Investigation of the risk for Rolling Contact Fatigue on ... - SimPack
Investigation of the risk for Rolling Contact Fatigue on ... - SimPack
Investigation of the risk for Rolling Contact Fatigue on ... - SimPack
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Shakedown evaluati<strong>on</strong><br />
p0/k<br />
p0/k<br />
10,0<br />
9,0<br />
8,0<br />
7,0<br />
6,0<br />
5,0<br />
4,0<br />
3,0<br />
2,0<br />
1,0<br />
0,0<br />
10,0<br />
9,0<br />
8,0<br />
7,0<br />
6,0<br />
5,0<br />
4,0<br />
3,0<br />
2,0<br />
1,0<br />
0,0<br />
Vehicle 1, Shakedown map, inner wheel<br />
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6<br />
SIMPACK UM 2007, B<strong>on</strong>n<br />
mue<br />
Vehicle 3, Shakedown map, inner wheel<br />
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6<br />
mue<br />
1. R=739m<br />
2. R=2922m<br />
3. R=570m<br />
4. R=736m<br />
5. straight track<br />
6. straight track<br />
7. R=430m<br />
boundary curve<br />
1. R=739m<br />
2. R=2922m<br />
3. R=570m<br />
4. R=736m<br />
5. straight track<br />
6. straight track<br />
7. R=430m<br />
boundary curve<br />
p0/k<br />
10,0<br />
9,0<br />
8,0<br />
7,0<br />
6,0<br />
5,0<br />
4,0<br />
3,0<br />
2,0<br />
1,0<br />
0,0<br />
Vehicle 2, Shakedown map, inner wheel<br />
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6<br />
mue<br />
Vehicles 1 and 2 suffer from RCF<br />
10<br />
1. R=300m<br />
2. R=600m<br />
3. R=1000m<br />
4. R=296m<br />
5. R=761m<br />
6. R=592m<br />
7. R=800m<br />
8. R=1000m<br />
9. R=579m<br />
boundary curve<br />
Vehicle 3 does not suffer from RCF
Change language