27.02.2013 Views

REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND AUGUST 11-13, 2008 - Veðurstofa Íslands

REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND AUGUST 11-13, 2008 - Veðurstofa Íslands

REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND AUGUST 11-13, 2008 - Veðurstofa Íslands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLIMATE CHANGE AND VARIABILITY: HOW CAN WE INFORM<br />

STRATEGIES FOR ADAPTATION<br />

Upmanu Lall<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Anthropogenic climate change has emerged as a major environmental<br />

concern In the 21st century. There is clear evidence that global warming<br />

has occurred in the 20th century, and its connection to the use of fossil<br />

fuels and greenhouse gas emissions is now widely accepted. The<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC,<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/) has developed many scenarios for greenhouse gas<br />

emissions corresponding to different degrees of mitigation of greenhouse<br />

gas emissions. These scenarios have been used with more than 45<br />

simulations of different coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation<br />

models (GCMs) to develop projections of climate up to the year 2100,<br />

for each of the scenarios. The different simulations are made to account<br />

for uncertainty in the knowledge of climate model parameters and also<br />

because, since the equations governing climate are nonlinear, small<br />

differences in the starting values can potentially translate into large<br />

differences in the resulting climate statistics. Climate change impact<br />

assessment and climate change adaptation work is then informed by the<br />

rainfall and temperature data from these simulations.<br />

The talk will first review some hydrologic aspects of these simulations<br />

And highlight the challenge faced in directly using such "data" for water<br />

resource management and project design. The argument is made that<br />

substantial "processing" of these simulations is needed to correct biases<br />

and such, in the control runs covering the 20th century, suggesting that<br />

as far as hydrology is concerned the model physics is likely to be far<br />

from the real world physics. At one level this argues against the use or<br />

credibility of these models for the future. At another level, the question<br />

becomes whether there are any state variables in these models that could<br />

be used to inform key variables of interest in water management, even in<br />

a probabilistic sense.<br />

This idea is developed through an example of what non-stationarity<br />

means for risk based or probabilistic analysis as typical in our field,<br />

using retrospective analyses constrained perhaps by long term proxy<br />

paleoclimate data that exhibits change over many time scales. The<br />

prospective application for the future is then outlined.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!