24.02.2013 Views

5p.Qian,Part 1,Spirit and Self - ScholarSpace

5p.Qian,Part 1,Spirit and Self - ScholarSpace

5p.Qian,Part 1,Spirit and Self - ScholarSpace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Character Appraisal 25<br />

discursive properties of this speech act. 21 What kind of speech act does<br />

character appraisal entail? What features constitute its discursive properties?<br />

How do they join together to form a discourse? Consider for example<br />

a relatively “original” historical account of character appraisal that is<br />

not yet codified into a character-writing episode. It is quoted by Liu Chün<br />

from Sun Sheng’s (ca. 302–373) Tsa-yü (Miscellaneous accounts), compiled<br />

at least a half century earlier than the Shih-shuo: “Ts’ao Ts’ao once<br />

asked Hsü Shao, ‘What sort of person am I?’After he had asked insistently,<br />

Shao finally answered: ‘An able minister in an age of order, <strong>and</strong> a treacherous<br />

warrior in an age of disorder.’ Ts’ao Ts’ao laughed aloud.” 22<br />

This episode presents a character appraisal in two parts: its text <strong>and</strong><br />

context. The text consists of Hsü Shao’s characterization of Ts’ao Ts’ao,<br />

evaluating his ability <strong>and</strong> moral qualities in two opposite political contexts,<br />

an age of order <strong>and</strong> an age of disorder. This feature establishes character<br />

appraisal as an evaluator’s comment on an evaluatee’s inner qualities in response<br />

to the outer world. The context consists of the relationship between<br />

the evaluator <strong>and</strong> the evaluatee <strong>and</strong> their relationship with the text. In this<br />

case, a tension exists clearly between the evaluator <strong>and</strong> the evaluatee: Hsü<br />

Shao hesitates to respond to Ts’ao Ts’ao’s insistent request, finally giving<br />

Ts’ao a dichotomistic evaluation—one complementary <strong>and</strong> the other pejorative;<br />

Ts’ao at any rate accepts this contentious comment with obvious<br />

pleasure. The tension reflects the two participants’ different st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong><br />

purposes, rooted in their respective social, political, cultural, <strong>and</strong>/or ethical<br />

backgrounds.<br />

The practice of character appraisal spanned a historical period of about<br />

350 years, from the Late Han to the end of the Eastern Chin (approximately<br />

a.d. 76–420). A close examination of its historical evolution <strong>and</strong><br />

its interactions with other intellectual or cultural influences will expose<br />

how character appraisal eventually led to the formation of the Shih-shuo<br />

t’i. In what follows, I shall divide this historical period into several chronological<br />

sections, reconstruct the character appraisal practices of each section<br />

via relevant historical records <strong>and</strong> studies, <strong>and</strong> then compare these<br />

changes with the Shih-shuo hsin-yü accounts. I will review this evolving

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!