Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
uption in a sewage utility in a town<br />
in Florida—Gannett decided to export<br />
this model to its other newspapers. 4<br />
Readers (a.k.a. community members)<br />
would also play a significant newsroom<br />
role in the renamed “community<br />
desk,” which would oversee everything<br />
from blogs to news articles written<br />
by readers.<br />
In reporting on Gannett’s strategy, I<br />
chose to focus on how the changes were<br />
being implemented at one paper, The<br />
Cincinnati Enquirer. One indication<br />
of how the newsroom was changing<br />
was the shift in job responsibilities.<br />
A longtime metro reporter, Linda<br />
Parker, had recently been reassigned<br />
as “online communities editor.” Every<br />
Enquirer Web page prominently featured<br />
the words “Get Published” as a<br />
way of eliciting stories, comments and<br />
anything else Cincinnatians might feel<br />
compelled to submit. It all landed in<br />
Parker’s queue; perhaps not surprisingly,<br />
these words and videos never<br />
have resembled anything commonly<br />
considered journalism.<br />
Even figuring out how best to prompt<br />
contributors has revealed valuable lessons<br />
to those at the Enquirer—ones<br />
that other news organizations can learn<br />
from. “It used to read, ‘Be a Citizen<br />
Journalist,’” Parker told me. “And no<br />
one ever clicked on it. Then we said,<br />
‘Tell Us Your Story,’ and still nothing.<br />
For some reason, ‘Get Published’ were<br />
the magic words.”<br />
Now, nearly two years into the<br />
experiment, the Enquirer considers<br />
this feature to be an unequivocal<br />
success. I sat with Parker, a cheerful<br />
woman in her mid-50’s, in April of<br />
last year as she pored over several<br />
dozen submissions she had received<br />
that day. There was one written by a<br />
local custom car builder trumpeting<br />
his upcoming appearance on a BET<br />
show, and another, expressing with the<br />
intensity of emotional passion befitting<br />
the circumstance, is a notice for<br />
a play being held to raise funds for a<br />
fifth-grader’s bone marrow<br />
transplant. Parker<br />
almost never rejects<br />
anything she receives,<br />
though she scans each<br />
one for “the F-word,”<br />
and then posts it to the<br />
site. “A few years ago<br />
these would have come<br />
across the transom as<br />
press releases and been<br />
ignored,” she says.<br />
This observation<br />
points to a central<br />
problem with Gannett’s<br />
strategy—indeed, with<br />
both the hyperlocal and<br />
crowdsourcing movements in general.<br />
Readers are content to leave the gritty<br />
aspects of reporting to journalists;<br />
they prefer to focus on content and<br />
storytelling that Nicholas Lemann,<br />
dean of the Graduate School of Journalism<br />
at Columbia <strong>University</strong>, once<br />
characterized in The New Yorker as<br />
being the equivalent of the contents<br />
of a church newsletter.<br />
As it turns out, Tom Callinan, the<br />
Enquirer’s editor, observed a while into<br />
the project “even ‘Get Published’ was<br />
too newspaperlike in its sound. People<br />
don’t want to get published. They want<br />
to ‘share.’” And so this is what the<br />
Web site’s button now encourages its<br />
readers to do. The results continue, as<br />
Callinan says, to tend toward “pretty<br />
fluffy stuff.”<br />
Lessons Learned<br />
So what are we to take away from<br />
these experiments? Readers are very<br />
interested in playing a role in the<br />
creation of their local media. They<br />
don’t necessarily want to write the<br />
news; what they want is to engage<br />
in a conversation. This doesn’t mean,<br />
however, that they don’t have valuable<br />
contributions to make. This fall,<br />
Callinan told me, readers shared with<br />
others on the Enquirer Web site news<br />
4 Betty Wells, special projects editor at The News-Press, wrote about the newspaper’s<br />
use of crowdsourcing for the Spring 2008 <strong>issue</strong> of <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports in an article<br />
entitled, “Using Expertise From Outside the Newsroom,” which can be read at www.<br />
nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100085.<br />
New Venues<br />
about a stabbing at a local strip club<br />
and a photograph of a theater fire.<br />
“We were able to confirm the stabbing,”<br />
he said. “We would have never<br />
known about it without the tip.” It<br />
might not be grist for a Pulitzer, but<br />
it fills the copy hole.<br />
Nor were these key lessons lost on<br />
those of us involved in Assignment<br />
Zero. In fact, Assignment Zero’s community<br />
manager, Amanda Michel,<br />
employed the lessons of what didn’t<br />
work adeptly at her next venture, directing<br />
The Huffington Post’s effort,<br />
Off the Bus, with its citizen-generated<br />
coverage of the presidential campaign.<br />
Rather than duplicate what journalists<br />
were doing, Off the Bus leveraged its<br />
strength—namely, the size of its network<br />
of 12,000 “reporters.” With citizen<br />
correspondents spread across the nation<br />
and ready to attend smaller rallies,<br />
fundraisers and get-out-the-vote<br />
events that the national press ignored,<br />
Off the Bus found its niche.<br />
Off the Bus became arguably the<br />
first truly successful example of crowdsourced<br />
journalism with some of its<br />
citizen reporters breaking national<br />
stories. Perhaps its most significant<br />
story was about the moment when<br />
Barack Obama, at a nonpress event<br />
fundraiser in San Francisco, made<br />
his famous comment about how rural<br />
<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports | Winter 2008 49