La recherche scientifique face aux défis de l'énergie - BibSciences.org
La recherche scientifique face aux défis de l'énergie - BibSciences.org
La recherche scientifique face aux défis de l'énergie - BibSciences.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 29<br />
In the immediate short-term future (3 yrs) there is a need<br />
– To i<strong>de</strong>ntify, among the possible energy policy orientations, those to be<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red as priorities and, on this basis, to <strong>de</strong>fine an energy policy,<br />
coherent not only at the national level but also, if possible, at the<br />
European level.<br />
– To make an accurate assessment as to the amounts of resources<br />
available and the conditions that could warrant exploitation of nonconventional<br />
hydrocarbon sources, notably shale gas and likewise take<br />
into account the rapid policy changes in some major industrialised<br />
countries (USA, UK…).<br />
– To un<strong>de</strong>rtake and implement timely <strong>de</strong>cisions to resolve the major<br />
problems i<strong>de</strong>ntified today. A case in point is that of nuclear wastes,<br />
<strong>de</strong>stined to be disposed of in geological repositories (French <strong>La</strong>w 2006).<br />
A new law in this area is planned for year 2015 to clarify and <strong>de</strong>fine<br />
the conditions for the un<strong>de</strong>rground storage and this horizon must be<br />
taken into account inasmuch as the results of research work in relation<br />
to safety concerns for waste storage are already available. It is to be<br />
noted, that the French Cour <strong>de</strong>s Comptes [national comptroller] report<br />
on the electro-nuclear sector activities, indicates that the uncertainty<br />
factor induced by costs of disposing wastes from industrialised power<br />
generation in nuclear reactors, and likewise for future <strong>de</strong>commissioning<br />
and dismantling of plants, will only have a weak effect on the cost of<br />
producing electricity from nuclear sources (e.g., doubling up the costs of<br />
disposing nuclear wastes would only lead to a 1% increase in<br />
production cost balance).<br />
– Not to take <strong>de</strong>cisions dictated by essentially political consi<strong>de</strong>rations<br />
without waiting for a scientific and technological assessment, <strong>de</strong>cisions<br />
which would negatively influence the <strong>de</strong>licate balance between fossil/<br />
renewable/nuclear resources and the <strong>de</strong>velopment of associated<br />
technological infrastructures. Incoherent policy making has been<br />
recently exemplified in the case of photovoltaic power generation. The<br />
Committee hopes that such errors will not be repeated when time will<br />
come to making <strong>de</strong>cisions about 4th generation nuclear reactor<br />
research <strong>de</strong>sign and planning.<br />
In the mid-term period (2020-2030)<br />
What are the real possibilities to see France’s main energy sources evolve over<br />
the coming 20 years? To what extent may nuclear generated power be<br />
replaced by intermittent energy sources?