Bilaga 2 Urodynamiska undersökningar - SBU
Bilaga 2 Urodynamiska undersökningar - SBU
Bilaga 2 Urodynamiska undersökningar - SBU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and micturition disorders. Neurourology<br />
& Urodynamics 1994;13(3):237-242.<br />
34. Rosenzweig BA, Bhatia NN, Nelson<br />
AL. Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry<br />
pressure transmission ratio: What do the<br />
numbers really mean? Obstet Gynecol<br />
1991;77:586-589.<br />
35. Sand PC, Brubaker LT, Novak T.<br />
Simple standing increment cystometry as a<br />
screening method for detrusor instability.<br />
Obstetrics & Gynecology 1991;77(3):453-<br />
457.<br />
36. Sand PK, Bowen LW, Ostergard DR.<br />
The prognostic significance of augmentation<br />
of urethral closure pressure and functional<br />
length. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1990;<br />
33(2):135-139.<br />
37. Siltberg H, Larsson G, Victor A.<br />
Reproducibility of a new method to determine<br />
cough-induced leak-point pressure<br />
in women with stress urinary incontinence.<br />
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct<br />
1996;7(1):13-19.<br />
38. Song JT, Rozanski TA, Belville WD.<br />
Stress leak point pressure: a simple and<br />
reproducible method utilizing a fiberoptic<br />
microtransducer. Urology 1995;46:81-84.<br />
39. Stanton S, Cardozo L, Chaudhury N.<br />
Spontaneous voiding after surgery for urinary<br />
incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol<br />
1978;85:149-152.<br />
40. Summitt RL, Sipes DR, Bent AE,<br />
Ostergard DR. Evaluation of pressure transmission<br />
ratios in women with genuine stress<br />
incontinence and low urethral pressure; a<br />
comparative study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;<br />
83(6):984-988.<br />
41. Sutherst JR, Brown MC. Comparison<br />
of simple and multichannel cystometry in<br />
diagnosing bladder instability. Br Med J<br />
1984;288:1720-22.<br />
42. Swift SE, Rust PF, Ostergard DR.<br />
Intrasubject variability of the pressuretransmission<br />
ratio in patients with genuine<br />
stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1996;<br />
7:312-316.<br />
43. Tapp AJS, Cardozo L, Versi E. The<br />
prevalence of variation of resting uretrhal<br />
pressure in women and its association with<br />
lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol<br />
1988;61:314-318.<br />
44. Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris<br />
RL, Bump RC. The effect of vesical volume<br />
on Valsalva leak-point pressures in women<br />
with genuine stress urinary incontinence.<br />
Obstet Gynecol 1996;87(5):711-714.<br />
45. Usui A, Mc Guire EJ, O´Conell HE,<br />
Aboseif S. Abdominal leak point pressures<br />
in stress incontinence. J Urol 1995;153:<br />
493A.<br />
46. Versi E, Cardozo L, Anand D, Cooper<br />
D. Symptom analysis for the diagnosis of<br />
genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet<br />
Gynecol 1991;98:815-819.<br />
47. Versi E. Discriminant analysis of urethral<br />
pressure profilometry data for the diagnosis<br />
of genuine stress incontinence. Br J<br />
Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:251-256.<br />
48. van Waalwijk, van Doorn ES, Meier<br />
AH, Ambergen AW, Janknegt RA. Ambulatory<br />
urodynamics: extramural testing of the<br />
lower and upper urinary tract by Holter<br />
monitoring of cystometrogram, uroflowmetry<br />
and renal pelvic pressures. Urol Clin<br />
North Am 1996; 23(3):345-371.<br />
49. Williams ME, Fitzhugh C, Pannill C.<br />
296 BEHANDLING AV URININKONTINENS