12.10.2014 Views

Editorial - Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Editorial - Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Editorial - Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 Paradigma económico Año 3 Núm. 1<br />

To formally test the presence of a unit root, Zivot and Andrews<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red the following t statistic for testing a=1 in (2),<br />

(3)<br />

Notice that this statistic <strong>de</strong>pends on the location of the break<br />

fraction . In this framework, the goal of Zivot and Andrews is<br />

to estimate the breakpoint that gives the heaviest weight to the<br />

trend stationary alternative, that is, the date of the break is chosen<br />

to give the least favourable result for the null hypothesis (1) using<br />

the test statistic (3). In other words, is chosen to minimise the<br />

t statistic for testing a=1. Let <strong>de</strong>note such minimising value;<br />

then, by <strong>de</strong>finition,<br />

where is an specified subset of (0,1).<br />

The number of extra regressors, k, required in the adf regressions<br />

is allowed to vary for each tentative choice of . In turn, in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to <strong>de</strong>termine the truncation lag parameter, k, we follow the<br />

same selection procedure proposed by Perron (1989). 12 Finally,<br />

let us say that when we treat the selection of as a result of<br />

the estimation procedure we can no longer use the critical values<br />

of Perron (1989). Therefore, Zivot and Andrews (1992) <strong>de</strong>rive<br />

the asymptotic distributions of the test statistic in (4) and the<br />

corresponding critical values to test the null in (1) against the<br />

alternative in (2). 13<br />

(4)<br />

12. The procedure starts with an upper bound lag, say k max<br />

. If the last inclu<strong>de</strong>d lag<br />

is significant, choose k = k max<br />

; if not, reduce k by 1 until the last lag becomes significant.<br />

If no lags are significant, set k = 0; k max<br />

is set equal to 8 by Perron (1989). A 10% value<br />

of the asymptotic normal distribution, 1.60, is applied to evaluate the significance of the<br />

last lag. Moreover, Ng and Perron (1995) use a simulation approach to prove that these<br />

sequential tests are superior to the information-based methods, such as the information<br />

criteria of Akaike and Schwarz, since the former shows less size distortions without<br />

much loss of power. Zivot and Andrews (1992) and Lumsdaine and Papell (1997) used<br />

the same approach.<br />

13. For further methodological <strong>de</strong>tails see Zivot and Andrews (1992). Lucatero

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!