28.02.2013 Views

Minority Rights Protection and Human Rights Policies in ... - IFSH

Minority Rights Protection and Human Rights Policies in ... - IFSH

Minority Rights Protection and Human Rights Policies in ... - IFSH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

towards the improvement of the <strong>in</strong>ter-ethnic relations as hav<strong>in</strong>g passed the first stage of a<br />

volatile coexistence <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ger<strong>in</strong>g before the stage of collaboration.<br />

The discussion after Ilire´s presentation <strong>in</strong>cluded, among others, the question <strong>and</strong><br />

controversial underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs of the concept of reconciliation <strong>and</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong> of this concept.<br />

Hilary Bown, M.P.S. c<strong>and</strong>idate at the <strong>IFSH</strong> <strong>in</strong> Hamburg: Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>orities<br />

Hilary started the group presentation of the German student group; she talked about def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ority groups <strong>and</strong> therefore presented different m<strong>in</strong>orities, native people <strong>and</strong> ethnic groups<br />

<strong>in</strong> Europe to the audience. Hilary po<strong>in</strong>ted out that there is no clear def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong> any legallyb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational treaty of what constitutes a m<strong>in</strong>ority. But despite controversial<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs of the term “m<strong>in</strong>ority” there are certa<strong>in</strong> agreed factors, which describes a<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly shared m<strong>in</strong>imum underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of a m<strong>in</strong>ority, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g objective <strong>and</strong> subjective<br />

criteria (formulated partly <strong>in</strong> Article 27 of the “Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Rights</strong>” of the<br />

United Nations (UN) <strong>in</strong> 1966):<br />

- a stable ethnic, religious or l<strong>in</strong>guistic differences which separated the m<strong>in</strong>orities<br />

significantly from the rest of the population<br />

- a non-dom<strong>in</strong>ant position at national <strong>and</strong> sub-national levels<br />

- a desire by the m<strong>in</strong>ority group to preserve cultural identity<br />

- citizenship of <strong>and</strong> loyalty to the state <strong>in</strong> which the m<strong>in</strong>ority is resident.<br />

Hilary referred to Tove Malloy, who po<strong>in</strong>ted out that often<br />

autochthonous groups became m<strong>in</strong>orities through historical shifts<br />

of boundary l<strong>in</strong>es, rather than through their own movements.<br />

There were groups whose territory was subsumed by another<br />

nation or empire or groups who migrated with<strong>in</strong> the boundaries of<br />

their empire <strong>and</strong> then found themselves outside their ethnic nation<br />

stated formed upon the collapse of the old empires for example.<br />

She po<strong>in</strong>ted out that <strong>in</strong> Europe there is ma<strong>in</strong>ly m<strong>in</strong>ority protection<br />

guaranteed to these “historical m<strong>in</strong>ority groups” (Swedes <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> or Dans <strong>in</strong> Germany for example), nevertheless there are<br />

also “new m<strong>in</strong>orities” <strong>in</strong> nations, such as migrant workers or<br />

refugees for <strong>in</strong>stance. But still constitutionally guaranteed<br />

protection for these new m<strong>in</strong>orities is often neglected or denied. Therefore Francesco<br />

Capotorti, former UN Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of<br />

Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Protection</strong> of M<strong>in</strong>orities, <strong>in</strong> his report to the UN <strong>in</strong> 1991 (“Study on the<br />

rights of persons belong<strong>in</strong>g to ethnic, religious <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic m<strong>in</strong>orities”), urges a more<br />

flexible <strong>in</strong>terpretation of what constitutes a m<strong>in</strong>ority. His proposal for a broader def<strong>in</strong>ition of<br />

the term “m<strong>in</strong>ority” is nowadays <strong>in</strong> generally not as accepted as the mentioned m<strong>in</strong>imalist<br />

criteria, nevertheless a positive development of national m<strong>in</strong>ority protection regimes <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade is recognizable.<br />

Matthias Kock, M.P.S. c<strong>and</strong>idate at the <strong>IFSH</strong>: “The Right of Self-Determ<strong>in</strong>ation”<br />

Matthias gave a presentation about “The Right of Self-Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> International Law”.<br />

He first presented the development of a right of self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation, before the UN existed <strong>and</strong><br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!