Revista Dental Press de Estética V olume 3 - Número 2 - Abril / Maio ...

Sanzio Marques, Daniela Marques Campos, Natália Lopes Vicinelli
Conclusão
Como todo e qualquer material utilizado na
Odontologia atual, os pinos de fibras de vidro possuem
vantagens e desvantagens, podendo ser excelentes
auxiliares na restauração de dentes tratados
endodonticamente e danificados estruturalmente,
garantindo certa previsibilidade, desde que sua indicação
e técnica de utilização sejam criteriosas.
Anterior superior teeth cosmetic remodelling:
a clinical case
Abstract
Fiberglass posts have increasingly been used for the
restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Their
greatest advantages are elasticity module close to
that of dentin, absence of corrosion, less execution
time and lower cost as compared to indirect cores,
favorable adhesivity and esthetics. On the other
hand, since they are a relatively new material for
Dentistry, more evaluation time is necessary as
the indications and the utilization technique are
extremely sensible. The purpose of this article
is to discuss some principles of fiberglass post
utilization concerning its longevity.
KEY WORDS: Fiberglass posts. Premanufactured posts. Endodontically treated teeth. Esthetic posts.
Referências
1. ALBUQUERQUE, R. C.; DUTRA, R. A.; VASCONCELLOS, W. A.
Pinos intraradiculares de fibras de carbono em restaurações de
dentes tratados endodonticamente. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent,
São Paulo, v. 52, n. 6, nov./dez. 1998.
2. BACHINCHA, W. S.; DI FIORE, P. M.; MILLER, D. A.;
LAUTENSCHLAGER, E. P.; PASHLEY, D. H. Microleakage of
endodontically treated teeth restored with post. J Endod,
Chicago, v. 24, no. 11, p. 703-708, Nov. 1998.
3. BARKHORDAR, R. A.; RADKE, R.; ABBASI, J. Effect of metal collars
on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture.
J Prosthet Dent, St. Louis, v. 61, no. 6, p. 676-678, June 1989.
4. BASSI, M. A. Light diffusion through double taper quartz-epoxy
fiber posts. In: SIMPOSIO INTERNAZIONALE, 5., S. Marguerita
Ligure, 2001. Atti Del… S. Marguerita Ligure, [s.n.], 2001.
p. 21-26.
5. FERRARI, M.; MANNOCCI, F. A onebottle adhesive system for
bonding a fiber post into a root canal: an SEM evaluation of the
postresin interface. Int Endod J, Cardiff, v. 33, no. 4, p. 397-400,
July 2000.
6. FERRARI, M.; MANNOCCI, F.; VICHI, A.; CAGIDIACO, M. C.; MJÖR, I. A.
Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate.
Am J Dent, San Antonio, v. 13, no. 5, p. 255-260, Oct. 2000.
7. FERRARI, M.; VICHI, A.; GRANDINI, S. Efficacy of different
adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM
investigation. Dent Mat, Copenhagen, v. 17, no. 5, p. 422-429,
Sept. 2001.
8. FREEDMAN, G. The carbon fiber post: metalfree,
postendodontic reabilitation. Oral Health, Toronto, v. 86, no. 2,
p. 23-30, Feb. 1996.
9. FREILICH, M. A.; MEIERS, J. C.; DUNCAN, J. P.; GOLDBERG, A. J.
Fiber reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Chicago:
Quintessence, 2000.
10. LEINFELDER, K.; NASH, R. W. The use of posts for endodontically
treated teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent, Lawrenceville, v. 19,
no. 10, p. 1054-1062, Oct. 1998.
11. MARQUES, S. M. L. Resistência adesiva na cimentação de pinos
de fibras de vidro utilizando diferentes sistemas adesivos e
agentes cimentantes. 2003. Dissertação (Mestrado)-Faculdade
de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo
Horizonte, 2003.
12. MAYHEW, J. T.; WINDCHY, A. M.; GOLDSMITH, J.; GETTLEMAN, L.
Effect of root canal sealers and irrigation agents on retention
of preformed posts luted with a resin cement. J Endod,
Chicago, v. 26, no. 6, p. 341-344, June 2000.
R Dental Press Estét, Maringá, v. 3, n. 2, p. 88-124, abr./maio/jun. 2006
123