27.02.2013 Views

Radical Protestant Propaganda of the Thirty Years' War

Radical Protestant Propaganda of the Thirty Years' War

Radical Protestant Propaganda of the Thirty Years' War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State <strong>of</strong> Research<br />

My assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> research into <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> Bethlen Gabor in radical<br />

<strong>Protestant</strong> propaganda <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Thirty</strong> Year’s <strong>War</strong> will be brief, because very little has been<br />

written on <strong>the</strong> topic. Bethlen is an extreme example <strong>of</strong> a trend in academic research which<br />

has virtually ignored some figures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war but concentrated intensely on o<strong>the</strong>rs, chief<br />

among <strong>the</strong>m Gustavus Adolphus <strong>of</strong> Sweden and Count Tilly.<br />

To date, <strong>the</strong>re are only two sources which comment on <strong>the</strong> Prince <strong>of</strong> Transylvania’s<br />

depiction in propaganda. These are Georg Kristóf’s article Die Gestalt Gabriel Bethlens in der<br />

zeitgenössischen deutschen Dichtung (1931) 82 and Wolfgang Harm’s second compendium <strong>of</strong><br />

early modern broadsheets, entitled Deutsche illustrierte Flugblätter des 16. und 17.<br />

Jahrhunderts: Die Sammlung der Herzog-August-Biblio<strong>the</strong>k in Wolfenbüttel (1980). 83 While<br />

both provide certain insights, <strong>the</strong>y are unable, alone or toge<strong>the</strong>r, to provide an overview <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> radical <strong>Protestant</strong> propagandistic campaign aimed at ga<strong>the</strong>ring support for <strong>the</strong> Prince.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> two sources, Kristóf’s work is more panoramic in its analysis <strong>of</strong> Bethlen’s image in<br />

propaganda. Given <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> my own <strong>the</strong>sis, it is only <strong>of</strong> limited use as it concentrates <strong>the</strong><br />

majority <strong>of</strong> its attention on <strong>the</strong> Prince’s image in Catholic (or Lu<strong>the</strong>ran) propaganda. For<br />

most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> article, Kristóf demonstrates that Bethlen was attacked in propaganda by<br />

writers antagonistic towards Friedrich V, both Catholic and Lu<strong>the</strong>ran, who used Friedrich V’s<br />

defeat and Bethlen’s association to <strong>the</strong> Turks to discredit <strong>the</strong> Transylvanian.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> three pages that do concentrate on radical propaganda that aimed to promote a<br />

positive image <strong>of</strong> Bethlen Gabor, <strong>the</strong>re is useful information on attempts to present him as a<br />

82<br />

Georg Kristóf, ‘Die Gestalt Gabriel Bethlens in der zeitgenössischen deutschen Dichtung’<br />

Ungarische Jahrbücher 11 (1931), pp. 98-112.<br />

83<br />

Wolfgang Harms, Deutsche illustrierte Flugblätter des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts: Die Sammlung der<br />

Herzog-August-Biblio<strong>the</strong>k in Wolfenbüttel, Teil 2: Historica (Munich: Kraus, 1980). Henceforth Harms.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!