27.02.2013 Views

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Search for True North<br />

ethical standards and accountable to<br />

no one.<br />

Whether existing shield laws in the<br />

states will cover bloggers and other<br />

nonmainstream journalists remains an<br />

open question and very much depends<br />

on the particular statutory language<br />

and the courts’ interpretation of it.<br />

Although a California court ruled<br />

that the state shield law protected the<br />

identities of operators of a blog that revealed<br />

Apple Computer’s trade secrets<br />

on the ground that their publications<br />

constituted “news,” the Ninth Circuit<br />

U.S. Court of Appeals refused to recognize<br />

that blogger and self-described<br />

anarchist Josh Wolf was a journalist<br />

under the same law, because he was<br />

not “connected with or employed by”<br />

a news organization.<br />

Law enforcement officials at the<br />

Republican National Convention in<br />

September 2008 collectively threw up<br />

their hands and declined to make a distinction,<br />

detaining or arresting dozens<br />

of journalists, both “mainstream” and<br />

“citizen,” swept up while attempting to<br />

cover and report on the demonstrations<br />

and protests in Saint Paul. Of course,<br />

the Internet made possible “real-time”<br />

and worldwide distribution of reports<br />

of the protests. 1<br />

Digital technology has facilitated<br />

newsgathering in many ways. But<br />

A screen shot from a YouTube video of the arrest of<br />

“Democracy Now!” radio host Amy Goodman at the<br />

protest during the Republican National Convention.<br />

56 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports | Winter 2008<br />

its impact has<br />

not been entirely<br />

positive. For example,<br />

in theory,<br />

the digitization<br />

of government<br />

records, coupled<br />

with the ability<br />

of anyone with<br />

a computer and<br />

a modem to gain<br />

easy access to<br />

them, should<br />

have been celebrated<br />

as a welcomeopportunity<br />

for meaningful<br />

citizen oversight.<br />

But judges and<br />

legislators, driven<br />

by fear that such<br />

access would facilitate<br />

illegal<br />

conduct ranging from identity theft<br />

to employment discrimination, have<br />

used the threat of it to justify curtailing<br />

access to these electronic files.<br />

It doesn’t stop there. Judges also<br />

cite their discomfort at the idea that<br />

someone logging on from a distant<br />

location, having no “legitimate interest”<br />

in the local community, will amuse<br />

himself by trawling through court<br />

or real estate records and publishing<br />

them online. They worry<br />

that citizen journalists<br />

with cell phone cameras<br />

will invade courtrooms and<br />

post trial footage online, a<br />

practice they consider both<br />

disruptive and undignified.<br />

Although they might support<br />

the concept of access<br />

to government records and<br />

proceedings in the abstract,<br />

once it becomes cheap and<br />

easy the gatekeepers began<br />

to question its wisdom.<br />

Information, it seems, is<br />

1 YouTube video about Amy Goodman’s arrest is at www.youtube.com/<br />

watch?v=sBjcqwQgF7Q&NR=1.<br />

AP photojournalist Matt Rourke was covering police arresting<br />

protesters at the Republican National Convention when he was arrested.<br />

One of the last images on his camera’s memory card before<br />

he was arrested shows a police officer pressing down with his knee<br />

on the neck of a protester whom he is handcuffing. Photo by Matt<br />

Rourke/The Associated Press.<br />

just too valuable—or too<br />

dangerous—to entrust to<br />

a blogger.<br />

None of these consider-<br />

ations should drive legal policy. Rights<br />

of access, or freedom of expression, are<br />

not, and should not be, conditioned<br />

on some government official’s idea of<br />

what constitutes “responsible” journalism.<br />

Judges and legislators should<br />

continue to follow the principles that<br />

have protected the press, and the<br />

public’s right to know, for more than<br />

200 years. But at the same time, those<br />

who publish in the new media and<br />

are always quick to invoke the First<br />

Amendment are challenging so many<br />

things held sacred.<br />

The question confronting all of<br />

us—given the tenor of our times and<br />

the judicial decision-making we are<br />

seeing—is whether the First Amendment<br />

will survive this challenge. �<br />

Jane Kirtley has been the Silha Professor<br />

of Media Ethics and Law at<br />

the School of Journalism and Mass<br />

Communication at the <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Minnesota since August 1999. Prior to<br />

that, she was executive director of The<br />

Reporters Committee for Freedom of<br />

the Press in Arlington, Virginia, for 14<br />

years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!