sample were available. The KOALA<br />

Birth Cohort Study is a prospective cohort in the Netherlands,described in detail by Kummeling et al.<br />

(2005).<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

Faecal samples of 681 one-month-old infants were collected and quantitatively screened for five<br />

Lactobacillus species: L. casei, L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri. Eleven haplotypetagging<br />

polymorphisms in the DC-SIGN gene were genotyped in these children. <strong>In</strong>formation on AD was<br />

available for all 506 children, whereas information on atopic sensitization was available for 492 children.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Faecal microbiota composition, clinical diagnosis of AD and sensitization (specific IgE) at 2 years of age.<br />

RESULTS<br />

L. rhamnosus (31.5%), L. paracasei (31.3%) and L. acidophilus (14.4%) were frequently detected in<br />

the faecal samples of one-month-old infants, whereas L. casei (2.5%) and L. reuteri (1%) were rare.<br />

Colonization with L. paracasei decreased the risk of AD significantly (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.32- 0.99,<br />

P=0.04), whereas effects of L. acidophilus were of borderline statistical significance (0.46, 0.20-1.04,<br />

P=0.06). Two DC-SIGN polymorphisms, rs11465413 and rs8112555, were statistically significantly<br />

associated with atopic sensitization.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

These results support the ‘‘old friends’’ hypothesis suggesting that certain health-beneficial microorganisms<br />

protect the host from developing allergies and that these protective effects are speciesdependent.<br />

Firm conclusions on the potential interaction between Lactobacillus colonization and genetic<br />

variations in DC-SIGN in association with the development of allergic disorders cannot be drawn.<br />

Penders J, Thijs C, Mommers M, Stobberingh EE, Dompeling E, Reijmerink NE, van den Brandt PA, Kerkhof M, Koppelman GH, Postma<br />

DS. <strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli and the DC-SIGN gene for their recognition by dendritic cells play a role in the aetiology of allergic manifestations.<br />

Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3298-305.<br />

Kummeling I., Thijs C., Penders J., Snijders B. E., Stelma F., Reimerink J., Koopmans M., Dagnelie PC., Huber M. & other authors (2005). Etiology<br />

of atopy in infancy: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 16, 679–684.<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

from Bruno Pot, <strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, France<br />

«This study examined the effect of five common intestinal Lactobacillus species (of 17 species that can be<br />

present in the human GIT) in early infancy and looked into genetic variations in DC-SIGN, both in association<br />

with development of atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic sensitization in early childhood, based on a clinical<br />

diagnosis of AD and sensitization (specifi IgE) at the age of 2. From the KOALA Birth Cohort Study, faecal<br />

samples from 681 one-month-old infants were quantitatively screened for Lactobacillus casei, L. paracasei,<br />

L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri. Contrary to what is stated in the discussion section, results show<br />

that colonization with L. paracasei significantly decreased the risk of AD (odds ratio 0.57, p= 0.04), whereas<br />

effects of L. acidophilus were of borderline statistical significance (0.46, p=0.06).<br />

The paper suggested that protective effects are species-dependent during childhood, but when considering<br />

probiotic applications, one is tempted to go even further and consider strain specificity rather than species<br />

specificity. Strain specificity could explain why, contrary to what is suggested in the paper, there are<br />

L. rhamnosus strains that do seem to have an effect on AD while L. acidophilus strain LAVRI-A1 e.g. did not<br />

show any effect in clinical trials.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the same population, two recognition receptor DC-SIGN SNPs, rs11465413 and rs8112555, were found to<br />

be significantly associated with atopic sensitization.<br />

Given the increased knowledge on mechanisms of interaction between the microbiota and the host, and the<br />

importance of these interactions at an early age when the immune system is maturing, it would be extremely<br />

interesting to examine possible associations between host genetics and microbiota composition in other<br />

populations in the future. »<br />

10


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

<strong>In</strong> at risk children, LGG failed to prevent allergic manifestations<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Probiotics</strong> are perceived to exert beneficial effects in the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases.<br />

However the data from studies as to an impact on allergic sensitization and asthma is still conflicting.<br />

This trial examined the impact of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on atopic dermatitis,<br />

asthma, and allergic sensitization in at risk children.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

131 children (6-24 months old) with at least two wheezing episodes and a first-degree family history of<br />

atopic disease were assigned to 6 months of LGG or placebo. Atopic dermatitis and asthma-related<br />

events (e.g. need of inhalation, symptom-free days) were documented throughout the intervention and<br />

6-month follow-up. The laboratory measures taken were: IgE, specific IgE, eosinophils, eosinophilic<br />

cationic protein, and TGF-b before, at the end of intervention, and after 6 months of follow-up.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Primary outcome measures were the SCORAD and asthma-related clinical events, including an asthma<br />

symptom score defined by coughing, wheezing, and need of intervention. Secondary measures were<br />

allergic sensitization to common dietary and respiratory allergens.<br />

RESULTS<br />

There were no significant differences as to atopic dermatitis or asthma-related events. <strong>In</strong> a subgroup with<br />

antecedent allergic sensitizations, asthmatic complaints were even slightly worse. Fewer sensitizations<br />

towards aeroallergens were seen after 6 months of LGG (P=0.027) and after 6 months of follow-up<br />

(P=0.03). Supplementation was well-tolerated and no severe adverse events occurred.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

<strong>In</strong> young children with recurrent wheezing and an atopic family history, oral L. rhamnosus GG had no<br />

clinical effect on atopic dermatitis or asthma-related events, and only mild effects on allergic sensitization.<br />

This effect persisted 6 months after the cessation of the supplementation.<br />

Rose MA, Stieglitz F, Köksal A, Schubert R, Schulze J, Zielen S. Efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus GG on allergic sensitization and asthma in<br />

infants at risk. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010 Sep;40(9):1398-405.<br />

11


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3.3. IBS & FUNCTIONAL GI DISORDERS<br />

Multispecies probiotic intervention alleviates bacterial alterations<br />

in IBS patients<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

The current hypothesis is that probiotics can alleviate the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS),<br />

possibly by stabilizing the intestinal microbiota. The aim of this work was to determine whether IBSassociated<br />

bacterial alterations were reduced during multispecies probiotic intervention.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

42 IBS patients (mean age 46 yrs; 29 females and 13 males) received daily (during 6 monts) either a<br />

probiotic capsule consisting of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), L. rhamnosus Lc705 (DSM<br />

7061), Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS (DSM 7067) and Bifidobacterium breve Bb99<br />

(DSM 13692) or a placebo capsule. Faecal samples were analysed using quantitative real-time polymerase<br />

chain reaction (qPCR). Eight bacterial targets within the gastrointestinal microbiota with a putative IBS<br />

association were measured (Bacteroides intestinalis-like, Clostridium cocleatum 88%, Clostridium<br />

thermosuccinogenes, Collinsella aerofaciens-like, Coprococcus eutactus-like, Ruminococcus torques<br />

91%, R. torques 93% and R. torques 94%)<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Analysis of faecal microbiota.<br />

RESULTS<br />

A phylotype with 94% similarity to R. torques remained abundant in the placebo group, but was decreased<br />

in the probiotic group during the intervention (P=0.02 at 6 months). <strong>In</strong> addition, the clostridial phylotype,<br />

C. thermosuccinogenes 85%, remained elevated during the intervention (P=0.00 and P=0.02 at 3 and 6<br />

months, respectively). The bacterial alterations detected were in line with previously discovered alleviation<br />

of symptoms.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The intervention has previously been shown to successfully alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms of IBS.<br />

The probiotic supplement was now shown to exert specific alterations in the IBS-associated microbiota<br />

towards the bacterial 16S rDNA phylotype quantities described previously for subjects free of IBS. These<br />

changes may have value as non-invasive biomarkers in probiotic intervention studies.<br />

Lyra A, Krogius-Kurikka L, Nikkilä J, Malinen E, Kajander K, Kurikka K, Korpela R, Palva A. Effect of a multispecies probiotic supplement on<br />

quantity of irritable bowel syndrome-related intestinal microbial phylotypes. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 19;10:110.<br />

12


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

L. rhamnosus GG relieves symptoms of abdominal pain in IBS<br />

children<br />

OBJECTIVES / BACKGROUND<br />

Recurrent abdominal pain is primarily a functional disorder that affects 10% to 15% of school-aged<br />

children and is one of the most common reasons for referral to a pediatric gastroenterologist. Data on<br />

the possible use of probiotics in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have hypothetisized their<br />

possible efficacy. The aim of the present study is to determine whether Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG<br />

(LGG) relieves symptoms in children with recurrent abdominal pain.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

A total of 141 children (5-14 years) with IBS or functional pain were enrolled in 9 primary care sites.<br />

Children received LGG or a placebo for 8 weeks and entered follow-up for 8 weeks. At the start and at<br />

the end of the trial, children underwent a double-sugar intestinal permeability test.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

The primary outcome was overall pain at the end of the intervention period.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Compared with baseline, LGG, but not placebo, caused a significant reduction in both the frequency<br />

(P


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3.4. IBD AND OTHER INFLAMMATORY DISEASES<br />

A mechanism explaining the preventive effect of probiotics against colitis<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

<strong>In</strong>testinal health requires the coexistence of the host’s own cells with the gut microbiota, and dysregulated<br />

host-microbial interactions can result in intestinal inflammation. This study used a murine model of colitis to<br />

gain insight into how a defined probiotic-containing food reduces intestinal inflammation, and focused on the<br />

microbiota and its response to host consumption of specific probiotics.<br />

METHODS & MEASURES<br />

T-bet −/− Rag2 −/− mice consumed a fermented milk product (BFMP) containing Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173<br />

010, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Lactococcus lactis or a nonfermented milk<br />

product (MP) starting at 4 wk of age for 4 wk.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The BFMP reduced colitis scores in the majority of mice both at early stages and at late stages of disease when<br />

intestinal inflammation was more severe. Colitis scores in the live BFMP were lower than those of the irradiated<br />

product (P=0.03).<br />

BFMP consumption decreased faecal levels of Enterobacteriaceae sevenfold (P=0.0132) compared to MP.<br />

The cecal pH of T-bet −/− Rag2 −/− mice was markedly lower after BFMP consumption (P


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Identification of a set of microbial species specific to Crohn’s<br />

disease condition<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a multifactorial disease of the human digestive tract whose etiology is still unclear.<br />

Several studies suggest that gastrointestinal microbes play a part in this pathogenesis and hypothesized<br />

that intestinal dysbiosis may lead to this condition. The aim of this study was to provide new insights into<br />

CD-associated dysbiosis by combining molecular approaches.<br />

METHOD & MEASURES<br />

Faecal samples were collected from 16 healthy individuals and 16 CD patients. The DNA extracted<br />

from these samples was subjected to two different methods of microbiome analysis. Specific bacterial<br />

groups were quantified by RT-PCR methods using primers designed using a high-throughput in-house<br />

bioinformatics pipeline. The same DNA extracts were also used to produce fluorescently-labelled cRNA<br />

amplicons to interrogate a custom-designed phylogenetic microarray for intestinal bacteria.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Even though the intersubject variability was high, differences in the faecal microbiomes of healthy and<br />

CD patients were detected. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Escherichia coli were more represented in<br />

healthy and ileal CD patients, respectively. Additionally, probes specific for Ruminococcus bromii,<br />

Oscillibacter valericigenes, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Eubacterium rectale produced stronger<br />

hybridization signals with the DNA samples from healthy subjects. Conversely, species overrepresented<br />

in CD patients were E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and species from the Proteobacteria not normally<br />

found in the healthy human GI tract. Furthermore, ‘‘healthy specific’’ molecular species or operational<br />

taxonomic units that are not closely-related to any known species (Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum,<br />

and Oscillospora species) were detected, indicating that the phylogenetic dysbiosis is broader than at<br />

strain or species level.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

These two techniques of microbiome analysis provided a statistically-robust new picture of the dysbiosis<br />

in faecal microbiota from ileal CD patients. Specifically, a set of six species discriminant for CD was<br />

determined, which provides a preliminary diagnostic tool.<br />

Mondot S, Kang S, Furet JP, Aguirre de Carcer D, McSweeney C, Morrison M, Marteau P, Doré J, Leclerc M. Highlighting new phylogenetic<br />

specificities of Crohn’s disease microbiota. <strong>In</strong>flamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Aug 18.<br />

15


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

L. reuteri consumption improves colic symptoms in breastfed<br />

newborns<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>In</strong>fantile colic, defined as paroxysmal, excessive, and inconsolable crying without an identifiable cause<br />

in an otherwise healthy newborn infant, is common in the first 3 months of life. The role of an aberrant<br />

intestinal microflora has recently been reproposed to affect gut motor function and gas production that<br />

lead to colicky behaviour. This work aimed to test the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri on infantile colic<br />

and to evaluate its relationship with gut microbiota.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

Fifty exclusively breastfed colicky infants (aged 2-16 weeks, 29 boys and 21 girls), diagnosed according<br />

to modified Wessel’s criteria, were randomly assigned to receive either L. reuteri DSM 17 938 (108 CFU)<br />

or a placebo daily for 21 days. Parental questionnaires monitored daily crying time and adverse effects.<br />

Stool samples were collected for microbiologic analysis.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

Primary outcome was defined as a reduction of average crying time to


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3.5. NUTRITION: OBESITY, CHOLESTEROL, ETC.<br />

<strong>Probiotics</strong> against central adiposity in pregnant women<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGOUND<br />

The objective of this trial was to establish whether probiotic supplemented dietary counselling influences<br />

maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

At the first trimester of pregnancy, 256 women were randomly assigned to receive nutrition counselling to<br />

modify dietary intake according to current recommendations or as controls. Dietary intervention groups<br />

were further randomized to receive Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) and Bifidobacterium<br />

lactis (diet/probiotics) or placebo (diet/placebo) capsules, whilst the controls received placebo (control/<br />

placebo). The intervention lasted until the end of exclusive breastfeeding for up to six months.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

The primary outcome measures were mothers’ anthropometric measurements, most importantly BMI<br />

and adiposity defined as a waist circumference of 80 cm or more, and the proportion of body fat over<br />

the 12-month postpartum period. Secondary outcomes were dietary intakes of foods and nutrients and<br />

a healthy eating index during the postpartum period.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The risk of central adiposity was lowered in women in the diet/probiotics group compared with the<br />

control/placebo group (OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.11-0.85, P=0.023 adjusted for baseline BMI), whilst the<br />

diet/placebo group did not differ from the controls (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38-2.68, P=0.994) at 6 months<br />

postpartum. The number needed to treat with diet/ probiotics to prevent one woman from developing a<br />

waist circumference ≥80 cm was 4. Healthy eating pattern at 12 months postpartum (P=0.001) and BMI<br />

prior to pregnancy (P


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Control of mothers’ diet during pregnancy benefits metabolic<br />

health of infants<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />

This trial aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal diet and intensive dietary counselling during pregnancy<br />

and breastfeeding on the infant’s metabolic status.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

At the first trimester of pregnancy, 256 women were randomized into a control/placebo group and two<br />

dietary counselling (diet/probiotics and diet/placebo). The counselling, with double-blind randomization<br />

with probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis) or placebo, targeted excessive<br />

saturated fat and low fibre consumption. Maternal diet was evaluated repeatedly during pregnancy and<br />

postpartum by means of 3-day food diaries. Metabolic markers, serum 32-33 split and intact proinsulin,<br />

leptin/adiponectin ratio, skinfold thickness and waist circumference were measured of 194 healthy infants<br />

at the age of 6 months, and the high levels were taken to mirror adverse metabolic status.<br />

MAIN OUTCOME<br />

The serum 32-33 split and intact proinsulin concentrations were primary outcome variables, leptin and<br />

adiponectin concentrations, waist circumference and supra-iliac skinfold were secondary outcome<br />

variables. Any 32-33 split and intact proinsulin values above the 85 th percentile of the concentrations (7.9<br />

and 6.64 pmol/l, respectively) were considered high values.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The proportion of infants with a high 32-33 split proinsulin was significantly lower in dietary counselling<br />

groups with probiotics (n=6/62, 9.7%) or placebo (n=7/69, 10.1%) compared with the control/placebo<br />

group (n=17/63, 27.0%). The high split proinsulin was associated with larger skinfold thickness, waist<br />

circumference and higher leptin/adiponectin ratios in the infants (P


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

Mothers’ weight or weight gain during pregnancy impacts the<br />

intestinal flora composition of the infants<br />

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND<br />

It has been reported that deviations in gut microbiota composition may predispose to obesity, and<br />

specific groups of commensal gut bacteria may harvest energy from food more efficiently than others.<br />

Alterations in microbiota compositions of mothers may be transferred to infants and lead to an increased<br />

risk of overweight. The aim of this study is to analyze the faecal microbiota composition of infants of<br />

overweight and normal-weight mothers and assess the relations of weight and excessive weight gain of<br />

mothers during pregnancy on the microbiota of infants.<br />

DESIGN<br />

Obervational study.<br />

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS<br />

Mothers (n=16) whose pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) was ≥25 were selected with their infants<br />

from a prospective follow-up study of 256 women. Women with a BMI


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

CHARACTERISATION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

STRAIN IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION<br />

Büchl NR, Hutzler M, Mietke-Hofmann H, Wenning M, Scherer S.<br />

Differentiation of probiotic and environmental Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />

strains in animal feed. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep;109(3):783-91. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04705.x.<br />

Cai Y, Yang J, Pang H, Kitahara M. Lactococcus fujiensis sp nov., a<br />

lactic acid bacterium isolated from vegetable. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol.<br />

2010 Jul 30.<br />

Chen YS, Miyashita M, Suzuki K, Sato H, Hsu JS, Yanagida F.<br />

Lactobacillus pobuzihii sp. nov., isolated from pobuzihi (fermented<br />

cummingcordia). <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Aug;60(Pt 8):1914-7.<br />

De Bruyne K, Camu N, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P. Weissella fabaria sp.<br />

nov., from a Ghanaian cocoa fermentation. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol.<br />

2010 Sep;60(Pt 9):1999-2005.<br />

Di Cagno R, Minervini G, Sgarbi E, Lazzi C, Bernini V, Neviani E, Gobbetti<br />

M. Comparison of phenotypic (Biolog System) and genotypic (random<br />

amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction, RAPD-PCR,<br />

and amplified fragment length polymorphism, AFLP) methods for<br />

typing Lactobacillus plantarum isolates from raw vegetables and fruits.<br />

<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):246-53.<br />

Ehrmann MA, Preissler P, Danne M, Vogel RF. Lactobacillus<br />

paucivorans sp. nov., isolated from a brewery environment. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst<br />

Evol Microbiol. 2010 Oct;60(Pt 10):2353-7.<br />

Fujimoto J, Tanigawa K, Kudo Y, Makino H, Watanabe K.<br />

Identification and quantification of viable Bifidobacterium breve<br />

strain Yakult in human faeces by using strain-specific primers<br />

and propidium monoazide. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep 27. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04873.x.<br />

Gilad O, Jacobsen S, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Pedersen MB, Garrigues<br />

C, Svensson B. Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis<br />

of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 grown on xylooligosaccharides<br />

and a model of their utilization. Appl Environ<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7285-91.<br />

Huang CH, Lee FL. The dnaK gene as a molecular marker for the<br />

classification and discrimination of the Lactobacillus casei group.<br />

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010 Aug 11.<br />

Killer J, Kopecný J, Mrázek J, Havlík J, Koppová I, Benada O, Rada<br />

V, Kofrocová O. Bombiscardovia coagulans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new<br />

member of the family Bifidobacteriaceae isolated from the digestive<br />

tract of bumblebees. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 13.<br />

Lai D, Yang X, Wu G, Liu Y, Nardini C. <strong>In</strong>ference of Gene Networks -<br />

application to Bifidobacterium. Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 12.<br />

Markiewicz LH, Biedrzycka E, Wasilewska E, Bielecka M. Rapid<br />

molecular identification and characteristics of Lactobacillus strains.<br />

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Sep;55(5):481-8.<br />

Marques AP, Zé-Zé L, San-Romão MV, Tenreiro R. A novel molecular<br />

method for identification of Oenococcus oeni and its specific detection<br />

in wine. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):251-5.<br />

Samelis J, Bleicher A, Delbès-Paus C, Kakouri A, Neuhaus K, Montel<br />

MC. FTIR-based polyphasic identification of lactic acid bacteria<br />

isolated from traditional Greek Graviera cheese. Food Microbiol. 2011<br />

Feb;28(1):76-83.<br />

Sarmiento-Rubiano LA, Berger B, Moine D, Zúñiga M, Pérez-Martínez<br />

G, Yebra MJ. Characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species closely<br />

related to Lactobacillus johnsonii using a combination of molecular<br />

and comparative genomics methods. BMC Genomics. 2010 Sep<br />

17;11:504.<br />

Sato H, Teramoto K, Ishii Y, Watanabe K, Benno Y. Ribosomal protein<br />

profiling by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight<br />

mass spectrometry for phylogenety-based subspecies resolution of<br />

Bifidobacterium longum. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep 7.<br />

Wang CY, Lin PR, Ng CC, Shyu YT. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus<br />

strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese<br />

pickled cabbage. Anaerobe. 2010 Oct 15.<br />

STRAIN METABOLISM AND PHYSIOLOGY<br />

Arai T, Kino K. New L-amino Acid ligases catalyzing oligopeptide<br />

synthesis from various microorganisms. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem.<br />

2010 Aug 23;74(8):1572-7.<br />

Candela M, Fiori J, Dipalo S, Brigidi P. Development of a highperformance<br />

affinity chromatography-based method to study the<br />

biological interaction between whole micro-organisms and target<br />

proteins. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 6. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-<br />

765X.2010.02953.x.<br />

Carvalheiro F, Moniz P, Duarte LC, Esteves MP, Gírio FM. Mannitol<br />

production by lactic acid bacteria grown in supplemented carob syrup.<br />

J <strong>In</strong>d Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 5.<br />

Chu W, Lu F, Zhu W, Kang C. Isolation and characterization of new<br />

potential probiotic bacteria based on quorum-sensing system. J Appl<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Sep 27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04872.x.<br />

Endo A, Futagawa-Endo Y, Sakamoto M, Kitahara M, Dicks LM.<br />

Lactobacillus florum sp. nov., a fructophilic species isolated from<br />

flowers. <strong>In</strong>t J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Oct;60(Pt 10):2478-82.<br />

Fukiya S, Sugiyama T, Kano Y, Yokota A. Characterization of an insertion<br />

sequence-like element, ISBlo15, identified in a size-increased cryptic<br />

plasmid pBK283 in Bifidobacterium longum BK28. J Biosci Bioeng.<br />

2010 Aug;110(2):141-6.<br />

Garneau JE, Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval<br />

P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S. The CRISPR/Cas<br />

bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA.<br />

Nature. 2010 Nov 4;468(7320):67-71..<br />

Ge XY, Yuan J, Qin H, Zhang WG. Improvement of L: -lactic acid<br />

production by osmotic-tolerant mutant of Lactobacillus casei at high<br />

temperature. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 21.<br />

Goffin P, van de Bunt B, Giovane M, Leveau JH, Höppener-Ogawa S,<br />

Teusink B, Hugenholtz J. Understanding the physiology of Lactobacillus<br />

plantarum at zero growth. Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Sep 21;6:413.<br />

Hancock V, Vejborg RM, Klemm P. Functional genomics of probiotic<br />

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and 83972, and UPEC strain CFT073:<br />

comparison of transcriptomes, growth and biofilm formation. Mol<br />

Genet Genomics. 2010 Oct 1.<br />

Harris PT, Raghunathan K, Spurbeck RR, Arvidson CG, Arvidson DN.<br />

Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies<br />

of Lactobacillus jensenii enolase. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol<br />

Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt 8):938-40.<br />

Horsham M, Saxby H, Blake J, Isaacs NW, Mitchell TJ, Riboldi-<br />

Tunnicliffe A. Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary<br />

X-ray crystallographic data from TktA, a transketolase from the lactic<br />

acid bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct<br />

Biol Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt 8):899-901.<br />

Ismail B, Nampoothiri KM. Production, purification and structural<br />

characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 9510. Arch Microbiol. 2010 Oct 19.<br />

Jeon JM, Lee HI, Han SH, Chang CS, So JS. Partial purification and<br />

characterization of glutaminase from Lactobacillus reuteri KCTC3594.<br />

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):146-54.<br />

Jia J, Mu W, Zhang T, Jiang B. Bioconversion of phenylpyruvate to<br />

phenyllactate: gene cloning, expression, and enzymatic characterization<br />

of D- and L1-lactate dehydrogenases from Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

SK002. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):242-51.<br />

Jiménez E, Martín R, Maldonado A, Martín V, Gómez de Segura<br />

A, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM. Complete genome sequence of<br />

Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713, a probiotic strain isolated from<br />

human milk and infant feces. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5266-7.<br />

Jin J, Liu S, Zhao L, Ge K, Mao X, Ren F. Changes in ffh, uvrA, groES<br />

and dnaK mRNA Abundance as a Function of Acid-Adaptation and<br />

Growth Phase in Bifidobacterium longum BBMN68 Isolated from<br />

Healthy Centenarians. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Sep 11.<br />

Kimoto-Nira H, Suzuki C, Sasaki K, Kobayashi M, Mizumachi K. Survival<br />

of a Lactococcus lactis strain varies with its carbohydrate preference<br />

under in vitro conditions simulated gastrointestinal tract. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):226-9.<br />

Kiyohara M, Tanigawa K, Chaiwangsri T, Katayama T, Ashida H,<br />

Yamamoto K. An exo-{alpha}-sialidase from bifidobacteria involved in<br />

the degradation of sialyloligosaccharides in human milk and intestinal<br />

glycoconjugates. Glycobiology. 2010 Oct 29.<br />

Koskenniemi K, Laakso K, Koponen J, Kankainen M, Greco D,<br />

Auvinen P, Savijoki K, Nyman TA, Surakka A, Salusjärvi T, de Vos WM,<br />

Tynkkynen S, Kalkkinen N, Varmanen P. Proteomic and transcriptomic<br />

characterization of bile stress response in probiotic Lactobacillus<br />

rhamnosus GG. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Nov 15.<br />

Kullisaar T, Songisepp E, Aunapuu M, Kilk K, Arend A, Mikelsaar<br />

M, Rehema A, Zilmer M. Complete glutathione system in probiotic<br />

Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2010 Sep-<br />

Oct;46(5):527-31.<br />

Kuratsu M, Hamano Y, Dairi T. Analysis of the Lactobacillus metabolic<br />

pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7299-301.<br />

Lagaert S, Pollet A, Delcour JA, Lavigne R, Courtin CM, Volckaert G.<br />

Substrate specificity of three recombinant �-l-arabinofuranosidases<br />

from Bifidobacterium adolescentis and their divergent action on<br />

arabinoxylan and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides. Biochem Biophys<br />

Res Commun. 2010 Oct 28.<br />

Łaniewska-Trokenheim Ł, Olszewska M, Miks-Krajnik M, Zadernowska<br />

A. Patterns of survival and volatile metabolites of selected Lactobacillus<br />

strains during long-term incubation in milk. J Microbiol. 2010<br />

Aug;48(4):445-51.<br />

20


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Li H, Qiu T, Huang G, Cao Y. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid<br />

by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912 using fed-batch fermentation. Microb<br />

Cell Fact. 2010 Nov 12;9(1):85.<br />

Locascio RG, Desai P, Sela DA, Weimer B, Mills DA. Broad Conservation<br />

of Milk Utilization Genes in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis<br />

as Revealed by Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Appl Environ<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(22):7373-81.<br />

López de Felipe F, Curiel JA, Muñoz R. Improvement of the<br />

fermentation performance of Lactobacillus plantarum by the flavanol<br />

catechin is uncoupled from its degradation. J Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />

Aug;109(2):687-97.<br />

Luo LH, Seo JW, Baek JO, Oh BR, Heo SY, Hong WK, Kim DH, Kim<br />

CH. Identification and characterization of the propanediol utilization<br />

protein PduP of Lactobacillus reuteri for 3-hydroxypropionic acid<br />

production from glycerol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Oct 2.<br />

Mackenzie DA, Jeffers F, Parker ML, Vibert-Vallet A, Bongaerts RJ,<br />

Roos S, Walter J, Juge N. Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding<br />

proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus<br />

reuteri. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3368-78.<br />

Maischberger T, Leitner E, Nitisinprasert S, Juajun O, Yamabhai<br />

M, Nguyen TH, Haltrich D. Beta-galactosidase from Lactobacillus<br />

pentosus: purification, characterization and formation of galactooligosaccharides.<br />

Biotechnol J. 2010 Aug;5(8):838-47.<br />

Mathias A, Duc M, Favre L, Benyacoub J, Blum S, Corthésy B.<br />

Potentiation of polarized intestinal Caco-2 cell responsiveness to<br />

probiotics complexed with secretory IgA. J Biol Chem. 2010 Oct<br />

29;285(44):33906-13.<br />

Nakai H, Petersen BO, Westphal Y, Dilokpimol A, Abou Hachem M,<br />

Duus JØ, Schols HA, Svensson B. Rational engineering of Lactobacillus<br />

acidophilus NCFM maltose phosphorylase into either trehalose or<br />

kojibiose dual specificity phosphorylase. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2010<br />

Oct;23(10):781-7.<br />

Nakanishi Y, Fukuda S, Chikayama E, Kimura Y, Ohno H, Kikuchi J.<br />

A dynamic omics approach identifies nutrition-mediated microbial<br />

interactions. J Proteome Res. 2010 Nov 9.<br />

Nam SH, Choi SH, Kang A, Kim DW, Kim RN, Kim A, Park HS. Genome<br />

Sequence of Leuconostoc argentinum KCTC 3773. J Bacteriol. 2010<br />

Oct 15.<br />

Neves AR, Pool WA, Solopova A, Kok J, Santos H, Kuipers OP.<br />

Towards enhanced galactose utilization by Lactococcus lactis. Appl<br />

Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7048-60.<br />

O’Flaherty SJ, Klaenhammer TR. Functional and phenotypic<br />

characterization of a protein from Lactobacillus acidophilus involved<br />

in cell morphology, stress tolerance and adherence to intestinal cells.<br />

Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3360-7.<br />

Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal<br />

SM. New method for electroporation of Lactobacillus species grown in<br />

high salt. J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Nov;83(2):164-7.<br />

Parente E, Ciocia F, Ricciardi A, Zotta T, Felis GE, Torriani S. Diversity<br />

of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus pentosus<br />

and Lactobacillus paraplantarum: A multivariate screening study. <strong>In</strong>t J<br />

Food Microbiol. 2010 Oct 27.<br />

Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G. Bioconversion of isoflavone glycosides to<br />

aglycones, mineral bioavailability and vitamin B complex in fermented<br />

soymilk by probiotic bacteria and yeast. J Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />

Oct;109(4):1198-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04745.x.<br />

Rodríguez N, Torrado A, Cortés S, Domínguez JM. Use of waste<br />

materials for Lactococcus lactis development. J Sci Food Agric. 2010<br />

Aug 15;90(10):1726-34.<br />

Scharl M, Geisel S, Vavricka SR, Rogler G. Dying in Yoghurt: The Number<br />

of Living Bacteria in Probiotic Yoghurt Decreases under Exposure to<br />

Room Temperature. Digestion. 2010 Sep 14;83(1-2):13-17.<br />

Scheu PD, Kim OB, Griesinger C, Unden G. Sensing by the<br />

membrane-bound sensor kinase DcuS: exogenous versus endogenous<br />

sensing of C(4)-dicarboxylates in bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2010<br />

Sep;5:1383-402.<br />

Schwab C, Sørensen KI, Gänzle MG. Heterologous expression<br />

of glycoside hydrolase family 2 and 42 �-galactosidases of lactic<br />

acid bacteria in Lactococcus lactis. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />

Oct;33(6):300-7.<br />

Shimoda K, Hamada H. Synthesis of beta-maltooligosaccharides of<br />

glycitein and daidzein and their anti-oxidant and anti-allergic activities.<br />

Molecules. 2010 Jul 29;15(8):5153-61.<br />

Sieuwerts S, Molenaar D, van Hijum SA, Beerthuyzen M, Stevens MJ,<br />

Janssen PW, <strong>In</strong>gham CJ, de Bok FA, de Vos WM, van Hylckama Vlieg<br />

JE. Mixed culture transcriptome analysis reveals molecular basis of<br />

mixed culture growth in Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus<br />

bulgaricus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct 1.<br />

Söderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL. Probiotic Lactobacilli<br />

<strong>In</strong>terfere with Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation <strong>In</strong> Vitro. Curr<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Sep 11.<br />

Stephenson DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE. Transformation of, and<br />

heterologous protein expression in, Lactobacillus agilis and<br />

Lactobacillus vaginalis isolated from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.<br />

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov 12.<br />

Streit F, Athès V, Bchir A, Corrieu G, Béal C. Microfiltration conditions<br />

modify Lactobacillus bulgaricus cryotolerance in response to<br />

physiological changes. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2010 Aug 28.<br />

Sudiarta IP, Fukushima T, Sekiguchi J. bacillus subtilis CwlP of the<br />

SP-beta prophage has two novel peptidoglycan hydrolase domains,<br />

muramidase and cross-linkage digesting D,D-endopeptidase. J Biol<br />

Chem. 2010 Oct 27.<br />

Suzuki R, Kim BJ, Shibata T, Iwamoto Y, Katayama T, Ashida H,<br />

Wakagi T, Shoun H, Fushinobu S, Yamamoto K. Overexpression,<br />

crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of xylulose-5-phosphate/<br />

fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase from Bifidobacterium breve.<br />

Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2010 Aug 1;66(Pt<br />

8):941-3.<br />

Takahashi K, Tagami U, Shimba N, Kashiwagi T, Ishikawa K, Suzuki<br />

E. Crystal structure of Bifidobacterium Longum phosphoketolase; key<br />

enzyme for glucose metabolism in Bifidobacterium. FEBS Lett. 2010<br />

Sep 24;584(18):3855-61.<br />

Tang AL, Wilcox G, Walker KZ, Shah NP, Ashton JF, Stojanovska L.<br />

Phytase Activity from Lactobacillus spp. in calcium-fortified soymilk. J<br />

Food Sci. 2010 Aug 1;75(6):M373-6.<br />

Turroni F, Bottacini F, Foroni E, Mulder I, Kim JH, Zomer A, Sánchez B,<br />

Bidossi A, Ferrarini A, Giubellini V, Delledonne M, Henrissat B, Coutinho<br />

P, Oggioni M, Fitzgerald GF, Mills D, Margolles A, Kelly D, van Sinderen<br />

D, Ventura M. Genome analysis of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010<br />

reveals metabolic pathways for host-derived glycan foraging. Proc Natl<br />

Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 9;107(45):19514-9.<br />

Vebø HC, Solheim M, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. Comparative<br />

genomic analysis of pathogenic and probiotic Enterococcus faecalis<br />

isolates, and their transcriptional responses to growth in human urine.<br />

PLoS One. 2010 Aug 31;5(8):e12489.<br />

Vélez MP, Petrova MI, Lebeer S, Verhoeven TL, Claes I, Lambrichts I,<br />

Tynkkynen S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Characterization<br />

of MabA, a modulator of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG adhesion<br />

and biofilm formation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010<br />

Aug;59(3):386-98.<br />

Waldherr FW, Doll VM, Meissner D, Vogel RF. Identification and<br />

characterization of a glucan-producing enzyme from Lactobacillus<br />

hilgardii TMW 1.828 involved in granule formation of water kefir. Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Aug;27(5):672-8.<br />

Wang G, Yin S, An H, Chen S, Hao Y. Coexpression of bile salt<br />

hydrolase gene and catalase gene remarkably improves oxidative<br />

stress and bile salt resistance in Lactobacillus casei. J <strong>In</strong>d Microbiol<br />

Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 21.<br />

Wang Y, Chen C, Ai L, Zhou F, Zhou Z, Wang L, Zhang H, Chen W, Guo<br />

B. Complete genome sequence of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

ST-III. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />

Wasko A, Kordowska-Wiater M, Podlesny M, Polak-Berecka M,<br />

Targonski Z, Kubik-Komar A. The Plackett-Burman design in optimization<br />

of media components for biomass production of Lactobacillus<br />

rhamnosus OXY. Acta Biol Hung. 2010 Sep;61(3):344-55.<br />

Wasko A, Polak-Berecka M, Targonski Z. A new protein of alphaamylase<br />

activity from Lactococcus lactis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010<br />

Sep;20(9):1307-13.<br />

Weidmann S, Rieu A, Rega M, Coucheney F, Guzzo J. Distinct amino<br />

acids of the Oenococcus oeni small heat shock protein Lo18 are<br />

essential for damaged protein protection and membrane stabilization.<br />

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;309(1):8-15.<br />

Wentworth CC, Jones RM, Kwon YM, Nusrat A, Neish AS. Commensal-<br />

Epithelial Signaling Mediated via Formyl Peptide Receptors. Am J<br />

Pathol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />

Wu R, Sun Z, Wu J, Meng H, Zhang H. Effect of bile salts stress on protein<br />

synthesis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang revealed by 2-dimensional gel<br />

electrophoresis. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3858-68.<br />

Yang EJ, Chang HC. Construction and evaluation of shuttle vector,<br />

pGYC4�, based on pYC2 from Lactobacillus sakei. Biotechnol Lett.<br />

2010 Nov 12.<br />

Zhang C, Gänzle MG. Metabolic pathway of �-ketoglutarate in<br />

Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis and Lactobacillus reuteri during<br />

sourdough fermentation. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1301-10.<br />

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04753.x.<br />

Zhang H, Hao Y, Zhang D, Luo Y. Characterization of the cryptic plasmid<br />

pTXW from Lactobacillus paracasei TXW. Plasmid. 2010 Aug 13.<br />

21


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Zhang W, Yu D, Sun Z, Wu R, Chen X, Chen W, Meng H, Hu S, Zhang<br />

H. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new<br />

probiotic strain isolated from traditional homemade koumiss in <strong>In</strong>ner<br />

Mongolia, China. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5268-9.<br />

Zhurina D, Zomer A, Gleinser M, Brancaccio VF, Auchter M, Waidmann<br />

MS, Westermann C, van Sinderen D, Riedel CU. Complete genome<br />

sequence of Bifidobacterium bifidum S17. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct 29.<br />

TECHNOLOGY OF PROBIOTIC AND PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

Albenzio M, Santillo A, Caroprese M, Marino R, Trani A, Faccia M.<br />

Biochemical patterns in ovine cheese: influence of probiotic strains. J<br />

Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3487-96.<br />

Bolla PA, de Los Angeles Serradell M, de Urraza PJ, De Antoni GL.<br />

Effect of freeze-drying on viability and in vitro probiotic properties of<br />

a mixture of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from kefir. J Dairy<br />

Res. 2010 Sep 8:1-8.<br />

Brachkova MI, Duarte MA, Pinto JF. Preservation of viability and<br />

antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus spp. in calcium alginate beads.<br />

Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010 Aug 26.<br />

Burns P, Molinari F, Beccaria A, Páez R, Meinardi C, Reinheimer J,<br />

Vinderola G. Suitability of buttermilk for fermentation with Lactobacillus<br />

helveticus and production of a functional peptide-enriched powder<br />

by spray-drying. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1370-8. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04761.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.<br />

Champagne CP, Tompkins TA, Buckley ND, Green-Johnson JM.<br />

Effect of fermentation by pure and mixed cultures of Streptococcus<br />

thermophilus and Lactobacillus helveticus on isoflavone and<br />

B-vitamin content of a fermented soy beverage. Food Microbiol. 2010<br />

Oct;27(7):968-72.<br />

Chávarri M, Marañón I, Ares R, Ibáñez FC, Marzo F, Villarán Mdel C.<br />

Microencapsulation of a probiotic and prebiotic in alginate-chitosan<br />

capsules improves survival in simulated gastro-intestinal conditions.<br />

<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):185-9.<br />

Di Criscio T, Fratianni A, Mignogna R, Cinquanta L, Coppola R,<br />

Sorrentino E, Panfili G. Production of functional probiotic, prebiotic,<br />

and synbiotic ice creams. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4555-64.<br />

Grzeskowiak L, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Gueimonde M. Manufacturing<br />

process influences properties of probiotic bacteria. Br J Nutr. 2010<br />

Nov 9:1-8.<br />

Islam MA, Yun CH, Choi YJ, Cho CS. Microencapsulation of live<br />

probiotic bacteria. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;20(10):1367-77.<br />

Meng XC, Pang R, Wang C, Wang LQ. Rapid and direct quantitative<br />

detection of viable bifidobacteria in probiotic yogurt by combination<br />

of ethidium monoazide and real-time PCR using a molecular beacon<br />

approach. J Dairy Res. 2010 Nov;77(4):498-504.<br />

Vanhee LM, Goemé F, Nelis HJ, Coenye T. Quality control of<br />

fifteen probiotic products containing Saccharomyces boulardii.<br />

J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Nov;109(5):1745-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />

2672.2010.04805.x.<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL INTERACTION WITH THE HOST<br />

SURVIVAL & PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> WITH MUCOSA<br />

Alp G, Aslim B, Suludere Z, Akca G. The role of hemagglutination and<br />

effect of exopolysaccharide production on bifidobacteria adhesion to<br />

Caco-2 cells in vitro. Microbiol Immunol. 2010 Nov;54(11):658-65. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00227.x..<br />

Burns P, Sánchez B, Vinderola G, Ruas-Madiedo P, Ruiz L, Margolles<br />

A, Reinheimer J, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG. <strong>In</strong>side the adaptation<br />

process of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis to bile. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):132-41.<br />

Del Piano M, Carmagnola S, Andorno S, Pagliarulo M, Tari<br />

R, Mogna L, Strozzi GP, Sforza F, Capurso L. Evaluation of<br />

the intestinal colonization by microencapsulated probiotic<br />

bacteria in comparison with the same uncoated strains. J Clin<br />

Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S42-6.<br />

Du L, Liu F, Ju X, Huo G. Adhesion capability of first two domains<br />

at N terminus of NP_785232 protein and their interaction with a UVabsorbing<br />

component from human mucus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010<br />

Oct;51(4):400-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02911.x.<br />

Grimoud J, Durand H, Courtin C, Monsan P, Ouarné F, Theodorou<br />

V, Roques C. <strong>In</strong> vitro screening of probiotic lactic acid bacteria<br />

and prebiotic glucooligosaccharides to select effective synbiotics.<br />

Anaerobe. 2010 Oct;16(5):493-500.<br />

Hsueh HY, Yueh PY, Yu B, Zhao X, Liu JR. Expression of Lactobacillus<br />

reuteri Pg4 Collagen-Binding Protein Gene in Lactobacillus casei<br />

ATCC 393 <strong>In</strong>creases Its Adhesion Ability to Caco-2 Cells. J Agric Food<br />

Chem. 2010 Nov 11.<br />

Iguchi A, Umekawa N, Maegawa T, Tsuruta H, Odamaki T, Xiao JZ,<br />

Osawa R. Polymorphism and distribution of putative cell-surface<br />

adhesin-encoding ORFs among human faecal isolates of Bifidobacterium<br />

longum subsp. longum. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010 Sep 24.<br />

Martín R, Olivares M, Pérez M, Xaus J, Torre C, Fernández L, Rodríguez<br />

JM. Identification and evaluation of the probiotic potential of lactobacilli<br />

isolated from canine milk. Vet J. 2010 Aug;185(2):193-8.<br />

Martins AK, Martins FS, Gomes DA, Elian SD, Vieira AT, Teixeira MM,<br />

Cara DC, Nardi RM, Nicoli JR. Evaluation of in vitro antagonism and<br />

of in vivo immune modulation and protection against pathogenic<br />

experimental challenge of two probiotic strains of Bifidobacterium<br />

animalis var. lactis. Arch Microbiol. 2010 Sep 17.<br />

Peleg M, Normand MD, Horowitz J, Corradini MG. Expanded fermi<br />

solution for estimating the survival of ingested pathogenic and probiotic<br />

microbial cells and spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov 5.<br />

Samonis G, Falagas ME, Lionakis S, Ntaoukakis M, Kofteridis DP,<br />

Ntalas I, Maraki S. Saccharomyces boulardii and Candida albicans<br />

experimental colonization of the murine gut. Med Mycol. 2010 Nov<br />

15.<br />

Shen D, Zhu Y, Hao Y, Lu J. Polymerase chain reaction detection of<br />

Lactobacillus acidophilus in human oral cavity and faecal samples after<br />

2-week consumption of yoghurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Sep 23.<br />

Stephenson DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE. Lactobacillus strain ecology and<br />

persistence within broiler chickens fed different diets: identification of<br />

persistent strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6494-503.<br />

Takemura N, Hagio M, Ishizuka S, Ito H, Morita T, Sonoyama K.<br />

<strong>In</strong>ulin prolongs survival of intragastrically administered Lactobacillus<br />

plantarum No. 14 in the gut of mice fed a high-fat diet. J Nutr. 2010<br />

Nov;140(11):1963-9.<br />

Vlková E, Grmanová M, Killer J, Mrázek J, Kopecný J, Bunesová<br />

V, Rada V. Survival of bifidobacteria administered to calves. Folia<br />

Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jul;55(4):390-2.<br />

INTERACTION OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> WITH PATHOGENS<br />

Belguesmia Y, Choiset Y, Prévost H, Dalgalarrondo M, Chobert JM,<br />

Drider D. Partial Purification and Characterization of the Mode of<br />

Action of Enterocin S37: A Bacteriocin Produced by Enterococcus<br />

faecalis S37 Isolated from Poultry Feces. J Environ Public Health.<br />

2010;2010. pii: 986460.<br />

Bøhle LA, Brede DA, Diep DB, Holo H, Nes IF. Specific degradation<br />

of the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus<br />

reuteri to an antimicrobial peptide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010<br />

Nov;76(21):7306-9.<br />

Chiodo PG, Sparo MD, Pezzani BC, Minvielle MC, Basualdo JA. <strong>In</strong> vitro<br />

and in vivo effects of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 on Toxocara<br />

canis. Mem <strong>In</strong>st Oswaldo Cruz. 2010 Aug;105(5):615-20.<br />

Dicks LM, Granger M, van Reenen CA. Survival and adherence of<br />

antimicrobial peptide ST4SA, produced by Enterococcus mundtii,<br />

at conditions found in the human gastro-intestinal tract. J Basic<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Oct 21.<br />

Eom JE, Moon SK, Moon GS. Heterologous production of pediocin<br />

PA-1 in Lactobacillus reuteri. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010<br />

Aug;20(8):1215-8.<br />

Gong HS, Meng XC, Wang H. Mode of action of plantaricin MG, a<br />

bacteriocin active against Salmonella typhimurium. J Basic Microbiol.<br />

2010 Oct 21.<br />

Malago JJ, Nemeth E, Koninkx JF, Tooten PC, Fajdiga S, van Dijk JE.<br />

Microbial products from probiotic bacteria inhibit Salmonella enteritidis<br />

857-induced IL-8 synthesis in Caco-2 cells. Folia Microbiol (Praha).<br />

2010 Jul;55(4):401-8.<br />

Murzyn A, Krasowska A, Augustyniak D, Majkowska-Skrobek G,<br />

Łukaszewicz M, Dziadkowiec D. The effect of Saccharomyces boulardii<br />

on Candida albicans-infected human intestinal cell lines Caco-2 and<br />

<strong>In</strong>testin 407. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Sep 1;310(1):17-23.<br />

Murzyn A, Krasowska A, Stefanowicz P, Dziadkowiec D, Łukaszewicz<br />

M. Capric acid secreted by S. boulardii inhibits C. albicans filamentous<br />

growth, adhesion and biofilm formation. PLoS One. 2010 Aug<br />

10;5(8):e12050.<br />

Ruas-Madiedo P, Medrano M, Salazar N, De Los Reyes-Gavilán CG,<br />

Pérez PF, Abraham AG. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus<br />

and Bifidobacterium strains abrogate in vitro the cytotoxic effect of<br />

bacterial toxins on eukaryotic cells. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug 19. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04839.x.<br />

Sadowska B, Walencka E, Wieckowska-Szakiel M, Rózalska B. Bacteria<br />

competing with the adhesion and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus<br />

aureus. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Sep;55(5):497-501.<br />

Smaoui S, Elleuch L, Bejar W, Karray-Rebai I, Ayadi I, Jaouadi B,<br />

Mathieu F, Chouayekh H, Bejar S, Mellouli L. <strong>In</strong>hibition of fungi and<br />

gram-negative bacteria by bacteriocin BacTN635 produced by<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum sp. TN635. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010<br />

Oct;162(4):1132-46.<br />

22


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Stöber H, Maier E, Schmidt H. Protective effects of Lactobacilli,<br />

Bifidobacteria and Staphylococci on the infection of cultured HT29<br />

cells with different enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotypes are<br />

strain-specific. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov 15;144(1):133-40.<br />

Todorov SD, Wachsman M, Tomé E, Dousset X, Destro MT, Dicks LM,<br />

Franco BD, Vaz-Velho M, Drider D. Characterisation of an antiviral<br />

pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Oct;27(7):869-79.<br />

Zihler A, Gagnon M, Chassard C, Hegland A, Stevens MJ, Braegger<br />

CP, Lacroix C. Unexpected consequences of administering<br />

bacteriocinogenic probiotic strains for Salmonella populations,<br />

revealed by an in vitro colonic model of the child gut. Microbiology.<br />

2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3342-53.<br />

Zoumpopoulou G, Papadimitriou K, Polissiou MG, Tarantilis PA,<br />

Tsakalidou E. Detection of changes in the cellular composition<br />

of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the presence of<br />

antimicrobial compound(s) of Lactobacillus strains using Fourier<br />

transform infrared spectroscopy. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov<br />

15;144(1):202-7.<br />

MUCOSA RESPONSE TO <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> (TROPHICITY & STRUCTURE)<br />

Anderson RC, Cookson AL, McNabb WC, Kelly WJ, Roy NC.<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that<br />

enhances intestinal barrier function. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Aug<br />

1;309(2):184-92.<br />

Chen HQ, Yang J, Zhang M, Zhou YK, Shen TY, Chu ZX, Zhang M,<br />

Hang XM, Jiang YQ, Qin HL. Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorates<br />

colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction by modulating the apical<br />

junctional complex and PepT1 in IL-10 knockout mice. Am J Physiol<br />

Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Sep 30.<br />

Generoso SV, Viana ML, Santos RG, Arantes RM, Martins FS, Nicoli JR,<br />

Machado JA, Correia MI, Cardoso VN. Protection against increased<br />

intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation induced by intestinal<br />

obstruction in mice treated with viable and heat-killed Saccharomyces<br />

boulardii. Eur J Nutr. 2010 Oct 10.<br />

Zou XP, Chen M, Wei W, Cao J, Chen L, Tian M. Effects of enteral<br />

immunonutrition on the maintenance of gut barrier function and<br />

immune function in pigs with severe acute pancreatitis. JPEN J<br />

Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):554-66.<br />

Van Baarlen P, Troost F, van der Meer C, Hooiveld G, Boekschoten<br />

M, Brummer RJ, Kleerebezem M. Microbes and Health Sackler<br />

Colloquium: Human mucosal in vivo transcriptome responses to three<br />

lactobacilli indicate how probiotics may modulate human cellular<br />

pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7.<br />

EFFECTS OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> ON MICROBIOTA<br />

Brignardello J, Morales P, Diaz E, Romero J, Brunser O,<br />

Gotteland M. Pilot study: alterations of intestinal microbiota in<br />

obese humans are not associated with colonic inflammation<br />

or disturbances of barrier function. Aliment Pharmacol<br />

Ther. 2010 Dec;32(11-12):1307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />

2036.2010.04475.x.<br />

Kong Q, He GQ, Jia JL, Zhu QL, Ruan H. Oral Administration of<br />

Clostridium butyricum for Modulating Gastrointestinal Microflora in<br />

Mice. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15.<br />

Malinen E, Krogius-Kurikka L, Lyra A, Nikkilä J, Jääskeläinen A,<br />

Rinttilä T, Vilpponen-Salmela T, von Wright AJ, Palva A. Association of<br />

symptoms with gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome.<br />

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 28;16(36):4532-40.<br />

Martin FP, Sprenger N, Montoliu I, Rezzi S, Kochhar S, Nicholson<br />

JK. Dietary modulation of gut functional ecology studied by faecal<br />

metabonomics. J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5284-95.<br />

Nakashimada Y, Michinaka A, Watanabe K, Nishio N, Fujii T. Brewer’s<br />

yeast cell wall affects microbiota composition and decreases<br />

Bacteroides fragilis populations in an anaerobic gut intestinal model. J<br />

Biosci Bioeng. 2010 Oct 5.<br />

Roger LC, Costabile A, Holland DT, Hoyles L, McCartney AL.<br />

Examination of faecal Bifidobacterium populations in breast- and<br />

formula-fed infants during the first 18 months of life. Microbiology.<br />

2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3329-41.<br />

Salazar N, Binetti A, Gueimonde M, Alonso A, Garrido P, González<br />

Del Rey C, González C, Ruas-Madiedo P, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG.<br />

Safety and intestinal microbiota modulation by the exopolysaccharideproducing<br />

strains Bifidobacterium animalis IPLA R1 and<br />

Bifidobacterium longum IPLA E44 orally administered to Wistar rats.<br />

<strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov 13.<br />

Samli HE, Dezcan S, Koc F, Ozduven ML, Okur AA, Senkoylu N.<br />

Effects of Enterococcus faecium supplementation and floor type on<br />

performance, morphology of erythrocytes and intestinal microbiota in<br />

broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;51(4):564-8.<br />

Sánchez E, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y.<br />

<strong>In</strong>testinal Bacteroides species associated with coeliac disease.<br />

J Clin Pathol. 2010 Oct 23.<br />

EFFECTS OF PROBIOTIC ON IMMUNITY (MUCOSAL & SYSTEMIC)<br />

Borthakur A, Anbazhagan AN, Kumar A, Raheja G, Singh V, Ramaswamy<br />

K, Dudeja PK. The probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum counteracts TNF-<br />

{alpha}-induced downregulation of SMCT1 expression and function.<br />

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Oct;299(4):G928-34.<br />

Brisbin JT, Gong J, Parvizi P, Sharif S. Effects of lactobacilli on cytokine<br />

expression by chicken spleen and cecal tonsil cells. Clin Vaccine<br />

Immunol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1337-43.<br />

Cazzola M, Tompkins TA, Matera MG. Immunomodulatory impact of a<br />

synbiotic in T(h)1 and T(h)2 models of infection. Ther Adv Respir Dis.<br />

2010 Oct;4(5):259-70.<br />

D’<strong>In</strong>cà R, Barollo M, Scarpa M, Grillo AR, Brun P, Vettorato<br />

MG, Castagliuolo I, Sturniolo GC. Rectal Administration of<br />

Lactobacillus casei DG Modifies Flora Composition and Toll-<br />

Like Receptor Expression in Colonic Mucosa of Patients with<br />

Mild Ulcerative Colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug 25.<br />

Dos Santos LM, Santos MM, de Souza Silva HP, Arantes RM, Nicoli JR,<br />

Vieira LQ. Monoassociation with probiotic Lactobacillus delbrueckii<br />

UFV-H2b20 stimulates the immune system and protects germfree<br />

mice against Listeria monocytogenes infection. Med Microbiol<br />

Immunol. 2010 Sep 14.<br />

Edwards LA, Lucas M, Edwards EA, Torrente F, Heuschkel RB, Klein<br />

NJ, Murch SH, Bajaj-Elliott M, Phillips AD. Aberrant response to<br />

commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in Crohn’s disease: An ex<br />

vivo human organ culture study. <strong>In</strong>flamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Nov 4.<br />

Foligné B, Deutsch SM, Breton J, Cousin FJ, Dewulf J, Samson M,<br />

Pot B, Jan G. Promising immunomodulatory effects of selected strains<br />

of dairy propionibacteria evidenced in vitro and in vivo. Appl Environ<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />

Fredriksen L, Mathiesen G, Sioud M, Eijsink VG. Cell wall anchoring<br />

of the 37-kilodalton oncofetal antigen by Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

for mucosal cancer vaccine delivery. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010<br />

Nov;76(21):7359-62.<br />

Grimoud J, Durand H, de Souza S, Monsan P, Ouarné F, Theodorou V,<br />

Roques C. <strong>In</strong> vitro screening of probiotics and synbiotics according to<br />

anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol.<br />

2010 Nov 15;144(1):42-50.<br />

Gueniche A, Benyacoub J, Philippe D, Bastien P, Kusy N, Breton L,<br />

Blum S, Castiel-Higounenc I. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116<br />

(ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates<br />

skin barrier function recovery in vitro. Eur J Dermatol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />

Guglielmetti S, Taverniti V, Minuzzo M, Arioli S, Zanoni I, Stuknyte<br />

M, Granucci F, Karp M, Mora D. A dairy bacterium displays in vitro<br />

probiotic properties for the pharyngeal mucosa by antagonizing group<br />

A streptococci and modulating the immune response. <strong>In</strong>fect Immun.<br />

2010 Nov;78(11):4734-43.<br />

Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo MS. Effect of probiotics enriched<br />

diet on Paralichthys olivaceus infected with lymphocystis disease virus<br />

(LCDV). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Nov;29(5):868-74.<br />

Hua MC, Lin TY, Lai MW, Kong MS, Chang HJ, Chen CC. Probiotic<br />

Bio-Three induces Th1 and anti-inflammatory effects in PBMC and<br />

dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 28;16(28):3529-40.<br />

Igarashi T. Study of the Relationship between Changes in Lactic Acid<br />

Bacterial Cell Components and Stimulation of IL-12 Production under<br />

Salt-Stressed Conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Nov 7.<br />

Jain S, Yadav H, Sinha PR, Kapila S, Naito Y, Marotta F. Anti-allergic<br />

effects of probiotic Dahi through modulation of the gut immune<br />

system. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;21(3):244-50.<br />

Jung BG, Ko JH, Lee BJ. Dietary Supplementation with Probiotic<br />

Fermented Tetra-Herbal Combination Enhances Immune Activity<br />

in Broiler Chicks and <strong>In</strong>creases Survivability against Salmonella<br />

Gallinarum in Experimentally <strong>In</strong>fected Broiler Chicks. J Vet Med Sci.<br />

2010 Jul 28.<br />

Kato-Mori Y, Orihashi T, Kanai Y, Sato M, Sera K, Hagiwara<br />

K. Fermentation Metabolites from Lactobacillus gasseri and<br />

Propionibacterium freudenreichii Exert Bacteriocidal Effects<br />

in Mice. J Med Food. 2010 Oct 18.<br />

AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Stimulates Colony-Stimulating<br />

Factor 3 (Granulocyte) (CSF3) Output in Placental Trophoblast Cells in<br />

a Fetal Sex-Dependant Manner. Biol Reprod. 2010 Sep 1.<br />

23


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Kotani Y, Shinkai S, Okamatsu H, Toba M, Ogawa K, Yoshida<br />

H, Fukaya T, Fujiwara Y, Chaves PH, Kakumoto K, Kohda N.<br />

Oral intake of Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 accelerates<br />

salivary immunoglobulin A secretion in the elderly: A<br />

randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Immun<br />

Ageing. 2010 Aug 26;7:11.<br />

Lee TY, Kim YH, Lee KS, Kim JK, Lee IH, Yang JM, Sung MH, Park<br />

JS, Poo H. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6-specific antitumor<br />

immunity is induced by oral administration of HPV16 E6-expressing<br />

Lactobacillus casei in C57BL/6 mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother.<br />

2010 Nov;59(11):1727-37.<br />

Liu Y, Fatheree NY, Mangalat N, Rhoads JM. Human-derived probiotic<br />

Lactobacillus reuteri strains differentially reduce intestinal inflammation.<br />

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):G1087-96.<br />

Mair C, Plitzner C, Pfaffl MW, Schedle K, Meyer HH, Windisch W.<br />

<strong>In</strong>ulin and probiotics in newly weaned piglets: effects on intestinal<br />

morphology, mRNA expression levels of inflammatory marker genes<br />

and haematology. Arch Anim Nutr. 2010 Aug;64(4):304-21.<br />

Mohamadzadeh M, Durmaz E, Zadeh M, Pakanati KC, Gramarossa M,<br />

Cohran V, Klaenhammer TR. Targeted expression of anthrax protective<br />

antigen by Lactobacillus gasseri as an anthrax vaccine. Future<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1289-96.<br />

Sharifuzzaman SM, Abbass A, Tinsley JW, Austin B. Subcellular<br />

components of probiotics Kocuria SM1 and Rhodococcus SM2 induce<br />

protective immunity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum)<br />

against Vibrio anguillarum. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Nov 12.<br />

Sohail MU, Ijaz A, Yousaf MS, Ashraf K, Zaneb H, Aleem M, Rehman H.<br />

Alleviation of cyclic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of<br />

mannan-oligosaccharide and Lactobacillus-based probiotic: dynamics<br />

of cortisol, thyroid hormones, cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and<br />

humoral immunity. Poult Sci. 2010 Sep;89(9):1934-8.<br />

Tao L, Pavlova SI, Ji X, Jin L, Spear G. A novel plasmid for delivering<br />

genes into mammalian cells with noninvasive food and commensal<br />

lactic acid bacteria. Plasmid. 2010 Sep 9.<br />

Tsai YT, Cheng PC, Pan TM. Immunomodulating Activity of Lactobacillus<br />

paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia<br />

coli O157H7-<strong>In</strong>fected Mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Oct 13.<br />

Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Kleerebezem M, Wichers HJ,<br />

Savelkoul HF. strains differentially modulate cytokine production by<br />

hPBMC Lactobacillus from pollen-allergic patients. FEMS Immunol<br />

Med Microbiol. 2010 Sep 24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00741.x.<br />

Yamamoto S, Wada J, Katayama T, Jikimoto T, Nakamura M,<br />

Kinoshita S, Lee KM, Kawabata M, Shirakawa T. Genetically modified<br />

Bifidobacterium displaying Salmonella-antigen protects mice from<br />

lethal challenge of Salmonella Typhimurium in a murine typhoid fever<br />

model. Vaccine. 2010 Sep 24;28(41):6684-91.<br />

Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR,<br />

Bocking AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1-induced IL-10 production<br />

in human placental trophoblast cells involves activation of JAK/STAT<br />

and MAPK pathways. Reprod Sci. 2010 Nov;17(11):1043-51.<br />

Zhou X, Tian Z, Wang Y, Li W. Effect of treatment with probiotics as<br />

water additives on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance<br />

and immune response. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010 Sep;36(3):501-9.<br />

OTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS<br />

Aronsson L, Huang Y, Parini P, Korach-André M, Håkansson J,<br />

Gustafsson JÅ, Pettersson S, Arulampalam V, Rafter J. Decreased<br />

fat storage by Lactobacillus paracasei is associated with increased<br />

levels of angiopoietin-like 4 protein (ANGPTL4). PLoS One. 2010 Sep<br />

30;5(9). pii: e13087.<br />

Bloise E, Torricelli M, Novembri R, Borges LE, Carrarelli P, Reis FM,<br />

Petraglia F. Heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG modulates<br />

urocortin and cytokine release in primary trophoblast cells. Placenta.<br />

2010 Oct;31(10):867-72.<br />

Caglar E, Sandalli N, Kuscu OO, Durhan MA, Pisiriciler R, Caliskan<br />

EA, Kargul B. Viability of fibroblasts in a novel probiotic storage<br />

media. Dent Traumatol. 2010 Oct;26(5):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-<br />

9657.2010.00914.x.<br />

Capcarova M, Chmelnicna L, Kolesarova A, Massanyi P, Kovacik<br />

J. Effects of Enterococcus faecium M 74 strain on selected blood<br />

and production parameters of laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2010<br />

Oct;51(5):614-20.<br />

Chen HQ, Shen TY, Zhou YK, Zhang M, Chu ZX, Hang XM, Qin HL.<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum Consumption <strong>In</strong>creases PepT1-Mediated<br />

Amino Acid Absorption by Enhancing Protein Kinase C Activity in<br />

Spontaneously Colitic Mice. J Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />

Di Cagno R, Mazzacane F, Rizzello CG, Vincentini O, Silano M, Giuliani G, De<br />

Angelis M, Gobbetti M. Synthesis of isoflavone aglycones and equol in soy<br />

milks fermented by food-related lactic acid bacteria and their effect on human<br />

intestinal Caco-2 cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Oct 13;58(19):10338-46.<br />

Fordjour L, D’Souza A, Cai C, Ahmad A, Valencia G, Kumar D, Aranda<br />

JV, Beharry KD. Comparative effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and<br />

synbiotics on growth factors in the large bowel in a rat model of<br />

formula-induced bowel inflammation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.<br />

2010 Oct;51(4):507-13.<br />

Giorgini E, Conti C, Ferraris P, Sabbatini S, Tosi G, Rubini C, Vaccari<br />

L, Gioacchini G, Carnevali O. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus<br />

on zebrafish oocyte maturation: an FTIR imaging and biochemical<br />

analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Oct 9.<br />

Kelley R, Soon Park J, O’Mahony L, Minikhiem D, Fix A. Safety and<br />

Tolerance of Dietary Supplementation With a Canine-Derived Probiotic<br />

(Bifidobacterium animalis Strain AHC7) Fed to Growing Dogs. Vet Ther.<br />

2010 Fall;11(3):E1-E14.<br />

Khailova L, Mount Patrick SK, Arganbright KM, Halpern MD, Kinouchi<br />

T, Dvorak B. Bifidobacterium bifidum reduces apoptosis in the intestinal<br />

epithelium in necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver<br />

Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):G1118-27.<br />

Kim Y, Oh S, Yun HS, Oh S, Kim SH. Cell-bound exopolysaccharide<br />

from probiotic bacteria induces autophagic cell death of tumour cells.<br />

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug;51(2):123-30.<br />

Kumar R, Grover S, Batish VK. Hypocholesterolaemic effect of dietary<br />

inclusion of two putative probiotic bile salt hydrolase-producing<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum strains in Sprague-Dawley rats. Br J Nutr.<br />

2010 Oct 6:1-12.<br />

Lieske JC, Tremaine WJ, De Simone C, O’Connor HM, Li X,<br />

Bergstralh EJ, Goldfarb DS. Diet, but not oral probiotics,<br />

effectively reduces urinary oxalate excretion and calcium<br />

oxalate supersaturation. Kidney <strong>In</strong>t. 2010 Aug 25.<br />

Lin YW, Mou YC, Su CC, Chiang BH. Antihepatocarcinoma activity of<br />

lactic acid bacteria fermented Panax notoginseng. J Agric Food Chem.<br />

2010 Aug 11;58(15):8528-34.<br />

Ma EL, Choi YJ, Choi J, Pothoulakis C, Rhee SH, Im E. The anticancer<br />

effect of probiotic Bacillus polyfermenticus on human colon cancer<br />

cells is mediated through ErbB2 and ErbB3 inhibition. <strong>In</strong>t J Cancer.<br />

2010 Aug 15;127(4):780-90.<br />

Ooi LG, Ahmad R, Yuen KH, Liong MT. Lactobacillus acidophilus<br />

CHO-220 and inulin reduced plasma total cholesterol and lowdensity<br />

lipoprotein cholesterol via alteration of lipid transporters.<br />

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Nov;93(11):5048-58..<br />

Ooi LG, Bhat R, Rosma A, Yuen KH, Liong MT. A synbiotic<br />

containing Lactobacillus acidophilus CHO-220 and inulin<br />

improves irregularity of red blood cells. J Dairy Sci. 2010<br />

Oct;93(10):4535-44.<br />

Osman A, Tzortzis G, Rastall RA, Charalampopoulos D. A comprehensive<br />

investigation of the synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides by<br />

whole cells of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171. J Biotechnol.<br />

2010 Oct 1;150(1):140-8.<br />

Pan DD, Zeng XQ, Yan YT. Characterisation of Lactobacillus fermentum<br />

SM-7 isolated from koumiss, a potential probiotic bacterium with<br />

cholesterol-lowering effects. J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Oct 28.<br />

Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta<br />

A, Menon VP, Black RE. Effects of Bifidobacterium lactis<br />

HN019 and prebiotic oligosaccharide added to milk on iron<br />

status, anemia, and growth among children 1 to 4 years old. J<br />

Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Sep;51(3):341-6.<br />

Sengül N, Isık S, Aslım B, Uçar G, Demirbag AE. The Effect of<br />

Exopolysaccharide-Producing Probiotic Strains on Gut Oxidative<br />

Damage in Experimental Colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug 4.<br />

Shen Q, Zhang B, Xu R, Wang Y, Ding X, Li P. Antioxidant activity<br />

in vitro of the selenium-contained protein from the Se-enriched<br />

Bifidobacterium animalis 01. Anaerobe. 2010 Aug;16(4):380-6.<br />

Shin HS, Park SY, Lee do K, Kim SA, An HM, Kim JR, Kim MJ, Cha<br />

MG, Lee SW, Kim KJ, Lee KO, Ha NJ. Hypocholesterolemic effect<br />

of sonication-killed Bifidobacterium longum isolated from healthy<br />

adult Koreans in high cholesterol fed rats. Arch Pharm Res. 2010<br />

Sep;33(9):1425-31.<br />

Shirasawa Y, Shibahara-Sone H, Iino T, Ishikawa F. Bifidobacterium<br />

bifidum BF-1 suppresses Helicobacter pylori-induced genes in human<br />

epithelial cells. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4526-34.<br />

Truusalu K, Kullisaar T, Hütt P, Mahlapuu R, Aunapuu M, Arend A,<br />

Zilmer M, Mikelsaar RH, Mikelsaar M. Immunological, antioxidative,<br />

and morphological response in combined treatment of ofloxacin and<br />

Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3 probiotic in Salmonella Typhimurium<br />

murine model. APMIS. 2010 Nov;118(11):864-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-<br />

0463.2010.02672.x.<br />

Wind RD, Tolboom H, Klare I, Huys G, Knol J. Tolerance<br />

and safety of the potentially probiotic strain Lactobacillus<br />

rhamnosus PRSF-L477: a randomised, double-blind placebocontrolled<br />

trial in healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug<br />

9:1-11.<br />

24


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Wu MH, Pan TM, Wu YJ, Chang SJ, Chang MS, Hu CY. Exopolysaccharide<br />

activities from probiotic bifidobacterium: Immunomodulatory effects<br />

(on J774A.1 macrophages) and antimicrobial properties. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Nov 15;144(1):104-10.<br />

Wutzke KD, Lotz M, Zipprich C. The effect of pre- and<br />

probiotics on the colonic ammonia metabolism in humans as<br />

measured by lactose-[(15)N(2)]ureide. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010<br />

Oct;64(10):1215-21.<br />

Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, Bocking<br />

AD. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Stimulates Colony-Stimulating<br />

Factor 3 (Granulocyte) (CSF3) Output in Placental Trophoblast Cells in<br />

a Fetal Sex-Dependant Manner. Biol Reprod. 2010 Sep 1.<br />

IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF <strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> INTAKE<br />

INFECTIONS (GI, RESPIRATORY, GENITO-URINARY, OTHER)<br />

Asahara T, Shimizu K, Takada T, Kado S, Yuki N, Morotomi M, Tanaka<br />

R, Nomoto K. Protective effect of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota<br />

against lethal infection with multi-drug resistant Salmonella enterica<br />

serovar Typhimurium DT104 in mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15.<br />

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04884.x.<br />

Berggren A, Lazou Ahrén I, Larsson N, Onning G. Randomised,<br />

double-blind and placebo-controlled study using new probiotic<br />

lactobacilli for strengthening the body immune defence against<br />

viral infections. Eur J Nutr. 2010 Aug 28.<br />

Braga TD, da Silva GA, de Lira PI, de Carvalho Lima M.<br />

Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei oral<br />

supplementation on necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birthweight<br />

preterm infants: a double-blind, randomized, controlled<br />

trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 27.<br />

Cazzola M, Pham-Thi N, Kerihuel JC, Durand H, Bohbot S.<br />

Efficacy of a synbiotic supplementation in the prevention of<br />

common winter diseases in children: a randomized, doubleblind,<br />

placebo-controlled pilot study. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010<br />

Oct;4(5):271-8.<br />

Chiu CH, Cheng CH, Gua WR, Guu YK, Cheng W. Dietary administration<br />

of the probiotic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae P13, enhanced the growth,<br />

innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper,<br />

Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Dec;29(6):1053-9.<br />

Donders GG, Van Bulck B, Van de Walle P, Kaiser RR, Pohlig G,<br />

Gonser S, Graf F. Effect of Lyophilized Lactobacilli and 0.03 mg<br />

Estriol (Gynoflor®) on Vaginitis and Vaginosis with Disrupted<br />

Vaginal Microflora: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind,<br />

Active-Controlled Pilot Study. Gynecol Obstet <strong>In</strong>vest. 2010 Oct<br />

16;70(4):264-272.<br />

Eaton KA, Honkala A, Auchtung TA, Britton RA. Probiotic Lactobacillus<br />

reuteri ameliorates disease due to Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli<br />

in germ free mice. <strong>In</strong>fect Immun. 2010 Oct 25.<br />

Ferrie S, Daley M. Lactobacillus GG as Treatment for Diarrhea<br />

During Enteral Feeding in Critical Illness: Randomized<br />

Controlled Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Oct 26.<br />

Geier MS, Mikkelsen LL, Torok VA, Allison GE, Olnood CG, Boulianne<br />

M, Hughes RJ, Choct M. Comparison of alternatives to in-feed<br />

antimicrobials for the prevention of clinical necrotic enteritis. J<br />

Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1329-1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />

2672.2010.04758.x.<br />

Grandy G, Medina M, Soria R, Terán CG, Araya M. <strong>Probiotics</strong><br />

in the treatment of acute rotavirus diarrhoea. A randomized,<br />

double-blind, controlled trial using two different probiotic<br />

preparations in Bolivian children. BMC <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Aug<br />

25;10:253.<br />

Guthmann F, Kluthe C, Bührer C. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for prevention of<br />

necrotising enterocolitis: an updated meta-analysis. Klin Padiatr. 2010<br />

Sep;222(5):284-90.<br />

Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo MS. Lactobacillus sakei BK19<br />

enriched diet enhances the immunity status and disease resistance to<br />

streptococcosis infection in kelp grouper, Epinephelus bruneus. Fish<br />

Shellfish Immunol. 2010 Dec;29(6):1037-43.<br />

Krause DO, Bhandari SK, House JD, Nyachoti CM. Response of nursery<br />

pigs to a synbiotic preparation of starch and an anti-Escherichia coli<br />

K88 probiotic. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15.<br />

Oudhuis GJ, Bergmans DC, Dormans T, Zwaveling JH, Kessels<br />

A, Prins MH, Stobberingh EE, Verbon A. <strong>Probiotics</strong> versus<br />

antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract: infection and<br />

mortality. <strong>In</strong>tensive Care Med. 2010 Aug 19.<br />

Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dhingra P, Dutta A,<br />

Verma P, Menon VP, Black RE. Prebiotic and probiotic fortified<br />

milk in prevention of morbidities among children: communitybased,<br />

randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. PLoS One.<br />

2010 Aug 13;5(8):e12164.<br />

Sur D, Manna B, Niyogi SK, Ramamurthy T, Palit A, Nomoto<br />

K, Takahashi T, Shima T, Tsuji H, Kurakawa T, Takeda Y, Nair<br />

GB, Bhattacharya SK. Role of probiotic in preventing acute<br />

diarrhoea in children: a community-based, randomized, doubleblind<br />

placebo-controlled field trial in an urban slum. Epidemiol<br />

<strong>In</strong>fect. 2010 Jul 30:1-8.<br />

Taipale T, Pienihäkkinen K, Isolauri E, Larsen C, Brockmann<br />

E, Alanen P, Jokela J, Söderling E. Bifidobacterium animalis<br />

subsp. lactis BB-12 in reducing the risk of infections in infancy.<br />

Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep 24:1-7.<br />

Ya W, Reifer C, Miller LE. Efficacy of vaginal probiotic capsules<br />

for recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double-blind, randomized,<br />

placebo-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010<br />

Aug;203(2):120.e1-6.<br />

Yasar B, Abut E, Kayadıbı H, Toros B, Sezıklı M, Akkan<br />

Z, Keskın Ö, Övünç Kurdas O. Efficacy of probiotics in<br />

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Turk J Gastroenterol.<br />

2010 Sep;21(3):212-7.<br />

ALLERGY & ATOPY<br />

Huang J, Zhong Y, Cai W, Zhang H, Tang W, Chen B. The effects of<br />

probiotics supplementation timing on an ovalbumin-sensitized rat<br />

model. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010 Nov;60(2):132-41. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00727.x.<br />

Koyama T, Kirjavainen PV, Fisher C, Anukam K, Summers K,<br />

Hekmat S, Reid G. Development and pilot evaluation of a novel<br />

probiotic mixture for the management of seasonal allergic<br />

rhinitis. Can J Microbiol. 2010 Sep;56(9):730-8.<br />

Nagata Y, Yoshida M, Kitazawa H, Araki E, Gomyo T.<br />

Improvements in seasonal allergic disease with Lactobacillus<br />

plantarum No. 14. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Sep<br />

23;74(9):1869-77.<br />

Penders J, Thijs C, Mommers M, Stobberingh EE, Dompeling<br />

E, Reijmerink NE, van den Brandt PA, Kerkhof M, Koppelman<br />

GH, Postma DS. <strong>In</strong>testinal lactobacilli and the DC-SIGN gene<br />

for their recognition by dendritic cells play a role in the aetiology<br />

of allergic manifestations. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt<br />

11):3298-305.<br />

Rose MA, Stieglitz F, Köksal A, Schubert R, Schulze J,<br />

Zielen S. Efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus GG on allergic<br />

sensitization and asthma in infants at risk. Clin Exp Allergy.<br />

2010 Sep;40(9):1398-405.<br />

Schiavi E, Barletta B, Butteroni C, Corinti S, Boirivant M, Di Felice<br />

G. Oral therapeutic administration of a probiotic mixture suppresses<br />

established Th2 responses and systemic anaphylaxis in a murine<br />

model of food allergy. Allergy. 2010 Nov 8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-<br />

9995.2010.02501.x.<br />

Schwarzer M, Repa A, Daniel C, Schabussova I, Hrncir T, Pot B,<br />

Stepankova R, Hudcovic T, Pollak A, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H,<br />

Wiedermann U, Kozakova H. Neonatal colonization of mice with<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum producing the aeroallergen Bet v 1 biases<br />

towards Th1 and T-regulatory responses upon systemic sensitization.<br />

Allergy. 2010 Sep 29. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02488.x.<br />

Shah MM, Miyamoto Y, Yamada Y, Yamashita H, Tanaka H, Ezaki T,<br />

Nagai H, <strong>In</strong>agaki N. Orally supplemented Lactobacillus acidophilus<br />

strain L-92 inhibits passive and active cutaneous anaphylaxis as<br />

well as 2,4-dinitroflurobenzene and mite faecal antigen induced<br />

atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in mice. Microbiol Immunol. 2010<br />

Sep;54(9):523-33.<br />

Torii S, Torii A, Itoh K, Urisu A, Terada A, Fujisawa T, Yamada K,<br />

Suzuki H, Ishida Y, Nakamura F, Kanzato H, Sawada D, Nonaka<br />

A, Hatanaka M, Fujiwara S. Effects of Oral Administration of<br />

Lactobacillus acidophilus L-92 on the Symptoms and Serum<br />

Markers of Atopic Dermatitis in Children. <strong>In</strong>t Arch Allergy<br />

Immunol. 2010 Sep 21;154(3):236-245.<br />

Van de Pol MA, Lutter R, Smids BS, Weersink EJ, van der Zee<br />

JS. Synbiotics reduce allergen-induced T-helper 2 response<br />

and improve peak expiratory flow in allergic asthmatics.<br />

Allergy. 2010 Aug 17.<br />

IBS & FUNCTIONAL GI DISORDERS<br />

Del Piano M, Carmagnola S, Anderloni A, Andorno S, Ballarè<br />

M, Balzarini M, Montino F, Orsello M, Pagliarulo M, Sartori M,<br />

Tari R, Sforza F, Capurso L. The use of probiotics in healthy<br />

volunteers with evacuation disorders and hard stools: a<br />

double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin<br />

Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S30-4.<br />

Francavilla R, Miniello V, Magistà AM, De Canio A, Bucci N,<br />

Gagliardi F, Lionetti E, Castellaneta S, Polimeno L, Peccarisi<br />

L, <strong>In</strong>drio F, Cavallo L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of<br />

Lactobacillus GG in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain.<br />

Pediatrics. 2010 Nov 15.<br />

25


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Jeon JR, Choi JH. Lactic acid fermentation of germinated barley fiber<br />

and proliferative function of colonic epithelial cells in loperamideinduced<br />

rats. J Med Food. 2010 Aug;13(4):950-60.<br />

Lee H, Kim YH, Kim JH, Chang DK, Kim JY, Son HJ, Rhee PL,<br />

Kim JJ, Rhee JC. A feasibility study of probiotics pretreatment<br />

as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy in constipated<br />

patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug;55(8):2344-51.<br />

Lyra A, Krogius-Kurikka L, Nikkilä J, Malinen E, Kajander<br />

K, Kurikka K, Korpela R, Palva A. Effect of a multispecies<br />

probiotic supplement on quantity of irritable bowel syndromerelated<br />

intestinal microbial phylotypes. BMC Gastroenterol.<br />

2010 Sep 19;10:110.<br />

Nakabayashi I, Nakamura M, Kawakami K, Ohta T, Kato I,<br />

Uchida K, Yoshida M. Effects of synbiotic treatment on serum<br />

level of p-cresol in haemodialysis patients: a preliminary study.<br />

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Oct 7.<br />

IBD AND OTHER INFLAMMATORY DISEASES<br />

Amdekar S, Singh V, Singh R, Sharma P, Keshav P, Kumar A.<br />

Lactobacillus casei reduces the <strong>In</strong>flammatory Joint Damage<br />

Associated with Collagen-<strong>In</strong>duced Arthritis (CIA) by Reducing the Pro-<br />

<strong>In</strong>flammatory Cytokines : Lactobacillus casei: COX-2 inhibitor. J Clin<br />

Immunol. 2010 Sep 14.<br />

Chu ZX, Chen HQ, Ma YL, Zhou YK, Zhang M, Zhang P, Qin HL.<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum prevents the upregulation of adhesion<br />

molecule expression in an experimental colitis model. Dig Dis Sci.<br />

2010 Sep;55(9):2505-13.<br />

Claes IJ, Lebeer S, Shen C, Verhoeven TL, Dilissen E, De Hertogh<br />

G, Bullens DM, Ceuppens JL, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts<br />

P, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Impact of lipoteichoic<br />

acid modification on the performance of the probiotic Lactobacillus<br />

rhamnosus GG in experimental colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010<br />

Nov;162(2):306-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04228.x. Epub<br />

2010 Aug 20.<br />

Grijó NN, Borra RC, Sdepanian VL. Proinflammatory and antiinflammatory<br />

cytokines present in the acute phase of experimental<br />

colitis treated with Saccharomyces boulardii. Dig Dis Sci. 2010<br />

Sep;55(9):2498-504.<br />

Hegazy SK, El-Bedewy MM. Effect of probiotics on proinflammatory<br />

cytokines and NF-kappaB activation in ulcerative<br />

colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 7;16(33):4145-51.<br />

Mondot S, Kang S, Furet JP, Aguirre de Carcer D, McSweeney<br />

C, Morrison M, Marteau P, Doré J, Leclerc M. Highlighting new<br />

phylogenetic specificities of Crohn’s disease microbiota. <strong>In</strong>flamm<br />

Bowel Dis. 2010 Aug 18.<br />

Savino F, Cordisco L, Tarasco V, Palumeri E, Calabrese R, Oggero R,<br />

Roos S, Matteuzzi D. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infantile colic:<br />

a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2010<br />

Sep;126(3):e526-33.<br />

Steed H, Macfarlane GT, Blackett KL, Bahrami B, Reynolds<br />

N, Walsh SV, Cummings JH, Macfarlane S. Clinical trial:<br />

the microbiological and immunological effects of synbiotic<br />

consumption - a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled<br />

study in active Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010<br />

Oct;32(7):872-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04417.x.<br />

Veiga P, Gallini CA, Beal C, Michaud M, Delaney ML, DuBois<br />

A, Khlebnikov A, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Punit S, Glickman JN,<br />

Onderdonk A, Glimcher LH, Garrett WS. Bifidobacterium animalis<br />

subsp. lactis fermented milk product reduces inflammation by altering<br />

a niche for colitogenic microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct<br />

19;107(42):18132-7.<br />

Watterlot L, Rochat T, Sokol H, Cherbuy C, Bouloufa I, Lefèvre F,<br />

Gratadoux JJ, Honvo-Hueto E, Chilmonczyk S, Blugeon S, Corthier<br />

G, Langella P, Bermúdez-Humarán LG. <strong>In</strong>tragastric administration of<br />

a superoxide dismutase-producing recombinant Lactobacillus casei<br />

BL23 strain attenuates DSS colitis in mice. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol. 2010<br />

Nov 15;144(1):35-41.<br />

NUTRITION: OBESITY, CHOLESTEROL…<br />

Aaltonen J, Ojala T, Laitinen K, Poussa T, Ozanne S, Isolauri E.<br />

Impact of maternal diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding<br />

on infant metabolic programming: a prospective randomized<br />

controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 13.<br />

Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Böhm J. Effect of addition of a probiotic<br />

micro-organism to broiler diet on intestinal mucosal architecture and<br />

electrophysiological parameters. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010<br />

Aug 1;94(4):486-94.<br />

Capcarova M, Hascik P, Kolesarova A, Kacaniova M, Mihok<br />

M, Pal G. The effect of selected microbial strains on internal<br />

milieu of broiler chickens after peroral administration. Res Vet<br />

Sci. 2010 Aug 17.<br />

Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Effect<br />

of mother’s weight on infant’s microbiota acquisition,<br />

composition, and activity during early infancy: a prospective<br />

follow-up study initiated in early pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr.<br />

2010 Nov;92(5):1023-30.<br />

Gebru E, Lee JS, Son JC, Yang SY, Shin SA, Kim B, Kim MK, Park SC.<br />

Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented<br />

feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acutephase<br />

response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with<br />

Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. J Anim Sci. 2010 Aug 20.<br />

Ilmonen J, Isolauri E, Poussa T, Laitinen K. Impact of<br />

dietary counselling and probiotic intervention on maternal<br />

anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy: A<br />

randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct 21.<br />

Kang JH, Yun SI, Park HO. Effects of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 on<br />

body weight and adipose tissue mass in diet-induced overweight rats.<br />

J Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(5):712-4.<br />

Kondo S, Xiao JZ, Satoh T, Odamaki T, Takahashi S, Sugahara<br />

H, Yaeshima T, Iwatsuki K, Kamei A, Abe K. Antiobesity effects<br />

of bifidobacterium breve strain B-3 supplementation in a mouse<br />

model with high-fat diet-induced obesity. Biosci Biotechnol<br />

Biochem. 2010 Aug 23;74(8):1656-61.<br />

Sefcíková Z, Kmet V, Bujnáková D, Racek L, Mozes S. Development<br />

of gut microflora in obese and lean rats. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010<br />

Jul;55(4):373-5.<br />

Taheri HR, Moravej H, Tabandeh F, Zaghari M, Shivazad M. Efficacy of<br />

combined or single use of Lactobacillus crispatus LT116 and L. johnsonii<br />

LT171 on broiler performance. Br Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;51(5):580-5.<br />

NEW APPLICATION & OTHER<br />

Andreasen AS, Larsen N, Pedersen-Skovsgaard T, Berg RM,<br />

Møller K, Svendsen KD, Jakobsen M, Pedersen BK. Effects of<br />

Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM on insulin sensitivity and the<br />

systemic inflammatory response in human subjects. Br J Nutr.<br />

2010 Sep 6:1-8.<br />

Castro MS, Molina MA, Di Sciullo P, Azpiroz MB, Leocata Nieto F,<br />

Sterín-Speziale NB, Mongini C, Manghi MA. Beneficial activity of<br />

Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in the anti-lymphoma protective<br />

response. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1234-43. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04747.x.<br />

Desbonnet L, Garrett L, Clarke G, Kiely B, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Effects<br />

of the probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis in the maternal separation<br />

model of depression. Neuroscience. 2010 Nov 10;170(4):1179-88.<br />

Doi A, Nakajo K, Kamiya T, Ohkusu K. Splenic abscess caused<br />

by Lactobacillus paracasei. J <strong>In</strong>fect Chemother. 2010 Jul 29.<br />

Gioacchini G, Maradonna F, Lombardo F, Bizzaro D, Olivotto I, Carnevali<br />

O. <strong>In</strong>crease of fecundity by probiotic administration in zebrafish (Danio<br />

rerio). Reproduction. 2010 Sep 10.<br />

Hammad AM, Shimamoto T. Towards a compatible probiotic-antibiotic<br />

combination therapy: assessment of antimicrobial resistance in the<br />

Japanese probiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;109(4):1349-60. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04762.x.<br />

Iwamoto T, Suzuki N, Tanabe K, Takeshita T, Hirofuji T. Effects<br />

of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius WB21 on halitosis and oral<br />

health: an open-label pilot trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol<br />

Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Aug;110(2):201-8.<br />

Jenks K, Stebbings S, Burton J, Schultz M, Herbison<br />

P, Highton J. Probiotic therapy for the treatment of<br />

spondyloarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol.<br />

2010 Oct;37(10):2118-25.<br />

Lee KC, Liu CF, Lin TH, Pan TM. Safety and risk assessment of the<br />

genetically modified Lactococci on rats intestinal bacterial flora. <strong>In</strong>t J<br />

Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):164-9.<br />

Liu JE, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Dong PL, Chen M, Duan ZP. Probiotic<br />

yogurt effects on intestinal flora of patients with chronic liver<br />

disease. Nurs Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;59(6):426-32..<br />

Lu YC, Yin LT, Chang WT, Huang JS. Effect of Lactobacillus reuteri<br />

GMNL-263 treatment on renal fibrosis in diabetic rats. J Biosci Bioeng.<br />

2010 Aug 4.<br />

Luong ML, Sareyyupoglu B, Nguyen MH, Silveira FP, Shields RK,<br />

Potoski BA, Pasculle WA, Clancy CJ, Toyoda Y. Lactobacillus<br />

probiotic use in cardiothoracic transplant recipients: a link to<br />

invasive Lactobacillus infection? Transpl <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Oct<br />

7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00580.x.<br />

Mayrhofer S, van Hoek AH, Mair C, Huys G, Aarts HJ, Kneifel W,<br />

Domig KJ. Antibiotic susceptibility of members of the Lactobacillus<br />

acidophilus group using broth microdilution and molecular<br />

identification of their resistance determinants. <strong>In</strong>t J Food Microbiol.<br />

2010 Nov 15;144(1):81-7.<br />

26


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Messaoudi M, Lalonde R, Violle N, Javelot H, Desor D,<br />

Nejdi A, Bisson JF, Rougeot C, Pichelin M, Cazaubiel M,<br />

Cazaubiel JM. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of<br />

a probiotic formulation ( Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and<br />

Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects.<br />

Br J Nutr. 2010 Oct 26:1-9.<br />

Munakata S, Arakawa C, Kohira R, Fujita Y, Fuchigami<br />

T, Mugishima H. A case of D-lactic acid encephalopathy<br />

associated with use of probiotics. Brain Dev. 2010<br />

Sep;32(8):691-4.<br />

Myhre R, Brantsæter AL, Myking S, Gjessing HK, Sengpiel V,<br />

Meltzer HM, Haugen M, Jacobsson B. <strong>In</strong>take of probiotic food<br />

and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010<br />

Oct 27.<br />

Qiao GH, Shan AS, Ma N, Ma QQ, Sun ZW. Effect of supplemental<br />

Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese<br />

Holstein cows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010 Aug<br />

1;94(4):429-36.<br />

Ranganathan N, Ranganathan P, Friedman EA, Joseph A,<br />

Delano B, Goldfarb DS, Tam P, Rao AV, Anteyi E, Musso CG.<br />

Pilot study of probiotic dietary supplementation for promoting<br />

healthy kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease.<br />

Adv Ther. 2010 Sep;27(9):634-47.<br />

Robin F, Paillard C, Marchandin H, Demeocq F, Bonnet R,<br />

Hennequin C. Lactobacillus rhamnosus meningitis following<br />

recurrent episodes of bacteremia in a child undergoing<br />

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Nov;48(11):4317-9.<br />

Szabo NJ, Dolan LC, Burdock GA, Shibano T, Sato SI, Suzuki<br />

H, Uesugi T, Yamahira S, Toba M, Ueno H. Safety evaluation of<br />

Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010<br />

Nov 5.<br />

Uchida M, Shimizu K, Kurakazu K. Yogurt containing Lactobacillus<br />

gasseri OLL 2716 (LG21 yogurt) accelerated the healing of acetic acidinduced<br />

gastric ulcer in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010 Sep<br />

23;74(9):1891-4.<br />

Weizman Z. <strong>Probiotics</strong> Use in Childhood Acute Diarrhea: A Web-based<br />

Survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 8.<br />

Zhang MM, Cheng JQ, Lu YR, Yi ZH, Yang P, Wu XT. Use of pre-,<br />

pro- and synbiotics in patients with acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.<br />

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 21;16(31):3970-8.<br />

REVIEWS<br />

Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB, Gálvez A. Diversity and applications<br />

of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul 31.<br />

Allen SJ, Martinez EG, Gregorio GV, Dans LF. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for treating<br />

acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov<br />

10;11:CD003048..<br />

Allgeyer LC, Miller MJ, Lee SY. Sensory and microbiological quality<br />

of yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. J Dairy Sci. 2010<br />

Oct;93(10):4471-9.<br />

Al-Mendalawi MD, Heydarian F. Comparison between traditional<br />

yogurt and probiotic yogurt in non-inflammatory acute gastroenteritis.<br />

Saudi Med J. 2010 Sep;31(9):1071-2; author reply 1071-2.<br />

Badel S, Bernardi T, Michaud P. New perspectives for Lactobacilli<br />

exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol Adv. 2010 Aug 31.<br />

Beattie LM, Hansen R, Barclay AR. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for preterm<br />

infants: confounding features warrant caution. Pediatrics. 2010<br />

Sep;126(3):e742-3; author reply e743-5.<br />

Bernaola Aponte G, Bada Mancilla CA, Carreazo Pariasca NY, Rojas<br />

Galarza RA. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for treating persistent diarrhoea in children.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;11:CD007401..<br />

Bernstein CN. New insights into IBD epidemiology: are there any<br />

lessons for treatment? Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):406-10.<br />

Bischoff SC, Zeitz M. Scientific evidence for the medical use of<br />

probiotics. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:1-5.<br />

Blaut M, Bischoff SC. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and obesity. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57<br />

Suppl:20-3.<br />

Boyle RJ. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for preventing eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2010<br />

Sep;163(3):450.<br />

Braegger CP. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis.<br />

Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:14-5.<br />

Buts JP, De Keyser N. <strong>In</strong>teraction of Saccharomyces boulardii with<br />

intestinal brush border membranes: key to probiotic effects? J Pediatr<br />

Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Oct;51(4):532-3.<br />

Cabana MD. Evidence increasing that probiotics reduce incidence of<br />

necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2010<br />

Nov;157(5):864-5..<br />

Camilleri M, Tack JF. Current medical treatments of dyspepsia<br />

and irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010<br />

Sep;39(3):481-93.<br />

Capurso L, Morelli L. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and European Food Safety Authority<br />

health claims. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S1.<br />

Cottone M, Orlando A, Renna S. <strong>In</strong>vestigational agents for Crohn’s<br />

disease. Expert Opin <strong>In</strong>vestig Drugs. 2010 Oct;19(10):1147-59.<br />

Coudeyras S, Forestier C. Microbiote et probiotiques : impact en sante<br />

humaine. Can J Microbiol. 2010 Aug;56(8):611-50.<br />

Del Giudice MM, Leonardi S, Maiello N, Brunese FP. Food allergy<br />

and probiotics in childhood. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44 Suppl<br />

1:S22-5.<br />

Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Calasso M, Gobbetti M. Proteomics of the<br />

bacterial cross-talk by quorum sensing. J Proteomics. 2010 Oct 15.<br />

Diamant M, Blaak EE, de Vos WM. Do nutrient-gut-microbiota<br />

interactions play a role in human obesity, insulin resistance and type 2<br />

diabetes? Obes Rev. 2010 Aug 13.<br />

Dimitroglou A, Merrifield DL, Carnevali O, Picchietti S, Avella M,<br />

Daniels C, Güroy D, Davies SJ. Microbial manipulations to improve fish<br />

health and production - A Mediterranean perspective. Fish Shellfish<br />

Immunol. 2010 Aug 27.<br />

Ducrotté P. [Microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome]. Gastroenterol<br />

Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S52-6.<br />

Falagas ME, Korbila IP, Karageorgopoulos DE. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for the<br />

prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Expert Rev Respir<br />

Med. 2010 Oct;4(5):567-71.<br />

Finch J, Munhutu MN, Whitaker-Worth DL. Atopic dermatitis and<br />

nutrition. Clin Dermatol. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):605-14..<br />

Fölster-Holst R. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in the treatment and prevention of atopic<br />

dermatitis. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:16-9.<br />

Foster KJ, Lin S, Turck CJ. Current and emerging strategies for<br />

treating hepatic encephalopathy. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2010<br />

Sep;22(3):341-50.<br />

Friswell M, Campbell B, Rhodes J. The role of bacteria in the<br />

pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Liver. 2010<br />

Sep;4(3):295-306.<br />

Gareau MG, Sherman PM, Walker WA. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and the gut<br />

microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol<br />

Hepatol. 2010 Sep;7(9):503-14.<br />

Garland SM, Jacobs SE, Tobin JM, Opie GF, Donath S; ProPrems<br />

study group. A cautionary note on instituting probiotics into routine<br />

clinical care for premature infants. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e741-2;<br />

author reply e743-5.<br />

Gobbetti M, Cagno RD, De Angelis M. Functional microorganisms<br />

for functional food quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010<br />

Sep;50(8):716-27.<br />

Gómez-Llorente C, Muñoz S, Gil A. Role of Toll-like receptors in the<br />

development of immunotolerance mediated by probiotics. Proc Nutr<br />

Soc. 2010 Aug;69(3):381-9.<br />

Goulet O, Joly F. [<strong>In</strong>testinal microbiota in short bowel syndrome].<br />

Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S37-43.<br />

Guéniche A, Bastien P, Ovigne JM, Kermici M, Courchay G, Chevalier<br />

V, Breton L, Castiel-Higounenc I. Bifidobacterium longum lysate, a new<br />

ingredient for reactive skin. Exp Dermatol. 2010 Aug;19(8):e1-8.<br />

Guslandi M. Medical treatment of uncomplicated diverticular disease<br />

of the colon: any progress? Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2010<br />

Sep;56(3):367-70.<br />

Hajela N, Nair GB, Ganguly NK. Are probiotics a feasible intervention<br />

for prevention of diarrhoea in the developing world? Gut Pathog. 2010<br />

Aug 29;2(1):10.<br />

Hall J, Hammerich K, Roberts P. New paradigms in the management of<br />

diverticular disease. Curr Probl Surg. 2010 Sep;47(9):680-735.<br />

Håvarstein LS. <strong>In</strong>creasing competence in the genus Streptococcus.<br />

Mol Microbiol. 2010 Nov;78(3):541-4..<br />

Hummelen R, Vos AP, van’t Land B, van Norren K, Reid G. Altered<br />

host-microbe interaction in HIV: a target for intervention with pro- and<br />

prebiotics. <strong>In</strong>t Rev Immunol. 2010 Oct;29(5):485-513.<br />

Im E, Pothoulakis C. [Recent advances in Saccharomyces boulardii<br />

research]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S62-70.<br />

27


<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong><br />

<strong>WATCH</strong><br />

ISSUE N°4 REFERENCES<br />

Contents :<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

THE MAIN POINTS OF<br />

THE QUARTER<br />

1. CHARACTERISATION OF<br />

<strong>PROBIOTICS</strong> AND<br />

PROBIOTIC FOODS<br />

2. PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

INTERACTION WITH THE<br />

HOST<br />

3. IN VIVO OUTCOMES OF<br />

PROBIOTIC INTAKE<br />

REFERENCES<br />

KEY DATES<br />

Jack L, Coyer F, Courtney M, Venkatesh B. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and diarrhoea<br />

management in enterally tube fed critically ill patients-What is the<br />

evidence? <strong>In</strong>tensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Aug 6.<br />

Kachaamy T, Bajaj JS. Diet and cognition in chronic liver disease. Curr<br />

Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 21.<br />

Klein G. Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Characterization of<br />

Probiotic and Clinical Lactobacillus Strains in Relation to Safety<br />

Aspects of <strong>Probiotics</strong>. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Oct 29.<br />

Koteyko N. Balancing the good, the bad and the better: a discursive<br />

perspective on probiotics and healthy eating. Health (London). 2010<br />

Nov;14(6):585-602..<br />

Lakhan SE, Kirchgessner A. Gut inflammation in chronic fatigue<br />

syndrome. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Oct 12;7:79.<br />

Lee JH, O’Sullivan DJ. Genomic insights into bifidobacteria. Microbiol<br />

Mol Biol Rev. 2010 Sep;74(3):378-416.<br />

Marteau P. [The clinical importance of intestinal microbiota].<br />

Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S93-7.<br />

McFarland LV. Lactobacillus GG prevented nosocomial gastrointestinal<br />

and respiratory tract infections. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010<br />

Oct 19.<br />

McFarland LV. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and diarrhea. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57<br />

Suppl:10-1.<br />

Meier R. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in irritable bowel syndrome. Ann Nutr Metab.<br />

2010;57 Suppl:12-3.<br />

Meuer S. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and respiratory tract diseases. Ann Nutr Metab.<br />

2010;57 Suppl:24-6.<br />

Millar M, Wilks M, Fleming P, Costeloe K. Should the use of probiotics<br />

in the preterm be routine? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010<br />

Sep 24.<br />

Moayyedi P. ACP Journal Club: probiotics improve symptoms in<br />

adults with the irritable bowel syndrome. Ann <strong>In</strong>tern Med. 2010 Sep<br />

21;153(6):JC3-7.<br />

Montgomery JY, Bajaj JS. Advances in the Evaluation and Management<br />

of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Oct 6.<br />

Moore SR. Update on prolonged and persistent diarrhea in children.<br />

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 10.<br />

Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Obesity, diabetes, and gut<br />

microbiota: the hygiene hypothesis expanded? Diabetes Care. 2010<br />

Oct;33(10):2277-84.<br />

Neu J, Shuster J. Nonadministration of routine probiotics unethical-really?<br />

Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e740-1; author reply e743-5.<br />

Patel AK, Singhania RR, Pandey A, Chincholkar SB. Probiotic bile salt<br />

hydrolase: current developments and perspectives. Appl Biochem<br />

Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(1):166-80.<br />

Payne D. Sticky labels. BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5861. doi: 10.1136/<br />

bmj.c5861.<br />

Pham LC, Hoogenkamp MA, Exterkate RA, Terefework Z, de Soet JJ,<br />

Ten Cate JM, Crielaard W, Zaura E. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus<br />

GG on saliva-derived microcosms. Arch Oral Biol. 2010 Oct 22.<br />

Prado S, Romalde JL, Barja JL. Review of probiotics for use in bivalve<br />

hatcheries. Vet Microbiol. 2010 Oct 26;145(3-4):187-97.<br />

Preidis GA, Hill C, Guerrant RL, Ramakrishna BS, Tannock GW,<br />

Versalovic J. <strong>Probiotics</strong>, Enteric and Diarrheal Diseases, and Global<br />

Health. Gastroenterology. 2010 Nov 11.<br />

Quigley EM. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in gastrointestinal disorders. Hosp Pract<br />

(Minneap). 2010 Nov;38(4):122-9..<br />

Rastmanesh R. High polyphenol, low probiotic diet for weight loss<br />

because of intestinal microbiota interaction. Chem Biol <strong>In</strong>teract. 2010<br />

Oct 15.<br />

Rayes N, Soeters PB. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in surgical and critically ill patients.<br />

Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:29-31.<br />

Roberfroid M, Gibson GR, Hoyles L, McCartney AL, Rastall R, Rowland<br />

I, Wolvers D, Watzl B, Szajewska H, Stahl B, Guarner F, Respondek F,<br />

Whelan K, Coxam V, Davicco MJ, Léotoing L, Wittrant Y, Delzenne NM,<br />

Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Meheust A. Prebiotic effects: metabolic and<br />

health benefits. Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104 Suppl 2:S1-63.<br />

Rosenstiel P, Stange EF. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and intestinal diseases. Ann Nutr<br />

Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:27-8.<br />

Sánchez B, Urdaci MC, Margolles A. Extracellular proteins secreted<br />

by probiotic bacteria as mediators of effects that promote mucosabacteria<br />

interactions. Microbiology. 2010 Nov;156(Pt 11):3232-42.<br />

Savino F, Tarasco V. New treatments for infant colic. Curr Opin Pediatr.<br />

2010 Sep 21.<br />

Scarpellini E, Campanale M, Leone D, Purchiaroni F, Vitale G, Lauritano<br />

EC, Gasbarrini A. Gut microbiota and obesity. <strong>In</strong>tern Emerg Med. 2010<br />

Oct;5 Suppl 1:S53-6.<br />

Schölmerich J. Evolving concepts in IBD therapy: what should be<br />

studied in the future? Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):472-7.<br />

Schwartz M, Regueiro M. Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative<br />

Crohn’s Disease Recurrence: An Update for a New Decade. Curr<br />

Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Nov 2.<br />

Settanni L, Moschetti G. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used to<br />

improve cheese quality and provide health benefits. Food Microbiol.<br />

2010 Sep;27(6):691-7.<br />

Shah SB. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for ulcerative colitis ... Are the good bugs back?<br />

Gastroenterology. 2010 Sep;139(3):1054-6; discussion 1056.<br />

Shanahan F, Collins SM. Pharmabiotic manipulation of the microbiota<br />

in gastrointestinal disorders, from rationale to reality. Gastroenterol<br />

Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;39(3):721-6.<br />

Shanahan F. <strong>Probiotics</strong> in Perspective. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct 19.<br />

Shanahan F. The colonic microflora and probiotic therapy in health and<br />

disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 1.<br />

Sherman MP. New concepts of microbial translocation in the<br />

neonatal intestine: mechanisms and prevention. Clin Perinatol. 2010<br />

Sep;37(3):565-79.<br />

Slattery L, O’Callaghan J, Fitzgerald GF, Beresford T, Ross RP. <strong>In</strong>vited<br />

review: Lactobacillus helveticus--a thermophilic dairy starter related to<br />

gut bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4435-54.<br />

Sleator RD. <strong>Probiotics</strong> -- a viable therapeutic alternative for enteric<br />

infections especially in the developing world. Discov Med. 2010<br />

Aug;10(51):119-24.<br />

Smith TJ, Margolis LM, Young AJ. Should military dining facilities offer<br />

and promote consumption of probiotic-containing foods? Mil Med.<br />

2010 Oct;175(10):770-83.<br />

Stoidis CN, Misiakos EP, Patapis P, Fotiadis CI, Spyropoulos BG.<br />

Potential benefits of pro- and prebiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity<br />

and intestinal barrier in short bowel syndrome. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Oct<br />

21:1-9.<br />

Surawicz CM. [The microbiota and infectious diarrhea]. Gastroenterol<br />

Clin Biol. 2010 Sep;34 Suppl 1:S29-36.<br />

Szajewska H. Advances and limitations of evidence-based medicine-impact<br />

for probiotics. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl:6-9.<br />

Tang ML, Lahtinen SJ, Boyle RJ. <strong>Probiotics</strong> and prebiotics: clinical<br />

effects in allergic disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Oct;22(5):626-34.<br />

Tangney M. Gene therapy for cancer: dairy bacteria as delivery vectors.<br />

Discov Med. 2010 Sep;10(52):195-200.<br />

Trebichavsky I, Splichal I, Rada V, Splichalova A. Modulation of natural<br />

immunity in the gut by Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917. Nutr Rev.<br />

2010 Aug;68(8):459-64.<br />

Turner P. Providing optimal nutritional support on the intensive care<br />

unit: key challenges and practical solutions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010<br />

Nov;69(4):574-81.<br />

Turpin W, Humblot C, Thomas M, Guyot JP. Lactobacilli as multifaceted<br />

probiotics with poorly disclosed molecular mechanisms. <strong>In</strong>t J Food<br />

Microbiol. 2010 Oct 15;143(3):87-102.<br />

Venugopalan V, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. Regulatory oversight and<br />

safety of probiotic use. Emerg <strong>In</strong>fect Dis. 2010 Nov;16(11):1661-5..<br />

Visich KL, Yeo TP. The prophylactic use of probiotics in the prevention<br />

of radiation therapy-induced diarrhea. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010<br />

Aug;14(4):467-73.<br />

Widhalm K, Ghods E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a challenge for<br />

pediatricians. <strong>In</strong>t J Obes (Lond). 2010 Oct;34(10):1451-67.<br />

Yao TC, Chang CJ, Hsu YH, Huang JL. <strong>Probiotics</strong> for allergic diseases:<br />

realities and myths. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Sep;21(6):900-19.<br />

Zivkovic AM, German JB, Lebrilla CB, Mills DA. Microbes and Health<br />

Sackler Colloquium: Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the<br />

infant gastrointestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 4.<br />

28


probiotics<br />

watch<br />

issUE N°4<br />

KEY DATES<br />

<strong>In</strong>ternational Human<br />

Microbiome Congress<br />

METHOD<br />

> Monitoring period : 28/07/2010 to 15/11/2010<br />

> Database : Medline<br />

> Result : 371 publications<br />

THE EDITORIAL COMMITTE<br />

February 26<br />

March 1<br />

March 9-11<br />

May 7-10<br />

May 13-17<br />

May 20-24<br />

> Keywords : probiotic / lactic acid bacteria /<br />

streptococcus thermophilus / lactobacilli / fermented<br />

milk / bifidobacteria<br />

this probiotics watch is designed as a time-saving tool for scientists and clinicians interested in probiotic research.<br />

in an interactive format, the quarterly report provides timely, quasi-exhaustive lists of the scientific publications of<br />

the previous three months. it sorts them by topic and highlights some of the most relevant results. readers can<br />

also check out upcoming scientific events and regular bibliometric analyses.<br />

objectivity is a strong commitment, that’s why the articles are selected by an editorial committee, composed of<br />

renowned scientists in the field. Editorial committee members also comment on what they believe are the quarter’s<br />

most relevant publications.<br />

Last but not least each issue features an editorial by a probiotic expert, which offers special insight into this<br />

fascinating field of science.<br />

Bruno Pot,<br />

<strong>In</strong>stitut Pasteur de Lille, FRANCE.<br />

Hania Szajewska,<br />

The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, POLAND.<br />

James Versalovic,<br />

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.<br />

April 14-16<br />

The members : Its missions :<br />

Vancouver, Canada<br />

http://www.cag-acg.org<br />

Vancouver, Canada<br />

http://www.cvent.com/EVENTS/<strong>In</strong>fo/<br />

Summary.aspx?e=c4aa192c-e47c-44fbb1dc-15dd34e5b2c2<br />

Chicago, USA<br />

http://www.ddw.org<br />

San Francisco, USA<br />

http://www.immunology2011.org<br />

Washington, USA<br />

http://gm.asm.org/<br />

Providing international and multidisciplinary<br />

vision.<br />

Selecting the articles of interest in the<br />

probiotics field.<br />

Commenting the most relevant publications.<br />

HEALTH AFFAIRS<br />

probioticswatch@danone.com<br />

www.e-probioticswatch.com<br />

San Fransisco, USA<br />

http://www.nature.com/<br />

natureconferences/mmi2011/index.html<br />

Realized with iNTUiTiO and Strat & Gérie, 2010<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!