16-10-16 POLL POOP Getting more from Polls
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>POLL</strong> <strong>POOP</strong> – GETTING MORE FROM THE <strong>POLL</strong>S <strong>10</strong>/<strong>16</strong>/20<strong>16</strong><br />
What if all polls had to have a map of where respondents were contacted based upon the answer<br />
to one simple question? What if one of the first questions asked was “What zip code do you<br />
reside in?”<br />
Answering that question doesn’t seem too intrusive to me. With that one piece of info the<br />
pollsters could readily produce a map, be it a State poll or a National poll. On the map they could<br />
use blue dots for Democrat respondents, red for Republican respondents, pick a color for<br />
Independents or Others. Using the zip code, which in most cases is a very general area based on<br />
maps I looked at, the colored dots could be placed in the respondent’s zip code.<br />
Creating a map with the general location of respondents by party affiliation would provide<br />
<strong>more</strong> information as to the polls veracity when being discussed in the realm of<br />
demographics and physical location of a respondent’s zip code.<br />
Using those simple maps of where the respondents reside in general would give a glimpse of<br />
other possible poll biases. An example of that would be a high concentration of respondents in<br />
Metro Boston (college town) versus a low concentration of Western MA voters or a high volume<br />
of respondents in the Research Triangle of North Carolina (white college educated) versus rural<br />
North Carolina.<br />
If polls provided the maps as additional respondent info, we would all be very surprised!