15.01.2013 Views

Docent vertelt: Taalonderzoek binnen en buiten de gebaande paden

Docent vertelt: Taalonderzoek binnen en buiten de gebaande paden

Docent vertelt: Taalonderzoek binnen en buiten de gebaande paden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Have you ever stood to wait for<br />

a bus or a train? Or have you be<strong>en</strong><br />

caught in a traffic jam waiting pati<strong>en</strong>tly<br />

for the other cars to move?<br />

If you are like me, you will have<br />

looked at your watch, you will have<br />

walked up and down the track and<br />

you will have called the transport<br />

system very inappropriate things.<br />

Here let us try another approach:<br />

Why do we have to wait?<br />

What is the reason? Technical<br />

difficulties, human errors and bad<br />

weather conditions pop up in our<br />

mind like mystical grand answers.<br />

But as we are sci<strong>en</strong>tists we have<br />

to look beyond this convincing appearance<br />

and un<strong>de</strong>rstand the real<br />

cause of the ph<strong>en</strong>om<strong>en</strong>a. If we do<br />

this we will find, that most of the<br />

time there is just a single <strong>de</strong>fect<br />

occurring. This <strong>de</strong>fect propagates<br />

through the whole network as increasing<br />

<strong>de</strong>lays. The result ranges<br />

from an uncomfortable waiting period<br />

to a complete break-down of<br />

the system (catastrophe).<br />

Now if we would be anything but<br />

<strong>en</strong>gineers, apart from being sci<strong>en</strong>tists,<br />

we might be tempted to say<br />

that this is just how the world is. But<br />

we are <strong>en</strong>gineers and so we have<br />

to ask: Is this necessary? Or more<br />

concrete: Is there a transport system<br />

possible without this problems?<br />

We do not have to look far. In fact<br />

we don’t ev<strong>en</strong> need to stand up. Just<br />

take a look at your arm. How many<br />

blood cells do you think are moving<br />

5<br />

Transport & Turing<br />

Niklas Semmler<br />

through your veins every minute?<br />

Yet have you ever heard about a<br />

traffic jam of blood cells? (And if<br />

you have how many people do you<br />

think would be alive if it happ<strong>en</strong>ed<br />

a lot?)<br />

Many living organisms use<br />

transport networks in one way or<br />

another. So it must be possible,<br />

to make a system that is at least<br />

partially more stable. To un<strong>de</strong>rstand<br />

their principles sci<strong>en</strong>tists have<br />

observed the most simple of organisms.<br />

One of those, which has<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> quite a name for itself, is the<br />

Physarum Polycephalum, the multihea<strong>de</strong>d<br />

slime mold (also see figure<br />

1).<br />

Giv<strong>en</strong> that we have a fri<strong>en</strong>dly <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t<br />

this cute little thing will<br />

create a network betwe<strong>en</strong> all of its<br />

sources of food (or nutri<strong>en</strong>ts). This<br />

behavior is part of the life-cycle<br />

that biologists have investigated for<br />

years. Okay, that is not very impressive.<br />

There is probably a crazy<br />

sci<strong>en</strong>tist for every topic. Still the<br />

findings of these few might actually<br />

interest us a lot. For example,<br />

if you use the food sources as a<br />

substitute for existing cities you can<br />

simulate the creation of a railway<br />

network. The Japaneseresearchers<br />

around Nakagaki, Ueda, Yamada<br />

and Tero have shown that the structure<br />

of the plasmodium network is<br />

betwe<strong>en</strong> 10% to 16% more fault tolerant<br />

than its real counterpart (14%<br />

or 20% against 4%). (And don’t for-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!