20.02.2013 Views

Home sweet (first) home - Community Shoppers, Inc.

Home sweet (first) home - Community Shoppers, Inc.

Home sweet (first) home - Community Shoppers, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Stateline News Sunday, August 3, 2008<br />

THE WAY WE SEE IT<br />

More to<br />

football than<br />

grass stains<br />

A<br />

s the marathon that is baseball season<br />

heads into the dog days of August,<br />

we’re reminded by the start of NFL<br />

training camps that another exciting football<br />

season is just around the corner.<br />

Thank goodness!<br />

In just a few days, local high school players<br />

will begin practice, as will youngsters in area<br />

youth leagues. It’s a wonderful time of year, as<br />

hundreds of area families prepare for another<br />

thrilling season on the<br />

gridiron.<br />

This may not seem<br />

particularly noteworthy,<br />

except when you<br />

consider that football<br />

is a uniquely remarkable<br />

athletic endeavor.<br />

No sport, arguably, is<br />

more physically and<br />

mentally demanding,<br />

or requires more<br />

YOUR VIEWS<br />

Our view<br />

■ From youth<br />

leagues to the NFL,<br />

players learn the<br />

value of working<br />

together toward a<br />

common goal.<br />

teamwork and individual sacrifice. Not coincidentally,<br />

no sport delivers rewards like football.<br />

For those who embrace the true concept of<br />

team play, success in football can be a defining<br />

moment. Even in defeat, players learn to share<br />

responsibility, while also committing to personal<br />

accountability. Those who are unable or unwilling<br />

to take these lessons to heart cannot be successful<br />

football players. More important, they<br />

exhibit character flaws that might well be crippling<br />

in other pursuits.<br />

On the overarching lessons that football offers,<br />

the great Vince Lombardi said it best: “Football<br />

is a great deal like life in that it teaches that<br />

work, sacrifice, perseverance, competitive drive,<br />

selflessness and respect for authority is the price<br />

that each and every one of us must pay to<br />

achieve any goal that is worthwhile.” Toss in a<br />

whole lot of fun and excitement and you’ve got<br />

the recipe for another fulfilling fall on the gridiron.<br />

Hope to see you at the field.<br />

Lack of sanitation?<br />

To the editor:<br />

Recently, a new business was recognized in a local<br />

paper. I read the article with interest because new<br />

business in Rock County always is a good thing. But<br />

my concern is about the lack of sanitation shown in<br />

the picture.<br />

The person grilling in the picture did not have on a<br />

hair net, gloves or a mustache guard. This is something<br />

I have noticed is a common practice in Rock<br />

County. Do cities or the county not have sanitation<br />

codes in effect?<br />

I have worked in the food industry in Illinois for a<br />

number of years and had a Food Safety Sanitation<br />

Certificate. I will not order food from an establishment<br />

that does not require hair nets or gloves. I also<br />

will not stay in a restaurant that allows a food handler<br />

to also handle money.<br />

If basic food-safety standards are not being followed,<br />

then how am I going to believe that other sanitation<br />

concerns are being addressed? I cannot be the<br />

only person that this bothers. As consumers we need<br />

to speak out against ineffective sanitation practices.<br />

With recent headlines of food illness, can we afford to<br />

ignore this issue any longer?<br />

Lorri Ginn<br />

Freeport, Ill.<br />

OUTLOOK<br />

Environmentalists jump the shark<br />

Some environmentalists are blaming<br />

the recent tomato/jalapeno salmonella<br />

scare on global climate change.<br />

If this keeps up, global warming also<br />

will undoubtedly be blamed for malepattern<br />

baldness, gingivitis, navel lint,<br />

erectile dysfunction, your uncle’s hemorrhoids<br />

and boring public radio.<br />

Has environmentalism finally<br />

“jumped the shark?” Or at least the Al<br />

Gore version of Greenism?<br />

In recent weeks, the enviros found<br />

themselves the butt of jokes and potentially<br />

on the wrong side of a red-hot<br />

political issue: drilling.<br />

All of this comes as a rude surprise<br />

to a movement that is used to being<br />

treated with deference, with its every<br />

proclamation and nostrum regarded<br />

with solemn respect and acquiescence.<br />

We need new low-flush toilets to save<br />

the planet? Of course. Replace our light<br />

bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs?<br />

Certainly. Blame climate change for<br />

the plight of polar bears? They had the<br />

pictures!<br />

Then came this:<br />

A Tennessee think tank recently<br />

reported that Al Gore’s <strong>home</strong> energy<br />

use surged more than 10 percent and<br />

that the apostle of conservation<br />

“burned through 213,210 kilowatthours<br />

of electricity, enough to power<br />

232 average American households for a<br />

month.” Quite a carbon footprint for a<br />

man who won the Nobel Prize for nagging<br />

us about our carbon footprint.<br />

The reaction to the tomato/jalapeno<br />

story suggests that climate change<br />

alarmism quickly is changing from<br />

great-moral-challenge-of-our-time to<br />

punch line. When a blog for Discover<br />

magazine reported the alleged link<br />

between bad vegetables and global<br />

warming, the site was inundated with<br />

hundreds of derisive comments along<br />

the line of: “This is pure tripe. If you<br />

tree huggers had any sense of reality<br />

you would have learned NOT to blame<br />

every issue on global warming.”<br />

Environmentalists who have pursued<br />

policies designed to drive up energy<br />

prices found themselves in the awkward<br />

position of having to defend policies<br />

that — inconveniently enough —<br />

drove up energy prices.<br />

The Los Angeles Times reported that<br />

environmentalists began to feel the<br />

political earth shifting beneath their<br />

feet. “The environmental movement,<br />

only recently poised for major advances<br />

on global warming and other issues,”<br />

reported The Times, “has suddenly<br />

found itself on the defensive as high<br />

gasoline prices shift the political climate<br />

nationwide and trigger defections<br />

by longtime supporters.”<br />

New polls came out showing strong<br />

public support for offshore drilling to<br />

deal with record-high gas prices.<br />

Up until recently, environmentalists<br />

were able to essentially play political<br />

tennis without a net: they were able to<br />

assume positions of moral superiority<br />

and confer cultural virtue, without ever<br />

having to explain how much all of this<br />

would cost or who would pay the bill.<br />

Four-dollar-per-gallon gasoline<br />

changed all that. When John McCain<br />

and President Bush came out in favor<br />

of lifting the moratoriums on drilling<br />

for the nation’s untapped billions of<br />

barrels of oil, congressional Democrats<br />

pulled out their usual talking points,<br />

only to find that they were channeling<br />

Jimmy Carter.<br />

Wisconsin Congressman Steve<br />

Kagen floated a variety of conspiracy<br />

theories involving grasping, evil oil<br />

companies, denouncing what he called<br />

the policy of “drill and burn.” But, like<br />

other Democratic politicians, he had<br />

little to offer in the way of relief for the<br />

drivers, truckers and middle-class voters<br />

in his district who have no alternative.<br />

There’s a reason for that: liberals<br />

long have supported higher gas and<br />

energy prices; their policies of enforced<br />

scarcity made the price spike<br />

inevitable. Now the bill has come due<br />

and people are noticing.<br />

Recently, Kagen was campaigning in<br />

Seymour with U.S. Rep. Collin<br />

Peterson, D-Minn., who explained that<br />

higher gas prices are “needed.”<br />

Lectured Peterson: “We needed these<br />

higher prices to force us to change our<br />

ways.”<br />

Kagen’s opponent in the fall election,<br />

former state Rep. John Gard, immediately<br />

leaped on the comment, calling on<br />

Kagen to repudiate the endorsement of<br />

$4-a gallon gas. Fat chance. Liberals<br />

have cast their lot with the greens.<br />

But they now are discovering that<br />

the pieties of the environmentalist elite<br />

— unchallenged in the salons of<br />

Cambridge or Madison — will be a bit<br />

harder to sell in the truck stops of<br />

northeast Wisconsin.<br />

What would Washington say?<br />

For the <strong>first</strong> time since the “don’t ask,<br />

don’t tell” law was enacted in 1993 by<br />

President Clinton, the House Armed<br />

Services Committee has scheduled<br />

hearings to review it. The law disqualifies<br />

gays from serving in the military.<br />

Individuals are deemed gay, according<br />

to this ruling, if they publicly state<br />

so. However, the military is prohibited<br />

from asking. Thus, “don’t ask, don’t<br />

tell.”<br />

Activists now are pushing for change<br />

to allow gays to serve openly.<br />

We can anticipate a technical discussion.<br />

Does the presence of openly gay<br />

soldiers undermine cohesiveness of<br />

units, morale and discipline? How<br />

would retention rates of troops or enlistments<br />

be affected?<br />

We can be sure, though, that a discussion<br />

about the general moral implications<br />

of such a policy will not take place.<br />

Early last year, then-chairman of the<br />

Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace<br />

called homosexuality “immoral.” More<br />

fire and brimstone rained down on him<br />

than fell on the residents of Sodom and<br />

Gomorrah for engaging in this behavior.<br />

Rebukes came from Democrats and<br />

Republicans alike. GOP Sen. John<br />

Warner, a former chairman of the<br />

Senate Armed Services Committee,<br />

writing his own scripture, challenged<br />

Pace’s view that homosexuality is<br />

immoral.<br />

Although a recent Zogby poll of military<br />

personnel shows more opposed to<br />

allowing gays to serve openly than<br />

favoring (37 percent to 26 percent), the<br />

direction of polling of the general public<br />

favors the pro-gay forces.<br />

When “don’t ask, don’t tell” was<br />

enacted in 1993, an NBC/Wall Street<br />

Journal poll showed 52 percent opposed<br />

CHARLIE HARLIE SYKES YKES<br />

GUEST COLUMN<br />

STAR TAR PARKER ARKER<br />

COALITION ON URBAN<br />

RENEWAL & EDUCATION<br />

to homosexuals serving openly and 43<br />

percent in favor. By 2004, Gallup<br />

polling indicated 63 percent in favor of<br />

allowing homosexuals to serve against<br />

32 percent opposed.<br />

The culture war is like the recipe for<br />

boiling a frog. If you drop it in hot<br />

water, it jumps out. But if you drop it in<br />

cold water and slowly turn up the heat,<br />

you get frog soup.<br />

Concession by concession, traditional<br />

values are being pushed, inexorably, to<br />

the margins of America.<br />

It’s a sign of this moral war of attrition<br />

that each battle is fought with less<br />

and less attention to what it means to<br />

the overall war.<br />

Acceptance of openly gay people in<br />

the military means the next discussion<br />

will be qualification of gay couples for<br />

the same benefits received by traditional<br />

military families.<br />

In all likelihood, we’ll see claims of<br />

discrimination if a gay person gets<br />

passed over for promotion, and intimidated<br />

review committees will become<br />

increasingly politically correct.<br />

But, hey, in the morally relative<br />

world, a glass half empty for one is half<br />

full for the other.<br />

<strong>Inc</strong>reasing acceptance of homosexuality<br />

is viewed by many as social<br />

progress. The Seattle Times, for example,<br />

calls for a “modernized” military<br />

that accepts the openly gay.<br />

But for this traditionalist, it’s no acci-<br />

Charlie Sykes hosts a daily show on<br />

620 WTMJ radio in Milwaukee. This column<br />

was distributed by the Wisconsin<br />

Policy Research Institute.<br />

dent that building public acceptance of<br />

homosexuality is coincident with a general<br />

moral unraveling of our society,<br />

with all its destructive consequences.<br />

According to Kevin Hassett of the<br />

American Enterprise Institute, a conservative<br />

think tank located in<br />

Washington, D.C., 32 percent of<br />

American households today are nontraditional,<br />

compared to only 28 percent<br />

that are traditional, with a mother,<br />

father, and children. The remaining 40<br />

percent are households without children.<br />

He points out that children in<br />

nontraditional households have considerably<br />

higher incidences of emotional<br />

and educational problems.<br />

I would argue that most of the major<br />

costs dragging down our society today<br />

— whether it’s poverty, entitlements,<br />

health care or housing — trace to our<br />

diminishing sense of personal responsibility<br />

and the erosion of traditional values.<br />

Our <strong>first</strong> great general, George<br />

Washington, would be considered politically<br />

incorrect today cautioning against<br />

believing “that national morality can<br />

prevail in exclusion of religious principle”<br />

and admonishing, “virtue or morality<br />

is a necessary spring of popular government.”<br />

Gays in the military is more than a<br />

question of military morale. It’s about<br />

the character of this country that we<br />

have a military to defend.<br />

Who would question what George<br />

Washington would say about this<br />

important issue?<br />

Star Parker is president of the Coalition<br />

on Urban Renewal & Education in<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

■ The Stateline News welcomes issue-oriented letters and guest column submissions for publication on the Outlook page. Guidelines: Letters no longer than 250 words; all letters are subject to editing for spelling, grammar, length; no personal attacks or<br />

letters related to personal disputes; daytime phone number needed for verification; limit of one per month. Guest columns should be approximately 550 to 650 words; not all guest columns will be published; limit of one per month. Send to: Managing<br />

Editor, P.O. Box 367, Delavan, WI, 53115. E-mail to bheisel@communityshoppers.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!