20.07.2013 Views

CONTENTS - Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica

CONTENTS - Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica

CONTENTS - Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graeber, Tanenhaus (1993) propose an informal approach to fractions designed to give<br />

them a concrete sense, using fractions as numbers for measuring sizes and thereby<br />

buil<strong>di</strong>ng an informal knowledge.<br />

Brown (1993) emphasizes the necessity to find common theories and models in order to<br />

overcome the fragmentation of the research into learning <strong>di</strong>fficulties.<br />

Giménez (1994) proposes a <strong>di</strong>stinction between “<strong>di</strong>vide” in everyday language and<br />

“fraction” in Mathematics, using accounts of experiences and various stimuli together<br />

with classroom <strong>di</strong>scussion designed to create greater integration between <strong>di</strong>fferent<br />

situations of use of fractions.<br />

Groff (1994) is one of numerous researchers who believe that fractions should be<br />

banished from the first years of schooling. Others argue the contrary, sustaining that<br />

informal construction of the idea of fraction should begin in the Infants school. I<br />

personally believe that the latter position is correct, while it is clearly necessary to<br />

proceed with caution.<br />

Mariotti, Sainati Nello, Sciolis Marino (1995) examine the skills that students say that<br />

possess at the moment of passage from Middle to Secondary school, <strong>di</strong>scovering that<br />

they generally believe that <strong>di</strong>fferent sets of numbers and unconnected and that the<br />

written form used determines the nature of the number.<br />

Kamii, Clark (1995) consider the classic question of the <strong>di</strong>fficulty of understan<strong>di</strong>ng the<br />

relation of equivalence between fractions, a question which will be of interest when<br />

considering teaching approaches.<br />

Pitkethly, Hunting (1996) provide an extremely wide and useful critical summary of<br />

many of the <strong>di</strong>rections of research in this field, obviously without explicit educational<br />

practical suggestions. The present study is a modest attempt to participate in the<br />

construction of a similar summary for the period up to 2005.<br />

Sensevy (1996a) describes a teaching-learning experience with fourth and fifth year<br />

primary pupils concerning the constant negotiation of meanings and construction of<br />

formal models in the classroom during the handling of problems involving fractions.<br />

The objective was that of achieving effective communication. Meanings and formal<br />

models were based on appropriate semantic tools designed to enable shared meanings.<br />

New social norms give rise to a new form of <strong>di</strong>dactic contract. The study is based on a<br />

doctoral thesis (1994).<br />

Sensevy (1996b) is also responsible for an experimental teaching activity called “The<br />

Journal of Fractions”, conducted over a period of two years in fourth and fifth year<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!