Port-Wide Sewer System Management Plan(SSMP) - Port of Oakland
Port-Wide Sewer System Management Plan(SSMP) - Port of Oakland
Port-Wide Sewer System Management Plan(SSMP) - Port of Oakland
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
May 2010
CHAPTER 1 - BACKGROUND<br />
PORT OF OAKLAND<br />
PORT-WIDE SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Page No.<br />
1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1-1<br />
1.1.1 Notice <strong>of</strong> Intent .............................................................................................. 1-3<br />
1.1.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule ............................................................................ 1-3<br />
1.2 SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION .............................................................................. 1-3<br />
1.3 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA ...................................................................... 1-3<br />
1.4 SERVICE POPULATION ESTIMATE ....................................................................... 1-4<br />
1.5 REGULATORY BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 1-6<br />
1.5.1 National Regulatory Background .................................................................. 1-6<br />
1.5.2 California Regulatory Background ................................................................ 1-7<br />
1.6 SSO DEFINITION ..................................................................................................... 1-7<br />
1.7 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ............................................................................. 1-8<br />
1.8 REPORT ORGANIZATION ...................................................................................... 1-8<br />
1.9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... 1-10<br />
1.10 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS .................................................................. 1-10<br />
1.11 REFERENCE MATERIAL ....................................................................................... 1-12<br />
CHAPTER 2 - GOALS<br />
2.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 2-1<br />
2.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 2-1<br />
2.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 2-1<br />
2.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................... 2-1<br />
2.3 PORT <strong>SSMP</strong> GOALS ............................................................................................... 2-2<br />
CHAPTER 3 - ORGANIZATION<br />
3.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 3-1<br />
3.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 3-1<br />
3.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 3-1<br />
3.2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ......................................................................... 3-1<br />
3.3 ORGANIZATIONAL HIERARCHY ............................................................................ 3-2<br />
3.3.1 <strong>SSMP</strong> Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................ 3-2<br />
3.3.1.1 Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners ........................................................ 3-2<br />
3.3.1.2 Executive Positions ........................................................................ 3-2<br />
3.3.1.3 Aviation Division ............................................................................. 3-4<br />
3.3.1.4 Maritime Division ............................................................................ 3-5<br />
3.3.1.5 Commercial/Real Estate Division ................................................... 3-7<br />
3.3.1.6 Engineering Division ....................................................................... 3-7<br />
3.3.1.7 Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning Division ............................ 3-7<br />
3.3.1.8 Information Technology Division .................................................... 3-8<br />
3.3.1.9 Administrative Services Division .................................................... 3-8<br />
3.3.1.10 Finance Division ............................................................................. 3-8<br />
3.4 CHAIN OF COMMUNICATION FOR REPORTING SSOS ...................................... 3-8<br />
May 2010 i<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
3.4.1 Receipt <strong>of</strong> Information Regarding SSO ........................................................ 3-9<br />
3.4.2 Aviation Notification Procedure ..................................................................... 3-9<br />
3.4.3 Maritime Notification Procedure .................................................................... 3-9<br />
3.4.4 Commercial/Real Estate Notification Procedure ........................................ 3-12<br />
3.4.5 Regulatory Agency Notification ................................................................... 3-12<br />
CHAPTER 4 - LEGAL AUTHORITY<br />
4.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 4-1<br />
4.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 4-1<br />
4.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 4-1<br />
4.2 PORT SEWER USE ORDINANCES ........................................................................ 4-2<br />
4.2.1 Illicit Discharges ............................................................................................ 4-2<br />
4.2.2 Design and Construction Requirements ....................................................... 4-2<br />
4.2.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access .............................................. 4-2<br />
4.2.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris .............................. 4-2<br />
4.2.5 Policies for Enforcing Violations ................................................................... 4-3<br />
4.3 CITY OF OAKLAND SEWER USE ORDINANCES ................................................. 4-3<br />
4.3.1 Illicit Discharges ............................................................................................ 4-3<br />
4.3.2 Design and Construction Requirements ....................................................... 4-3<br />
4.3.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access .............................................. 4-4<br />
4.3.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris .............................. 4-4<br />
4.4 EBMUD SEWER USE ORDINANCES ..................................................................... 4-4<br />
4.4.1 Illicit Discharges ............................................................................................ 4-4<br />
4.4.2 Design and Construction Requirements ....................................................... 4-4<br />
4.4.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access .............................................. 4-4<br />
4.4.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris .............................. 4-5<br />
CHAPTER 5 - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM<br />
5.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 5-1<br />
5.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 5-1<br />
5.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 5-1<br />
5.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM MAP .................................................................................. 5-2<br />
5.2.1 Collection <strong>System</strong> Description ...................................................................... 5-2<br />
5.2.1.1 Aviation Collection <strong>System</strong> ............................................................. 5-8<br />
5.2.1.2 Maritime Collection <strong>System</strong> ............................................................ 5-8<br />
5.2.1.3 Commercial/Real Estate Collection <strong>System</strong> ................................... 5-8<br />
5.3 PORT PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN ..................................................... 5-9<br />
5.3.1 Preventative Maintenance and Inspection Activity ....................................... 5-9<br />
5.3.2 Pump Station Maintenance Program .......................................................... 5-21<br />
5.3.3 Operation and Maintenance Costs ............................................................. 5-23<br />
5.3.4 CMMS Tracking <strong>System</strong> ............................................................................. 5-23<br />
5.4 PORT REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT PLAN ....................................... 5-24<br />
5.5 STAFF TRAINING .................................................................................................. 5-24<br />
5.6 EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT PART INVENTORIES ................................. 5-24<br />
5.7 OUTREACH TO PLUMBERS/BUILDING CONTRACTORS ................................. 5-25<br />
CHAPTER 6 - DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS<br />
6.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 6-1<br />
6.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 6-1<br />
6.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 6-1<br />
May 2010 ii<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
6.2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ...................................................... 6-1<br />
6.2.1 <strong>Port</strong> Design Standards .................................................................................. 6-1<br />
6.2.2 City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Design Standards ................................................................ 6-2<br />
6.2.3 EBMUD Design Standards ........................................................................... 6-2<br />
6.3 INSPECTION AND TESTING STANDARDS ........................................................... 6-2<br />
6.3.1 <strong>Port</strong> Inspection Standards ............................................................................ 6-2<br />
6.3.2 City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Inspection Standards .......................................................... 6-3<br />
6.3.3 EBMUD Inspection Standards ...................................................................... 6-3<br />
CHAPTER 7 - OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN<br />
7.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 7-1<br />
7.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 7-1<br />
7.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 7-1<br />
7.2 OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ..................................................... 7-2<br />
7.2.1 Aviation Division ............................................................................................ 7-2<br />
7.2.1.1 Primary Notification Procedures ..................................................... 7-2<br />
7.2.1.2 SSO Response Program ................................................................ 7-2<br />
7.2.1.3 Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies ............................................... 7-3<br />
7.2.1.4 Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training ................... 7-3<br />
7.2.1.5 Emergency Operations ................................................................... 7-5<br />
7.2.1.6 SSO Surface Water Mitigation ....................................................... 7-5<br />
7.2.2 Maritime Division ........................................................................................... 7-5<br />
7.2.2.1 Primary Notification Procedures ..................................................... 7-5<br />
7.2.2.2 SSO Response Program ................................................................ 7-5<br />
7.2.2.3 Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies ............................................... 7-6<br />
7.2.2.4 Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training ................... 7-6<br />
7.2.2.5 Emergency Operations ................................................................... 7-6<br />
7.2.2.6 SSO Surface Water Mitigation ....................................................... 7-6<br />
7.2.3 Commercial/Real Estate Division ................................................................. 7-8<br />
7.2.3.1 Primary Notification Procedures ..................................................... 7-8<br />
7.2.3.2 SSO Response Program ................................................................ 7-8<br />
7.2.3.3 Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies ............................................... 7-9<br />
7.2.3.4 Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training ................... 7-9<br />
7.2.3.5 Emergency Operations ................................................................... 7-9<br />
7.2.3.6 SSO Surface Water Mitigation ....................................................... 7-9<br />
CHAPTER 8 - FOG CONTROL PLAN<br />
8.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 8-1<br />
8.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 8-1<br />
8.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 8-1<br />
8.2 FOG CONTROL PLAN ............................................................................................. 8-2<br />
8.2.1 Public Outreach Materials ............................................................................. 8-2<br />
8.2.2 FOG Disposal ................................................................................................ 8-3<br />
8.2.3 Legal Authority .............................................................................................. 8-3<br />
8.2.4 Grease Removal Device Requirements ....................................................... 8-4<br />
8.2.5 Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices ......................................................................... 8-5<br />
8.2.6 Inspection and Enforcement Procedures ..................................................... 8-5<br />
8.2.6.1 Inspection ....................................................................................... 8-5<br />
8.2.6.2 Enforcement Actions ...................................................................... 8-7<br />
8.2.6.3 Grease Interceptor Maintenance and Inspection Records ............ 8-7<br />
8.2.7 Service Area FOG Evaluation ....................................................................... 8-7<br />
May 2010 iii<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
8.2.7.1 Consultation <strong>of</strong> Operational Staff ................................................... 8-8<br />
8.2.7.2 Airport Terminal Site Visit ............................................................... 8-8<br />
8.2.7.3 CCTV Inspection ............................................................................ 8-8<br />
8.2.8 FOG Problem Areas ..................................................................................... 8-9<br />
8.2.9 Source Control Measures ........................................................................... 8-11<br />
CHAPTER 9 - SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLAN<br />
9.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 9-1<br />
9.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ........................................ 9-1<br />
9.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ................................................................................. 9-1<br />
9.2 SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLAN ............................. 9-2<br />
9.2.1 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Criteria ............................................................................................ 9-2<br />
9.2.1.1 Gravity <strong>Sewer</strong>s ................................................................................ 9-2<br />
9.2.2 Flow Monitoring Program .............................................................................. 9-4<br />
9.2.3 Hydraulic Model Development and Calibration ............................................ 9-5<br />
9.2.4 Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 9-5<br />
9.2.5 Capacity Enhancement Measures ................................................................ 9-6<br />
9.2.5.1 Pipeline Capacity Improvements .................................................... 9-6<br />
9.2.5.2 Lift Station Replacement or Rehabilitation ..................................... 9-6<br />
9.2.5.3 <strong>Sewer</strong> Main Rehabilitation and Replacement .............................. 9-11<br />
9.2.5.4 Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Program ........................................... 9-11<br />
9.2.5.5 Operations and Maintenance (<strong>Sewer</strong> Main Cleaning/CCTV) ...... 9-12<br />
9.2.6 Schedule ..................................................................................................... 9-13<br />
CHAPTER 10 - MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM MODIFICAITONS<br />
10.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 10-1<br />
10.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ...................................... 10-1<br />
10.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ............................................................................... 10-1<br />
10.2 MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM MODIFICATION ................. 10-1<br />
10.2.1 <strong>SSMP</strong> Information Maintenance Program .................................................. 10-1<br />
10.2.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> Implementation Monitoring .............................................................. 10-3<br />
10.2.3 Preventative Maintenance Program Evaluation ......................................... 10-3<br />
10.2.4 <strong>SSMP</strong> Program Updates ............................................................................. 10-3<br />
10.2.5 SSO Trends ................................................................................................ 10-3<br />
CHAPTER 11 - <strong>SSMP</strong> PROGRAM AUDITS<br />
11.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 11-1<br />
11.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ...................................... 11-1<br />
11.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ............................................................................... 11-1<br />
11.2 PORT <strong>SSMP</strong> PROGRAM AUDITS WORK PLAN .................................................. 11-1<br />
11.2.1 Responsible Party for Program Audit ......................................................... 11-1<br />
11.2.2 Audit Frequency .......................................................................................... 11-2<br />
11.2.3 Audit Procedures ........................................................................................ 11-2<br />
11.2.3.1 Data Compilation/Summary .......................................................... 11-2<br />
11.2.3.2 Operations Audit ........................................................................... 11-5<br />
11.2.3.3 Engineering/Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Audit .............. 11-6<br />
11.2.4 Program Audit Report ................................................................................. 11-7<br />
CHAPTER 12 - COMMUNICATION PROGRAM AND FINAL CERTIFICATION<br />
12.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 12-1<br />
May 2010 iv<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
12.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements ...................................... 12-1<br />
12.1.2 SWRCB Requirements ............................................................................... 12-1<br />
12.2 COMMUNICATION PLAN ...................................................................................... 12-2<br />
12.3 FINAL CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................... 12-2<br />
APPENDIX A SWRCB GWDR Order No. 2006-0003<br />
APPENDIX B <strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule<br />
APPENDIX C <strong>Port</strong> Resolution Adopting <strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule<br />
APPENDIX D Organizational Chart Contact Information<br />
APPENDIX E <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> Use Ordinance<br />
APPENDIX F City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> Use Ordinance<br />
APPENDIX G EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03<br />
APPENDIX H Collection <strong>System</strong> Map<br />
APPENDIX I Equipment and Replacement Parts Inventory<br />
APPENDIX J Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Design and Construction Standards<br />
APPENDIX K Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong><br />
APPENDIX L FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong><br />
APPENDIX M <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong><br />
APPENDIX N <strong>Port</strong> Staff Notes Related to the <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
APPENDIX O SSO Data Table<br />
APPENDIX P <strong>SSMP</strong> Adopting Resolution<br />
APPENDIX Q SWRCB <strong>SSMP</strong> Certification Form<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table 1.1 Service Population Estimate ......................................................................... 1-6<br />
Table 1.2 <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> Implementation Schedule ................................ 1-8<br />
Table 3.1 Regulatory Agency Notification <strong>Plan</strong> .......................................................... 3-13<br />
Table 5.1 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection <strong>System</strong> Summary ............................................... 5-8<br />
Table 5.2 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots” Cleaning Schedule ......................................... 5-10<br />
Table 5.3 Maritime <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule ................. 5-11<br />
Table 5.4 Aviation <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule .................. 5-12<br />
Table 5.5 C/RE <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule ...................... 5-12<br />
Table 5.6 Lift Station Preventative Maintenance Program Summary ......................... 5-21<br />
Table 8.1 EBMUD Approved Grease Haulers .............................................................. 8-4<br />
Table 8.2 Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices for Fats, Oil, and Grease ................................ 8-6<br />
Table 8.3 FOG Related Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots” .................................................. 8-11<br />
Table 9.1 Maximum Allowable d/D Ratio for New <strong>Sewer</strong>s ........................................... 9-3<br />
Table 9.2 Minimum Slope for New <strong>Sewer</strong> Pipes .......................................................... 9-4<br />
Table 9.3 Capital Improvement Projects ....................................................................... 9-9<br />
Table 9.4 Capital Improvement Cost Summary .......................................................... 9-13<br />
Table 9.5 High Priority Improvements Summary ........................................................ 9-14<br />
Table 11.1 Example SSO Trend Tracking Table .......................................................... 11-4<br />
Table 11.2 Example <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance Tracking Table ............................................ 11-5<br />
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure 1.1 Regional Location Map ................................................................................. 1-2<br />
Figure 1.2 Current Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Service Area ........................................................... 1-5<br />
May 2010 v<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
Figure 3.1 <strong>SSMP</strong> Organizational Chart .......................................................................... 3-3<br />
Figure 3.2 SSO Reporting Requirements Flow Chart .................................................. 3-10<br />
Figure 5.1 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection <strong>System</strong> Map ........................................................ 5-3<br />
Figure 5.2 Recommended Gravity Main Cleaning Schedule ....................................... 5-13<br />
Figure 5.3 Completed 2009/10 CCTV Inspections (page 1 <strong>of</strong> 2) ................................ 5-18<br />
Figure 5.3 Completed 2009/10 CCTV Inspections (page 2 <strong>of</strong> 2) ................................ 5-19<br />
Figure 5.4 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots” ........................................................................ 5-20<br />
Figure 7.1 Airport Facilities SSO Field Response Action Flow Chart ............................ 7-4<br />
Figure 7.2 Maritime/Comm. Facilities SSO Field Response Action Flow Chart ............ 7-7<br />
Figure 8.1 FOG Related Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots” .................................................. 8-10<br />
Figure 9.1 Proposed Capital Improvements .................................................................. 9-7<br />
May 2010 vi<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/TOCPW<strong>SSMP</strong>.doc (FinalA)
Chapter 1<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) sanitary sewer system<br />
service area, the need for this <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>), a description <strong>of</strong><br />
the regulatory history <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>, and population estimates for the <strong>Port</strong>. General<br />
information, such as a list <strong>of</strong> abbreviations and a list <strong>of</strong> references, is also provided to assist<br />
the reader.<br />
1.1 BACKGROUND<br />
In 1927, the Charter <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (City) established the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> as a fully<br />
autonomous City department. The <strong>Port</strong> is located on the eastern mainland shore <strong>of</strong> San<br />
Francisco Bay in the City, as shown on Figure 1.1. Under the City Charter, exclusive control<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> is vested in the <strong>Port</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners, which is a<br />
board consisting <strong>of</strong> seven members nominated by the Mayor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> and appointed by<br />
the <strong>Oakland</strong> City Council.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> is broken down into three major revenue divisions: Maritime, Aviation, and<br />
Commercial/Real Estate.<br />
• Maritime Division. The <strong>Port</strong> owns and manages seaport facilities on the San<br />
Francisco Bay and the <strong>Oakland</strong> Estuary, which consist <strong>of</strong> ten marine container<br />
terminals, two intermodal rail facilities, and maritime support areas. The <strong>Port</strong> also<br />
leases and rents facilities used in cargo transport.<br />
• Aviation Division. The Aviation Division consists <strong>of</strong> two main areas: the Southfield<br />
and the Northfield.<br />
– Airport Southfield.<br />
The Southfield consists primarily <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oakland</strong> International<br />
Airport main terminals, as well as other privately operated airport support<br />
facilities. The <strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport consists <strong>of</strong> two terminals and 29<br />
boarding gates. The airport includes eight domestic airlines, two international<br />
airlines, and three cargo airlines. Food, beverage, retail, and duty free<br />
concessions are provided primarily through Host International, as well as a few<br />
other concessionaires.<br />
– Airport Northfield. The Northfield consists primarily <strong>of</strong> fixed base operators (e.g.,<br />
Business Jet Center, KaiserAir, etc.), providing fueling, maintenance, and<br />
charter flight services. Rental Car services are also located in the Northfield.<br />
May 2010 1-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
[<br />
Revision Date: April 23, 2010<br />
?Ò<br />
California<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Oakland</strong><br />
tu 101<br />
San Francisco<br />
?Ò<br />
I-280<br />
Santa Rosa<br />
!(<br />
Elevation<br />
?ñ<br />
Richmond<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Palo Alto<br />
Napa<br />
I-680<br />
Fremont<br />
Los Gatos<br />
San Jose<br />
tu 101<br />
High : 3,500 Feet<br />
Low : Sea Level<br />
Major Roads<br />
Concord<br />
I-580<br />
Morgan Hill<br />
I-80<br />
Woodland<br />
Tracy<br />
I-5<br />
I-5<br />
AÞ<br />
?}<br />
Sacramento<br />
AÃ<br />
Lodi<br />
Stockton<br />
Figure 1.1<br />
Regional Location Map<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Modesto<br />
Turlock<br />
?×
• Commercial/Real Estate Division. The Commercial/Real Estate Division owns and<br />
manages roughly 900 acres <strong>of</strong> developable land located west <strong>of</strong> Embarcadero and<br />
south <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice building. The centerpiece <strong>of</strong> the Commercial/Real<br />
Estate Division is Jack London Square, although other development areas are owned<br />
by the <strong>Port</strong>. Jack London Square consists <strong>of</strong> several waterfront bars/restaurants,<br />
hotels, and other retail establishments. These buildings are leased out by the <strong>Port</strong> to<br />
individual tenants, who are responsible for building and facility maintenance through<br />
their lease agreements with the <strong>Port</strong>.<br />
In addition to the three revenue divisions, the <strong>Port</strong> also operates several administrative or<br />
support divisions (e.g., Engineering, Finance, Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning, etc.).<br />
1.1.1 Notice <strong>of</strong> Intent<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> submitted a Notice <strong>of</strong> Intent (NOI) for coverage under State General Waste<br />
Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) on October 20, 2006. Appendix A<br />
contains a copy <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs for reference. Subsequent to the submission <strong>of</strong> the NOI, the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> was required to begin reporting all overflows, developing an <strong>SSMP</strong>, and developing a<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule.<br />
1.1.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule<br />
On December 4, 2007, the <strong>Port</strong>’s <strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule was formally approved and<br />
adopted in Resolution No. 07324 by the Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners. The <strong>Plan</strong> and<br />
Schedule serves as a “road map” in the development <strong>of</strong> individual elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
Appendix B contains a copy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule for reference, and Appendix C<br />
contains a copy <strong>of</strong> Resolution No. 07324.<br />
1.2 SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION<br />
On May 8, 2009, the <strong>Port</strong> approved a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service agreement with Carollo<br />
Engineers, P.C. (Carollo) to prepare a <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong>, which included the following main<br />
tasks:<br />
• Information gathering and records review;<br />
• Condition assessment, system inspection, evaluation, mapping, and hydraulic<br />
modeling;<br />
• <strong>SSMP</strong> development.<br />
1.3 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA<br />
Figure 1.2 illustrates the <strong>Port</strong>’s current sanitary sewer service area. Wastewater flows<br />
generated within the <strong>Port</strong> service area are conveyed through the <strong>Port</strong> collection system to<br />
the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (City) sanitary sewer system or directly to sewer interceptors owned<br />
May 2010 1-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
and maintained by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD). All <strong>Port</strong> wastewater flow<br />
is treated at EBMUD’s Main Wastewater Treatment <strong>Plan</strong>t (MWWTP).<br />
Sanitary sewer facilities in the <strong>Port</strong> service area can be divided into five main types, as<br />
outlined below:<br />
• <strong>Port</strong> Owned, <strong>Port</strong> Maintained. These facilities are located on <strong>Port</strong> property, and are<br />
owned and maintained by <strong>Port</strong> operations staff. Approximately 30 miles <strong>of</strong> sewer lines<br />
ranging in diameter from 3-inches to 36-inches in diameter fall into this category.<br />
Twenty-one lift stations and two sewer ejectors also fit into this category.<br />
• City Owned, <strong>Port</strong> Maintained. These facilities are located within the <strong>Port</strong>’s<br />
boundaries, are located within City right-<strong>of</strong>-way, and are also owned by the City, but<br />
are maintained by <strong>Port</strong> operations staff. Approximately 4 miles <strong>of</strong> sewer lines ranging<br />
in diameter from 6-inches to 30-inches in diameter fall into this category. Three lift<br />
stations also fit into this category.<br />
• <strong>Port</strong> Owned, Privately Maintained. These facilities are located on <strong>Port</strong> property, but<br />
are maintained by private non-<strong>Port</strong> property managers, for example the Jack London<br />
Square area. Approximately 3 miles <strong>of</strong> sewer fell into this category and in 2011 an<br />
additional 1.5 miles <strong>of</strong> 8-inch diameter sewer lines will be added. One lift station also<br />
fits into this category.<br />
• City Owned, City Maintained. These facilities are located on <strong>Port</strong> property within<br />
City easements, and are owned and maintained by the City. Therefore, the <strong>Port</strong> is not<br />
responsible for maintaining these facilities or for responding to and reporting sanitary<br />
sewer overflows (SSOs) within these facilities.<br />
• <strong>Port</strong> Owned, <strong>Port</strong> Maintained, Out <strong>of</strong> Service. These facilities are owned by the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> on existing <strong>Port</strong> property, but are currently not in service. The majority <strong>of</strong> these<br />
facilities are located at the <strong>Oakland</strong> Army base, and are available for redevelopment.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the sewer laterals or mains in this area are currently plugged.<br />
1.4 SERVICE POPULATION ESTIMATE<br />
Accurate population estimates for the <strong>Port</strong> are difficult due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the service area.<br />
<strong>Port</strong> staff has estimated the average population served at any given time at approximately<br />
8,700 persons. This estimate accounts for the number <strong>of</strong> airport/maritime employees,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> airport passengers, and the population served by the commercial real estate<br />
division <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>. The number <strong>of</strong> employees and passengers used for this calculation are<br />
included in Table 1.1.<br />
May 2010 1-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
Legend<br />
Revision Date: May 13, 2010<br />
Service Area<br />
7TH ST<br />
FERRY ST<br />
MAIN ST<br />
!"c$<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
ATLANTIC AVE<br />
CENTRAL AVE<br />
8TH ST<br />
OTIS DR<br />
MECARTNEY RD<br />
ISLAND DR<br />
%&t(<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
SEA VIEW PKWY<br />
HOLLY ST<br />
O<br />
MAITLAND DR<br />
MANDELA PKWY<br />
UNION ST<br />
RAMP<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
%&t(<br />
?t<br />
MANDELA PKWY<br />
8TH ST<br />
0 2,500<br />
Feet<br />
5,000<br />
ADELINE ST<br />
HARRISON ST<br />
PACIFIC AVE<br />
BRUSH ST<br />
14TH ST<br />
OAK ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
PARK ST<br />
VERSAILLES AVE<br />
HARBOR BAY PKWY<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
8TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
DOOLITTE DR<br />
EARHART RD<br />
SAN PABLO AVE<br />
HIGH ST<br />
TELEGRAPH AVE<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
WEBSTER ST<br />
1ST AVE<br />
E 8TH ST<br />
MARKET ST<br />
FOOTHILL BLVD<br />
KENNEDY ST<br />
MARINA DR<br />
STATE HWY 123<br />
%&n(<br />
BROADWAY<br />
13TH AVE<br />
INTERNATIONAL BLVD<br />
HEGENBERGER RD<br />
98TH AVE<br />
29TH AVE<br />
OAKPORT ST<br />
MARKET ST<br />
E 16TH ST<br />
TELEGRAPH AVE<br />
COLISEUM WAY<br />
%&t(<br />
RAMP<br />
14TH AVE<br />
66TH AVE<br />
SHATTUCK AVE<br />
51ST ST<br />
PIEDMONT AVE<br />
GRAND AVE<br />
MACARTHUR BLVD<br />
23RD AVE<br />
SAN LEANDRO ST<br />
TELEGRAPH AVE<br />
STATE HWY 24 W<br />
51ST ST<br />
LAKESHORE AVE<br />
FRUITVALE AVE<br />
HIGH ST<br />
BANCROFT AVE<br />
COLLEGE AVE<br />
PARK BLVD<br />
35TH AVE<br />
Figure 1.2<br />
Current Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong><br />
Service Area<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
An
Table 1.1 Service Population Estimate<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
<strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Employees<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Passengers<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Equivalent Residents<br />
8,000 14,500,000 8,165<br />
Maritime <strong>Port</strong> 1,000 N/A 400<br />
Total 9,000 14,500,000 8,665<br />
Notes:<br />
1. The number <strong>of</strong> equivalent residents = (2/5) * the number <strong>of</strong> employees.<br />
2. The number <strong>of</strong> equivalent residents = number <strong>of</strong> passengers per year / 365 x Average<br />
length <strong>of</strong> stay (1/8 <strong>of</strong> a day or 3hrs).<br />
1.5 REGULATORY BACKGROUND<br />
This section briefly summarizes the history surrounding the development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
requirements.<br />
1.5.1 National Regulatory Background<br />
Nationally, Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflows (SSOs) have been in the regulatory spotlight since<br />
1995, when the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) formed the<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflow Federal Advisory Subcommittee (SSO Subcommittee). The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> the SSO Subcommittee is to examine the need for national consistency in<br />
permitting and enforcement <strong>of</strong> SSOs.<br />
From 1995 to 1999, the SSO Subcommittee met 12 times to discuss policy issues<br />
associated with SSOs. In 1999, the SSO Subcommittee supported basic principals<br />
requiring the following:<br />
• Capacity, management, operation, and maintenance (CMOM) programs for municipal<br />
sanitary sewer collection systems;<br />
• A prohibition on SSOs, which includes a closely circumscribed framework for raising a<br />
defense for unavoidable discharges;<br />
• Reporting, public notification, and record-keeping requirements for municipal sanitary<br />
sewer collection systems and SSOs.<br />
The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the SSO Subcommittee were then incorporated into the proposed<br />
“SSO Rule,” which was published in the Federal Register in January 2001. For a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
reasons, however, the proposed SSO Rule has yet to be formally adopted by the USEPA<br />
on a national level.<br />
May 2010 1-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)<br />
(1),(2)
1.5.2 California Regulatory Background<br />
In 2004, the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)<br />
implemented new monitoring and reporting requirements related to SSOs. Subsequently, in<br />
2005, the RWQCB issued a letter requiring the development <strong>of</strong> an <strong>SSMP</strong>. The new<br />
requirements were in response to a growing emphasis on the reduction <strong>of</strong> overflows and<br />
applied only to agencies within its region.<br />
On May 2, 2006, the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted<br />
the GWDRs, establishing new monitoring and reporting requirements, and <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
development requirements for all agencies that own or operate a collection system with<br />
more than one mile <strong>of</strong> pipe. The GWDRs were subsequently amended on February 20,<br />
2008. The provisions <strong>of</strong> this amendment are incorporated in this report.<br />
The GWDRs prohibit any SSO that results in a discharge <strong>of</strong> untreated or partially treated<br />
wastewater to waters <strong>of</strong> the United States or that causes a “nuisance,” as defined in<br />
California Water Code Section 13050(m). There is no “affirmative defense” for unforeseen<br />
or unavoidable SSOs. Instead, the GWDRs include the concept <strong>of</strong> “enforcement discretion,”<br />
and identify seven specific factors that must be considered in an enforcement action, such<br />
as the extent to which the discharger has complied with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs. In<br />
the event <strong>of</strong> an SSO, all feasible steps shall be taken to limit the released volume and<br />
prevent untreated water from entering storm drains, creeks, etc. SSOs must be reported<br />
through a new statewide online reporting system, the California Integrated Water Quality<br />
<strong>System</strong> (CIWQS), which is a computer system used by the SWRCB to track information<br />
about places <strong>of</strong> environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections,<br />
and manage violations and enforcement activities.<br />
1.6 SSO DEFINITION<br />
An SSO is defined as any overflow, release, discharge, or diversion <strong>of</strong> untreated or partially<br />
treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer system. There are three categories <strong>of</strong> SSOs as<br />
established by the GWDRs:<br />
• Category 1: This category includes all discharges <strong>of</strong> sewage resulting from a failure<br />
in the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer system that:<br />
a. Equal or exceed 1,000 gallons, or<br />
b. Result in a discharge to a drainage channel and/or surface water; or<br />
c. Discharge to a stormdrain pipe that was not fully captured and returned to the<br />
sanitary sewer system.<br />
• Category 2: This category includes all other discharges <strong>of</strong> sewage resulting from a<br />
failure in the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer system.<br />
• Private Lateral Sewage Discharges: Sewage discharges that are caused by<br />
blockages or other problems within a privately owned lateral.<br />
May 2010 1-7<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
As part <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs, all agencies that own or operate sanitary systems greater than one<br />
mile in length that collect and/or convey untreated or partially treated wastewater to a<br />
publicly owned treatment facility are required to report Category 1 and Category 2 SSOs.<br />
The reporting <strong>of</strong> Private Lateral Sewage Discharges is optional.<br />
1.7 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE<br />
The GWDRs have established an <strong>SSMP</strong> implementation schedule based on the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
agency. As mentioned in Section 1.4, population estimates for the <strong>Port</strong> are difficult. It is<br />
estimated that the <strong>Port</strong> currently serves a population <strong>of</strong> roughly 8,700. The <strong>Port</strong>’s<br />
implementation schedule is therefore governed by the schedule established for agencies<br />
ranging in size from 2,500 to 10,000 persons. Table 1.2 contains the implementation<br />
schedule that must be followed by the <strong>Port</strong> in the development <strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
Table 1.2 <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> Implementation Schedule<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Task Required Certification Date<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> and Schedule<br />
02/01/08<br />
Goals and Organization 05/01/08<br />
Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Legal Authority<br />
11/01/09<br />
O&M <strong>Plan</strong><br />
FOG <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Design and Performance Standards<br />
<strong>System</strong> Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong><br />
05/01/10<br />
Final <strong>SSMP</strong> and Certification<br />
Note:<br />
1. Required Certification Date based on GWDR Order No. 2006-0003 for Population<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2,500 to 10,000.<br />
1.8 REPORT ORGANIZATION<br />
This <strong>SSMP</strong> contains twelve chapters. Appendices are provided to support the information<br />
provided in the text. A brief description <strong>of</strong> the chapters is provided as follows:<br />
Chapter 1 - Background. This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer<br />
system service area, the need for the <strong>SSMP</strong>, a description <strong>of</strong> the regulatory history <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong>, and population estimates for the <strong>Port</strong>. General information, such as a list <strong>of</strong><br />
abbreviations and a list <strong>of</strong> references, is also provided to assist the reader.<br />
May 2010 1-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)<br />
(1)
Chapter 2 - Goals. This chapter summarizes goals established for the <strong>Port</strong>’s <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
Chapter 3 - Organization. This chapter identifies the responsible <strong>Port</strong> representative for<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong>. It also includes an organizational chart<br />
and a chain <strong>of</strong> communication for reporting SSOs.<br />
Chapter 4 - Legal Authority. This chapter summarizes the <strong>Port</strong>’s authority, through<br />
ordinances, services agreements, or other legally binding procedures, to conform to the<br />
RWQCB requirements and the GWDRs.<br />
Chapter 5 - Operation and Maintenance <strong>Plan</strong>. This chapter contains a description <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Port</strong>’s operations and maintenance plan, including mapping, routine and preventative<br />
maintenance, rehabilitation, and training.<br />
Chapter 6 - Design and Performance Provisions. This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong><br />
the relevant design and construction standards, as well as standards for the inspection and<br />
testing <strong>of</strong> new sewers, pumps, and other appurtenances and for rehabilitation projects.<br />
Chapter 7 - Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong>. This chapter describes the overflow<br />
emergency response plan, which provides measures to protect the public health and the<br />
environment in the event <strong>of</strong> an overflow.<br />
Chapter 8 - FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong>. This chapter summarizes the <strong>Port</strong>’s fats, oil, and grease<br />
(FOG) control plan, which has been developed to limit the amount <strong>of</strong> FOG that enters the<br />
collection system to the extent feasible.<br />
Chapter 9 - <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong>. This chapter provides an<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer system facilities, identifies and proposes<br />
improvements for deficiencies, identifies design criteria, and provides a list <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
improvement projects (CIP) and schedule for improvements.<br />
Chapter 10 - Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications. This chapter<br />
presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the steps to be taken by the <strong>Port</strong> to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
this <strong>SSMP</strong>, and perform updates to the document should improvements be necessary or<br />
desirable.<br />
Chapter 11 - <strong>SSMP</strong> Program Audits. This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the procedures<br />
to be used by the <strong>Port</strong> to perform internal audits.<br />
Chapter 12 - Communication Program and Final Certification. This chapter presents a<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the steps to be taken by the <strong>Port</strong> to communicate with the public on the<br />
development, implementation, and performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>. This chapter also contains<br />
the final certification <strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
May 2010 1-9<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
1.9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Carollo Engineers wishes to acknowledge and thank Mr. Liem Nguyen, Water <strong>System</strong>s<br />
Engineer; Mr. Wing Lau, Utilities Engineering Supervisor; Mr. Mike Mantino, Aviation<br />
Facilities Manager; Mr. Ted Mankowski, Harbor Facilities Manager; Mr. Jeff Jones, <strong>Port</strong><br />
Environmental Compliance Supervisor; Mr. Curtis Wilkins, Aviation Construction and<br />
Maintenance Supervisor; Mr. Noel Santos, Aviation Senior Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Engineer;<br />
Mr. Sam Tamura, Aviation Utilities Supervisor; Ms. Valerie Zabb, Aviation Utilities Foreman;<br />
Mr. Michael Ringbom, Harbor Utilities Foreman; Mr. Dennis Ho, Harbor Associate Engineer<br />
- Civil Work; and Mr. Bill Morrison, Harbor Maintenance and Construction Supervisor. Their<br />
cooperation and courtesy in obtaining a variety <strong>of</strong> necessary information were valuable<br />
components in completing and producing this report.<br />
1.10 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS<br />
To conserve space and to improve readability, the following abbreviations are used in this<br />
report. The abbreviations are spelled out in the text the first time the phrase or title is used<br />
in each chapter and subsequently identified by abbreviation only.<br />
ABAG Association <strong>of</strong> Bay Area Governments<br />
BMPs Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices<br />
Board Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners<br />
Carollo Carollo Engineers, P.C.<br />
CCTV closed-circuit television<br />
CIP Capital Improvement Projects<br />
City City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality <strong>System</strong><br />
CMMS Computerized Maintenance <strong>Management</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
CMOM Capacity, <strong>Management</strong>, Operation, and Maintenance<br />
CWEA California Water Environment Association<br />
d/D Flow Depth to Pipe Diameter Ratio<br />
EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District<br />
FOG fats, oil, and grease<br />
FSF Food Service Facilities<br />
May 2010 1-10<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
GIS Geographic Information <strong>System</strong><br />
GWDRs State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003<br />
I/I Infiltration and Inflow<br />
MRP Monitoring Reporting Program<br />
MWWTP Main Wastewater Treatment <strong>Plan</strong>t<br />
NOI Notice <strong>of</strong> Intent<br />
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Program<br />
O&M Operations and Maintenance<br />
ODBC Open Database Connectivity<br />
OERP Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong><br />
OES State Office <strong>of</strong> Emergency Services<br />
PDF <strong>Port</strong>able Document Format<br />
PLAP Pooled Liability Assurance <strong>Plan</strong><br />
PM Preventative Maintenance<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
RWQCB San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board<br />
SECAP <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong><br />
SOP Standard Operating Procedures<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
SSO Subcommittee Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflow Federal Advisory Subcommittee<br />
SSOs Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflows<br />
SWRCB California State Water Resources Control Board<br />
TM Technical Memorandum<br />
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency<br />
May 2010 1-11<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
1.11 REFERENCE MATERIAL<br />
The following documents were referenced in the preparation <strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong>:<br />
• City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>, Public Works Agency Standards - Draft Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Design<br />
Guidelines, November 2004.<br />
• City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>, Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, August 2008.<br />
• EBMUD, Ordinance No. 311A-03, Adopted July 2003.<br />
• EBMUD, <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, August 2008.<br />
• City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Drawings.<br />
• City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> AutoCAD and Record Drawings.<br />
May 2010 1-12<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch01 (FinalA)
Chapter 2<br />
GOALS<br />
This chapter summarizes goals established for the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>).<br />
2.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
2.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency develop, at a minimum, goals for the <strong>SSMP</strong> as<br />
follows:<br />
• To properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts <strong>of</strong> the wastewater collection<br />
system;<br />
• To provide adequate capacity to convey peak flows;<br />
• To minimize the frequency <strong>of</strong> Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflows (SSOs);<br />
• To mitigate the impact <strong>of</strong> SSOs.<br />
2.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
the following with respect to the goals element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>:<br />
“The purpose <strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong> is to provide a plan and schedule to properly manage, operate,<br />
and maintain all parts <strong>of</strong> the sanitary sewer system. This will help reduce and prevent<br />
SSOs, as well as mitigate any SSOs that do occur.”<br />
2.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> OBJECTIVE<br />
The main <strong>Port</strong> objective for the <strong>SSMP</strong> is to effectively manage, operate, and maintain its<br />
sanitary sewer system to provide the world-class infrastructure facilities and services to its<br />
airport, seaport, and commercial real estate tenants and customers. This objective<br />
conforms to <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> Strategic Goal Numbers 1, 2, and 3, which are listed below as a<br />
reference:<br />
1. Consider our customers and stakeholders first in all that we do by providing services,<br />
infrastructure, and support that help them fulfill their goals;<br />
2. Develop and maintain relationships <strong>of</strong> trust and integrity with our community,<br />
customers, public agencies, and other stakeholders to maximize the benefits to the<br />
region; and<br />
3. Improve the environmental conditions and stewardship at the <strong>Port</strong>.<br />
May 2010 2-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch02 (FinalA)
2.3 PORT <strong>SSMP</strong> GOALS<br />
In order to achieve the main <strong>SSMP</strong> objective (see Section 2.2), the <strong>Port</strong> is committed to the<br />
following goals relative to the sanitary sewer system:<br />
1. Provide adequate capacity in the sanitary sewer system to convey base and peak<br />
flows and reduce infiltration and inflow (I/I) into the system;<br />
2. Perform routine preventive maintenance (e.g. condition assessment using video<br />
camera, cleaning, etc.) on all facilities <strong>of</strong> the sewer collection system, including pump<br />
stations, triturator, other equipment, and sewer appurtenances, to reduce future risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> SSOs;<br />
3. Minimize and reduce the frequency <strong>of</strong> SSOs to the extent possible;<br />
4. Limit the impacts <strong>of</strong> SSOs to a minimum by utilizing safe and effective methods and<br />
proven technology;<br />
5. Prevent public health hazards and damages to public and private properties caused<br />
by SSOs;<br />
6. Identify collection system blockages due to fats, oil, and grease (FOG) and develop<br />
strategies to decrease backups; and<br />
7. Develop capital improvement projects (CIP) to maintain the existing sewer<br />
infrastructure facilities, to improve system reliability, and to provide adequate capacity<br />
to accommodate future flows.<br />
May 2010 2-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch02 (FinalA)
Chapter 3<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
This chapter identifies the responsible <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) representative for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>). It also includes an<br />
organizational chart and a chain <strong>of</strong> communication for reporting sanitary sewer overflows<br />
(SSOs).<br />
3.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
3.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection agency shall, at a minimum, provide information regarding its<br />
organization:<br />
• Identify agency staff responsible for implementing, managing, and updating the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong>;<br />
• Identify chain <strong>of</strong> communication for responding to SSOs;<br />
• Identify chain <strong>of</strong> communication for reporting SSOs.<br />
3.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs)<br />
specifies that the <strong>SSMP</strong> must identify the following:<br />
a. The name <strong>of</strong> the responsible or authorized representative for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>;<br />
b. The names and telephone numbers for management, administrative, and<br />
maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific measures <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> program. The <strong>SSMP</strong> must identify lines <strong>of</strong> authority through an<br />
organizational chart or similar document with a narrative explanation; and<br />
c. The chain <strong>of</strong> communication for reporting SSOs, from receipt <strong>of</strong> a complaint<br />
and other information, including the person responsible for reporting SSOs to<br />
the State and Regional Water Board and other agencies if applicable (such as<br />
County Health Officer, County Environmental Health Agency, Regional Water<br />
Quality Control Board, and/or State Office <strong>of</strong> Emergency Services [OES]).<br />
3.2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> has designated the Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer to serve as the <strong>Port</strong>’s legally<br />
responsible <strong>of</strong>ficial (LRO) (i.e., authorized representative) for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
provisions set forth in this <strong>SSMP</strong>. The Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer is authorized to submit<br />
electronic spill reports to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). He is also<br />
authorized to report SSOs to other applicable agencies (such as County Health Officer,<br />
May 2010 3-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
County Environmental Health Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and/or State<br />
OES).<br />
In the event that the Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer is unavailable, the <strong>Port</strong> has established two<br />
alternate LROs. Alternative LRO numbers 1 and 2 are the Environmental Compliance<br />
Supervisor and the Associate Environmental Scientist, respectively. The alternative LROs<br />
also can serve as “data entry designee” 1<br />
on the California Integrated Water Quality <strong>System</strong><br />
(CIWQS). The Environmental Compliance Supervisor normally serves as “data entry<br />
designee.”<br />
3.3 ORGANIZATIONAL HIERARCHY<br />
Figure 3.1 shows the lines <strong>of</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials and employees that will be<br />
responsible for implementing and participating in specific measures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>. In order<br />
to make the update <strong>of</strong> this document more user friendly, the lines <strong>of</strong> authority in Figure 3.1<br />
reference job titles only. Appendix D provides the names and contact information for the<br />
individuals referenced in the organizational chart.<br />
3.3.1 <strong>SSMP</strong> Roles and Responsibilities<br />
This section summarizes the roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the positions identified in<br />
Figure 3.1 as applicable to this <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
3.3.1.1<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners<br />
The Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners (Board) is vested with exclusive control and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>. The Board consists <strong>of</strong> seven members nominated by the Mayor <strong>of</strong><br />
the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (City) and appointed by the City Council for four-year terms. The Board<br />
is responsible for the overall approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>, as well as the approval <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
expenditures related to the <strong>SSMP</strong> program elements, including ongoing operations and<br />
maintenance costs.<br />
3.3.1.2<br />
Executive Positions<br />
The executive <strong>of</strong>fice overseas the overall operation and budgeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>. For this<br />
reason, the roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> these positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are<br />
relatively few, as described below:<br />
• Executive Director. The Executive Director is responsible for the administration and<br />
operations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>.<br />
• Chief Audit Officer. The Chief Audit Officer is responsible for all internal audits <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> organization. He will provide an overall supervisory role in the performance <strong>of</strong><br />
periodic <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits, as discussed in Chapter 11.<br />
1<br />
The “Data Entry Designee” is the individual who initially inputs spill information on CIWQS prior to<br />
final certification by the LRO.<br />
May 2010 3-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
• <strong>Port</strong> Attorney. The <strong>Port</strong> Attorney is responsible for verifying that the <strong>Port</strong>, through<br />
service agreements, ordinances, or other legally binding provisions, has the authority<br />
to implement the programs and activities documented or recommended in this plan.<br />
• Deputy Executive Director - Finance. The Deputy Executive Director - Finance<br />
serves as the <strong>Port</strong>’s chief financial <strong>of</strong>ficer and is responsible for all internal financial<br />
audits <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>.<br />
3.3.1.3<br />
Aviation Division<br />
The Aviation Division is responsible for the operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
International Airport and associated facilities. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Aviation. The Director <strong>of</strong> Aviation is responsible for the operation,<br />
management, and marketing <strong>of</strong> the Aviation Division.<br />
• Aviation Facilities Manager. The Aviation Facilities Manager is responsible for<br />
overseeing the operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the Aviation Division infrastructure<br />
facilities, including the sanitary sewer system. As relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Aviation<br />
Facilities Manager oversees the budgeting process for the aviation sewer system<br />
operation and maintenance (O&M) expenditures, supervises lower level aviation<br />
facilities maintenance positions, and is responsible for ensuring that SSOs are<br />
appropriately responded to.<br />
• Aviation <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Development Manager. The Aviation <strong>Plan</strong>ning and<br />
Development Manager is responsible for coordinating capital improvement<br />
expenditures related to the airport sanitary sewer system.<br />
• Maintenance/Construction Supervisor. As related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor is responsible for coordinating the maintenance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the gravity sewer collection system and for coordinating the response to SSOs<br />
within the gravity collection system. He also oversees the in-house repair,<br />
replacement, or construction <strong>of</strong> sanitary sewer mains.<br />
• Utilities Supervisor. Related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Utilities Supervisor is responsible for<br />
the O&M <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations in the Northfield area <strong>of</strong> the aviation sewer system. He<br />
is also responsible for responding to SSOs caused by sewer lift station failure in the<br />
Northfield area.<br />
• Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Superintendent. The Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Superintendent is<br />
responsible for the O&M <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations, ejectors, and triturator in the Southfield<br />
area (terminal area) <strong>of</strong> the aviation sewer system. He is also responsible for<br />
coordinating the response to SSOs that occur due to failure <strong>of</strong> these facilities.<br />
May 2010 3-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
• Facility Support Supervisor. The Facilities Support Supervisor is responsible for<br />
coordinating O&M and emergency response activities within the <strong>Port</strong>’s computerized<br />
maintenance management system (CMMS).<br />
• Maintenance Foreman. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor, the Maintenance Foreman is responsible for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
gravity sewer collection system and for responding to SSOs within the gravity<br />
collection system. He is also responsible for, under the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor, in-house repair, replacement, or construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> sanitary sewer mains.<br />
• Utilities Foreman. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Utilities Supervisor, the Utilities<br />
Foreman is responsible for the O&M <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations in the Northfield area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
aviation sewer system. He is also responsible for responding to SSOs caused by the<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations in the Northfield area.<br />
• Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Engineer/Senior Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Engineer. Under the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> the Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Superintendent, The Equipment <strong>System</strong>s<br />
Engineer is responsible for the O&M <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations, ejectors, and triturator in<br />
the Southfield area (terminal area) <strong>of</strong> the aviation sewer system. He is also<br />
responsible for responding to SSOs that occur due to the failure <strong>of</strong> these facilities.<br />
• Equipment Driver/Operator. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance Foreman, the<br />
Equipment Driver/Operator is responsible for operating <strong>Port</strong> construction equipment<br />
as used for sewer repair, rehabilitation, construction, or emergency response<br />
activities.<br />
• Semi-Skilled Labor. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance Foreman, the Semi-<br />
Skilled Laborer is responsible for completing various construction activities associated<br />
with sewer repair, rehabilitation, construction, or emergency response activities.<br />
• Plumber. The Plumber is responsible for clearing sewer line blockages located within<br />
buildings or in the airport terminal.<br />
3.3.1.4<br />
Maritime Division<br />
The Maritime Division is responsible for the operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Seaport and associated facilities. They are also responsible for sewer construction projects<br />
located within commercial real estate areas <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />
specific positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Maritime. The Director <strong>of</strong> Maritime is responsible for the operation,<br />
management, and marketing <strong>of</strong> the Maritime Division.<br />
• Harbor Facilities Manager. The Harbor Facilities Manager is responsible for<br />
overseeing the operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the Maritime Division infrastructure<br />
facilities, including the sanitary sewer system. As relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Harbor<br />
Facilities Manager oversees the budgeting process for the maritime sewer system<br />
May 2010 3-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
O&M expenditures, supervises lower level harbor facilities maintenance positions,<br />
and is responsible for ensuring that SSOs are appropriately responded to.<br />
• Administrative/Financial Services Manager. The Administrative/Financial Services<br />
Manager is responsible for coordinating capital improvement expenditures related to<br />
the maritime sanitary sewer system.<br />
• <strong>Port</strong> Chief Wharfinger/Wharfinger. The Wharfinger serves as the liaison between<br />
the harbor tenants and the <strong>Port</strong> Maritime Division and is responsible for notifying <strong>Port</strong><br />
staff in the event <strong>of</strong> an SSO.<br />
• Maintenance/Construction Supervisor. As related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor is responsible for coordinating the maintenance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the maritime gravity sewer collection system and for coordinating the response to<br />
SSOs within the gravity collection system.<br />
• Utilities Supervisor. Related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Utilities Supervisor is responsible for<br />
the O&M <strong>of</strong> sewer lift stations in the maritime sewer system. He is also responsible<br />
for responding to SSOs caused by a failure <strong>of</strong> a maritime sewer lift station.<br />
• Facilities Support Supervisor. The Facilities Support Supervisor is responsible for<br />
coordinating O&M and emergency response activities within the <strong>Port</strong>’s CMMS.<br />
• Maintenance Foreman. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor, the Maintenance Foreman is responsible for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
maritime gravity sewer collection system and for responding to SSOs within the<br />
gravity collection system.<br />
• Utilities Foreman. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Utilities Supervisor, the Utilities<br />
Foreman is responsible for the O&M <strong>of</strong> maritime sewer lift stations. He is also<br />
responsible for responding to SSOs caused by a failure <strong>of</strong> a maritime sewer lift<br />
station.<br />
• Equipment Driver/Operator. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance Foreman, the<br />
Equipment Driver/Operator is responsible for operating <strong>Port</strong> construction equipment<br />
as used for sewer repair, rehabilitation, construction, or emergency response<br />
activities.<br />
• Semi-Skilled Labor. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance Foreman, the Semi-<br />
Skilled Laborer is responsible for completing various construction activities associated<br />
with sewer repair, rehabilitation, construction, or emergency response activities.<br />
• Plumber. The Plumber is responsible for clearing sewer line blockages located within<br />
maritime buildings.<br />
May 2010 3-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
3.3.1.5<br />
Commercial/Real Estate Division<br />
The Commercial/Real Estate Division manages much <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s public access areas,<br />
including the Waterfront Gateway in Jack London Square. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />
specific positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Commercial/Real Estate. The Director <strong>of</strong> Commercial/Real Estate is<br />
responsible for overseeing leasing in the <strong>Port</strong> and managing the <strong>Port</strong>’s public access<br />
areas.<br />
• Commercial/Real Estate Representative. The Commercial/Real Estate<br />
Representative serves as the liaison between commercial/real estate tenants<br />
(primarily in Jack London Square) and harbor facilities.<br />
3.3.1.6<br />
Engineering Division<br />
The Engineering Division is responsible for pr<strong>of</strong>essional engineering design, construction,<br />
dredging, and land surveying functions for the <strong>Port</strong>. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Engineering. The Director <strong>of</strong> Engineering is responsible for overseeing<br />
the operation and management <strong>of</strong> the Engineering Division.<br />
• Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer is responsible for managing several divisions <strong>of</strong><br />
engineering design (e.g., Maritime, Aviation, etc.).<br />
• Utilities Manager. The Utilities Manager oversees the design <strong>of</strong> sewer system<br />
utilities <strong>Port</strong>-wide. He also identifies the need for sewer rehabilitation or replacement<br />
projects and coordinates with the other engineering departments (e.g., Maritime,<br />
Aviation, etc.)<br />
• Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer. The Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer, under the supervision <strong>of</strong><br />
the Utilities Manager, is responsible for the design <strong>of</strong> new or rehabilitated sewer<br />
facilities and for reviewing engineering submittals from outside consultants as<br />
relevant to the sewer system. The Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer also serves as the <strong>Port</strong>’s<br />
LRO, as discussed in Section 3.2.<br />
• Aviation/Maritime Design and Engineering Services. The Aviation Design<br />
Department, Maritime Design Department, and Engineering Services Department are<br />
responsible for coordinating the design <strong>of</strong> aviation, maritime, roadwork, or other<br />
facilities with the Utilities Manager and the Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer.<br />
3.3.1.7<br />
Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning Division<br />
The Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning Division is responsible for regulatory<br />
compliance and environmental protection. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
May 2010 3-7<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
• Director <strong>of</strong> Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning. The Director <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning is responsible for overseeing the operation and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Environmental Programs and <strong>Plan</strong>ning Division.<br />
• Environmental Compliance Supervisor. The Environmental Compliance Supervisor<br />
is responsible for coordinating the clean up and mitigation <strong>of</strong> SSOs and for reporting<br />
SSOs to the appropriate regulatory agencies. He is also designated as an alternative<br />
LRO and normally serves as the “data entry designee” on CIWQS.<br />
• Environmental Scientist. The Environmental Scientist performs the duties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Environmental Compliance Supervisor in the event that he is unavailable. This<br />
position reports to the Environmental Compliance Supervisor. The Environmental<br />
Scientist is also designated as the second LRO.<br />
3.3.1.8<br />
Information Technology Division<br />
The Information Technology Division is responsible for the strategic direction and<br />
operations <strong>of</strong> information technology at the <strong>Port</strong>. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Information Technology. The Director <strong>of</strong> Information Technology is<br />
responsible for the strategic direction and operations <strong>of</strong> information technology at the<br />
<strong>Port</strong>.<br />
3.3.1.9<br />
Administrative Services Division<br />
The Administrative Services Division is responsible for the administrative functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Port</strong>, including human resources, management information services, organizational<br />
development, workers’ compensation, and building services. The roles and responsibilities<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific positions as relevant to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Administrative Services. The Director <strong>of</strong> Administrative Services<br />
oversees the Administrative Services Division.<br />
3.3.1.10 Finance Division<br />
The Finance Division is responsible for providing centralized accounting services to all<br />
divisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>. The roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> specific positions as relevant to the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> are described below:<br />
• Director <strong>of</strong> Finance. The Director <strong>of</strong> Finance oversees the Finance Division.<br />
3.4 CHAIN OF COMMUNICATION FOR REPORTING SSOS<br />
The <strong>Port</strong>’s Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> (OERP) contains the procedures that<br />
should be utilized by <strong>Port</strong> staff to notify primary response crews and the appropriate<br />
regulatory agencies. This section contains a brief summary <strong>of</strong> the chain <strong>of</strong> communication<br />
May 2010 3-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
for reporting SSOs. For more information related to the <strong>Port</strong> OERP, refer to Chapter 7 <strong>of</strong><br />
this report.<br />
The chain <strong>of</strong> communication varies depending on the location and severity <strong>of</strong> the SSO. This<br />
section summarizes the chain <strong>of</strong> communication, whereas Figure 3.2 presents a flow chart<br />
showing how individuals are notified.<br />
3.4.1 Receipt <strong>of</strong> Information Regarding SSO<br />
An overflow may be detected by the general public, <strong>Port</strong> tenants, <strong>Port</strong> staff through routine<br />
maintenance activities, or by others. Calls from the public are generally received through<br />
the Airport Airside Operations Department (Operations Department) at (510) 563-3361.<br />
Calls from tenants are generally received through the Operations Department for spills in<br />
the aviation collection system, through the <strong>Port</strong> Wharfinger for spills in the maritime<br />
collection system, and through the Commercial/Real Estate Representative for spills<br />
located in Jack London Square or areas southeast along Embarcadero. Should the <strong>Port</strong><br />
Wharfinger or the Commercial/Real Estate Representative be unavailable, all calls<br />
regarding potential SSOs are routed through the Operations Department. The Operations<br />
Department is staffed 24 hours per day, every day <strong>of</strong> the year (including weekends, nonbusiness<br />
hours, and holidays).<br />
3.4.2 Aviation Notification Procedure<br />
For spills within the aviation sewer collection system, calls from the Operations Department<br />
are forwarded to the Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Superintendent, who notifies the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor as well as the Aviation Facilities Manager. If the spill<br />
occurs due to a sewer lift station failure in the Northfield, the Utilities Supervisor would be<br />
notified. If the spill occurs due to a lift station or ejector failure in the Southfield (terminal),<br />
then the Senior Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Engineer would be notified. If the spill is caused by a<br />
problem with a gravity sewer, it is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor.<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> severity, the Environmental Compliance Supervisor or dedicated spill<br />
responder should be notified <strong>of</strong> every SSO that occurs (either by the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor, Utilities Supervisor, or Senior Equipment <strong>System</strong>s<br />
Engineer as appropriate). The Environmental Compliance Supervisor or designated spill<br />
responder is responsible for notifying the applicable regulatory agencies <strong>of</strong> the spill, as<br />
discussed in Section 3.3.4.<br />
3.4.3 Maritime Notification Procedure<br />
For spills within the maritime sewer collection system, calls from the Wharfinger or<br />
Operations Department are forwarded to Harbor Facilities and can be received from any <strong>of</strong><br />
the following individuals: Utilities Supervisor, Utilities Foreman, Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor, Maintenance Foreman. The call is then forwarded on to the appropriate<br />
May 2010 3-9<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
individual depending on the location <strong>of</strong> the spill, as well as the Harbor Facilities Manager. If<br />
a spill occurs due to a problem with a gravity sewer, the Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor is notified. If a spill occurs due to a lift station failure or is in a building, the<br />
Utilities Supervisor is notified.<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> severity, the Environmental Compliance Supervisor or designated spill<br />
responder should be notified <strong>of</strong> every SSO that occurs (either by the<br />
Maintenance/Construction Supervisor or Utilities Supervisor as appropriate). The<br />
Environmental Compliance Supervisor or designated spill responder is responsible for<br />
notifying the appropriate regulatory agencies regarding the spill, as discussed in<br />
Section 3.3.4.<br />
3.4.4 Commercial/Real Estate Notification Procedure<br />
Spills that occur in commercial/real estate facilities are not operated by the <strong>Port</strong> (primarily in<br />
Jack London Square), and hence the <strong>Port</strong> does not typically respond to SSOs within these<br />
facilities. However, since these lines are owned by the <strong>Port</strong>, it is still the <strong>Port</strong>’s responsibility<br />
to report spills that occur. In the event <strong>of</strong> an SSO in Jack London Square, the<br />
Commercial/Real Estate Representative should be notified. The Commercial/Real Estate<br />
Representative should then inform the property manager that it is their responsibility to<br />
clean up and mitigate the effects <strong>of</strong> the spill, and that they must provide the <strong>Port</strong> with the<br />
details <strong>of</strong> the spill so that it can be reported.<br />
It should be noted that it is not the current practice <strong>of</strong> Jack London Square property<br />
managers to report SSOs to the <strong>Port</strong>. To raise awareness <strong>of</strong> the new GWDRs and the need<br />
to report all SSOs, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> reach out to each property manager<br />
through an informational letter or some other means.<br />
The Environmental Compliance Supervisor or designated spill responder, who is<br />
responsible for notifying the applicable regulatory agencies <strong>of</strong> the spill, should then be<br />
notified <strong>of</strong> the details <strong>of</strong> the spill.<br />
3.4.5 Regulatory Agency Notification<br />
The regulatory agencies that must be notified if an SSO occurs varies depending on the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> discharge. Likewise, the time frame in which the appropriate agencies must be<br />
notified depends on the type <strong>of</strong> discharge. The GWDRs define three types <strong>of</strong> SSOs, as<br />
summarized in Chapter 1 <strong>of</strong> this report. For the reporting <strong>of</strong> SSOs, however, there are four<br />
main types <strong>of</strong> spills where specific reporting time frames are required, as summarized, in<br />
order <strong>of</strong> severity, below:<br />
1. Category 1 SSOs that Reach Surface Waters. This SSO type includes, regardless<br />
<strong>of</strong> volume, spills that result in a discharge to a drainage channel and/or surface water<br />
or discharges to a storm drain pipe that are not fully captured and returned to the<br />
sanitary sewer system.<br />
May 2010 3-12<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
2. Category 1 SSOs that Do Not Reach Surface Waters. This SSO type includes<br />
spills greater than 1,000 gallons that do not result in a discharge to a drainage<br />
channel and/or surface water or discharges to a storm drain pipe that are not fully<br />
captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system.<br />
3. Category 2 SSOs. This SSO type includes spills less than 1,000 gallons that do not<br />
result in a discharge to a drainage channel and/or surface water or discharges to a<br />
storm drain pipe that are not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system.<br />
4. Private Lateral Sewage Discharges. This SSO type includes discharges that are<br />
caused by blockages or other problems within a lateral sewer that is not owned by the<br />
wastewater collection system agency. Privately owned laterals typically service<br />
residential, commercial, and industrial customers and extend from either the sewer<br />
main connection or the publicly owned right-<strong>of</strong>-way to the building connection.<br />
Because all <strong>of</strong> the sanitary sewers in the <strong>Port</strong>, including service laterals, are owned<br />
by the <strong>Port</strong>, City, or EBMUD, this type <strong>of</strong> discharge is not applicable to the <strong>Port</strong>.<br />
Table 3.1 summarizes the regulatory agency notification plan for each type <strong>of</strong> discharge.<br />
Table 3.1 Regulatory Agency Notification <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Agency Contact Information Action Criteria<br />
Category 1 Spills That Reach a Drainage Channel or Surface Water<br />
State Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Emergency<br />
Services<br />
Alameda County<br />
Health Department<br />
San Francisco Bay<br />
Area RWQCB<br />
Phone: (800) 852-7550 Contact within 2 Hours When spill reaches<br />
drainage channel<br />
or surface water<br />
Phone: (510) 267-8000 Contact within 2 Hours When spill reaches<br />
drainage channel<br />
or surface water<br />
(1)<br />
http://www.wbers.net/ - Complete Online<br />
Report SSO within<br />
2 Hours<br />
SWRCB https://ciwqs.waterboard<br />
s.ca.gov/<br />
- Within 24 hours,<br />
certify online that<br />
State OES and<br />
County Health<br />
Department were<br />
notified.<br />
- Initial CIWQs report<br />
within 3 business days<br />
- Final CIWQs report<br />
within 15 calendar days<br />
When spill reaches<br />
drainage channel<br />
or surface water<br />
Category 1 SSO<br />
May 2010 3-13<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
Table 3.1 Regulatory Agency Notification <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Agency Contact Information Action Criteria<br />
National Response<br />
Center (United<br />
States Coast<br />
Guard)<br />
http://www.nrc.uscg.mil/<br />
nrchp.html<br />
As soon as possible Whenever a<br />
sewage spill<br />
threatens bay<br />
water quality<br />
Category 1 SSOs that Do Not Reach Drainage Channels or Surface Water<br />
SWRCB https://ciwqs.waterboard<br />
s.ca.gov/<br />
State Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Emergency<br />
Services<br />
Alameda County<br />
Health Department<br />
- Complete Initial<br />
Online SSO Report<br />
within 3 business<br />
days<br />
- Final Online SSO<br />
Report within 15<br />
calendar days<br />
Category 1 SSO<br />
Phone: (800) 852-7550 As soon as possible Category 1 SSO<br />
(Non Surface<br />
Water)<br />
Phone: (510) 267-8000 As soon as possible Category 1 SSO<br />
(Non Surface<br />
Water)<br />
SWRCB https://ciwqs.waterboard<br />
s.ca.gov/<br />
SWRCB https://ciwqs.waterboard<br />
s.ca.gov/<br />
Notes:<br />
Category 2 SSOs<br />
- Final Online SSO<br />
Report within 30 days<br />
<strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
calendar month<br />
Private Lateral Sewage Discharges<br />
- Final Online SSO<br />
Report within 30 days<br />
<strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
calendar month<br />
Category 2 SSO<br />
Reporting is<br />
Optional<br />
1. The RWQCB online reporting system encompasses both the 2 hour notification and the<br />
24 hour notification requirement.<br />
May 2010 3-14<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch03 (FinalA)
Chapter 4<br />
LEGAL AUTHORITY<br />
This chapter summarizes the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>’s (<strong>Port</strong>’s) authority, through ordinances,<br />
services agreements, or other legally binding procedures, to conform to the RWQCB<br />
requirements and the GWDRs.<br />
4.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
4.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency shall, at a minimum, describe its legal authority,<br />
through sewer use ordinances, services agreements, or other legally binding procedures to:<br />
• Control inflow/infiltration (I/I) from satellite wastewater collection systems and laterals;<br />
• Require proper design and construction <strong>of</strong> new and rehabilitated sewers and<br />
connections;<br />
• Require proper installation, testing, and inspection <strong>of</strong> new and rehabilitated sewers.<br />
The RWQCB allows for this element to be waived for collection systems that serve a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 10,000 or less. However, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)<br />
requirements do not allow for such a waiver. Therefore, the <strong>Port</strong> must demonstrate that it<br />
possesses adequate legal authority.<br />
4.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
the following with respect to Legal Authority:<br />
Each Enrollee must demonstrate, through sanitary sewer system use ordinances,<br />
service agreements, or other legally binding procedures, that it possesses the<br />
necessary legal authority to:<br />
a. Prevent illicit discharges into its sanitary sewer system (examples may include<br />
I/I, stormwater, chemical pumping, unauthorized debris and cut roots, etc.);<br />
b. Require that sewers and connections be properly designed and constructed;<br />
c. Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, or repairs for portions <strong>of</strong> the lateral<br />
owned or maintained by the Public Agency;<br />
d. Limit the discharge <strong>of</strong> fats, oils, and grease and other debris that may cause<br />
blockages; and<br />
e. Enforce any violation <strong>of</strong> its sewer ordinances.<br />
May 2010 4-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch04 (FinalA)
4.2 PORT SEWER USE ORDINANCES<br />
Prior to developing the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners, which has been vested<br />
exclusive control and management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> through the Charter <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
(City), had not developed or enacted ordinances related to the sanitary sewer system.<br />
In order to strengthen the <strong>Port</strong>’s ability to regulate the type <strong>of</strong> wastewater discharged into<br />
the <strong>Port</strong> sewer system and to require that sewers and connections be properly designed<br />
and constructed, a <strong>Port</strong> specific sewer use ordinance (<strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113) was developed<br />
and adopted by the Board. This ordinance, which is included in Appendix E for reference,<br />
will help the <strong>Port</strong> to comply with the GWDRs and the requirements <strong>of</strong> the RWQCB.<br />
Because the <strong>Port</strong> discharges into both the City and East Bay Municipal Utility District<br />
(EBMUD) sewer systems, an effort was made to provide consistency with the <strong>Port</strong>’s, the<br />
City’s, and EBMUD’s sewer use ordinances.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> sewer use ordinance is not meant to supersede the existing EBMUD or City<br />
ordinances. Rather, it is meant to provide an additional measure <strong>of</strong> legal authority to the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> in the implementation <strong>of</strong> specific measures outlined in this report. This section<br />
summarizes the provisions <strong>of</strong> the ordinances as applicable to the GWDRs.<br />
4.2.1 Illicit Discharges<br />
Section 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113 (Appendix E) provides limitations <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong><br />
substances that may be discharged into the <strong>Port</strong>’s sewer system. This generally includes<br />
wastewater discharges that result in contamination, pollution, or a nuisance.<br />
4.2.2 Design and Construction Requirements<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113 (Appendix E) establishes the authority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> to develop and<br />
enforce standards for design, construction, inspection, and testing <strong>of</strong> new or rehabilitated<br />
sanitary sewers within the <strong>Port</strong>’s jurisdiction. Pursuant to the proposed ordinance, a formal<br />
set <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> specific design standards have been developed as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
development process. Chapter 6 describes the design standards in greater detail.<br />
4.2.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access<br />
Section 6 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113 (Appendix E) grants the authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> staff, under the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> the Executive Director or his designated representative, to secure access to any<br />
buildings, structures, or premises under <strong>Port</strong> jurisdiction to inspect, repair, or maintain<br />
sanitary sewer facilities.<br />
4.2.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris<br />
Section 5, Part F <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113 prohibits the discharge <strong>of</strong> any substance with a<br />
constituent concentration that exceeds the numerical limits established in the EBMUD<br />
Wastewater Control Ordinance or the City Municipal Code, whichever is more stringent. As<br />
May 2010 4-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch04 (FinalA)
noted in Section 4.3.4 and Section 4.4.4, both the City and EBMUD have established a<br />
numerical limit <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/L for FOG.<br />
4.2.5 Policies for Enforcing Violations<br />
The Charter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> specifically limits the <strong>Port</strong>’s ability to prescribe fines,<br />
forfeitures, and penalties for violations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> ordinances to a maximum fine <strong>of</strong> five hundred<br />
dollars ($500) and/or a maximum imprisonment <strong>of</strong> six months. Pursuant to this requirement,<br />
any person who violates the provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Ordinance 4113 is subject to a fine not<br />
exceeding five hundred dollars ($500), or by imprisonment in the prison <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Oakland</strong> for not more than six (6) months, or both. Each day the violation occurs constitutes<br />
a separate violation.<br />
4.3 CITY OF OAKLAND SEWER USE ORDINANCES<br />
Chapter 13 <strong>of</strong> the City’s Municipal Code provides legal authority for the City sewer system.<br />
A copy <strong>of</strong> Chapter 13 <strong>of</strong> the City’s municipal code is included in Appendix F for reference 1<br />
.<br />
Because the <strong>Port</strong> maintains connections to the City sewer system, it is important that the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> sewer use ordinances are generally consistent with the City ordinances. For this<br />
reason, the applicable sections <strong>of</strong> the City Municipal Code are summarized briefly in this<br />
section.<br />
4.3.1 Illicit Discharges<br />
The following sections <strong>of</strong> the City Municipal Code (Appendix F) contain provisions to limit<br />
or prohibit the discharge <strong>of</strong> illicit substances into the sanitary sewer system:<br />
• 13.08.130 - Use <strong>of</strong> public sanitary sewers<br />
• 13.08.140 - Prohibited use <strong>of</strong> public sanitary sewers and any private sanitary sewer<br />
or building sewer discharging, directly or indirectly, into said public sanitary sewers<br />
• 13.08.150 - Prohibited uses generally--Wastewater<br />
• 13.08.160 - Additional prohibited uses--Waters and wastes<br />
• 13.08.170 Additional prohibited uses--Excessive volume<br />
• 13.08.180 Additional prohibited uses--Radioactive wastes<br />
4.3.2 Design and Construction Requirements<br />
Section 13.02.030 <strong>of</strong> the City Municipal Code grants the authority to the City’s engineer to<br />
develop and enforce standards for the design and construction <strong>of</strong> the sewer system. It also<br />
stipulates that these standards may be updated from time to time at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
City’s engineer.<br />
1 Full text available at http://www.municode.com/resources/gateway.asp?pid=16308&sid=5<br />
May 2010 4-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch04 (FinalA)
4.3.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access<br />
Section 13.08.220 and Section 13.08.230 <strong>of</strong> the City Municipal Code grants the right <strong>of</strong><br />
entry to City personnel for “dangerous or insanitary conditions” or for rehabilitation or<br />
replacement <strong>of</strong> sewers as part <strong>of</strong> the City’s infiltration and inflow (I/I) corrective program.<br />
4.3.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris<br />
Part D <strong>of</strong> Section 13.08.160 <strong>of</strong> the City Municipal Code limits the discharge <strong>of</strong> “any water or<br />
waste, which contains excessive amounts <strong>of</strong> grease, oil, or fats…”<br />
In addition, Part D <strong>of</strong> Section 13.08.170 limits the discharge <strong>of</strong> “oils and greases <strong>of</strong> animal,<br />
vegetable, or mineral origin floating, dispersed, or emulsified in excess <strong>of</strong> 100 milligrams<br />
per liter (mg/L) or in any amount as to adversely affect any part <strong>of</strong> the sewer system.”<br />
4.4 EBMUD SEWER USE ORDINANCES<br />
EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03, known as the “Wastewater Control Ordinance” provides<br />
specific limitations on the use <strong>of</strong> the EBMUD sewer system, which consists primarily <strong>of</strong><br />
large diameter interceptor sewers, and the so-called “community sewers” (<strong>Sewer</strong>s owned<br />
and operated by public agencies within the EBMUD boundary which are connected to an<br />
EBMUD interceptor). Appendix G contains a full copy <strong>of</strong> the ordinance.<br />
4.4.1 Illicit Discharges<br />
Title II <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03 (Appendix G) regulates the type <strong>of</strong> discharges<br />
allowed in community sewers, and includes general discharge prohibitions and specific<br />
discharge prohibitions.<br />
4.4.2 Design and Construction Requirements<br />
EBMUD owns and operates primarily large diameter interceptor sewers. No direct<br />
connections between private laterals and the interceptor system are allowed. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
this, design and construction requirements are only required for the interceptor system and<br />
to the connection points <strong>of</strong> the community sewer systems to the EMBUD interceptors.<br />
Title I, Section 4 <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03 specifies, in part, the following:<br />
“[EBMUD] will not permit direct connections <strong>of</strong> or accept direct contributions <strong>of</strong> wastewater<br />
from sewers other than community sewers…The connecting <strong>of</strong> community sewers will be<br />
performed by the public agency at its expense in accordance with [EBMUD] requirements<br />
and subject to approval and inspection by [EBMUD].”<br />
4.4.3 Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Access<br />
Title V, Section 2.l specifies, in part, the following:<br />
May 2010 4-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch04 (FinalA)
“The Director [<strong>of</strong> EBMUD] may require any non-residential discharger to construct, at his<br />
own expense, a sampling facility or inspection manhole together with necessary related<br />
measuring and sampling equipment... The sampling facility or inspection manhole shall be<br />
constructed on the [lateral] <strong>of</strong> the discharger and within the public right <strong>of</strong> way at a location<br />
approved by the District and the public agency owning the community sewer; provided that<br />
the Director may permit the installation <strong>of</strong> such facilities on the premises <strong>of</strong> the discharger<br />
at a location which will permit District access to the facility at all times…”<br />
4.4.4 Limitations on Fats, Oils, and Grease and Other Debris<br />
Title II, Section 2.b, Section 3, and Section 5 <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03 provide<br />
limitations on the discharge <strong>of</strong> FOG to the community sewer systems. General discharge<br />
prohibitions that may, under certain circumstances, be applied to FOG are established in<br />
Title II, Section 2.b <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03. More specific discharge limits for<br />
FOG are established in the EBMUD pretreatment program per Title II, Section 5 <strong>of</strong> EBMUD<br />
Ordinance No. 311A-03. In addition, an allowable discharge limit for FOG <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/L has<br />
been set in Title II, Section 3 <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No. 311A-03.<br />
May 2010 4-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch04 (FinalA)
Chapter 5<br />
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM<br />
This chapter contains a description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>’s (<strong>Port</strong>’s) operations and<br />
maintenance program, including mapping, routine and preventative maintenance,<br />
rehabilitation, and training.<br />
5.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
5.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires the<br />
following with respect to “Measures and Activities,” which is comparable to the State Water<br />
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements for an “Operation and Maintenance<br />
Program”.<br />
a. Each wastewater collection system agency shall maintain up-to-date maps <strong>of</strong><br />
its wastewater collection system facilities;<br />
b. Each wastewater collection system agency shall allocate adequate resources<br />
for the operation, maintenance, and repair <strong>of</strong> its collection system;<br />
c. Each wastewater collection system agency shall prioritize its preventative<br />
maintenance activities;<br />
d. Each wastewater collection system agency shall identify and prioritize structural<br />
deficiencies and implement a program <strong>of</strong> prioritized short-term and long-term<br />
actions to address them;<br />
e. Each wastewater collection system agency shall provide contingency<br />
equipment to handle emergencies, and spare/replacement parts intended to<br />
minimize equipment/facility downtime;<br />
f. Each wastewater collection system agency shall provide training on a regular<br />
basis for its staff in collection system operations, maintenance, and monitoring;<br />
and<br />
g. Implement an outreach program to educate commercial entities involved in<br />
sewer construction or maintenance about the proper practices for preventing<br />
blockages in private laterals. This requirement can be met by participating in a<br />
region-wide outreach program. This section can be waived for collection<br />
systems serving a population <strong>of</strong> 10,000 or less.<br />
5.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
that the <strong>Port</strong>’s <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>) must include the following<br />
elements as appropriate to the system:<br />
a. Maintain an up-to-date map <strong>of</strong> the sanitary sewer system, showing all gravity<br />
line segments and manholes, pumping facilities, pressure pipes and valves,<br />
and applicable stormwater conveyance facilities;<br />
b. Describe routine preventative operation and maintenance activities by staff and<br />
contractors, including a system for scheduling regular maintenance and<br />
May 2010 5-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
cleaning <strong>of</strong> the sanitary sewer system with more frequent cleaning and<br />
maintenance targeted at known problem areas. The preventative maintenance<br />
(PM) program should have a system to document scheduled and conducted<br />
activities, such as work orders;<br />
c. Develop a rehabilitation and replacement plan to identify and prioritize system<br />
deficiencies and implement short-term and long-term rehabilitation actions to<br />
address each deficiency. The program should include regular visual and TV<br />
inspections <strong>of</strong> manholes and sewer pipes, and a system for ranking the<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> sewer pipes and scheduling rehabilitation. Rehabilitation and<br />
replacement should focus on sewer pipes that are at a risk <strong>of</strong> collapse or prone<br />
to more frequent blockages due to pipe defects. Finally, the rehabilitation and<br />
replacement plan should have a capital improvement plan that addresses<br />
proper management and protection <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure assets. The plan shall<br />
include a time schedule for implementing the short- and long-term plans plus a<br />
schedule for developing the funds needed for the capital improvement plan;<br />
d. Provide training on a regular basis for staff in sanitary sewer system operations<br />
and maintenance, and require contractors to be appropriately trained; and<br />
e. Provide equipment and replacement part inventories, including identification <strong>of</strong><br />
critical parts.<br />
5.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM MAP<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-wide <strong>SSMP</strong>, a comprehensive <strong>Port</strong>-wide map was<br />
created, which identifies the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer collection system facilities, including<br />
gravity mains, manholes, force mains, lift stations, sewer ejectors, grease<br />
traps/interceptors, and the triturator. The map is provided in an AutoCAD format<br />
accompanied by an Open Database Connectivity (ODBC)-compliant database, which<br />
contains important physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the collection system (e.g., pipe size, length,<br />
material, slope, manhole rim/invert, etc.). The collection system map should be updated<br />
regularly or whenever changes to the collection system are made. The mapping includes a<br />
“revision date” indicating the date on which the map was most recently modified.<br />
Figure 5.1 provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the collection system map, indicating pipeline diameters<br />
and alignments. A DVD containing detailed plat maps <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s collection system in an<br />
electronic format is also provided in Appendix H <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
5.2.1 Collection <strong>System</strong> Description<br />
The <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer collection system consists <strong>of</strong> approximately 39 miles <strong>of</strong> active<br />
gravity sewers pipelines ranging in size from 3-inches to 36-inches in diameter,<br />
approximately four miles <strong>of</strong> active force mains ranging in size from 2-inches to 16-inches in<br />
diameter, 25 sewer lift stations, two (2) sewer ejectors, a triturator, several grease<br />
traps/interceptors, and several oil/water separators. The collection system is divided into<br />
three main subsystems: Aviation, Maritime, and Commercial/Real Estate. This section<br />
provides a brief overview <strong>of</strong> these three subsystems and Table 5.1 provides a summary <strong>of</strong><br />
the sanitary sewer facilities in each subsystem.<br />
May 2010 5-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
Legend<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
) Clarifier<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
12''<br />
4''<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
BAY BRIDGE<br />
#*<br />
6''<br />
12'' 6''<br />
! ! !<br />
7TH ST.<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
#*<br />
12''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!(<br />
Force Main<br />
Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
108''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
<strong>Port</strong>s America<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
FREIGHT ST<br />
8''<br />
7TH ST<br />
DUNKIRK ST<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
TERMINAL ST<br />
!(<br />
Electric Substation A<br />
!<br />
6''<br />
!"c$<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
7TH ST<br />
18''<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
FERRY ST<br />
27''<br />
21''<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AB148P<br />
10''<br />
PIER ST<br />
#*<br />
LS B31P<br />
MARITIME STREET<br />
24''<br />
4''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
#*<br />
6''<br />
!( !(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
BURMA ROAD<br />
CHUNG KING ST.<br />
10TH ST<br />
LS AB663P<br />
30''<br />
MIDWAY ST<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
6''<br />
LS AB018P<br />
CORREGIDOR AVE<br />
4''<br />
BATTAN AVE<br />
12TH ST<br />
4''<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
ALASKA ST<br />
#*<br />
12''<br />
!<br />
6''<br />
14TH ST<br />
15TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
15''<br />
MARITIME STREET<br />
LS AB836P<br />
17TH STREET<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
PINE ST<br />
GOSS ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
9TH ST<br />
SHOREY ST<br />
19TH STREET<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/ <strong>Port</strong> Owned/Privately Maintained<br />
8''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to <strong>Port</strong> Owned/Out <strong>of</strong> Service City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/ EBMUD Owned/<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
#*<br />
Gravity Main<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Cal Trans Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
EBMUD Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service) #*<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/ ! ! ! !<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Maintained<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Feet<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
108''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
18''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
21''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
30''<br />
10''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
30''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
30''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
8''8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
0 500 1,000<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
108''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
PINE ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
#*<br />
12'' 8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
%&t(<br />
11TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
13TH ST<br />
14TH ST<br />
18TH ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
7TH ST 7TH ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
6''<br />
21ST STREET<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
O<br />
15''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
WOOD ST<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
LEWIS ST<br />
8''<br />
EBMUD<br />
Interceptor<br />
5TH ST<br />
15''<br />
HENRY ST<br />
15''<br />
WAKE AVE<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
GRAND AVE<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong> Map (1 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
CYPRESS ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
WOOD ST
10''<br />
Legend<br />
6''<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
4''<br />
LS C07P<br />
#*<br />
12''<br />
! ! !<br />
12''<br />
7TH ST<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
Force Main<br />
) Valve Box<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
8''<br />
LS C08P<br />
! ! !<br />
8''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
3''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
5''<br />
!<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
LS D05P<br />
8''<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
5''<br />
TERMINAL ST<br />
12''<br />
!(<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
FREIGHT ST<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
7TH ST<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! !! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!<br />
!<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
!(<br />
LS D04P<br />
FERRY ST<br />
8''<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
LS D06P<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Privately Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
Gravity Main (Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
) ))<br />
!( ) )<br />
) )<br />
#*<br />
LS D10P<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
18''<br />
6''<br />
! !<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
LS D03P<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
)<br />
) )<br />
!( )<br />
)<br />
) )))<br />
3''<br />
6''<br />
7TH ST<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
!<br />
8''<br />
27''<br />
!<br />
!<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
8''<br />
21''<br />
16''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
24''<br />
#*<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
Gravity Main<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! !<br />
4''<br />
! !<br />
LS D02P<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Maintained<br />
Gravity Main<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
LS AB663P<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
30''<br />
4''<br />
30''<br />
! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
10''<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10TH ST<br />
4''<br />
BAY ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
4''<br />
LS D01P<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
3''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Out <strong>of</strong> Service<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
6''<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
%&t(<br />
CEDAR ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
6''<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
GOSS ST<br />
FERRO ST<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
PINE ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
Cal Trans Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
PINE ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
10TH ST<br />
9TH ST<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
11TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
7TH ST 7TH ST<br />
FERRO ST<br />
LEWIS ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
HENRY ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
#*<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
15''<br />
EBMUD Owned/<br />
EBMUD Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
4''<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
16''<br />
ELDORADO ST<br />
6''<br />
CHESTER ST<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
O<br />
EBMUD<br />
Interceptor<br />
8''<br />
CENTER ST<br />
16''<br />
5TH ST<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
CYPRESS ST<br />
18''<br />
8''<br />
KIRKHAM ST<br />
8''<br />
POPLAR CT<br />
UNION ST<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
MAGNOLIA ST<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong> Map (2 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
#*<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
16''<br />
! ! !!<br />
4''<br />
ELDORADO ST<br />
Legend<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
) Clarifier<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
16''<br />
8''<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
#*<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
18''<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
8''<br />
3RD ST<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
LINDEN ST<br />
!(<br />
8''<br />
FILBERT ST<br />
MYRTLE ST<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
Force Main<br />
) Valve Box<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
MARKET ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
BRUSH ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
8''<br />
CASTRO ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
8''<br />
ML KING JR WAY<br />
%&t(<br />
CLAY ST<br />
10''<br />
JEFFERSON ST<br />
2ND ST<br />
WATER ST<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
6TH ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
8''<br />
3''<br />
#*#*<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
!!<br />
WASHINGTON ST<br />
BROADWAY<br />
15''<br />
FRANKLIN ST<br />
WEBSTER ST<br />
ALICE STREET<br />
HARRISON ST<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Privately Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main (Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
ALICE ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
2ND ST<br />
JACKSON ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
MADISON ST<br />
6TH ST<br />
OAK ST<br />
3RD STEMBARCADERO<br />
FALLON ST<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
Gravity Main<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Maintained<br />
Gravity Main<br />
4TH ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
36''<br />
EBMUD<br />
Interceptor<br />
36''<br />
8''<br />
5TH AVE<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6TH AVE<br />
7TH AVE<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Out <strong>of</strong> Service<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
10TH AVE<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
10''<br />
DEFREMERY AVE<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
Cal Trans Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
EBMUD Owned/<br />
EBMUD Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
O<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong> Map (3 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
22ND ST<br />
LIVINGSTON ST<br />
DENNISON STR
BEACH FRWY<br />
Legend<br />
LILAC ST<br />
MAGNOLIA DR<br />
) Clarifier<br />
MAITLAND DR<br />
) Drain Box<br />
POND<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
DIKE RD<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
LS AP926P<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
4''<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
4''<br />
#* !(<br />
4''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!(<br />
Force Main<br />
Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! !<br />
8''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
#*<br />
LS AP881P<br />
DOOLITTLE DRIVE<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
EARHART RD<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
GRUMMAN ST<br />
8''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
15''<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
RYAN ST<br />
10''<br />
BENSON ST<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
CESSNA ST<br />
10''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
15''<br />
SIKORSKY ST<br />
FAIRCHILD ST<br />
NORTHROP ST<br />
8''<br />
14''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
CONVAIR ST<br />
8''<br />
LANGLEY ST<br />
WRIGHT ST<br />
12''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
!(<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
15''<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
18''<br />
#*<br />
PARDEE LN<br />
SWAN WAY<br />
ROLAND WAY<br />
CAPWELL DR CAPWELL DR<br />
PARDEE DR<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
EARHART RD<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
15''<br />
EDGEWATER DR<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
LEFT DR<br />
OAKPORT ST<br />
EBMUD<br />
Interceptor<br />
PENDLETON WAY<br />
HEGENBURGER RD<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
%&t(<br />
HEGENBERGER RD<br />
EDGEWATER RD<br />
98TH AVE<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
EDES AVENUE<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Privately Maintained <strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to <strong>Port</strong> Owned/Out <strong>of</strong> Service City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/ EBMUD Owned/<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
Gravity Main<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Cal Trans Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
EBMUD Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/ ! ! ! !<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Maintained<br />
Gravity Main (Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Force Main<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
O<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong> Map (4 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
ROAD A<br />
SOUTH LOOP RD<br />
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
ROAD B<br />
SOUTH LOOP RD<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
DIKE RD<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
Force Main<br />
) Valve Box<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AP911P<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
!( #*<br />
!<br />
! ! !<br />
#* !( !(<br />
LS AP912P<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
! ! !<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main<br />
(Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WY<br />
LS AP07P<br />
4''<br />
10''<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
AP15E LS AP06P<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
AP14E<br />
LS AP08P<br />
4''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Privately Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Gravity Main (Out <strong>of</strong> Service)<br />
10''<br />
!(<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
LS AP155P<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
#*<br />
JOHN GLENN DR<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!( !(<br />
!(<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
Gravity Main<br />
10''<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Maintained<br />
Gravity Main<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
#*<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
NEIL ARMSTRONG WY<br />
LS AP02P<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
15''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned, <strong>Port</strong><br />
Maintained, Out <strong>of</strong> Service<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
15''<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
15''<br />
4''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
EARHART RD<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
EDWARD WHITE WY<br />
LS AP137P<br />
15''<br />
12''<br />
#*<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Owned/<br />
Cal Trans Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
LS AP01P<br />
98TH AVE<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
EBMUD Owned/<br />
EBMUD Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
O<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong> Map (5 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
EDEN ROAD
Table 5.1 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Collection <strong>System</strong> Summary<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
(1)<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
Aviation Maritime<br />
Commercial/<br />
Real Estate Total<br />
Length (mi.) 13.0 22.1 3.9 39.0<br />
Pipe Diameter Range (in.) 3” – 18” 4” – 30” 3” – 36” 3” – 36”<br />
(1)<br />
Force Mains<br />
Length (mi.) 1.7 2.4 0.1 4.1<br />
Pipe Diameter Range (in.) 4” – 12” 3” – 16” 2” – 3” 2” – 16”<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Lift Stations 11 14 0 25<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejectors 2 0 0 2<br />
Note:<br />
1) Lengths presented do not include abandoned sewers.<br />
5.2.1.1<br />
The Aviation sewer collection system serves the <strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport and<br />
associated facilities. Sewage from the airport terminal and other facilities located in the<br />
Southfield area <strong>of</strong> the system is ultimately routed north and west through a 12-inch and<br />
15-inch diameter gravity main into an East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) lift station<br />
located near Doolittle Drive and Swan Way. Sewage from the Northfield area, which<br />
primarily serves private airfields, is ultimately routed through a 15-inch diameter gravity<br />
main into the EBMUD lift station at Doolittle Drive and Swan Way.<br />
5.2.1.2<br />
Aviation Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
The Maritime sewer collection system serves the <strong>Oakland</strong> seaport and other tenants in and<br />
near the former <strong>Oakland</strong> Army Base. The majority <strong>of</strong> sewage from the Maritime collection<br />
system is conveyed through a series <strong>of</strong> gravity sewers and sewer lift stations to the EBMUD<br />
lift station located near the intersection <strong>of</strong> 7th Street and Maritime Street. Sewage from a<br />
smaller area located in the northeast portion Maritime area is conveyed to <strong>Port</strong> lift station<br />
AB018P, which discharges into an EBMUD sewer main. Sewage from <strong>Port</strong> Berths 60 - 63<br />
and 67 - 68 is ultimately discharged into the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (City) sewer collection system<br />
at several points (see Figure 5.1).<br />
5.2.1.3<br />
Maritime Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
Commercial/Real Estate Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
The <strong>Port</strong> owns, but does not operate, a small number <strong>of</strong> 6-inch, 8-inch, and 10-inch<br />
diameter sanitary sewer pipelines in Jack London Square and areas southeast <strong>of</strong> Jack<br />
May 2010 5-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
London Square along Embarcadero. These pipes discharge either into the City collection<br />
system or directly into the EBMUD interceptor that runs parallel to Embarcadero.<br />
5.3 PORT PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN<br />
This section summarizes the <strong>Port</strong>’s existing preventative maintenance program.<br />
Recommendations are provided, as appropriate, in order to reduce the potential for SSOs<br />
in the <strong>Port</strong> and to better comply with the GWDRs.<br />
5.3.1 Preventative Maintenance and Inspection Activity<br />
Preventative maintenance activities can include some <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />
a. Periodic cleaning <strong>of</strong> sewer lines is essential for proper operation. Higher<br />
frequency cleaning might be necessary in those areas with a history <strong>of</strong><br />
stoppage due to debris and fats, oils, and grease. There are many methods to<br />
clean sewer lines including flushing, rodding, or high velocity jet cleaning.<br />
Hydr<strong>of</strong>lush or other hydraulic cleaning <strong>of</strong> gravity sewers is the most commonly<br />
used method to clean sewers. Mechanical cleaning (e.g. rodding machine)<br />
might be more effective than hydraulic cleaning in certain sewer conditions.<br />
Note that mechanical cleaning can only be applied to rigid pipe material such as<br />
vitrified clay, concrete, or reinforced concrete pipe.<br />
b. Root control in areas that are known to have recurring blockage, SSOs, or<br />
premature structural damage due to root intrusion.<br />
c. Investigation and resolution <strong>of</strong> customer complaints.<br />
d. Scheduled cleaning <strong>of</strong> force mains.<br />
e. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection <strong>of</strong> the sewers and visual inspections<br />
<strong>of</strong> manholes.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> currently performs sanitary sewer cleaning on an “as needed” basis (i.e., when a<br />
blockage or overflow occurs). Maintenance activities related to the gravity sewer system,<br />
therefore, are almost exclusively “corrective” in nature. While this strategy may have proven<br />
sufficient in the past, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> begin to take a more preventative<br />
approach with regard to sewer line cleaning. A reasonable goal for the <strong>Port</strong> is to proactively<br />
clean roughly 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the total length <strong>of</strong> its gravity sewers (in both Aviation and<br />
Maritime) each year, thus providing a rotation in which every sewer main is cleaned at least<br />
once every five (5) years. This equates to roughly 7 miles <strong>of</strong> sewer mains cleaned annually.<br />
Figure 5.2 identifies a potential sewer main cleaning rotation to achieve the desired<br />
cleaning schedule.<br />
Hydraulic cleaning equipment is the most frequently used piece <strong>of</strong> equipment applied for<br />
cleaning sewers less than or equal to 18-inches in diameter (WERF, 2003). The sewers are<br />
cleaned through a targeted application <strong>of</strong> high pressure water. These high pressure/velocity<br />
machines are used to open stoppages, remove grease, clean lines <strong>of</strong> debris, and wash<br />
manholes and wet wells. A variety <strong>of</strong> water tank sizes, pressure output, and nozzle<br />
configurations are available for both truck and trailer mounted equipment.<br />
May 2010 5-9<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
It is further recommended that sewer mains and manholes receive a closed-circuit<br />
television (CCTV) inspection every ten (10) years, following cleaning. The <strong>Port</strong> does not<br />
currently own CCTV equipment and might contract this work out to a third party at a cost <strong>of</strong><br />
$3.0 to $10 per foot. Since sewer cleaning should occur every 5 years and CCTV work<br />
every 10 years, the CCTV work should happen every other occasion that a sewer is<br />
cleaned. This will help to verify that the cleaning was properly performed and to identify<br />
structural and condition problems in the sewers and manholes. The <strong>Port</strong> will later be able to<br />
refine the cleaning frequency and rotation based on actual system performance and staffing<br />
availability. Figure 5.3 identifies the sewers that the <strong>Port</strong> inspected with CCTV in 2009 and<br />
2010.<br />
Figure 5.3 also presents a general summary <strong>of</strong> the CCTV results. The pipe condition varied<br />
by reach and age <strong>of</strong> sewer. Recently constructed pipes were generally in good condition,<br />
but some older sewers displayed corrosion and fractured pipes. Many <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />
sewers exhibited severe maintenance problems with heavy debris accumulation in the<br />
channel. For more detailed CCTV inspection results by reach <strong>of</strong> sewer, Appendix M -<br />
<strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong> (SECAP) report, contains photographs <strong>of</strong><br />
fractured pipes, equipment corrosion, and debris accumulation in the sewers.<br />
Sanitary sewer “hot spots,” or areas which are known to require more frequent<br />
maintenance, should be targeted to receive more frequent cleaning, such as annually or biannually,<br />
depending on the extent <strong>of</strong> the problem. <strong>Port</strong> staff has identified certain “hot<br />
spots” throughout the aviation and maritime collection systems. These “hot spots” are<br />
shown in Figure 5.4 and details related to each “hot spot,” including the suspected cause <strong>of</strong><br />
the problem, are provided in Table 5.2. The <strong>Port</strong> should establish a more frequent cleaning<br />
schedule for these pipelines, since they are known maintenance issues. For this reason, it<br />
is recommended that the “hot spots” be cleaned and CCTV inspected annually as a starting<br />
point. An exception to this is hot spot number M-1, which is located near building D501 and<br />
D502 in the harbor. <strong>Port</strong> staff indicated that this line requires maintenance roughly once<br />
every two weeks due to root intrusion. For this reason, it is recommended that a monthly<br />
cleaning schedule be adopted for this “hot spot”. The <strong>Port</strong> should be able to track the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the increased cleaning frequency, and make adjustments to the<br />
accelerated cleaning schedule as deemed necessary.<br />
Tables 5.3 through 5.5 present a summary <strong>of</strong> a possible schedule for conducting sewer<br />
cleaning and CCTV inspections for the Maritime, Aviation and Commercial Real Estate<br />
collection systems. The summaries in these tables are consistent with the schedule<br />
illustrated in Figure 5.2. Note that CCTV work should take place every other occasion that a<br />
sewer is cleaned. Not included in these totals are sewers maintained by others (e.g. <strong>Port</strong>s<br />
America or other private entities).<br />
May 2010 5-10<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
Table 5.2 Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots” Cleaning Schedule<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Hot<br />
Spot<br />
(1)<br />
No. Division<br />
Street<br />
Name<br />
Location<br />
Description<br />
Pipeline<br />
Diameter<br />
(in.)<br />
Suspected<br />
Cause <strong>of</strong><br />
Problem<br />
Recommended<br />
Cleaning<br />
Frequency<br />
A-1 Aviation n/a Terminal 1 6 - 10 FOG Annually<br />
A-2 Aviation n/a s/o Terminal 2 8 - 10 FOG Annually<br />
M-1 Maritime<br />
Maritime<br />
Street<br />
Near Building<br />
D501 and D502 4 - 6<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Hot Spot Number corresponds to that shown in Figure 5.3.<br />
Root<br />
Intrusion Monthly<br />
Table 5.3 Maritime <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
“Hot<br />
5-Year Cycle/Length <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> (feet)<br />
Diameter Spots” Monthly 1 2 3 4 5 Total<br />
Unknown 0 0 0 0 214 45 420 679<br />
4" 0 144 0 2,276 2,397 1,936 1,475 8,227<br />
5" 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 128<br />
6" 0 857 3,241 766 6,747 5,075 5,858 22,544<br />
8" 0 0 11,468 7,382 6,323 4,688 9,575 39,436<br />
10" 0 0 2,390 2,597 1,717 455 2,227 9,386<br />
12" 0 0 5,211 72 5,384 7 1,940 12,614<br />
15" 0 0 0 0 0 0 450 450<br />
16" 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 159<br />
18" 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 145<br />
21" 0 0 0 0 0 1,320 0 1,320<br />
24" 0 0 0 0 0 501 0 501<br />
25”x16” 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 109<br />
27" 0 0 0 0 0 990 0 990<br />
Total 0 1,001 22,309 13,093 22,782 15,398 22,104 96,688<br />
May 2010 5-11<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
Table 5.4 Aviation <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Diameter<br />
“Hot<br />
Spots” Monthly<br />
5-Year Cycle/Length <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> (feet)<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
May 2010 5-12<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)<br />
Total<br />
Unknown 0 0 469 708 76 0 18 1,272<br />
3" 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 101<br />
4" 1,231 0 1,765 379 441 657 571 5,045<br />
6" 1,415 0 2,608 2,141 164 869 1,419 8,615<br />
8" 694 0 2,470 4,632 2,510 3,649 1,213 15,169<br />
10" 915 0 2,134 485 0 4,260 1,771 9,565<br />
12" 0 0 1,602 32 7,899 271 585 10,389<br />
14" 0 0 724 0 0 0 0 724<br />
15" 0 0 1,956 4,497 1,065 1,088 0 8,606<br />
18" 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 149<br />
Total 4,255 0 13,728 13,024 12,155 10,794 5,678 59,634<br />
Table 5.5 C/RE <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Schedule<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Diameter<br />
“Hot<br />
Spots” Monthly<br />
5-Year Cycle/Length <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> (feet)<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Total<br />
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21<br />
8" 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,206 2,206<br />
10" 0 0 0 0 0 0 897 897<br />
12" 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 218<br />
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,342 3,342
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
BAY BRIDGE<br />
#*<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
7TH ST.<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
#*<br />
Maintenance Schedule<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Monthly<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Monthly<br />
Annual<br />
Year 1<br />
Year 2<br />
Year 3<br />
#*<br />
<strong>Port</strong>s America<br />
FREIGHT ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
DUNKIRK ST<br />
#*<br />
TERMINAL ST<br />
#*#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
!(<br />
Electric Substation A<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 4 Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 5 <strong>Port</strong> Owned or Operated Force Main<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!"c$<br />
7TH ST<br />
!<br />
FERRY ST<br />
LS AB148P<br />
PIER ST<br />
#*<br />
LS B31P<br />
MARITIME STREET<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
#*<br />
!( !(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
BURMA ROAD<br />
CHUNG KING ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
LS AB663P<br />
Base Map<br />
MIDWAY ST<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
CORREGIDOR AVE<br />
BATTAN AVE<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
#*<br />
LS AB018P<br />
12TH ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
ALASKA ST<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
14TH ST<br />
15TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
O<br />
MARITIME STREET<br />
LS AB836P<br />
17TH STREET<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
PINE ST<br />
GOSS ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
9TH ST<br />
SHOREY ST<br />
0 500<br />
Feet<br />
1,000<br />
19TH STREET<br />
PINE ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
#*<br />
%&t(<br />
11TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
13TH ST<br />
14TH ST<br />
18TH ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
7TH ST 7TH ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
21ST STREET<br />
WOOD ST<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
LEWIS ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
HENRY ST<br />
WAKE AVE<br />
GRAND AVE<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Recommended Gravity<br />
Main Cleaning Schedule (1 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
CYPRESS ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
WOOD ST
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
LS C07P<br />
#*<br />
! ! !<br />
7TH ST<br />
Maintenance Schedule<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Monthly<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Monthly<br />
Annual<br />
#*<br />
LS C08P<br />
! ! !<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
LS D05P<br />
Year 1<br />
Year 2<br />
Year 3<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
TERMINAL ST<br />
!(<br />
FREIGHT ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
LS D04P<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 4 Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 5 <strong>Port</strong> Owned or Operated Force Main<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
!( #*<br />
LS AB663P<br />
FERRY ST<br />
LS D10P<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
LS D06P<br />
!<br />
) ))<br />
!( ) )<br />
) )<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS D03P<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
)<br />
) )<br />
!( )<br />
)<br />
) )))<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
#*<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
LS D02P<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
Base Map<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
10TH ST<br />
BAY ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
LS D01P<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
%&t(<br />
CEDAR ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
GOSS ST<br />
FERRO ST<br />
O<br />
PINE ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
PINE ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
9TH ST<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
11TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
7TH ST 7TH ST<br />
FERRO ST<br />
LEWIS ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
HENRY ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
#*<br />
PERALTA ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
! ! ! !<br />
ELDORADO ST<br />
CHESTER ST<br />
CENTER ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
CYPRESS ST<br />
KIRKHAM ST<br />
POPLAR CT<br />
UNION ST<br />
MAGNOLIA ST<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Recommended Gravity<br />
Main Cleaning Schedule (2 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
#*<br />
! ! !<br />
!<br />
ELDORADO ST<br />
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
3RD ST<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
LINDEN ST<br />
!(<br />
FILBERT ST<br />
MYRTLE ST<br />
MARKET ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
Maintenance Schedule<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Monthly<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Monthly<br />
Annual<br />
BRUSH ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
CASTRO ST<br />
Year 1<br />
Year 2<br />
Year 3<br />
5TH ST<br />
ML KING JR WAY<br />
%&t(<br />
CLAY ST<br />
JEFFERSON ST<br />
2ND ST<br />
WATER ST<br />
6TH ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
#*#*<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
!!<br />
WASHINGTON ST<br />
BROADWAY<br />
FRANKLIN ST<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 4 Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 5 <strong>Port</strong> Owned or Operated Force Main<br />
WEBSTER ST<br />
ALICE STREET<br />
HARRISON ST<br />
ALICE ST<br />
4TH ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
2ND ST<br />
JACKSON ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
MADISON ST<br />
6TH ST<br />
OAK ST<br />
3RD STEMBARCADERO<br />
FALLON ST<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
4TH ST<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
5TH AVE<br />
Base Map<br />
6TH AVE<br />
7TH AVE<br />
10TH AVE<br />
O<br />
DEFREMERY AVE<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
EMBARCADERO<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Recommended Gravity<br />
Main Cleaning Schedule (3 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
22ND ST<br />
LIVINGSTON ST<br />
DENNISON STR
BEACH FRWY<br />
Legend<br />
LILAC ST<br />
MAGNOLIA DR<br />
) Clarifier<br />
MAITLAND DR<br />
) Drain Box<br />
POND<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
DIKE RD<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
LS AP926P<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
#* !(<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
Maintenance Schedule<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Monthly<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Monthly<br />
Annual<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
LS AP881P<br />
Year 1<br />
Year 2<br />
Year 3<br />
DOOLITTLE DRIVE<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
EARHART RD<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
GRUMMAN ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
RYAN ST<br />
BENSON ST<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
CESSNA ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
SIKORSKY ST<br />
FAIRCHILD ST<br />
NORTHROP ST<br />
CONVAIR ST<br />
LANGLEY ST<br />
WRIGHT ST<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 4 Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 5 <strong>Port</strong> Owned or Operated Force Main<br />
!(<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
#*<br />
PARDEE LN<br />
SWAN WAY<br />
ROLAND WAY<br />
CAPWELL DR CAPWELL DR<br />
PARDEE DR<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
EARHART RD<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Base Map<br />
EDGEWATER DR<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
LEFT DR<br />
OAKPORT ST<br />
PENDLETON WAY<br />
HEGENBURGER RD<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
O<br />
%&t(<br />
HEGENBERGER RD<br />
EDGEWATER RD<br />
98TH AVE<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
EDES AVENUE<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Recommended Gravity<br />
Main Cleaning Schedule (4 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
ROAD A<br />
SOUTH LOOP RD<br />
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
HARBOR BAY PRKWY<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: March 24, 2010<br />
ROAD B<br />
SOUTH LOOP RD<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
DIKE RD<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
Maintenance Schedule<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Monthly<br />
Gravity Mains<br />
Monthly<br />
Annual<br />
Year 1<br />
Year 2<br />
Year 3<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AP911P<br />
!( #*<br />
!<br />
! ! !!<br />
! ! !<br />
#* !( !(<br />
LS AP912P<br />
Air Sally<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 4 Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WY<br />
LS AP07P<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Year 5 <strong>Port</strong> Owned or Operated Force Main<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
AP15E LS AP06P<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
AP14E<br />
LS AP08P<br />
!(<br />
LS AP155P<br />
#*<br />
JOHN GLENN DR<br />
!( !(<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
NEIL ARMSTRONG WY<br />
LS AP02P<br />
Base Map<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
#*<br />
EARHART RD<br />
EDWARD WHITE WY<br />
LS AP137P<br />
O<br />
#*<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
LS AP01P<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
98TH AVE<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Recommended Gravity<br />
Main Cleaning Schedule (5 <strong>of</strong> 5)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
EDEN ROAD
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: April 21, 2010<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
LS C07P<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
Root Intrusion and<br />
Sediment Deposition<br />
#*<br />
7TH ST.<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
LS C08P<br />
#* #*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
LS D05P<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
2009/2010 CCTV Location Pipelines<br />
Existing <strong>Port</strong> Owned and/or<br />
Maintained <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
#* Lift Station<br />
LS D04P<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!<br />
#*#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#* #*#*#*<br />
!(<br />
LS D10P<br />
!(<br />
#*<br />
FERRY ST<br />
!<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS D03P<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
#*<br />
LS D06P<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
) )<br />
) )<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)) )<br />
))<br />
) )))) !( !(<br />
!(<br />
#*<br />
!"c$<br />
BURMA RD<br />
LS AB148P<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
#*<br />
! ! !<br />
LS B31P<br />
!( !(<br />
PIER ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
LS D02P<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
LS AB663P<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS D01P<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
LS AB018P<br />
BAY ST<br />
! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
! ! !<br />
BATTAN AVE<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
14TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
FERRO ST<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
!<br />
LS AB836P<br />
17TH STREET<br />
WOOD ST<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
9TH ST<br />
#*<br />
%&t(<br />
PINE ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
12TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
13TH ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> in good<br />
condition . with few<br />
or no defects.<br />
#*<br />
HENRY ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
! ! !<br />
WAKE AVE<br />
14TH ST<br />
CHESTER ST.<br />
FERRO ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
18TH ST<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> in very poor<br />
. condition with visible<br />
defects. Up to 12-inches <strong>of</strong><br />
heavy debris in pipe.<br />
CYPRESS ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Base Map<br />
WOOD ST<br />
24TH ST<br />
W. GRAND AVE<br />
34TH ST<br />
32ND ST<br />
O<br />
ADELINE ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
!(<br />
MARKET ST<br />
MARKET ST<br />
BRUSH ST<br />
0 1,250<br />
Feet<br />
2,500<br />
CASTRO ST<br />
%&t(<br />
6TH ST<br />
4TH STREET<br />
3RD STREET<br />
2ND STREET<br />
WATER STREET<br />
#*#*<br />
! !<br />
!!<br />
BROADWAY<br />
Figure 5.3<br />
Completed 2009/10 CCTV<br />
Inspections (1 <strong>of</strong> 2)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
WEBSTER ST<br />
HARRISON ST<br />
ALICE ST
POND<br />
Legend<br />
#*<br />
Pipe generally in good<br />
condition. Some cracks.<br />
and grease problems.<br />
DIKE ROAD<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
HARBOR PARKWAY<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
HARBOR BAY PKWY<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Revision Date: April 21, 2010<br />
!(<br />
LS AP926P<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#* !(<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
#* !( !(!(<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! !<br />
Fractured pipe and deformation in<br />
some locations. Heavy debris,<br />
gravel and broken concrete in channel.<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> downstream pump station<br />
.<br />
causes pipe to flow three quarters full.<br />
Pipe in poor condition.<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
LS AP911P<br />
LS AP912P<br />
EARHART RD<br />
#*<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
! ! ! !<br />
GRUMMAN ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AP881P<br />
Pipeline fractures in<br />
multiple locations. Fat, oil,<br />
and grease build-up in sewer. .<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AP07P<br />
AP15E<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
AP14E<br />
2009/2010 CCTV Location<br />
Existing <strong>Port</strong> Owned and/or<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
Oil Interceptor<br />
Maintained <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
#* Lift Station<br />
!(<br />
Pipelines<br />
Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
RYAN ST<br />
BENSON ST<br />
EARHART RD<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
Pipe in good . .<br />
condition.<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WAY<br />
!(<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
LS AP155P<br />
LS AP08P<br />
FAIRCHILD ST<br />
CONVAIR ST<br />
LANGLEY ST<br />
WRIGHT ST<br />
#*<br />
!( !(<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
EARHART RD<br />
JOHN GLENN DR<br />
LS AP06P<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
Privately Maintained Facilities<br />
#* Privately Maintained Lift Station<br />
Privately Maintained Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Privately Maintained Force Main<br />
0 500<br />
Feet<br />
1,000<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
LS AP02P<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong>s contain<br />
sediment build-up<br />
and broken concrete<br />
construction material. .<br />
NEIL ARMSTRONG WY .<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/<br />
EBMUD Facilities<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
Base Map<br />
#*<br />
O<br />
PARDEE LN<br />
CAPWELL DR<br />
SWAN WAY<br />
EARHART RD<br />
#*<br />
EDWARD WHITE WAY<br />
LS AP137P<br />
EDGEWATER DR<br />
I - 880<br />
ROLAND WAY<br />
PARDEE DR<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
LS AP01P<br />
LEFT DR<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
%&t(<br />
Fractured pipe in<br />
multiple locations.<br />
Pipe in poor condition.<br />
OAKPORT ST<br />
! ! ! !<br />
HEGENBURGER RD<br />
Figure 5.3<br />
Completed 2009/10 CCTV<br />
Inspections (2 <strong>of</strong> 2)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
98TH AVE
Legend<br />
) Clarifier<br />
) Drain Box<br />
) Diverter Box<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap<br />
!( Grinder Pump<br />
Hot Spot A-1<br />
Detail A<br />
Revision Date: May 13, 2010<br />
AP15E<br />
!(<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WY<br />
LS AP07P<br />
!(<br />
AP14E<br />
Hot Spot M-1<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
6''<br />
!(<br />
#*<br />
LS AP08P<br />
6''<br />
) Trench Drain<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
#* #*<br />
LS AP06P<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
) Valve Box<br />
Hot Spot M-1<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
!( !( ) ) )) ) )) !( ))<br />
)) )))))<br />
!!<br />
! !<br />
! ! !<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
Hot Spot A-2<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
!( !(<br />
!(<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
Hot Spots<br />
7th St<br />
!(<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
Owner and Maintenance<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
Detail B<br />
#*#*<br />
#*#*#*#*<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
!<br />
Ferry St<br />
! !<br />
! !<br />
! !<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
! !<br />
Hot Spot A-1<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
!"c$<br />
#*<br />
!( !(<br />
#*<br />
Middle Harbor Rd<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
Detail B<br />
Maritime St<br />
! !<br />
LS AP02P<br />
!<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
!( !( !(<br />
!(<br />
!<br />
!!<br />
!(<br />
! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
!( !(<br />
#*<br />
%&t(<br />
City Owned/<strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/<br />
Privately Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
! ! ! ! Gravity Main<br />
! !<br />
#* #*#*<br />
Embarcadero<br />
#*<br />
!(<br />
!(!( !(<br />
!( !(<br />
#*#*<br />
!<br />
!!<br />
! !<br />
#*<br />
%&t(<br />
! !<br />
! ! !<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
Detail A<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
!(<br />
Embarcadero<br />
! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
! !<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!(<br />
Earhart Rd<br />
#*<br />
City Owned/Privately Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned/Transfer to<br />
Developer by Jan. 2011<br />
Gravity Main<br />
Doolitte Dr<br />
#*<br />
Airport Dr<br />
Hot Spot A-2<br />
Other<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
0 1,750<br />
Feet<br />
3,500<br />
O<br />
%&t(<br />
Figure 5.4<br />
Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong><br />
"Hot Spots"<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
5.3.2 Pump Station Maintenance Program<br />
As opposed to gravity sewer maintenance, the <strong>Port</strong>’s existing lift station maintenance<br />
program can be described as primarily “preventative” rather than “corrective,” with the vast<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> maintenance performed on the lift stations performed on a pre-set schedule<br />
rather than “as needed” when problems or overflows occur.<br />
Table 5.6 summarizes the <strong>Port</strong>’s existing lift station maintenance program. As shown in<br />
Table 5.6, lift stations are inspected daily to weekly, depending on division (e.g., Maritime or<br />
Aviation) and the time <strong>of</strong> year (i.e., dry weather vs. wet weather). Washdowns <strong>of</strong> the sewer<br />
wet wells are performed monthly. The <strong>Port</strong>’s existing lift station maintenance program is<br />
considered to be very “proactive” and meeting the intent <strong>of</strong> GWDRs. For this reason, no<br />
modifications to the City’s lift station maintenance program are recommended.<br />
Table 5.6<br />
Lift<br />
Lift Station Preventative Maintenance Program Summary<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
(1),(2)<br />
Station Location Inspection Frequency Maintenance Frequency<br />
Aviation Southfield Lift Stations<br />
Southfield Lift Stations/<strong>Sewer</strong> Ejectors<br />
AP01P Airport Dr. w/o Golf Course Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP02P Airport Parking Lot Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP06P Near Gate 6 in Terminal 1 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP07P Near Gate 7 in Terminal 1 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP08P Near Gate 8 in Terminal 1 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
(3)<br />
AP14E Near Gate 14 in Terminal 1 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
(3)<br />
AP15E Near Gate 15 in Terminal 1 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP137P Lift Station at Tank Farm Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP155P Near Building M-155 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP911P Near Building M-911 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
AP912P Near Remote Aircraft<br />
Parking Area<br />
Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
Southfield Lift Stations<br />
AP881P Near Building L-881<br />
(Chevron Site)<br />
Privately Maintained<br />
(by Chevron)<br />
Privately Maintained<br />
(by Chevron)<br />
AP926P Near Building L-926 Daily to Weekly Monthly<br />
May 2010 5-21<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
Table 5.6 Lift Station Preventative Maintenance Program Summary<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Lift<br />
(1),(2)<br />
Station Location Inspection Frequency Maintenance Frequency<br />
Maritime Lift Stations<br />
Harbor<br />
D01P Berth 59 Near Blockhouse Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
D02P Berth 58 Near Blockhouse Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
D03P Berth 57 Near Blockhouse Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
D04P Berth 56 Near Restroom Weekly (dry weather)<br />
D05P Berth 55 Near Crane Dept.<br />
Facility<br />
D06P Berth 57 Near<br />
Maintenance Bldg.<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
C07P 7 th Street (at west end) Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Monthly<br />
C08P 7 th Street (middle <strong>of</strong> street) Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Monthly<br />
D10P Near Building D512 Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Monthly<br />
B31P Back <strong>of</strong> B319 Water Side<br />
<strong>Oakland</strong> Army Base<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
AB663P 10th St & Midway St Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
AB836P Tobruk St n/o 17th St Weekly (dry weather)<br />
AB018P Burma Rd at Army Base<br />
Building 18<br />
AB148P Burma Rd at Army Base<br />
Building 148<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Weekly (dry weather)<br />
Daily (wet weather)<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Monthly<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Names have not been established for lift stations located in the Aviation system. Lift station<br />
names have been assigned based on the applicable building number or gate number, if<br />
available.<br />
2. Names have not been established for lift stations located in the <strong>Oakland</strong> Army Base. Lift<br />
station names have been assigned based on the Army Base building number.<br />
3. AP14E and AP15E are sewer ejectors.<br />
May 2010 5-22<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
5.3.3 Operation and Maintenance Costs<br />
The operation and maintenance (O&M) costs to conduct the annual sewer cleaning and<br />
scheduled CCTV work will depend on the sewer condition (i.e. sediment or debris<br />
accumulation) and length <strong>of</strong> pipe inspected. For budget purposes, we assumed that on<br />
average, 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the sewers would be cleaned annually using high velocity jet<br />
cleaning methods and CCTV inspected according to schedule. We also assumed that the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> sewers could be cleaned in two passes, and only a small portion would require<br />
heavy duty hydro flushing, debris removal, and root intrusion removal. Depending on the<br />
severity <strong>of</strong> material built-up within the sewers, the CCTV hydro flushing, and disposal costs<br />
could range from $3 to $10 per foot <strong>of</strong> sewer for a contractor to complete the work.<br />
Table 5.7 <strong>Sewer</strong> Cleaning and CCTV Costs<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Division<br />
Phase 1<br />
2011-2015<br />
Phase 2<br />
2016-2020<br />
Phase 3<br />
2021-2025<br />
Phase 4<br />
2026-2030<br />
Phase 5<br />
2030+<br />
Aviation 495,000 330,000 495,000 330,000 495,000<br />
Maritime 855,000 570,000 855,000 570,000 855,000<br />
C/RE 150,000 100,000 150,000 100,000 150,000<br />
Total 1,500,000 487,000 1,500,000 487,000 1,500,000<br />
5.3.4 CMMS Tracking <strong>System</strong><br />
The <strong>Port</strong> utilizes a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
application to schedule routine preventative maintenance, track emergency spill responses,<br />
repair activities, and to generate work orders. The s<strong>of</strong>tware package currently utilized by<br />
the <strong>Port</strong> is MP2, by Datastream®. However, the <strong>Port</strong> is currently in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
upgrading its CMMS s<strong>of</strong>tware package.<br />
In the CMMS s<strong>of</strong>tware, lift stations and other sewer facilities are assigned a unique<br />
equipment number, and different maintenance activities are assigned a unique task<br />
number. Through this s<strong>of</strong>tware package, the <strong>Port</strong> is capable <strong>of</strong> tracking lift station and<br />
gravity sewer maintenance trends isolating and summarizing work by equipment number<br />
and/or by task number. The ability to study maintenance trends using the CMMS s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
will prove to be very useful to the <strong>Port</strong> in measuring the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the various <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
elements and performing program audits in the future.<br />
Currently, there is only one equipment number assigned to all sewer pipelines in the <strong>Port</strong>’s<br />
CMMS program. This limits the <strong>Port</strong>’s ability to track maintenance trends in specific pipeline<br />
reaches. As part <strong>of</strong> the comprehensive mapping <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s collection system, unique IDs<br />
May 2010 5-23<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
were created for each unique pipeline. The <strong>Port</strong> can now integrate the unique pipe IDs from<br />
the collection system maps into the MP2 s<strong>of</strong>tware, giving the <strong>Port</strong> the ability to track<br />
maintenance activities in specific pipe reaches. Since the ability to track the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> measures will be desirable when the <strong>Port</strong> performs <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits, it is<br />
recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> consider integrating the map IDs into the CMMS s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
5.4 PORT REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT PLAN<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> this project, CCTV inspections <strong>of</strong> selected <strong>Port</strong> sewers, as well as a wet weather<br />
flow-monitoring program were performed to identify areas with structural deficiencies (e.g,<br />
cracks in pipelines, etc.), areas with excessive amounts <strong>of</strong> infiltration and inflow (I/I), and<br />
other condition problems associated with gravity sewers (e.g, adverse slope conditions,<br />
“bellies,” etc.). Based on the results <strong>of</strong> work performed as part <strong>of</strong> this project, specific<br />
sewers have been targeted for rehabilitation or replacement: These pipelines are identified<br />
in Chapter 9, as well as the <strong>Port</strong>s <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong><br />
(SECAP), which is included in Appendix M.<br />
For budgetary purposes, the SECAP also assumes that additional sewers requiring<br />
rehabilitation or replacements not specifically identified in this project will be identified in the<br />
future. In addition, the SECAP includes costs associated with rehabilitation or replacement<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Lift Stations to address condition issues as well as the requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Environmental Protection Agencies (EPA’s) Administrative Order.<br />
5.5 STAFF TRAINING<br />
Upon hiring, the <strong>Port</strong> trains collection system’s staff on the proper operation and<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> the sewer system and on <strong>Port</strong> standard operating procedures (SOPs).<br />
Ongoing training for <strong>Port</strong> staff is provided through a combination <strong>of</strong> informal/on the job<br />
training and optional special training classes or seminars, such as those provided by the<br />
California Water Environment Association (CWEA).<br />
To aid in compliance with the GWDRs, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> begin to <strong>of</strong>fer its<br />
maintenance workers with periodic “refresher courses” on <strong>Port</strong> SOPs and maintenance<br />
activities (e.g. hydr<strong>of</strong>lushing, etc.) for the collection system. In addition, it is recommended<br />
that these training sessions include training with regard to the new programs or policies that<br />
will be implemented as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> and the new GWDRs. This is particularly<br />
important with respect to the reporting requirements for SSOs in the <strong>Port</strong>. It is essential that<br />
all staff is aware <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs and know who needs to be informed should an SSO occur.<br />
5.6 EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT PART INVENTORIES<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> maintains an inventory <strong>of</strong> spare pump parts, pipes, and other parts needed to<br />
perform emergency repair work on the sewer system. Certain construction and other<br />
May 2010 5-24<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
equipment is also available for trench excavation and other sewer work. A list <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />
and spare parts that are currently available to the <strong>Port</strong> is included in Appendix I. According<br />
to <strong>Port</strong> staff, the inventory available has proven sufficient given the amount and extent <strong>of</strong><br />
sewer maintenance or repair work that is performed by <strong>Port</strong> staff.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> currently does not own its own vactor truck or CCTV equipment. As noted in<br />
Section 5.3.1, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> begin cleaning and CCTV inspecting<br />
approximately 20 percent <strong>of</strong> its collection system each year. Without CCTV equipment or a<br />
vactor truck, the <strong>Port</strong> would likely have to contract most <strong>of</strong> this work out, which would<br />
represent a significant ongoing cost to the <strong>Port</strong>. For this reason, it may prove to be cost<br />
effective for the <strong>Port</strong> to purchase a small vactor truck and CCTV equipment.<br />
5.7 OUTREACH TO PLUMBERS/BUILDING CONTRACTORS<br />
This element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> is a sole requirement <strong>of</strong> the RWQCB (the GWDRs do not contain<br />
any specific requirements for the development <strong>of</strong> outreach materials for plumbers and<br />
contractors). Furthermore, the RWQCB allows an exemption <strong>of</strong> this element for collection<br />
system agencies servicing a population <strong>of</strong> less than 10,000 persons. As noted in Chapter 1,<br />
it is estimated that the <strong>Port</strong> services an average population <strong>of</strong> roughly 8,700. For this<br />
reason, the <strong>Port</strong> is not specifically required to participate in or develop an outreach program<br />
for plumbers and contractors.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> is a “cooperating member” <strong>of</strong> the Association <strong>of</strong> Bay Area Governments (ABAG),<br />
which, through its Pooled Liability Assurance Network (PLAN), developed the “Be <strong>Sewer</strong><br />
Smart” campaign. The program is focused on providing awareness <strong>of</strong> and preventing sewer<br />
system backups and backflows. Outreach materials are available on the “Be <strong>Sewer</strong> Smart”<br />
website 1<br />
.<br />
1<br />
www.sewersmart.org<br />
May 2010 5-25<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch05 (FinalA)
Chapter 6<br />
DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS<br />
This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the relevant design and construction standards, as well<br />
as standards for the inspection and testing <strong>of</strong> new sewers, pumps, and other<br />
appurtenances and for rehabilitation projects.<br />
6.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
6.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires<br />
that:<br />
a. Each wastewater collection system agency shall identify minimum design and<br />
construction standards and specifications for the installation <strong>of</strong> new sewer<br />
systems and for the rehabilitation and repair <strong>of</strong> existing sewer systems; and that<br />
b. Each wastewater collection system agency shall identify procedures and<br />
standards for inspecting and testing the installation <strong>of</strong> new sewers, pump<br />
stations, and other appurtenances; and for rehabilitation and repair projects.<br />
6.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
that a <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>) must include the following:<br />
a. Design and construction standards and specifications for the installation <strong>of</strong> new<br />
sanitary sewer systems, pump stations and other appurtenances; and for the<br />
rehabilitation and repair <strong>of</strong> existing sanitary sewer systems; and<br />
b. Procedures and standards for inspecting and testing the installation <strong>of</strong> new<br />
sewers, pumps, and other appurtenances and for rehabilitation and repair<br />
projects.<br />
6.2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS<br />
This section summarizes the applicable elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) design<br />
standards for sanitary sewer facilities. Because the <strong>Port</strong> discharges wastewater into the<br />
City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (City) and East Bay Municipal Water District (EBMUD) sewer systems, brief<br />
descriptions <strong>of</strong> their design standards are also provided.<br />
6.2.1 <strong>Port</strong> Design Standards<br />
Historically, the <strong>Port</strong> has not maintained a “formal” set <strong>of</strong> design guidelines for the design <strong>of</strong><br />
new or replacement sewer system facilities. In lieu <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficial set <strong>of</strong> design guidelines,<br />
<strong>Port</strong> engineering staff carefully reviewed each sewer system design to ensure compliance<br />
with accepted industry standards.<br />
May 2010 6-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch06 (FinalA)
To comply with the GWDRs and the SWRCB requirements, <strong>Port</strong> specific design standards<br />
have been developed as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> development process. A copy <strong>of</strong> the “Sanitary<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> Design and Construction Standards” is included in Appendix J for reference. In the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the standards, an effort was made to provide consistency with City<br />
standards for the design <strong>of</strong> sewer facilities. However, certain <strong>Port</strong> criteria are provided<br />
which vary somewhat from the requirements <strong>of</strong> the City. In general, where differences<br />
occur, the proposed <strong>Port</strong> standard is more conservative than the City standard.<br />
6.2.2 City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Design Standards<br />
Design standards for sanitary sewer facilities constructed in the City are provided in the<br />
City’s “Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Design Guidelines 1 ”. This document has an effective date <strong>of</strong><br />
November 2004 and is maintained by the City’s Public Works Agency Engineering Design<br />
and Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way <strong>Management</strong> Division. In addition, the City’s Public Works Agency<br />
Engineering Design and Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way <strong>Management</strong> Division has developed a set <strong>of</strong><br />
standard drawings and details for sanitary sewer facilities 2<br />
.<br />
To ensure that sanitary sewers are installed, rehabilitated, or repaired properly, the City has<br />
adopted the “Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction”, more commonly<br />
known as the “Greenbook”. This document is republished every three years.<br />
6.2.3 EBMUD Design Standards<br />
EBMUD’s Wastewater Design Section maintains its “Standards and Guidelines for Design<br />
and Construction <strong>of</strong> Wastewater Facilities”. This document contains design, construction,<br />
testing, and inspection standards for the design <strong>of</strong> new or rehabilitation sewers. The<br />
document is meant to be used to provide standards for typical sewer design and<br />
construction work.<br />
6.3 INSPECTION AND TESTING STANDARDS<br />
This section summarizes the applicable elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> inspection and testing<br />
standards for sanitary sewer facilities. Because the <strong>Port</strong> discharges wastewater into the<br />
City and EBMUD sewer systems, brief descriptions <strong>of</strong> their inspection and testing standards<br />
are also provided.<br />
6.3.1 <strong>Port</strong> Inspection Standards<br />
Historically, the <strong>Port</strong> has not maintained a “formal” set <strong>of</strong> testing and inspection guidelines<br />
for sewer system facilities. In lieu <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficial set <strong>of</strong> standards, <strong>Port</strong> engineering staff has<br />
performed needed inspections and tests to ensure that sanitary sewers are properly<br />
constructed.<br />
1 Available at: http://www.oaklandpw.com/Asset605.aspx<br />
2 Available at: http://www.oaklandpw.com/Page707.aspx<br />
May 2010 6-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch06 (FinalA)
To comply with the GWDRs and the SWRCB requirements, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong><br />
adopt the “Greenbook” for the inspection and testing <strong>of</strong> new or rehabilitated sewers in the<br />
<strong>Port</strong>. This approach is consistent with City standards for the testing and inspection <strong>of</strong><br />
sanitary sewer facilities.<br />
6.3.2 City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> Inspection Standards<br />
Standards for the inspection and testing <strong>of</strong> new or rehabilitated sewers in the City are<br />
provided in the “Greenbook”. City inspectors regulate all sewer construction work to ensure<br />
compliance with the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>'s municipal code, traffic safety, and the requirements<br />
specified in the “Greenbook”. All sewers are tested and inspected with closed circuit<br />
television (CCTV) technology prior to acceptance by the City.<br />
6.3.3 EBMUD Inspection Standards<br />
EBMUD’s “Standards and Guidelines for Design and Construction <strong>of</strong> Wastewater Facilities”<br />
contains procedures for the inspection and testing <strong>of</strong> new and rehabilitated sanitary sewer<br />
facilities. The standards are applicable to both new installations and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />
existing facilities.<br />
May 2010 6-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch06 (FinalA)
Chapter 7<br />
OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN<br />
This chapter describes the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong><br />
(OERP), which provides measures to protect the public health and the environment in the<br />
event <strong>of</strong> a sanitary sewer overflow (SSO).<br />
7.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
7.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency develop an overflow emergency response plan<br />
with the following elements:<br />
• Notification: Provide SSO notification procedures.<br />
• Response: Develop and implement a plan to respond to SSOs.<br />
• Reporting: Develop procedures to report and notify SSOs per SSO Monitoring and<br />
Reporting Program.<br />
• Impact Mitigation: Develop steps to contain wastewater, to prevent overflows from<br />
reaching surface waters, and to minimize or correct any adverse impact from SSOs.<br />
7.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GDWRs), issued by<br />
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), specifies that a <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>) must include an Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> that<br />
includes, at a minimum, the following:<br />
a. Proper notification procedures so that the primary responders and regulatory<br />
agencies are informed <strong>of</strong> all SSOs in a timely manner;<br />
b. A program to ensure an appropriate response to all overflows;<br />
c. Procedures to ensure prompt notification to appropriate regulatory agencies<br />
and other potentially affected entities (e.g. health agencies, Regional Water<br />
Boards, water suppliers, etc.) <strong>of</strong> all SSOs that potentially affect public health or<br />
reach the waters <strong>of</strong> the State in accordance with the monitoring reporting<br />
program (MRP), the California Water Code, other State Law, and other<br />
applicable Regional Water Board waste discharge requirements or National<br />
Pollutant Discharge Elimination Program (NPDES) permit requirements. The<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> should identify the <strong>of</strong>ficials who will receive immediate notification;<br />
d. Procedures to ensure that appropriate staff and contractor personnel are aware<br />
<strong>of</strong> and follow the Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> and are appropriately trained;<br />
e. Procedures to address emergency operations, such as traffic and crowd control<br />
and other necessary response activities; and<br />
May 2010 7-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
f. A program to ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to contain and prevent<br />
discharge <strong>of</strong> untreated or partially treated wastewater to waters <strong>of</strong> the United<br />
States and to minimize or correct any adverse impact <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
resulting from the SSOs, including such accelerated or additional monitoring as<br />
may be necessary to determine the nature and impact <strong>of</strong> the discharge.<br />
7.2 OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> this project, a <strong>Port</strong> specific OERP has been developed, which is included in<br />
Appendix K for reference. The <strong>Port</strong>’s OERP has been developed to meet the GWDRs and<br />
RWQCB requirements and to protect the public health and welfare. The plan shall not<br />
supersede existing standard operating procedures, unless otherwise specified by the<br />
Executive Director or his duly authorized representative.<br />
This section summarizes the major aspects <strong>of</strong> the OERP as relevant to the specific GWDRs<br />
and RWQCB requirements. Response procedures vary depending upon the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spill (e.g., Aviation, Maritime, Commercial/Real Estate). For the sake <strong>of</strong> clarity, the following<br />
sections, which summarize the various aspects <strong>of</strong> the OERP, are organized by <strong>Port</strong><br />
division.<br />
7.2.1 Aviation Division<br />
7.2.1.1<br />
Primary Notification Procedures<br />
Calls from <strong>Port</strong> tenants or from the public regarding potential overflows in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport are generally received through the <strong>Port</strong> Operations<br />
Department at (510) 563-3361. The Operations Department is staffed 24 hours per day,<br />
every day <strong>of</strong> the year (including weekends, non-business hours, and holidays).<br />
The telephone operator at the <strong>Port</strong> Operations Department then records the overflow<br />
information and forwards the information the Aviation Facilities Maintenance Department.<br />
From time to time, operators representing the maritime or commercial/real estate divisions<br />
may not be available to field calls regarding potential overflows. For this reason, the <strong>Port</strong><br />
Operations Department may also receive calls regarding potential overflows in the vicinity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the harbor or commercial/real estate areas. In this case, the telephone operator will<br />
record the relevant information and forward it to the appropriate department (e.g., Harbor<br />
Facilities Maintenance Department) or individuals as appropriate.<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> overflows in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport detected by <strong>Port</strong> staff in<br />
the course <strong>of</strong> their normal duties shall be reported immediately to the Aviation Facilities<br />
Maintenance Department.<br />
7.2.1.2<br />
SSO Response Program<br />
Failure <strong>of</strong> any element within the aviation sewer system that threatens to cause or causes a<br />
SSO will trigger an immediate response to isolate and correct the problem. Crews and<br />
May 2010 7-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
equipment shall be available to respond to any SSO location and shall be dispatched to the<br />
site <strong>of</strong> a reported SSO immediately. Also, additional maintenance personnel shall be “on<br />
call” should extra crews be needed.<br />
Dispatching duties are normally performed by either the Aviation Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor, Utilities Supervisor, or the Equipment <strong>System</strong>s Superintendent, depending on<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the problem. Dispatching personnel should record all relevant overflow<br />
information and dispatch response crews, as needed.<br />
It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the first personnel who arrive at the site <strong>of</strong> an overflow in the<br />
aviation area to protect the health and safety <strong>of</strong> the public to the extent possible. Aviation<br />
personnel are responsible for identifying the cause <strong>of</strong> the overflow, requesting additional<br />
resources as needed, taking steps to contain or divert the overflow, and taking steps to stop<br />
the overflow if possible.<br />
Following initial attempts for overflow correction and containment, Aviation personnel<br />
should contact the Environmental Compliance Supervisor for guidance on how to proceed.<br />
For smaller wastewater spills, Aviation staff may be able to use wash-down water to direct<br />
wastewater collected in the spill area back into a manhole and into the collection system.<br />
For larger spills, the Environmental Compliance Supervisor typically contacts a Hazardous<br />
Material Contractor to clean up and disinfect the affected area. Figure 7.1 summarizes the<br />
Aviation SSO Field Response Action <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />
7.2.1.3<br />
Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies<br />
The regulatory agencies that must be notified in the event <strong>of</strong> a SSO vary depending on the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> discharge. Likewise, the time frame in which the appropriate agencies must be<br />
notified depends on the type <strong>of</strong> discharge. Table 3.1 and Section 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP<br />
provide a summary <strong>of</strong> which regulatory agencies must be notified and under what<br />
conditions. These requirements are the same regardless <strong>of</strong> the responsible <strong>Port</strong> division.<br />
However, the SSO reporting chain <strong>of</strong> communication does vary depending upon the<br />
responsible <strong>Port</strong> division. A flow chart identifying the flow <strong>of</strong> information regarding a<br />
potential SSO in the aviation area is provided in Figure 3.2 and Section 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong><br />
OERP for reference.<br />
7.2.1.4<br />
Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training<br />
Section 7.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains provisions concerning the distribution, maintenance,<br />
and awareness <strong>of</strong> the provisions presented in that document. Copies <strong>of</strong> the OERP and any<br />
amendments should be distributed to all <strong>of</strong> the aviation personnel that are heavily involved<br />
with the <strong>SSMP</strong> or OERP programs. It is also recommended that the appropriate aviation<br />
personnel be trained concerning the provisions <strong>of</strong> the OERP.<br />
May 2010 7-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
7.2.1.5<br />
Section 3.2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains the emergency response procedures that should be<br />
followed by SSO response crews. These provisions are largely the same regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong><br />
division, and include provisions for dispatching, crew instruction, requests for additional<br />
resources, assessing property damage, field supervision and inspection, hazard materials,<br />
and crowd control, traffic diversion, and other emergency operations.<br />
7.2.1.6<br />
Emergency Operations<br />
SSO Surface Water Mitigation<br />
Discharges <strong>of</strong> untreated wastewater to San Francisco Bay are an infrequent occurrence in<br />
the <strong>Port</strong>. The <strong>Port</strong>’s aviation storm drainage collection system is serviced entirely by<br />
retention basins and does not include direct discharges to San Francisco Bay. Should an<br />
SSO result in a discharge to the waters <strong>of</strong> the United States from the aviation sewer<br />
system, <strong>Port</strong> staff shall take steps to avoid the degradation <strong>of</strong> this body <strong>of</strong> water.<br />
When it is determined to be feasible and safe, the <strong>Port</strong> shall collect and analyze samples <strong>of</strong><br />
the receiving waters for those SSOs that may imminently and substantially endanger<br />
human health and SSOs that cause fish kills. The <strong>Port</strong> shall exercise their best judgement<br />
to determine if sampling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis.<br />
7.2.2 Maritime Division<br />
7.2.2.1<br />
Primary Notification Procedures<br />
Calls from <strong>Port</strong> tenants or the public regarding potential overflows in the maritime area are<br />
generally received through the <strong>Port</strong> Wharfinger. Should the <strong>Port</strong> Wharfinger be unavailable,<br />
all calls regarding potential overflows are routed through the Operations Department (see<br />
Section 7.2.1).<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> Wharfinger (or the telephone operator at the <strong>Port</strong> Operations Department) then<br />
records the overflow information and forwards the information the Harbor Facilities<br />
Maintenance Department.<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> overflows in the maritime area detected by <strong>Port</strong> staff in the course <strong>of</strong> their normal<br />
duties shall be reported immediately to the Harbor Facilities Maintenance Department.<br />
7.2.2.2<br />
SSO Response Program<br />
Failure <strong>of</strong> any element within the maritime sewer system that threatens to cause or causes<br />
a SSO will trigger an immediate response to isolate and correct the problem. Crews and<br />
equipment shall be available to respond to any SSO location and shall be dispatched to the<br />
site <strong>of</strong> a reported SSO immediately. Also, additional maintenance personnel shall be “on<br />
call” should extra crews be needed.<br />
Dispatching duties are normally performed by either the Maritime Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor or the Utilities Supervisor, depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> the problem. Dispatching<br />
May 2010 7-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
personnel in the maritime division should record all relevant overflow information and<br />
dispatch response crews, as needed.<br />
It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the first personnel who arrive at the site <strong>of</strong> an overflow in the<br />
maritime area to protect the health and safety <strong>of</strong> the public to the extent possible. Maritime<br />
personnel are responsible for identifying the cause <strong>of</strong> the overflow, requesting additional<br />
resources as needed, taking steps to contain or divert the overflow, and taking steps to stop<br />
the overflow if possible.<br />
Following initial attempts for overflow correction and containment, Maritime personnel<br />
should contact the Environmental Compliance Supervisor for guidance on how to proceed.<br />
For spills in the maritime area, the Environmental Compliance Supervisor typically contacts<br />
a Hazardous Material Contractor to clean up and disinfect the affected area. Figure 7.2<br />
summarizes the Maritime SSO Field Response Action <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />
7.2.2.3<br />
Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies<br />
As noted in Section 7.2.1.3, Table 3.1 and Section 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP provide a<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> which regulatory agencies must be notified and under what conditions. These<br />
requirements are the same regardless <strong>of</strong> the responsible <strong>Port</strong> division.<br />
However, the SSO reporting chain <strong>of</strong> communication does vary depending upon the<br />
responsible <strong>Port</strong> division. A flow chart identifying the flow <strong>of</strong> information regarding a<br />
potential SSO in the maritime area is provided in Figure 3.3 and Section 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong><br />
OERP.<br />
7.2.2.4<br />
Section 7.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains provisions concerning the distribution, maintenance,<br />
and awareness <strong>of</strong> the provisions presented in that document. Copies <strong>of</strong> the OERP and any<br />
amendments should be distributed to all <strong>of</strong> the maritime personnel that are heavily involved<br />
with the <strong>SSMP</strong> or OERP programs. It is also recommended that the appropriate maritime<br />
personnel be trained concerning the provisions <strong>of</strong> the OERP.<br />
7.2.2.5<br />
Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training<br />
Section 3.2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains the emergency response procedures that should be<br />
followed by SSO response crews. These provisions are largely the same regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong><br />
division, and include provisions for dispatching, crew instruction, requests for additional<br />
resources, assessing property damage, field supervision and inspection, hazard materials,<br />
and crowd control, traffic diversion, and other emergency operations.<br />
7.2.2.6<br />
Emergency Operations<br />
SSO Surface Water Mitigation<br />
Discharges <strong>of</strong> untreated wastewater to San Francisco Bay are an infrequent occurrence in<br />
the <strong>Port</strong>. Should an SSO result in a discharge to the waters <strong>of</strong> the United States from the<br />
May 2010 7-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
maritime sewer system, <strong>Port</strong> staff shall take steps to avoid the degradation <strong>of</strong> this body <strong>of</strong><br />
water.<br />
When it is determined to be feasible and safe, the <strong>Port</strong> shall collect and analyze samples <strong>of</strong><br />
the receiving waters for those SSOs that may imminently and substantially endanger<br />
human health and SSOs that cause fish kills. The <strong>Port</strong> shall exercise their best judgement<br />
to determine if sampling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis.<br />
7.2.3 Commercial/Real Estate Division<br />
7.2.3.1<br />
Primary Notification Procedures<br />
Calls from <strong>Port</strong> tenants or the public regarding potential overflows in Jack London Square<br />
or other commercial/real estate areas are generally received through the Commercial/Real<br />
Estate Representative. Should the Commercial/Real Estate Representative be unavailable,<br />
all calls regarding potential overflows are routed through the Operations Department (see<br />
Section 7.2.1).<br />
The Commercial/Real Estate Representative (or the telephone operator at the <strong>Port</strong><br />
Operations Department) then records the overflow information and forwards the information<br />
the Harbor Facilities Maintenance Department.<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> overflows in Jack London Square or other commercial/real estate areas detected by<br />
<strong>Port</strong> staff in the course <strong>of</strong> their normal duties shall be reported immediately to the Harbor<br />
Facilities Maintenance Department.<br />
7.2.3.2<br />
SSO Response Program<br />
Failure <strong>of</strong> any element within the commercial/real estate sewer system that threatens to<br />
cause or causes a SSO will trigger an immediate response to isolate and correct the<br />
problem. Crews and equipment shall be available to respond to any SSO location and shall<br />
be dispatched to the site <strong>of</strong> a reported SSO immediately. Also, additional maintenance<br />
personnel shall be “on call” should extra crews be needed.<br />
Dispatching duties are normally performed by either the Maritime Maintenance/Construction<br />
Supervisor or the Utilities Supervisor, depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> the problem. Dispatching<br />
personnel should record all relevant overflow information and dispatch response crews, as<br />
needed.<br />
It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the first personnel who arrive at the site <strong>of</strong> an overflow in the<br />
maritime area to protect the health and safety <strong>of</strong> the public to the extent possible. Maritime<br />
personnel are responsible for identifying the cause <strong>of</strong> the overflow, requesting additional<br />
resources as needed, taking steps to contain or divert the overflow, and taking steps to stop<br />
the overflow if possible.<br />
May 2010 7-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
Following initial attempts for overflow correction and containment, Maritime personnel<br />
should contact the Environmental Compliance Supervisor for guidance on how to proceed.<br />
For spills in the commercial/real estate area, the Environmental Compliance Supervisor<br />
typically contacts a Hazardous Material Contractor to clean up and disinfect the affected<br />
area. Similar to the maritime division, Figure 7.2 summarizes the Commercial/Real Estate<br />
SSO Field Response Action <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />
7.2.3.3<br />
Notification <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Agencies<br />
As noted in Section 7.2.1.3, Table 3.1 and Section 5.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP provide a<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> which regulatory agencies must be notified and under what conditions. These<br />
requirements are the same regardless <strong>of</strong> the responsible <strong>Port</strong> division.<br />
However, the SSO reporting chain <strong>of</strong> communication does vary depending upon the<br />
responsible <strong>Port</strong> division. A flow chart identifying the flow <strong>of</strong> information regarding a<br />
potential SSO in the commercial/real estate area is provided in Figure 3.3 and Section 5.0<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP.<br />
7.2.3.4<br />
Section 7.0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains provisions concerning the distribution, maintenance,<br />
and awareness <strong>of</strong> the provisions presented in that document. Copies <strong>of</strong> the OERP and any<br />
amendments should be distributed to all <strong>of</strong> the maritime and commercial/real estate<br />
personnel that are heavily involved with the <strong>SSMP</strong> or OERP programs. It is also<br />
recommended that the appropriate maritime and commercial/real estate personnel be<br />
trained concerning the provisions <strong>of</strong> the OERP.<br />
7.2.3.5<br />
Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> Awareness and Training<br />
Section 3.2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> OERP contains the emergency response procedures that should be<br />
followed by SSO response crews. These provisions are largely the same regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong><br />
division, and include provisions for dispatching, crew instruction, requests for additional<br />
resources, assessing property damage, field supervision and inspection, hazard materials,<br />
and crowd control, traffic diversion, and other emergency operations.<br />
7.2.3.6<br />
Emergency Operations<br />
SSO Surface Water Mitigation<br />
Discharges <strong>of</strong> untreated wastewater to San Francisco Bay are an infrequent occurrence in<br />
the <strong>Port</strong>. Should an SSO result in a discharge to the waters <strong>of</strong> the United States from the<br />
commercial/real estate sewer system, <strong>Port</strong> staff shall take steps to avoid the degradation <strong>of</strong><br />
this body <strong>of</strong> water.<br />
When it is determined to be feasible and safe, the <strong>Port</strong> shall collect and analyze samples <strong>of</strong><br />
the receiving waters for those SSOs that may imminently and substantially endanger<br />
human health and SSOs that cause fish kills. The <strong>Port</strong> shall exercise their best judgement<br />
to determine if sampling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis.<br />
May 2010 7-9<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch07 (FinalA)
Chapter 8<br />
FOG CONTROL PLAN<br />
This chapter summarizes the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) fats, oil, and grease (FOG) control<br />
program, which has been developed to limit the amount <strong>of</strong> FOG that enters the collection<br />
system to the extent feasible.<br />
8.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
8.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency shall evaluate its service area to determine<br />
whether a FOG control program is needed. If so, a FOG control program shall be<br />
developed as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>. If an agency determines that a FOG program is not<br />
needed, the agency must provide justification for why it is not needed.<br />
8.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs), issued by<br />
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), specifies that this <strong>SSMP</strong> must include<br />
an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> service area to determine whether a FOG control program is<br />
needed. If no FOG program is needed, justification for why it is not needed must be<br />
provided. If FOG is considered to be a problem, a FOG source control program must be<br />
prepared and implemented, including the following as appropriate:<br />
a. An implementation plan and schedule for a public education outreach program<br />
that promotes the proper disposal <strong>of</strong> FOG;<br />
b. A plan and schedule for the disposal <strong>of</strong> FOG generated within the sanitary<br />
sewer system service area. This may include a list <strong>of</strong> acceptable disposal<br />
facilities and/or additional facilities needed to adequately dispose <strong>of</strong> FOG<br />
generated within a sanitary sewer system service area;<br />
c. The legal authority to prohibit discharges into the system and identify measures<br />
to prevent SSOs and blockages caused by FOG;<br />
d. Requirements to install grease removal devices (such as traps or interceptors),<br />
design standards for the removal devices, maintenance requirements, Best<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Practice (BMP) requirements, record keeping and reporting<br />
requirements;<br />
e. Authority to inspect grease producing facilities, enforcement authorities, and<br />
whether the Enrollee has sufficient staff to inspect and enforce the FOG<br />
ordinance;<br />
f. An identification <strong>of</strong> sanitary sewer system sections subject to FOG blockages<br />
and establishment <strong>of</strong> a cleaning maintenance schedule for each section; and<br />
g. Development and implementation <strong>of</strong> source control measures for all sources <strong>of</strong><br />
FOG discharged into the sanitary sewer system for each section identified in (f)<br />
above.<br />
May 2010 8-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
8.2 FOG CONTROL PLAN<br />
The East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD) has developed a district wide FOG<br />
control program. The <strong>Port</strong> facilities are covered under this program, similar to any satellite<br />
discharger; therefore, the <strong>Port</strong> will not develop a separate program. In lieu <strong>of</strong> developing a<br />
<strong>Port</strong> specific FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong>, the report included in Appendix L summarizes the EBMUD<br />
FOG control program as relevant to the <strong>Port</strong>. The EBMUD FOG control program is primarily<br />
focused on reducing FOG discharged from food service facilities (FSFs) in the <strong>Port</strong>, since<br />
the <strong>Port</strong> has no residential customers.<br />
The EBMUD FOG control program meets the GWDRs and RWQCB requirements and<br />
protects the public health and welfare. This section summarizes the major aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EBMUD FOG control program as relevant to the specific GWDRs and RWQCB<br />
requirements.<br />
8.2.1 Public Outreach Materials<br />
EBMUD has developed several useful public outreach materials for controlling FOG<br />
discharges into the sanitary sewer system, focused on both FSFs as well as residential<br />
customers. The outreach materials relevant to the <strong>Port</strong> and its tenants are those pertaining<br />
to FSFs. The outreach materials are available in several languages (English, Spanish,<br />
Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese). The FSF outreach material includes the following:<br />
• Program Brochure. This document describes the EBMUD FOG control program,<br />
and explains what FOG is, the issues related to FOG, introduces the BMPs,<br />
describes grease interceptors and EBMUD’s interceptor requirements.<br />
• List <strong>of</strong> Approved Grease Haulers. This document is a list <strong>of</strong> grease haulers in the<br />
area that are approved by EBMUD.<br />
• Grease Interceptor Maintenance Brochure. This document summarizes the<br />
maintenance requirements for facilities required by EBMUD to use a grease<br />
interceptor.<br />
• BMP Brochure. This document summarizes the FOG BMPs summarized in<br />
Section 8.2.5.<br />
• FAQs. A list <strong>of</strong> frequently asked questions (FAQs) is available for FSFs describing<br />
the program requirements.<br />
• Permit Forms. Various permit documents are included to describe the program terms<br />
and conditions and provide documents that must be completed and signed by the<br />
discharger.<br />
• Grease Trap Maintenance Form. This form is to be completed by each<br />
establishment and keeps a log <strong>of</strong> when a grease interceptor was cleaned, who<br />
cleaned it, amount <strong>of</strong> grease removed, and where the grease was disposed <strong>of</strong>. Each<br />
May 2010 8-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
FSF is required to keep a copy <strong>of</strong> this log on file should an EBMUD inspector wish to<br />
review it.<br />
• “No Grease” Sign. This sign should be posted near sinks and drains to remind<br />
workers not to dispose <strong>of</strong> FOG into the sanitary sewer system.<br />
8.2.2 FOG Disposal<br />
The EBMUD MWWTP serves as one <strong>of</strong> the main receiving facilities for waste grease in the<br />
vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> 1<br />
. The address and contact information for the MWWTP is listed below:<br />
EBMUD MWWTP<br />
2020 Wake Avenue<br />
<strong>Oakland</strong>, CA 94607<br />
Alameda County<br />
Phone: 510-287-1651<br />
Residents within the EBMUD service area may drop <strong>of</strong>f small amounts <strong>of</strong> grease<br />
(15 gallons or less) themselves at the MWWTP between the hours <strong>of</strong> 7:00 AM and<br />
7:00 PM. However, since the <strong>Port</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> non-residential users, use <strong>of</strong> the drop on site<br />
is not allowed. However, EBMUD does maintain a list <strong>of</strong> “approved haulers,” which<br />
dischargers with an EBMUD wastewater discharge permit (WDP) are required to use. Table<br />
8.1 provides a list <strong>of</strong> the “approved haulers,” as well as contact information. Individuals<br />
should contact the hauler ahead <strong>of</strong> time to determine their specific requirements.<br />
8.2.3 Legal Authority<br />
Historically, the <strong>Port</strong> did not have any ordinances restricting the type, volume, and character<br />
<strong>of</strong> wastewater discharged into the <strong>Port</strong> collection system. EBMUD and the City, however,<br />
do have legally binding ordinances limiting certain discharges. As part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>, a <strong>Port</strong><br />
specific sewer use ordinance was developed and adopted by the Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong><br />
Commissioners (See Chapter 4 for more detailed information). However, since the<br />
programs and activities recommended in this plan rely primarily on a utilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing EBMUD FOG control program, the legal authority to implement (and continue to<br />
implement) the majority <strong>of</strong> the measures described in this FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong> is currently<br />
available through the existing EBMUD sewer use ordinances.<br />
1 For a more comprehensive list <strong>of</strong> grease receiving facilities in the region, refer to http://baywise.org.<br />
Note that most <strong>of</strong> the receiving facilities have residency restrictions.<br />
May 2010 8-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
Table 8.1 EBMUD Approved Grease Haulers<br />
FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Hauler Phone Number<br />
A-1 Septic Tank Service, Inc. (510) 886-4455<br />
A-1 Septic – Little River (707) 937-0496<br />
Able Septic Tank Service (408) 377-9990<br />
All Valley Environmental, Inc.<br />
(559) 498-8378<br />
or (559) 217-5949<br />
Ameriguard Maintenance Services (800) 347-7876<br />
(3)<br />
Blue Sky Bio-Fuels (510) 868-9229<br />
Burr Plumbing and Pumping (408) 287-2877<br />
Coast Environmental (800) 588-7762<br />
Darling International, Inc. (415) 647-4890<br />
Ernie’s Plumbing (925) 228-5242<br />
Joe’s Farmers Septic and Grease Service (707) 546-3236<br />
Liquid Environmental Solutions <strong>of</strong> California (866) 694-7327<br />
North Coast Sanitary (707) 884-1095<br />
Pioneer Liquid Transport (800) 366-6808<br />
<strong>Port</strong>osan – Santa Rosa (707) 566-2000<br />
R & D Grease Trap Cleaning (707) 632-5827<br />
Roto Rooter Plumbing (510) 483-2324<br />
SRC Pumping Company (916) 363-1342<br />
Trap Recyclers (800) 994-7867<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Source: http://www.ebmud.com<br />
2. As <strong>of</strong> February 27, 2008.<br />
3. The <strong>Port</strong> uses Blue Sky Bio-Fuels to clean and dispose <strong>of</strong> grease collected in its grease<br />
interceptors at the <strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport.<br />
8.2.4 Grease Removal Device Requirements<br />
EBMUD requires FSFs to install grease interceptors (if not already installed) if any <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following three conditions are met:<br />
1. The facility is newly constructed or converts from a non-food handling facility to a food<br />
handling facility;<br />
2. The facility submits plans to perform remodels, additions, alterations, or repairs<br />
valued a $75,000 or more.<br />
May 2010 8-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
3. The facility has caused or contributed to collection system blockages resulting in<br />
maintenance requirements or sewage spills.<br />
Each FSF with a grease interceptor is required through their WDP and EBMUD Ordinance<br />
No. 311A-03 to clean their interceptor on a regular basis to ensure its proper operation. At a<br />
minimum, each interceptor must be cleaned once every three months and the grease must<br />
be disposed <strong>of</strong> by an EBMUD approved grease hauler (see Section 8.2.2).<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> is becoming very proactive in requiring new FSFs in the airport to install large<br />
grease interceptors. A large grease interceptor for the new Chile’s Too was recently<br />
installed. Additionally, grease interceptors will be constructed to service two new food<br />
courts and the new Silver Dragon restaurant. This approach is consistent with the EBMUD<br />
interceptor requirements and the intent <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs.<br />
8.2.5 Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices<br />
EBMUD has developed nine separate BMPs related to FOG. The BMPs are summarized in<br />
Table 8.2 and are developed primarily for FSFs, which are the primary discharges <strong>of</strong> FOG<br />
within the <strong>Port</strong> service area. Certain BMPs, however, do have a more universal<br />
applicability. A flyer containing the information presented in Table 8.2 is also available on<br />
the EBMUD website.<br />
8.2.6 Inspection and Enforcement Procedures<br />
In order to avoid redundancy and save time and cost to the <strong>Port</strong>, FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong><br />
recommends that all FOG inspection and enforcement actions be completed by EBMUD<br />
through their existing FOG control program. A partnership with <strong>Port</strong> personnel may be<br />
required at the Airport and Maritime facilities since security clearance requirements could<br />
hinder EBMUD personnel from performing this function. <strong>Port</strong> staff could take on<br />
responsibility for inspecting facilities at the Airport or Maritime areas, or escort EBMUD staff<br />
on these inspections.<br />
8.2.6.1<br />
Inspection<br />
The inspection procedures are based on a system-wide monitoring approach with<br />
increased monitoring targeted at known “hot spot” areas, as summarized below:<br />
• Hot spot areas. For this group <strong>of</strong> inspections, the <strong>Port</strong> identifies the locations <strong>of</strong><br />
grease-related SSOs or blockages to EBMUD. EBMUD then schedules targeted<br />
inspections for dischargers upstream <strong>of</strong> the “hot spot” to identify the most likely<br />
source <strong>of</strong> the problem. Accelerated interceptor maintenance schedules or interceptor<br />
installations are then required as necessary to mitigate the issue.<br />
• Non-hotspot areas. Inspection is performed routinely at all FSFs during the permit<br />
period (at least once during each permit period). EBMUD inspectors verify that<br />
required routine maintenance for grease traps and interceptors is being performed in<br />
May 2010 8-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
accordance with program standards. If FSFs are not in compliance with the terms <strong>of</strong><br />
their WDP, accelerated interceptor maintenance schedules or interceptor installations<br />
may then be required as necessary to mitigate the issue.<br />
Table 8.2 Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices for Fats, Oil, and Grease<br />
FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
BMP Reason For BMP Benefits <strong>of</strong> BMP<br />
Train all staff on BMPs. People are more willing to<br />
support an effort if they<br />
understand its basis.<br />
Post “No Grease” signs above<br />
sinks and on the front <strong>of</strong><br />
dishwashers.<br />
Check grease interceptor solids<br />
depth routinely. The combined<br />
thickness <strong>of</strong> the floating grease<br />
and the bottom solids should be<br />
not more than 25 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total interceptor depth.<br />
Collect and recycle waste<br />
cooking oil.<br />
“Dry wipe” pots, pans, and<br />
kitchen equipment before<br />
cleaning.<br />
Maintain a routine grease trap<br />
cleaning schedule.<br />
Use absorbent paper under fryer<br />
baskets.<br />
Use absorbents such as cat litter<br />
or paper towels to pick up oil and<br />
grease spills before mopping.<br />
Signs serve as a constant<br />
reminder for staff working in<br />
kitchens.<br />
Grease interceptor will not meet<br />
performance standards when<br />
solids and floating grease levels<br />
exceed 25 percent.<br />
These actions reduce grease<br />
loading on grease removal<br />
devices and the sewer.<br />
“Dry wiping” will reduce the<br />
grease loading on grease<br />
removal devices and the sewer.<br />
If grease traps are not routinely<br />
cleaned, they do not work<br />
properly and do not prevent<br />
grease from entering the sewer.<br />
If a grease trap is not providing<br />
adequate protection, a grease<br />
interceptor may be required.<br />
This reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
grease during clean up.<br />
Decreases the amount <strong>of</strong> grease<br />
that will be put down the drain.<br />
Trained staff will be more likely to<br />
implement BMPs and work to<br />
reduce grease discharges to the<br />
sewer.<br />
Reminders help minimize grease<br />
discharge to the sewer or grease<br />
removal device.<br />
This will keep grease interceptor<br />
working at peak performance.<br />
This will reduce the frequency<br />
and maintenance costs for<br />
grease removal devices and<br />
reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> grease<br />
entering the drain.<br />
This will reduce the frequency<br />
and maintenance costs for<br />
grease removal devices and<br />
reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> grease<br />
entering the drain.<br />
This reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
grease entering the drain and<br />
protects sewers from grease<br />
blockages and overflows.<br />
This reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
grease entering the drain and<br />
protects sewers from grease<br />
blockages and overflows.<br />
This reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
grease entering the drain and<br />
protects sewers from grease<br />
blockages and overflows.<br />
May 2010 8-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
Table 8.2 Best <strong>Management</strong> Practices for Fats, Oil, and Grease<br />
FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
BMP Reason For BMP Benefits <strong>of</strong> BMP<br />
Do not use emulsifiers or<br />
solvents other than typical dish<br />
washing detergents.<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Source: http://www.ebmud.com<br />
8.2.6.2<br />
Enforcement Actions<br />
Emulsifiers and solvents will<br />
break down grease causing a<br />
problem in the sewer<br />
downstream.<br />
Allows for proper removal <strong>of</strong><br />
grease.<br />
Enforcement actions for non-compliance are defined in Title VI <strong>of</strong> EBMUD Ordinance No.<br />
311A-03, which is based on an escalating (progressive) enforcement structure.<br />
Enforcement actions vary depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> the violation, and can consist <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following:<br />
• Requiring discharger to submit time schedule for completion <strong>of</strong> remedial or preventive<br />
measures;<br />
• Issuance <strong>of</strong> cease and desist orders;<br />
• Cost recovery for damage <strong>of</strong> facilities;<br />
• Termination <strong>of</strong> service;<br />
• Issuance <strong>of</strong> complaints;<br />
• Criminal penalties;<br />
• Civil penalties.<br />
In addition, Ordinance No. 311A-03 provides an appeals process for a discharger who is<br />
subject to the aforementioned enforcement actions.<br />
8.2.6.3<br />
Grease Interceptor Maintenance and Inspection Records<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the EBMUD issued WDPs, each discharger with a grease trap or grease<br />
interceptor is required to keep a record <strong>of</strong> when the grease interceptor was cleaned, who<br />
cleaned it, the volume <strong>of</strong> grease disposed, and where the grease was disposed. These<br />
records should be up to date, saved on file for three years, and be made available to an<br />
EBMUD inspector upon request. An example grease interceptor maintenance sheet is<br />
included in the FOG Control <strong>Plan</strong> (Appendix L).<br />
8.2.7 Service Area FOG Evaluation<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-wide <strong>SSMP</strong>, a service area FOG evaluation was performed, consisting<br />
<strong>of</strong> the following four main elements:<br />
May 2010 8-7<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
• Discussion with <strong>Port</strong> operating staff to identify any known FOG problem areas (or “hot<br />
spots”) within the <strong>Port</strong>;<br />
• Airport Terminal site visit;<br />
• Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection <strong>of</strong> selected sanitary sewer lines within<br />
the <strong>Port</strong> collection system.<br />
This section summarizes the service area FOG evaluation.<br />
8.2.7.1<br />
Consultation <strong>of</strong> Operational Staff<br />
The initial step in conducting a FOG service area evaluation for the <strong>Port</strong> was to seek input<br />
from <strong>Port</strong> operations staff regarding any known FOG “hot spots” or other issues related to<br />
FOG. Examples <strong>of</strong> these issues are areas <strong>of</strong> historical FOG related overflows and sewer<br />
lines that frequently exhibit FOG buildup.<br />
Based on information provided by <strong>Port</strong> staff, the majority <strong>of</strong> sewers that exhibit blockages<br />
associated with FOG buildup are attributable to FSFs located within the <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
International Airport. In fact, <strong>of</strong> the three sanitary sewer “hot spots” identified by <strong>Port</strong> staff,<br />
two are attributable to FOG and are near or adjacent to the airport terminals (see<br />
Section 8.2.8).<br />
8.2.7.2<br />
A site visit was conducted at the <strong>Oakland</strong> International Airport terminals to identify which<br />
FSFs operate in the airport and to verify which FSFs are served, or are planned to be<br />
served, by grease interceptors. It was discovered during the site visit that the <strong>Port</strong> is<br />
becoming very proactive in requiring new FSFs in the airport to install large grease<br />
interceptors. A large grease interceptor for the new Chile’s Too was recently installed.<br />
Additionally, grease interceptors will be constructed to service two new food courts and the<br />
new Silver Dragon restaurant.<br />
8.2.7.3<br />
Airport Terminal Site Visit<br />
CCTV Inspection<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> project, CCTV inspections were performed on selected<br />
sanitary sewer lines within the <strong>Port</strong> collection system. The primary purpose <strong>of</strong> these<br />
inspections was to identify pipeline or manholes with condition problems (e.g., cracked<br />
pipes, tree roots, adverse slope conditions) and to help identify areas with potential<br />
infiltration and inflow (I/I) issues. However, the inspections also helped to determine where<br />
FOG buildup is a problem in the sewers, which may be indicative <strong>of</strong> an issue with an FSF<br />
located upstream <strong>of</strong> the blockage. As the <strong>Port</strong> performs additional CCTV inspections,<br />
additional FOG problem areas may be identified.<br />
May 2010 8-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
8.2.8 FOG Problem Areas<br />
Based on the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the service area FOG evaluation summarized in<br />
Section 8.2.7, two FOG related “hot spots” were identified. These “hot spots” are illustrated<br />
in Figure 8.1 as well as Table 8.3.<br />
The first “hot spot” (No. A-1) is located in a series <strong>of</strong> 6-inch to 10-inch diameter sewers that<br />
service the FSFs located in Airport Terminal 1. The second is located in a series <strong>of</strong> 8-inch<br />
and 10-inch diameter sewers that serve Airport Terminal 2.<br />
May 2010 8-9<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
Legend<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
LS AP911P<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
!( #*<br />
!<br />
!<br />
!<br />
LS AP912P<br />
!( Diversion Structure<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
4''<br />
#* !( !(<br />
! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!( Grease Interceptor/Trap Owner and Maintenance<br />
!( Triturator<br />
!( <strong>Sewer</strong> Ejector<br />
!( Oil Interceptor<br />
!( Oil/Water Separator<br />
Revision Date: May 13, 2010<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
FOG Hot Spots<br />
Hot Spot A-1<br />
LS AP07P<br />
AP15E<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned, <strong>Port</strong> Maintained<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
AP14E<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WAY<br />
!(<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
4''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
LS AP08P<br />
LS AP155P<br />
10''<br />
LS AP06P<br />
#*<br />
JOHN GLENN DIRVE<br />
4''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
<strong>Port</strong> Owned, <strong>Port</strong><br />
Maintained, Out <strong>of</strong> Service<br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
!<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
!( !(<br />
!(<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
!(<br />
!(<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
O<br />
10''<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
#*<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
LS AP02P<br />
Hot Spot A-2<br />
0 500<br />
Feet<br />
1,000<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
NEIL ARMSTRONG WY<br />
15''<br />
12''15''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
4''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
EDWARD WHITE WY<br />
15''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
LS AP137P<br />
#*<br />
LS AP01P<br />
Figure 8.1<br />
FOG Related Sanitary<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> "Hot Spots"<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>
Table 8.3 FOG Related Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> “Hot Spots”<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Hot<br />
Spot<br />
(1)<br />
No. Division<br />
Street<br />
Name<br />
Location<br />
Description<br />
Pipeline<br />
Diameter<br />
(in.)<br />
Suspected<br />
Cause <strong>of</strong><br />
Problem<br />
Recommended<br />
Cleaning<br />
Frequency<br />
A-1 Aviation n/a Terminal 1 6 - 10 FOG Annually<br />
A-2 Aviation n/a s/o Terminal 2 8 - 10 FOG Annually<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Hot Spot Number corresponds to that shown in Figure 8.1.<br />
8.2.9 Source Control Measures<br />
Source control measures are currently implemented through the EBMUD WDP program.<br />
The WDP established strict limits on the amount <strong>of</strong> FOG that can be discharged into the<br />
sanitary sewer system, provided requirements for grease interceptors, and established<br />
enforcement actions for non compliant dischargers.<br />
May 2010 8-11<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch08 (FinalA)
Chapter 9<br />
SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLAN<br />
This chapter provides an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) sanitary sewer system<br />
facilities, identifies and proposes improvements for deficiencies, identifies design criteria,<br />
and provides a list <strong>of</strong> capital improvement projects (CIP) and schedule for improvements.<br />
9.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
9.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires the<br />
following:<br />
a. Each wastewater collection system agency shall establish a process to assess<br />
the current and future capacity requirements for the collection system facilities.<br />
b. Each wastewater collection system agency shall prepare and implement a CIP<br />
to provide hydraulic capacity <strong>of</strong> key sewer system elements under peak flow<br />
conditions.<br />
The RWQCB allows for this element to be waived for collection systems that serve a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 10,000 or less. However, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)<br />
requirements do not allow for such a waiver. Therefore, the <strong>Port</strong> must prepare a <strong>Port</strong><br />
specific <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong> (SECAP).<br />
9.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs), issued by<br />
the SWRCB, requires that the <strong>Port</strong> prepare and implement a CIP that will provide hydraulic<br />
capacity for peak dry weather flows as well as the appropriate design storm or wet weather<br />
event. The <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>) must address, at a minimum, the<br />
following:<br />
a. Evaluation. Actions needed to evaluate those portions <strong>of</strong> the sanitary sewer<br />
system that are experiencing or contributing to a sanitary sewer overflow (SSO)<br />
discharge caused by hydraulic deficiency. The evaluation must provide<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> peak flows (including flows from SSOs that escape from the<br />
system) associated with conditions similar to those causing overflow events,<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> the capacity <strong>of</strong> key system components, hydraulic deficiencies<br />
(including components <strong>of</strong> the system with limiting capacity) and the major<br />
sources that contribute to the peak flows associated with overflow events;<br />
b. Design Criteria. Where design criteria do not exist or are deficient, undertake<br />
the evaluation identified in (a) above to establish appropriate design criteria;<br />
c. Capacity Enhancement Measures. The steps needed to establish a shortand<br />
long-term CIP to address identified hydraulic deficiencies, including<br />
prioritization, alternatives analysis, and schedules. The CIP may include<br />
increases in pipe size, infiltration and inflow (I/I) reduction programs, increases<br />
May 2010 9-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
and redundancy in pumping capacity, and storage facilities. The CIP shall<br />
include an implementation schedule and shall identify sources <strong>of</strong> funding; and<br />
d. Schedule. The Enrollee shall develop a schedule <strong>of</strong> completion dates for all<br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the capital improvement program developed in (a) - (c) above. The<br />
schedule shall be reviewed and updated consistent with the <strong>SSMP</strong> review and<br />
update requirements as described in Section D.14 (<strong>of</strong> the GWDRs).<br />
9.2 SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLAN<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> this project, a <strong>Port</strong> specific SECAP has been developed, which is included in<br />
Appendix M for reference. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the SECAP is to identify capacity deficiencies in<br />
the wastewater collection system, develop feasible alternatives to correct these<br />
deficiencies, and plan the infrastructure that accommodate future wastewater flows. This<br />
section summarizes the major aspects <strong>of</strong> the SECAP as relevant to the specific GWDRs<br />
and RWQCB requirements.<br />
9.2.1 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Criteria<br />
Capacity analysis <strong>of</strong> the wastewater collection system was performed in accordance with<br />
the criteria established in the SECAP. This section summarizes the most important planning<br />
criteria that were used in the SECAP.<br />
9.2.1.1<br />
Gravity <strong>Sewer</strong>s<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> pipe capacities are dependent on many factors, including roughness <strong>of</strong> the pipe, the<br />
maximum allowable depth <strong>of</strong> flow, minimum velocity, and slope <strong>of</strong> pipe. Relevant criteria<br />
are summarized below:<br />
• Manning Coefficient (n). The Manning coefficient 'n' is a friction coefficient and<br />
varies with respect to pipe material, size <strong>of</strong> pipe, depth <strong>of</strong> flow, smoothness <strong>of</strong> pipe<br />
and joints, and extent <strong>of</strong> root intrusion. For sewer pipes, the Manning coefficient<br />
typically ranges between 0.011 and 0.017, with 0.013 being a representative value<br />
used for sewer system planning.<br />
• Flow Depth Criteria (d/D). The primary criterion used to identify capacity deficient<br />
trunk sewers or to size new improvements is the maximum flow depth to pipe<br />
diameter ratio (d/D). The d/D value is defined as the depth (d) <strong>of</strong> flow in a pipe during<br />
peak flow conditions divided by the pipe’s diameter (D).<br />
– Flow Depth for Existing <strong>Sewer</strong>s. Using a conservative d/D ratio when<br />
evaluating existing sewers may lead to unnecessary replacement <strong>of</strong> existing<br />
pipelines. Therefore, a d/D ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.0 was used to evaluate the existing sewer<br />
system for peak wet weather flow (PWWF) (this is typically the maximum hourly<br />
flow in the collection system). If the flow depth was greater than the maximum<br />
allowed, then the sewer was deemed deficient and a larger sewer was<br />
proposed to provide greater flow capacity.<br />
May 2010 9-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
– Flow Depth for New <strong>Sewer</strong>s. When designing new sewers, it is common<br />
practice to adopt variable flow depth criteria for different pipe sizes. Design d/D<br />
ratios typically range from 0.5 to 0.92, with the lower values used for smaller<br />
pipes, which may experience flow peaks greater than design flow or may<br />
experience blockages from debris, paper or rags.<br />
The maximum d/D ratio under the design flow condition depends on the pipe<br />
diameter as shown in Table 9.1.<br />
Table 9.1 Maximum Allowable d/D Ratio for New <strong>Sewer</strong>s<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Pipe Diameter<br />
(in.) Maximum d/D Ratio (at Design Flow)<br />
Less than 12 ≤ 0.50<br />
12 to 18 ≤ 0.67<br />
Larger than 18 ≤ 1.00<br />
• Design Velocities and Minimum Slopes. In order to minimize the settlement <strong>of</strong><br />
sewage solids, gravity sewers should be designed for a minimum velocity <strong>of</strong> 2 feet<br />
per second (fps) (based on roughness coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0.013). At this velocity, the sewer<br />
flow will typically provide self-cleaning for the pipe. Table 9.2 lists the recommended<br />
minimum slopes and their corresponding maximum flows for maintaining self-cleaning<br />
velocities (equal to or greater than 2 fps) when the pipe is flowing at its maximum<br />
depth.<br />
• Lift Stations and Force Mains. A minimum <strong>of</strong> two (2) non-clog, submersible pumps<br />
specifically designed for conveying raw wastewater should be installed in each lift<br />
station. If two pumps are to be installed, each should be capable <strong>of</strong> independently<br />
conveying the design flow with the second pump serving as standby. If three or more<br />
pumps are to be installed, the firm capacity <strong>of</strong> the lift station, which is defined as the<br />
total pumping capacity <strong>of</strong> the lift station less the capacity <strong>of</strong> the largest pump, should<br />
be sufficient to convey the design flow.<br />
Force main piping should be sized to provide a minimum velocity <strong>of</strong> 3 fps at the<br />
design flow rate <strong>of</strong> the lift station and no more than 8 fps. For the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
head loss, the Hazen Williams Equation was used with a C factor <strong>of</strong> 100.<br />
May 2010 9-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
Table 9.2 Minimum Slope for New <strong>Sewer</strong> Pipes<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Pipe Diameter<br />
(in.)<br />
Minimum Slope (1),(2)<br />
Calculated Flow<br />
(2),(3)<br />
at Maximum d/D Criterion<br />
(ft/ft) d/D (cfs) (mgd)<br />
8 0.0033 0.50 0.35 0.23<br />
10 0.0025 0.50 0.55 0.35<br />
12 0.0019 0.67 1.23 0.80<br />
15 0.0014 0.67 1.92 1.24<br />
18 0.0011 0.67 2.77 1.79<br />
21 0.0009 1.00 4.81 3.11<br />
24 0.0008 1.00 6.28 4.06<br />
27 0.0007 1.00 7.95 5.14<br />
30 0.0006 1.00 9.82 6.35<br />
36 0.0006 1.00 16.38 10.59<br />
42 0.0006 1.00 24.71 15.97<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Recommended minimum slope for design flow at maximum d/D and at minimum<br />
velocity <strong>of</strong> 2 ft/s.<br />
2. Manning’s n = 0.013<br />
3. Calculated flow is determined using the minimum slope and the maximum<br />
allowable d/D presented in Table 9.1.<br />
9.2.2 Flow Monitoring Program<br />
Temporary flow monitoring was conducted to assist in the development <strong>of</strong> design flow<br />
criteria, and to correlate actual sewer system flows to the hydraulic model predicted flows.<br />
Flow monitoring data are used to calibrate the wastewater collection system hydraulic<br />
model for dry weather and wet weather flow.<br />
The primary purpose <strong>of</strong> flow monitoring is to measure flow contributions from different areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> the collection system. The flow monitoring period was conducted for approximately eight<br />
weeks from December 10, 2009 through January 26, 2010 at 8 monitoring sites, at<br />
locations selected by Carollo. The meter sites were selected to best model the sewer areas<br />
and multiple sub-areas within the sewer system.<br />
More information regarding the flow monitoring program, including the flow monitoring<br />
results, is provided in Appendix M.<br />
May 2010 9-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
9.2.3 Hydraulic Model Development and Calibration<br />
A wastewater collection system model is a simplified representation <strong>of</strong> the real sewer<br />
system. <strong>Sewer</strong> system models can assess the conveyance capacity for a collection system.<br />
Also, sewer system models can perform “what if” scenarios to assess the impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
additional flows or modifications to the collection system.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong>’s hydraulic model combines information on the physical and operational<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> the wastewater system, and performs calculations to solve a series <strong>of</strong><br />
mathematical equations to simulate flows in pipes. The hydraulic model was developed<br />
based on available data collected from the <strong>Port</strong>’s, City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>’s (City’s), and East Bay<br />
Municipal Utility District’s (EBMUD’s) utility maps, design drawings, lift station summaries,<br />
field surveys, and appropriate assumptions.<br />
Model calibration is a crucial component <strong>of</strong> the hydraulic modeling effort. Calibrating the<br />
model to match data collected during the flow-monitoring program ensures the most<br />
accurate results possible. The calibration process consists <strong>of</strong> calibrating to both dry and wet<br />
weather conditions. For this project, both dry and wet weather flow monitoring were<br />
conducted. Dry weather flow (DWF) calibration ensures an accurate depiction <strong>of</strong> base<br />
wastewater flow generated within the study area. The wet weather flow (WWF) calibration<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> calibrating the hydraulic model to a specific storm event to quantify the peak and<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> I/I into the sewer system. The amount <strong>of</strong> I/I is essentially the difference between<br />
the WWF and DWF components.<br />
A detailed summary <strong>of</strong> the model calibration process, including the results <strong>of</strong> the model<br />
calibration, is included in Appendix M for reference.<br />
9.2.4 Evaluation<br />
Following the dry and wet weather flow calibration, a capacity analysis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> collection<br />
system was performed. The capacity analysis entailed identifying areas in the sewer<br />
system where flow restrictions occur or where pipe capacity is insufficient to convey design<br />
flows. <strong>Sewer</strong>s that lack sufficient capacity to convey design flows could produce backwater<br />
effects in the collection system and potentially cause SSOs. The sewer system was<br />
evaluated based on planning criteria presented in Section 9.2.1 and Appendix M.<br />
For existing conditions, the capacity analysis consisted <strong>of</strong> applying the 10-year, 24-hour<br />
design storm to the existing average day flow (ADF) to simulate the peak wet weather, or<br />
design, flow condition. This is the maximum hourly flow that is expected to occur in the<br />
collection system. <strong>Sewer</strong>s with flows exceeding the maximum d/D under design flow<br />
conditions were identified and improvement projects to mitigate existing capacity<br />
deficiencies were developed. This process was then repeated for the anticipated flow<br />
conditions at year 2030.<br />
May 2010 9-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
There is a significant I/I response throughout the <strong>Port</strong>’s wastewater collection system, which<br />
leads to design flow peaking factors greater than the industry standard in most locations. In<br />
general, though, the majority <strong>of</strong> sewers in the <strong>Port</strong> are currently sized with sufficient<br />
capacity to convey existing design flows. This assumes, however, that the existing sewers<br />
are free <strong>of</strong> sediment buildup, fats, oil, and grease (FOG) build up, large debris, and other<br />
capacity limiting materials. Excessive build up in a sewer will restrict flow, which can lead to<br />
sewer backups and SSOs in severe cases.<br />
9.2.5 Capacity Enhancement Measures<br />
Figure 9.1 illustrates the proposed sewer improvements required to correct existing<br />
deficiencies and to accommodate future growth in the <strong>Port</strong>. This section summarizes the<br />
projects shown on Figure 9.1, while Table 9.3 contains specific details related to each<br />
project.<br />
9.2.5.1<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> sewers within the <strong>Port</strong> contain sufficient capacity to accommodate existing<br />
and future design flows without exceeding the established capacity criteria. There are a few<br />
exceptions where existing sewers will need to be replaced by larger diameter sewers, or<br />
parallel sewers will need to be constructed to bypass flow around hydraulically deficient<br />
sewers. The decision as to whether a particular sewer should be replaced or a parallel<br />
sewer constructed should be made during the preliminary design phase. This study<br />
assumes that deficient sewers will be replaced.<br />
9.2.5.2<br />
Pipeline Capacity Improvements<br />
Lift Station Replacement or Rehabilitation<br />
Visual inspection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer lift stations was performed on March 5 and 6,<br />
2010 as part <strong>of</strong> this study. More detail is provided in Appendix M.<br />
Lift station replacement or rehabilitation will be necessary to maintain proper operation <strong>of</strong><br />
existing facilities and to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Protection Agency’s<br />
(EPA’s) Administrative Order. Therefore, we assumed that each lift station in the <strong>Port</strong> would<br />
be rehabilitated or replaced by the year 2030 and beyond. The rehabilitation and<br />
replacement projects were phased considering the findings <strong>of</strong> the visual inspections such<br />
that the costs associated with these projects were distributed as evenly as possible through<br />
year 2030 and beyond. Required capacities for each lift station are identified for each lift<br />
station in Table 9.3, based on the requirement that each lift station be equipped with<br />
sufficient firm capacity to pump the design flow.<br />
May 2010 9-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
4''<br />
4''<br />
BAY BRIDGE<br />
LS C07P<br />
4''<br />
Legend<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
7TH ST<br />
!<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
Existing Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Pipelines*<br />
6''<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
*Note: Only <strong>Port</strong> modeled<br />
sewers are shown.<br />
Revision Date: April 23, 2010<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
LS-PORT-3<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
I - 80<br />
LS C08P<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
3''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
!<br />
LS D05P<br />
<strong>Port</strong>s America<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
Proposed Improvements<br />
Lift Station<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
Phase 1 (2010 - 2015)<br />
Phase 2 (2016 - 2020)<br />
Phase 3 (2021 - 2025)<br />
Phase 4 (2026 - 2030)<br />
Phase 5 (2030 +)<br />
5''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
Pipelines<br />
I - 80<br />
I - 80<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
! ! !<br />
#*<br />
! !<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! !<br />
! ! !<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
12"<br />
P-1<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
#*<br />
LS D04P<br />
!<br />
DUNKIRK ST<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
P-2<br />
!<br />
4''<br />
15"<br />
10''<br />
#*#*<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
LS D06P<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
FERRY ST<br />
P-1<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
LS D10P<br />
#*<br />
#*<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
LS D03P<br />
Phase 1 (2010 - 2015)<br />
Phase 2 (2016 - 2020)<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
6''<br />
! !! ! !<br />
!"c$<br />
8"<br />
RR-6<br />
4''<br />
Required Improvements by Others<br />
Phase 1 (2010 - 2015)<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
21''<br />
8''<br />
18''<br />
18''<br />
27"<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
3''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
RR-5<br />
4''<br />
21''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
LS D02P<br />
I - 80<br />
LS AB148P<br />
10''<br />
#* #*<br />
LS B31P<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
I - 80<br />
! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
! !<br />
#* #* #*<br />
PIER ST<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
8''<br />
30''<br />
6''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
EBMUD LS<br />
8''<br />
Base Map<br />
BURMA ROAD<br />
LS AB663P<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
<strong>Port</strong>s America<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
CHUNG KING ST<br />
4''<br />
#* #*<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
To EBMUD<br />
Interceptor<br />
#*<br />
LS D01P<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
O<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
BAY ST<br />
! ! ! ! !<br />
14TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
10TH ST<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
3''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
0 750<br />
Feet<br />
1,500<br />
7TH ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
#* #*<br />
BATTAN AVE<br />
CORREGIDOR AVE<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
! !<br />
#* #*<br />
!<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
FERRO ST<br />
I - 80<br />
W GRAND AVE<br />
8'' 6''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
! !<br />
!<br />
ALASKA ST<br />
17TH STREET<br />
6''<br />
10''<br />
LS AB018P<br />
WAKE AVE<br />
LS AB836P<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
12''<br />
TULAGI ST<br />
PINE ST<br />
WOOD ST<br />
To WWTP<br />
9TH ST<br />
SHOREY ST<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
MARITIME ST<br />
PINE ST<br />
%&t(<br />
10TH ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
I - 80<br />
12TH ST<br />
11TH ST<br />
GRAND AVENUE<br />
LEWIS ST<br />
13TH ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
EBMUD LS<br />
MIDDLE HARBOR RD<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
WAKE AVENUE<br />
HENRY ST<br />
3RD ST<br />
#*<br />
14TH ST<br />
To City<br />
Collection<br />
<strong>System</strong><br />
! ! !<br />
CHESTER ST.<br />
FERRO ST<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
Figure 9.1<br />
Proposed Capital<br />
Improvements (1 <strong>of</strong> 2)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
8''<br />
WOOD ST<br />
18TH ST<br />
7TH ST<br />
5TH ST<br />
8''<br />
WAKE AVE<br />
CYPRESS ST
POND<br />
DIKE ROAD<br />
Legend<br />
HARBOR PARKWAY<br />
HARBOR BAY PKWY<br />
LS AP926P<br />
Existing Collection <strong>System</strong><br />
#* Lift Station<br />
Pipelines*<br />
Gravity Main<br />
! ! ! ! ! Force Main<br />
#*<br />
4''<br />
*Note: Only <strong>Port</strong> modeled sewers are shown.<br />
Revision Date: April 23, 2010<br />
4''<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
4''<br />
LS AP911P<br />
4''<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
#*<br />
!<br />
LS AP912P<br />
!<br />
!<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
!<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
Air Sally<br />
8''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
Proposed Improvements<br />
#*<br />
Lift Station<br />
#* Phase 1 (2010 - 2015)<br />
#* Phase 2 (2016 - 2020)<br />
EARHART RD<br />
8''<br />
LS AP881P<br />
! !<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
#*<br />
! ! ! !<br />
GRUMMAN ST<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
LS AP07P<br />
AP15E<br />
#*<br />
#* #*<br />
#*<br />
RR-4<br />
4"<br />
AP14E<br />
10''<br />
12''<br />
RYAN ST<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
BENSON ST<br />
EARHART RD<br />
OLD EARHART RD<br />
15''<br />
6''<br />
ALAN SHEPARD WAY<br />
4''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
4''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
14''<br />
FAIRCHILD ST<br />
15"<br />
LS AP155P<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
LS AP08P<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
#* Phase 3 (2021 - 2025)<br />
#* Phase 4 (2026 - 2030)<br />
#* Phase 5 (2030 +)<br />
0 500<br />
Feet<br />
1,000<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
CONVAIR ST<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
LANGLEY ST<br />
WRIGHT ST<br />
RR-2<br />
#*<br />
EARHART RD<br />
JOHN GLENN DR<br />
LS AP06P<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
10''<br />
6''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
3''<br />
Pipelines<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
12''<br />
10''<br />
10''<br />
10"<br />
10''<br />
! ! ! !<br />
15"<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
RR-3<br />
#*<br />
RR-2<br />
8''<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
12''<br />
6''<br />
8''<br />
6''<br />
#*<br />
NEIL ARMSTRONG WY<br />
8'' 8'' 8''<br />
6''<br />
LS AP02P<br />
Phase 1 (2010 - 2015)<br />
Phase 2 (2016 - 2020)<br />
Base Map<br />
RR-1<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
O<br />
EBMUD LS<br />
15"<br />
12''<br />
8''<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
To EBMUD Interceptor<br />
6''<br />
4''<br />
#*<br />
12''<br />
PARDEE LN<br />
6''<br />
SWAN WAY<br />
15"<br />
CAPWELL DR<br />
EARHART RD<br />
RR-1<br />
15''<br />
8''<br />
#*<br />
EDWARD WHITE WAY<br />
8''<br />
LS AP137P<br />
EDGEWATER DR<br />
PARDEE DR<br />
I - 880<br />
ROLAND WAY<br />
DOOLITTLE DR<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
12''<br />
LEFT DR<br />
AIRPORT DR<br />
LS AP01P<br />
Figure 9.1<br />
Proposed Capital<br />
Improvements (2 <strong>of</strong> 2)<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
%&t(<br />
HEGENBURGER RD<br />
OAKPORT ST<br />
98TH AVE
Table 9.3 Capital Improvement Projects<br />
Table 9.3 <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Table 9.3 <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Project Length/Size and Cost Capital Improvement Phasing<br />
Ex. Size/ New Size/ Replace/<br />
Capital<br />
Improvement Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5<br />
Improv. Type <strong>of</strong> Diam. Diam. New Length Cost (2),(3)<br />
2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2030 +<br />
ID Improvement Description/Street Description/Limits (in) (in) (ft) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)<br />
Aviation Collection <strong>System</strong> Improvements<br />
Lift Station Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
LS-AIRSALLY Lift Station LS-Air Sally Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.17 mgd - 0.34 mgd Replace - $ 653,000<br />
$ 653,000<br />
LS-AP01P Lift Station LS-AP01P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 1.0 mgd - 1.50 mgd Replace - $ 1,188,000<br />
$ 1,188,000<br />
LS-AP02P Lift Station LS-AP02P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.17 mgd - 0.34 mgd Replace - $ 653,000<br />
$ 653,000<br />
LS-AP06P Lift Station LS-AP06P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP07P Lift Station LS-AP07P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP08P Lift Station LS-AP08P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP14E Lift Station LS-AP14E Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP15E Lift Station LS-AP15E Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP137P Lift Station LS-AP137P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP155P Lift Station LS-AP155P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP881P Lift Station LS-AP881P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP911P Lift Station LS-AP911P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP912P Lift Station LS-AP912P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-AP926P Lift Station LS-AP926P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
Pipeline Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
pw:/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Cost Estimate/CIP.xls/Table 9.3<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000 $ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000 $ 350,000<br />
RR-1 Pipe Earhart Road Swan Way to Hegenberger Road 15 15 Replace 1,800 $ 580,000<br />
$ 580,000<br />
RR-2 Pipe Earhart Road Swan Way to Cooke Street 15 15 Replace 2,200 $ 709,000<br />
$ 709,000<br />
RR-3 Pipe <strong>Oakland</strong> Airport Parking Lot Airport Road to LS AP02P force main 10 10 Replace 900 $ 193,000 $ 193,000<br />
RR-4 Pipe Terminal 1 at Gate 9 Terminal 1 Gate 9 Pipeline Replacement 3 4 Replace 145 $ 28,000 $ 28,000<br />
- Pipe Various Locations <strong>Sewer</strong> Main Rehab./Replac. Program. Average Size is 10". 10 10 Replace 35,300 $ 7,587,000 $ 1,517,400 $ 1,517,400 $ 1,517,400 $ 1,517,400 $ 1,517,400<br />
Infiltration/Inflow Reduction<br />
- Pipe I/I Reduction Program Assumed 13,200 LF <strong>of</strong> 24" Pipe Constructed - 24 New 13,200 $ 5,571,000 $ 1,114,200 $ 1,114,200 $ 1,114,200 $ 1,114,200 $ 1,114,200<br />
Maritime Collection <strong>System</strong> Improvements<br />
Pipeline Capacity Improvements<br />
Aviation Collection <strong>System</strong> Subtotal $ 21,012,000 $ 3,552,600 $ 5,320,600 $ 2,981,600 $ 4,822,600 $ 4,334,600<br />
P-1 Pipe 7th Street Navy Roadway to Ferry Street 12 15 Replace 450 $ 145,000 $ 145,000<br />
P-2 Pipe Ferry Street 7th Street to <strong>Port</strong>s America Boundary 8 12 Replace 700 $ 180,000 $ 180,000<br />
Lift Station Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
LS-AB018P Lift Station LS-AB018P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 1.3 mgd - 1.90 mgd Replace - $ 1,383,000<br />
$ 1,383,000<br />
LS-AB148P Lift Station LS-AB148P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.16 mgd - 0.32 mgd Replace - $ 644,000 $ 644,000<br />
LS-AB663P Lift Station LS-AB663P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.25 mgd - 0.50 mgd Replace - $ 725,000 $ 725,000<br />
LS-AB836P Lift Station LS-AB836P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000 $ 350,000<br />
LS-C07P Lift Station LS-C07P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.35 mgd - 0.70 mgd Replace - $ 814,000<br />
$ 814,000<br />
LS-C08P Lift Station LS-C08P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.60 mgd - 1.20 mgd Replace - $ 1,047,000<br />
$<br />
1,047,000
Table 9.3 Capital Improvement Projects<br />
Table 9.3 <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Table 9.3 <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Project Length/Size and Cost Capital Improvement Phasing<br />
Ex. Size/ New Size/ Replace/<br />
Capital<br />
Improvement Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5<br />
Improv. Type <strong>of</strong> Diam. Diam. New Length Cost (2),(3)<br />
2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2030 +<br />
ID Improvement Description/Street Description/Limits (in) (in) (ft) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)<br />
LS-D01P Lift Station LS-D01P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-D02P Lift Station LS-D02P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-D03P Lift Station LS-D03P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-D04P Lift Station LS-D04P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-D05P Lift Station LS-D05P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
pw:/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Cost Estimate/CIP.xls/Table 9.3<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
LS-D06P Lift Station LS-D06P Rehab./Replac. Project Firm Capacity = 0.40 mgd - 0.80 mgd Replace - $ 860,000<br />
$ 860,000<br />
LS-D10P Lift Station LS-D10P Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
LS-PORT-3 Lift Station LS-PORT-3 Rehab./Replac. Project Capacity to be Determined in Preliminary Design Phase (4)<br />
Pipeline Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
- Note 4 Replace - $ 350,000<br />
$ 350,000<br />
RR-5 Pipe Maritime Street 7th Street to 1,000' south <strong>of</strong> 7th Street 24/27 27 Replace 1,500 $ 791,000 $ 791,000<br />
RR-5A Pipe/Casing (1)<br />
Maritime Street Casing under Railroad Tracks 27 27/48 Replace 200 $ 657,000 $ 657,000<br />
RR-6 Pipe Near 7th Street 6" Pipe Serving Buildings D-501, D-502, and D-504 6 8 Replace 600 $ 102,000<br />
$ 102,000<br />
- Pipe Various Locations <strong>Sewer</strong> Main Rehab./Replac. Program. Average Size is 10". 10 10 Replace 71,700 $ 15,412,000 $ 3,082,400 $ 3,082,400 $ 3,082,400 $ 3,082,400 $ 3,082,400<br />
Infiltration/Inflow Reduction<br />
- Pipe I/I Reduction Program Assumed 26,800 LF <strong>of</strong> 24" Pipe Constructed - 24 New 26,800 $ 11,312,000 $ 2,262,400 $ 2,262,400 $ 2,262,400 $ 2,262,400 $ 2,262,400<br />
Maritime Collection <strong>System</strong> Subtotal $ 36,872,000 $ 8,836,800 $ 7,470,800 $ 8,127,800 $ 6,391,800 $ 6,044,800<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Proposed casings size and carrier pipe size.<br />
2. Baseline Construction Cost plus 25% to account for unforeseen events and unknown conditions.<br />
3. Estimated Construction Cost plus 30% to cover other costs including Engineering, Construction <strong>Management</strong>, and Project Administration.<br />
4. To account for site specific factors that are beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this planning level study, the required capacity for the <strong>Port</strong>'s small lift stations should be determined in the preliminary design phase <strong>of</strong> each rehabilitation/replacement project.<br />
5. Lift station capacities refer to the total capacity unless noted otherwise.<br />
6. Costs are based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for San Francisco <strong>of</strong> 9,728 (March 2010).<br />
CIP Total $ 57,884,000 $ 12,389,400 $ 12,791,400 $ 11,109,400 $ 11,214,400 $ 10,379,400
9.2.5.3<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> Main Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
Closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection <strong>of</strong> selected sewers in the Aviation and Maritime<br />
collection systems were performed as part <strong>of</strong> this study. Figure 9.1 shows the locations <strong>of</strong><br />
sewers targeted as rehabilitation and replacement projects based on the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CCTV inspections. Depending on the structural condition <strong>of</strong> each pipeline, slip lining or<br />
cured-in-place pipe lining could be installed, or the pipeline could be replaced. The decision<br />
to rehabilitate or replace a given pipeline should be determined during the preliminary<br />
design phase. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this study, however, we assumed that each pipeline<br />
requiring a condition upgrade would be replaced.<br />
As the <strong>Port</strong> performs CCTV inspection <strong>of</strong> sewers not performed as part <strong>of</strong> this study,<br />
additional pipelines will likely be identified as candidates for rehabilitation or replacement.<br />
We assumed that in addition to those pipelines identified in Figure 9.1, the <strong>Port</strong> would<br />
implement various rehabilitation and replacement projects through the year 2030 and<br />
beyond. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the initial CCTV work performed as part <strong>of</strong> this study,<br />
approximately 56-percent <strong>of</strong> the pipelines inspected were targeted as candidates for<br />
condition upgrades. Assuming that the remaining sewers in the collection that will be<br />
inspected will require condition upgrades at the same rate as those inspected in this study<br />
(about 56 percent), roughly 107,000 feet (20.3 miles) <strong>of</strong> sewers in the <strong>Port</strong> could<br />
conceivably require condition upgrades. 107,000 feet is possibly the maximum length <strong>of</strong><br />
sewers that would be upgraded due to condition assessment. It is likely that the actual<br />
number would be less than 56 percent <strong>of</strong> future sewers, but the <strong>Port</strong> should be prepared for<br />
this outcome.<br />
Due to the availability <strong>of</strong> funds, however, it is unrealistic that the <strong>Port</strong> could implement<br />
rehabilitation and replacement projects for all sewers that could potentially require condition<br />
upgrades through 2030 and beyond. For this reason, the capital projects assumed that the<br />
<strong>Port</strong> would replace approximately 50,000 feet (9.5 miles) <strong>of</strong> sewers through year 2030 and<br />
beyond, distributed to the Aviation and Maritime divisions based on the total length <strong>of</strong> pipe<br />
within each division (e.g. Maritime received the greatest allocation <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation and<br />
replacement projects). It was assumed that the designated master developer would<br />
complete all rehabilitation and replacement work within the Commercial/Real Estate<br />
division. Therefore, no sewer capital projects are assumed for Commercial/Real Estate.<br />
The weighted average diameter <strong>of</strong> all sewers in the <strong>Port</strong> is approximately 10-inches.<br />
Therefore, in order to develop the capital program costs, we assumed that 50,000 feet <strong>of</strong><br />
10-inch diameter sewer would be replaced through 2030 and beyond.<br />
9.2.5.4<br />
Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Program<br />
The flow monitoring data indicate that there is a significant I/I response throughout the <strong>Port</strong><br />
collection system. To meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the EPA’s administrative order, it is<br />
recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> implement an I/I reduction program, focused on identifying the<br />
May 2010 9-11<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
main sources <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f into the collection system. Disconnecting storm drain cross<br />
connections and eliminating other I/I sources will reduce peak flows into the system.<br />
Costs associated with an I/I reduction program can vary greatly and are difficult to estimate<br />
in the planning stage. Projects could range from closing open clean-outs to constructing<br />
new storm drain pipelines to disconnect storm drain inlets from the sanitary sewer. To<br />
develop the capital improvement projects associated with an I/I reduction program, we<br />
assumed that roughly 25,000 feet (4.7 miles) <strong>of</strong> 24-inch diameter storm drain pipes would<br />
be constructed through year 2030 and beyond. As with the sewer main rehabilitation and<br />
replacement projects, the I/I reduction projects were distributed to the Aviation and Maritime<br />
divisions based on the total length <strong>of</strong> pipe within each division.<br />
9.2.5.5<br />
Operations and Maintenance (<strong>Sewer</strong> Main Cleaning/CCTV)<br />
CCTV inspection and surveys <strong>of</strong> selected sewers in the <strong>Port</strong> have revealed that there are<br />
locations in the <strong>Port</strong> where sediment, FOG, large debris, and other materials have been<br />
deposited. This is primarily a maintenance issue; however, a significant amount <strong>of</strong> sediment<br />
build up or the presence <strong>of</strong> objects (e.g. concrete material) can reduce the capacity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
sewer mains, which may clog sewers and result in SSOs. To reduce this potential, it is<br />
recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> increase the cleaning frequency <strong>of</strong> those pipelines which have<br />
been identified to have sediment deposits, root intrusions, or other maintenance issues.<br />
As discussed in Chapter 5, a reasonable goal for the <strong>Port</strong> is to proactively clean roughly 20<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the total length <strong>of</strong> its gravity sewers each year, thus providing a rotation in which<br />
every sewer main is cleaned at least once every five (5) years. This equates to roughly 7<br />
miles <strong>of</strong> sewer mains cleaned annually.<br />
It is further recommended that sewer mains and manholes receive a CCTV inspection<br />
every ten (10) years, following cleaning. Since sewer cleaning should occur every 5 years<br />
and CCTV work every 10 years, the CCTV work should happen every other occasion that a<br />
sewer is cleaned. This will help to verify that the cleaning was properly performed and to<br />
identify structural and condition problems in the sewers and manholes.<br />
To develop the maintenance cost impacts associated with a sewer main cleaning/CCTV<br />
program, we assumed that the <strong>Port</strong> would spend roughly $300,000 per year in the first,<br />
third, and fifth round <strong>of</strong> sewer main cleaning and CCTV program. This equates to<br />
$1,500,000 per phase for the first, third, and fifth round <strong>of</strong> sewer cleaning (Phase 1, 3, and<br />
5). Because CCTV inspections are recommended on a ten (10) year schedule, we<br />
assumed that the <strong>Port</strong> would spend roughly $200,000 per year for the second and fourth<br />
rounds <strong>of</strong> sewer main cleaning (not accompanied by CCTV). This equates to $1,000,000<br />
per phase for the second and fourth round <strong>of</strong> sewer cleaning (Phase 2 and 4). The<br />
operations and maintenance costs were distributed to each division (e.g., Aviation,<br />
Maritime, and Commercial/Real Estate) based on the total length <strong>of</strong> pipe within each. The<br />
sewer cleaning and CCTV costs are included in Chapter 5 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
May 2010 9-12<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
9.2.6 Schedule<br />
The improvement projects outlined in the SECAP are prioritized based on their urgency to<br />
mitigate existing deficiencies and to correct pipeline or lift station condition problems. It is<br />
recommended that improvements to mitigate existing deficiencies be constructed as soon<br />
as possible. The projects were grouped into the following timeframes:<br />
• Years 2011 through 2015<br />
• Years 2016 through 2020<br />
• Years 2021 through 2025<br />
• Years 2026 through 2030<br />
• Post 2030<br />
Each CIP is itemized by phase in Table 9.3 and a summary by phase is included in<br />
Table 9.4 for reference. Table 9.5 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the highest priority improvement<br />
projects.<br />
Table 9.4 Capital Improvement Cost Summary<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Improvement Type<br />
2011-15<br />
($, mill.)<br />
2016-20<br />
($, mill.)<br />
Implementation Phase<br />
2021-25<br />
($, mill.)<br />
2026-30<br />
($, mill.)<br />
2030 +<br />
($, mill.)<br />
Total<br />
($, mill.)<br />
Pipeline Capacity 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3<br />
Lift Station<br />
Rehab./Replace.<br />
2.4 3.4 3.1 3.2 2.4 14.6<br />
Pipeline<br />
Rehab./Replace.<br />
Infiltration/Inflow<br />
Reduction<br />
3.1 3.0 2.2 2.6 2.9 13.8<br />
1.4 1.6 2.2 2.5 2.9 10.6<br />
Total<br />
Notes:<br />
7.2 8.1 7.5 8.4 8.2 39.3<br />
1. Costs are based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for San<br />
Francisco <strong>of</strong> 9,728 (March 2010).<br />
May 2010 9-13<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch09 (FinalA)
Table 9.5 High Priority Improvements Summary<br />
Table 9.5 <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Table 9.5 <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Capital Improv.<br />
Improv. Proposed Length Cost (1),(2)<br />
ID Size (ft) ($) Comments<br />
Pipeline Capacity Improvements<br />
P-1 15-in. 450 $145,000 Results from the capacity evaluation indicated that the existing 12-inch sewer is<br />
unable to convey the design flow without exceeding the established flow depth<br />
criterion. Installing new a new 15-inch diameter sewer will mitigate the capacity<br />
deficiency.<br />
P-2 12-in. 700 $180,000 Results from the capacity evaluation indicated that the existing 8-inch sewer is<br />
unable to convey the design flow without exceeding the established flow depth<br />
criterion. Installing new a new 12-inch diameter sewer will mitigate the capacity<br />
deficiency.<br />
Lift Station Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
LS-AP911P Note 3 - $350,000 Both pumps/motors experience bearing problems approximately every 2 years.<br />
There is a significant amount <strong>of</strong> corrosion under the gas jumper, which was<br />
installed to allow the hydrogen sulfide gas to escape the structure. The placement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the jumper is causing the structure's lid to corrode. One <strong>of</strong> the effluent pipes<br />
above ground and the pipes in the dry well have a large amount <strong>of</strong> noticeable<br />
corrosion. It appears that the dry well during wet weather can fill with water, which<br />
is causing rust buildup.<br />
LS-AP926P Note 3 - $350,000 The structure’s lid and pipes show signs <strong>of</strong> corrosion. The lid has no vent and had<br />
to be replaced two years ago. A vent needs to be added as the lid already shows<br />
a significant amount <strong>of</strong> corrosion.<br />
LS-AB148P 0.32 mgd - $644,000 Lift Station AB148P has only one operating pump, as the second pump has burnt<br />
out. Should the remaining pump fail during a significant storm event, a SSO could<br />
occur. In addition, the outgoing pipes and valves located in a dry pit on the side <strong>of</strong><br />
the pump building are severely corroded.<br />
LS-AB663P 0.50 mgd - $725,000 This lift station consists <strong>of</strong> two submersible pumps. One pump currently runs at 65<br />
amps, which is too high so it has been taken <strong>of</strong>f line. In the past, vandals cut and<br />
stole wire from the lift station. Repairs were subsequently made; however, the<br />
auto control system still does not work. Because <strong>of</strong> this, O&M staff comes out<br />
once a week to the lift station and manually turns on the one working pump until<br />
the water level in the wet well drops to its low level.
Table 9.5 High Priority Improvements Summary<br />
Table 9.5 <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Table 9.5 <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Capital Improv.<br />
Improv. Proposed Length Cost (1),(2)<br />
ID Size (ft) ($) Comments<br />
LS-AB836P Note 3 - $350,000 The discharge pipe for this lift station is separated from the pump due to a<br />
corroded base and is currently supported by a few pieces <strong>of</strong> lumber. The effluent<br />
pipe shows a significant amount <strong>of</strong> decay and corrosion.<br />
Pipeline Rehabilitation and Replacement<br />
RR-3 10-in. 900 $193,000 CCTV inspection <strong>of</strong> the 10-inch diameter sewer underneath the OAK terminal<br />
parking lot revealed several locations with pipeline fractures or voids with visible<br />
soil.<br />
RR-4 4-in. 145 $28,000 In 2009, there was a SSO located near Gate 9, which was released from an<br />
overhead exterior sanitary sewer line when a cleanout was opened to clear a<br />
clog. The sanitary sewer line has been found to lack adequate fall and also<br />
appears to be flat or has reverse grade in certain reaches. Consequently, the line<br />
does not scour well and needs to be cleared periodically. Maintenance is difficult<br />
because the sewer line hangs nine feet in the air and there are no clean outs from<br />
the terminal floor above the line.<br />
To mitigate the issues mentioned above, the <strong>Port</strong> has planned to replace the<br />
existing 3-inch diameter sewer line with a 4-inch diameter cast iron pipe that<br />
meets minimum slope requirements and has clean-outs every 35 feet for service<br />
from the floor area above.<br />
RR-5 27-in. 1,500 $791,000 CCTV inspection <strong>of</strong> the 27-inch diameter trunk sewer in Maritime Street south <strong>of</strong><br />
7th Street in the harbor area revealed severe structural deficiencies that should<br />
be addressed as a very high priority condition upgrade project. In several<br />
locations throughout the pipeline segment, the pipeline has experienced interior<br />
lining deterioration to a point where the structural reinforcing steel has become<br />
visible.<br />
RR-5A<br />
Notes:<br />
27/48-in. 200 $657,000 Improvement RR-5 will require casing be installed under the railroad tracks.<br />
Project RR-5A represents the costs <strong>of</strong> installing the casing.<br />
1. Baseline Construction Cost plus 25% to account for unforeseen events and unknown conditions.<br />
2. Estimated Construction Cost plus 30% to cover other costs including Engineering, Construction <strong>Management</strong>, and Project Administration.<br />
3. To account for site specific factors that are beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this planning level study, the required capacity for the <strong>Port</strong>'s small lift stations<br />
3. should be determined in the preliminary design phase <strong>of</strong> each rehabilitation/replacement project.
Chapter 10<br />
MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND<br />
PROGRAM MODIFICAITONS<br />
This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the steps to be taken by the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) to<br />
evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>) and update it<br />
should improvements be necessary or desirable.<br />
10.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
10.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency shall monitor the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> each <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
element, and update and modify <strong>SSMP</strong> elements to keep them current, accurate, and<br />
available for audit as appropriate.<br />
10.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
that the City shall:<br />
a. Maintain relevant information that can be used to establish and prioritize<br />
appropriate <strong>SSMP</strong> activities;<br />
b. Monitor the implementation and, where appropriate, measure the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> each element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>;<br />
c. Assess the success <strong>of</strong> the preventative maintenance program;<br />
d. Update program elements, as appropriate, based on monitoring or performance<br />
evaluations; and<br />
e. Identify and illustrate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO) trends, including<br />
frequency, location, and volume.<br />
10.2 MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM<br />
MODIFICATION<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs, the <strong>Port</strong> is required to perform periodic <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits, as<br />
outlined in Chapter 11. The monitoring, measurement, and program modification element <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>SSMP</strong> is closely paired with the program audits element, in that the information<br />
collected as part <strong>of</strong> the monitoring, measurement, and program modification element (such<br />
as SSO trends, etc.) will be used while performing the <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits.<br />
10.2.1 <strong>SSMP</strong> Information Maintenance Program<br />
In order to streamline <strong>SSMP</strong> audits (performed at least once every two years) and updates<br />
(at least once every five years), it is necessary to store and maintain relevant information<br />
related to individual <strong>SSMP</strong> elements so that they can be easily located and accessed in the<br />
May 2010 10-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch10 (FinalA)
future. This may prove difficult given that the <strong>Port</strong> is broken up into several divisions that<br />
operate independently <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />
Recommendations for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> data related to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are provided below:<br />
• Notes Related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>. <strong>Port</strong> staff, during the course <strong>of</strong> their day to day routine,<br />
will likely encounter elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> that will need to be updated (e.g.,<br />
personnel changes, changes in operational conditions, new equipment acquired, etc.)<br />
or areas in which the <strong>SSMP</strong> could be improved. Because <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits are<br />
performed only once every two years, important changes that need to be included in<br />
the <strong>SSMP</strong> may be lost or forgotten. To account for this, Appendix N has been<br />
provided in this document as a blank place holder. The intent <strong>of</strong> Appendix N is that<br />
when <strong>Port</strong> staff identify an important change related to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, they can place<br />
their notes or other relevant documents in the appendix for easy reference at a later<br />
date.<br />
• Computerized Maintenance <strong>Management</strong> <strong>System</strong>. The <strong>Port</strong> uses its computerized<br />
maintenance management system (CMMS) s<strong>of</strong>tware package to track routine and<br />
emergency maintenance activities. When the <strong>Port</strong> performs program audits, the<br />
auditor will work with the Harbor and Aviation Facilities Support Supervisors to obtain<br />
relevant data summaries <strong>of</strong> maintenance work performed during the audit period<br />
broken down between preventative and corrective actions.<br />
• CIP Implementation/Expenditures. When the <strong>Port</strong> performs program audits, the<br />
auditor should work with the Aviation <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Development Supervisor, Aviation<br />
Facilities Manager, Maritime Administrative and Financial Service Supervisor, and the<br />
Harbor Facilities Manager to obtain summaries <strong>of</strong> capital improvement projects (CIP)<br />
and other sanitary sewer facility expenditures during the audit period. Additionally,<br />
projects identified in the <strong>Port</strong> CIP (which will be prepared as part <strong>of</strong> Technical Service<br />
Order No. 2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> Development project) shall be reviewed to<br />
determine which have been implemented as scheduled.<br />
• CCTV Video. As part <strong>of</strong> Technical Service Order No. 2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
Development project, closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections will be performed<br />
on selected <strong>Port</strong> sewers and hyperlinked back into the hydraulic model. As noted in<br />
Chapter 5, it is recommended that the <strong>Port</strong> implement an ongoing CCTV program,<br />
where every sewer is videoed at least once every five years. When new CCTV<br />
inspections are performed, the <strong>Port</strong> should make sure that the videos are included as<br />
hyperlinks into the hydraulic model so that they can be easily reviewed at a later date.<br />
• Hydraulic Model Maintenance. As noted in Chapter 9, a hydraulic computer model<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong> collection system will be created as part <strong>of</strong> Technical Service Order No. 2<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> Development project. As changes are made to the collection<br />
system, the <strong>Port</strong> should update its hydraulic model accordingly. These changes could<br />
include new sewer facilities, changes in land use, or projected sewer flows.<br />
May 2010 10-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch10 (FinalA)
• SSO Data. The overall purpose and intent <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs is to reduce the amount<br />
and severity <strong>of</strong> SSOs. It is critical that the <strong>Port</strong> have available detailed information<br />
regarding SSOs that occur within the <strong>Port</strong> in order to establish whether or not the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> is effective in meeting the intent <strong>of</strong> the WDRs. The new statewide reporting<br />
requirements should help the <strong>Port</strong> to store this information, because the <strong>Port</strong>’s SSO<br />
reports are now maintained on a state run database available through the SWRCB<br />
website 1<br />
. Appendix O also provides a table that can be used by the <strong>Port</strong> to maintain<br />
relevant information pertaining to each SSO as it occurs.<br />
10.2.2 <strong>SSMP</strong> Implementation Monitoring<br />
To accurately gauge the progress <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> and its successes or failures in preventing<br />
SSOs, the <strong>Port</strong> should establish a key staff member, or a group <strong>of</strong> staff members, to<br />
periodically monitor the implementation and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> elements to<br />
determine which <strong>SSMP</strong> elements are being implemented or not implemented, and their<br />
general performance to date. This information will be useful in the preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
program audits (See Chapter 11) to establish overall trends. Notes or records <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monitoring activities should be kept on file, and can be placed in Appendix N as noted in<br />
Section 10.1.1.<br />
10.2.3 Preventative Maintenance Program Evaluation<br />
To accurately gauge the progress <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> and its successes or failures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong><br />
preventative maintenance program, the <strong>Port</strong> should establish a key staff member, or a<br />
group <strong>of</strong> staff members, to periodically review its performance. This information will be<br />
useful in the preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits (Chapter 11). Notes or records <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monitoring activities should be kept on file, and can be placed in Appendix N as noted in<br />
Section 10.1.1.<br />
10.2.4 <strong>SSMP</strong> Program Updates<br />
Updates to the <strong>Port</strong>’s <strong>SSMP</strong> programs will be performed based on the results <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
year program audits discussed in Chapter 11 <strong>of</strong> this report or whenever there are major<br />
changes to the <strong>SSMP</strong>. All program updates and modifications should be approved by the<br />
<strong>Port</strong>’s Legally Responsible Official (LRO), the Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer, and incorporated<br />
into the <strong>SSMP</strong> report, when necessary. If there are major changes to the <strong>SSMP</strong>, it needs to<br />
be re-certified by the <strong>Port</strong>’s LRO on CIWQS. At a minimum, the <strong>Port</strong> shall update and recertify<br />
the <strong>SSMP</strong> once every five (5) years. The <strong>Port</strong> should budget for the costs associated<br />
with the <strong>SSMP</strong> updates.<br />
10.2.5 SSO Trends<br />
In order to optimize the performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer collection system, it is<br />
necessary to identify any SSO trends that may exist. Through the identification <strong>of</strong> such<br />
1 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ciwqs/<br />
May 2010 10-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch10 (FinalA)
trends, the <strong>Port</strong> may find capacity deficiencies, areas <strong>of</strong> the system in need <strong>of</strong> increased<br />
maintenance, SSO or fats, oil, and grease (FOG) “Hot Spots.” Some key performance<br />
indicators that should be considered for tracking by the <strong>Port</strong> are:<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> Service Calls, blockages, and SSOs over a one year period;<br />
• SSO events by cause;<br />
• SSOs by Type (e.g., Category 1 to Surface Water, Category 1 not to Surface Water,<br />
Category 2)<br />
• Volume <strong>of</strong> SSOs and volume contained;<br />
• SSO events by location (e.g., Airport, Harbor, Commercial/Real Estate).<br />
More detailed information regarding SSO trends is presented in Chapter 11 <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
May 2010 10-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch10 (FinalA)
Chapter 11<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> PROGRAM AUDITS<br />
This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the procedures to be used by the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
(<strong>Port</strong>) to perform internal audits.<br />
11.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
11.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires that<br />
each wastewater collection system agency shall conduct an annual audit <strong>of</strong> their <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
which includes any deficiencies and steps to correct them (if applicable), appropriate to the<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the system and the number <strong>of</strong> overflows, and submit a report <strong>of</strong> such audit.<br />
The RWQCB allows this element to be waived for collection systems that serve a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 10,000 or less. However, the SWRCB requirements do not allow for such a<br />
waiver. Therefore, the <strong>Port</strong> must perform program audits.<br />
11.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
The State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs) specify<br />
the following in relation to audits <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>:<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the Enrollee shall conduct periodic internal audits, appropriate to the<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the system and the number <strong>of</strong> sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). At a minimum,<br />
these audits must occur every two years and a report must be kept on file. This audit shall<br />
focus on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> and the Enrollee’s compliance with the <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
requirements identified in this subsection (D.13), including identification <strong>of</strong> any deficiencies<br />
in the <strong>SSMP</strong> and steps to correct them.<br />
11.2 PORT <strong>SSMP</strong> PROGRAM AUDITS WORK PLAN<br />
In accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the GWDRs, the <strong>Port</strong> shall perform periodic<br />
performance audits on its <strong>SSMP</strong>. An <strong>SSMP</strong> Program Audits Work <strong>Plan</strong> has been developed<br />
to provide guidance to the <strong>Port</strong> and is included in this section.<br />
11.2.1 Responsible Party for Program Audit<br />
The <strong>Port</strong>’s legally responsible <strong>of</strong>ficial (LRO), the Water <strong>System</strong>s Engineer, will oversee the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> program audit. He may also designate certain key <strong>Port</strong> staff that<br />
are knowledgeable in the <strong>Port</strong>’s sanitary sewer collection facilities to assist in the audits.<br />
The final audit report shall be reviewed and approved by the <strong>Port</strong>’s Chief Audit Officer.<br />
May 2010 11-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
11.2.2 Audit Frequency<br />
The GWDRs and RWQCB requirements differ with respect to the frequency at which<br />
program audits are required. The GWDRs require that audits be performed, at a minimum,<br />
once every two years and that a copy <strong>of</strong> the audits be kept on file at the <strong>Port</strong> (i.e., no<br />
submission requirements).<br />
The RWQCB, on the other hand, requires that program audits be performed each year, and<br />
that each audit should be submitted to the RWQCB by March 15 <strong>of</strong> each year. However,<br />
the RWQCB allows that agencies serving a population less than 10,000 can waive this<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> element. The <strong>Port</strong>’s current population is estimated to be roughly 8,700 persons (see<br />
Chapter 1). Because the <strong>Port</strong> services a population less than 10,000 people, the <strong>Port</strong> is not<br />
required to submit yearly audit reports to the RWQCB. Therefore, the <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits<br />
should be performed at least once every two years. The <strong>Port</strong> shall maintain a copy <strong>of</strong> each<br />
program audit on file should the SWRCB or RWQCB request a copy.<br />
11.2.3 Audit Procedures<br />
The recommended program audit procedures are broken up into three major categories:<br />
data compilation/summary, operation, and engineering. The <strong>Port</strong>’s LRO will likely be<br />
responsible for coordinating the major aspects <strong>of</strong> the program audit, including relevant<br />
interviews and data collection. This section summarizes the main aspects <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
audit approach. As is true with the <strong>SSMP</strong> in general, the audit procedures should be<br />
updated and modified, as necessary, to improve efficiency or reflect changing operating<br />
conditions.<br />
11.2.3.1 Data Compilation/Summary<br />
The data compilation/summary audit focuses primarily on the following aspects, and is<br />
initiated by the LRO:<br />
• Data Gathering.<br />
– SSO Reports. The LRO should obtain copies <strong>of</strong> all SSO reports and data since<br />
the previous program audit. Data that should be collected include SSO cause,<br />
location and receiving waters (if any portion <strong>of</strong> the spill reached a surface<br />
water), spill volume, volume <strong>of</strong> spill contained, rainfall (if infiltration and inflow<br />
(I/I) is the suspected cause) as discussed in Chapter 10 <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
– Maintenance Records. The LRO should compile all relevant data concerning<br />
the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the system (e.g., number <strong>of</strong> service calls, number <strong>of</strong><br />
blockages, lift station failures/maintenance activities, miles <strong>of</strong> pipe cleaned,<br />
etc.). This information should be obtained from the Harbor and Aviation<br />
Facilities Support Supervisors using the <strong>Port</strong>’s computerized maintenance<br />
management system (CMMS) s<strong>of</strong>tware package. Maintenance work performed<br />
during the audit period should be broken down between preventative and<br />
May 2010 11-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
corrective actions and by the need for the maintenance action (e.g., FOG<br />
blockage, electrical problem, etc.).<br />
– Interviews/Miscellaneous Data Gathering. The LRO should seek feedback<br />
from utilities managers as to which <strong>SSMP</strong> elements work well and which could<br />
be improved upon. The LRO should also gather relevant information necessary<br />
to audit the various elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> to determine which items are<br />
outdated. Examples may include updated names/contact information for<br />
organization chart, recent improvement plans, maps <strong>of</strong> recently abandoned<br />
sewer lines or lines transferred from the <strong>Port</strong> to the City, etc. The LRO should<br />
also gather copies <strong>of</strong> notes from <strong>Port</strong> staff that have been stored in Appendix N<br />
<strong>of</strong> the various <strong>SSMP</strong> report copies.<br />
• Data Analysis.<br />
– SSO Summary. One <strong>of</strong> the most important aspects <strong>of</strong> the program audits is to<br />
summarize the data collected from the SSO reports in order to establish trends.<br />
A simple way to track SSO trends is to develop Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel based tables<br />
and charts to summarize the data available in the SSO reports. Examples <strong>of</strong><br />
SSO statistics to track are including in Table 11.1. More sophisticated tracking<br />
methods, such as geographic information systems (GIS) mapping, could also<br />
be utilized as desired.<br />
– Maintenance Activity Summary. In order to gauge the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>SSMP</strong> in reducing SSOs, the <strong>SSMP</strong> program audits should include a summary<br />
<strong>of</strong> maintenance activities performed during the audit year. Correlations between<br />
maintenance activities and SSO trends or blockages can then be identified.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> maintenance statistics to track are included in Table 11.2.<br />
• Develop Technical Memorandum (TM) Summarizing Utilities <strong>Management</strong> Audit.<br />
The LRO, upon completion <strong>of</strong> the data gathering and data analysis/summary phases,<br />
should develop a TM summarizing the results <strong>of</strong> the utilities management audit,<br />
including the following:<br />
– Discussion <strong>of</strong> SSO trends during the audit period compared to historical trends.<br />
– A summary <strong>of</strong> maintenance activities during the audit period, including any<br />
apparent correlations to SSOs (did an increase/decrease in maintenance <strong>of</strong> a<br />
sewer facility correlate to increase/decreases in SSOs?).<br />
– A list <strong>of</strong> changes to be made to the <strong>SSMP</strong> to reflect changes to reflect current<br />
operational conditions or to improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
May 2010 11-3<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
Table 11.1 Example SSO Trend Tracking Table<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
SSO Statistic<br />
Total Number <strong>of</strong> SSOs 1 1<br />
Year<br />
(1) (1)<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />
Category 1 (to<br />
Surface Water)<br />
1 0<br />
Category 1 (Non-<br />
Surface Water)<br />
0 0<br />
Category 2 0 1<br />
Greater than 1,000<br />
gallons<br />
0 0<br />
Less than 1,000<br />
gallons<br />
1 1<br />
Total Volume <strong>of</strong> SSOs<br />
(gal)<br />
100 400<br />
Volume Recovered 0 400<br />
Volume to Surface<br />
Water<br />
100 0<br />
Percent to Surface<br />
Water (percent)<br />
100 0<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> SSOs by Cause<br />
Roots 0 0<br />
Grease Deposition<br />
(FOG)<br />
0 0<br />
Infiltration and Inflow 0 0<br />
Lift Station Failure 0 0<br />
Capacity Deficiency 0 0<br />
Vandalism 1 0<br />
Debris 0 1<br />
Other 0 0<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> SSOs by Location<br />
Aviation 1 1<br />
Maritime 0 0<br />
Commercial 0 0<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Locations<br />
with Repeated SSOs<br />
Notes:<br />
0 0<br />
1. Source: SWRCB online public SSO database (California Integrated Water Quality <strong>System</strong>).<br />
Information presented is current as <strong>of</strong> June 2009.<br />
May 2010 11-4<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
Table 11.2 Example <strong>Sewer</strong> Maintenance Tracking Table<br />
<strong>Port</strong>-<strong>Wide</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
Statistic<br />
Total Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Blockages<br />
Aviation<br />
Maritime<br />
Commercial/Real<br />
Estate<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Blockages<br />
by Cause<br />
Roots<br />
Grease Deposition<br />
(FOG)<br />
Infiltration and Inflow<br />
Lift Station Failure<br />
Capacity Deficiency<br />
Vandalism<br />
Debris<br />
Other<br />
Total Miles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sewer</strong><br />
Pipe Cleaned (miles)<br />
Preventative<br />
Corrective<br />
Percentage<br />
Corrective (percent)<br />
11.2.3.2 Operations Audit<br />
Year<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />
The operations audit focuses primarily on the following aspects, and is initiated by the LRO:<br />
• Operations Interviews. The LRO should conduct interviews with both Aviation and<br />
Maritime operations staff to determine how effective the <strong>SSMP</strong> has been in helping<br />
the crews respond to and mitigate the effects <strong>of</strong> SSOs. Questions that could be<br />
helpful in conducting these interviews include:<br />
– Is the Overflow Emergency Response <strong>Plan</strong> (OERP) being fully implemented,<br />
and is it working as envisioned?<br />
May 2010 11-5<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
– Are there any procedures that should be added to the OERP?<br />
– Are there any procedures in the OERP that are unnecessary or need to be<br />
removed?<br />
– Which components <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> are working well? Why?<br />
– Which components <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> need improvement? Why?<br />
– Is there a need to purchase additional equipment or add staff?<br />
– Are there any equipment maintenance needs?<br />
– Is there a need for additional training to field crews on <strong>SSMP</strong>/<strong>Port</strong> operating<br />
procedures?<br />
– What additional resources are needed to help respond to SSOs?<br />
– Are there any operational changes that have occurred since the previous<br />
program audit (e.g., new equipment/spare parts, changes to<br />
cleaning/maintenance activities, new “hot spots” identified, etc.)?<br />
• Develop TM Summarizing Operations Audit. The LRO, upon completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
operations interviews, should develop a TM summarizing the results <strong>of</strong> the operations<br />
audit, including the following:<br />
– Discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> components that are working well.<br />
– A summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> components that need to be improved, enhanced, or<br />
removed.<br />
– A list <strong>of</strong> changes to be made to the <strong>SSMP</strong> to reflect changes to reflect current<br />
operational conditions or to improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
– A list <strong>of</strong> recommendations for additional training, equipment, staffing levels, etc.<br />
11.2.3.3 Engineering/Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Audit<br />
The engineering/CIP audit focuses primarily on the following aspects, and is initiated by the<br />
LRO:<br />
• Element Review. The LRO should coordinate a meeting with all appropriate <strong>Port</strong><br />
engineering staff and other staff related to CIP projects and expenditures in order to<br />
review specific elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> as they pertain to the engineering division,<br />
including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:<br />
– <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong>. It is recommended that<br />
the <strong>Port</strong> review the <strong>System</strong> Evaluation and Capacity Assurance <strong>Plan</strong> (SECAP)<br />
during the each program audit to determine whether updates or amendments<br />
are necessary. When an update or amendment to the SECAP is required, it<br />
should be prepared by a licensed engineer.<br />
– Capital Improvement Program. The program audit should also include a<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the capital improvement program to determine which projects have<br />
been implemented as scheduled, which projects have not been implemented as<br />
May 2010 11-6<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
scheduled and why, and to determine the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the budget allocation for<br />
each program or project.<br />
– Design, Inspection, and Construction Standards. <strong>Port</strong> engineering staff<br />
should review their design, inspection, and construction standards during each<br />
program audit to determine if changes or modifications are needed.<br />
– Mapping, Etc. The <strong>Port</strong> should also review their collection system<br />
map/hydraulic model to verify that its contents are up to date and accurate.<br />
• Develop TM Summarizing Engineering/CIP Audit. The LRO, upon completion <strong>of</strong><br />
the engineering/CIP review, should develop a TM summarizing the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
engineering audit, including the following:<br />
– A summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> components that need to be improved, modified,<br />
enhanced, or removed.<br />
– A list <strong>of</strong> changes to be made to the <strong>SSMP</strong> to reflect changes or to improve the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
11.2.4 Program Audit Report<br />
Following the utilities management, operations, and engineering audits, the LRO should<br />
use the material summarized in the utilities management, operations, and engineering TMs<br />
to develop a draft <strong>SSMP</strong> program audit report.<br />
This draft report should include supporting material, such as tables, figures, and maps that<br />
support the conclusions <strong>of</strong> the report. Information presented in the audit report may include<br />
the following:<br />
• An evaluation <strong>of</strong> each element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong> report;<br />
• Progress made on the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>SSMP</strong> elements. Justification should be<br />
provided if progress has not been made on the development <strong>of</strong> certain elements <strong>of</strong><br />
this <strong>SSMP</strong>;<br />
• A description <strong>of</strong> the new <strong>SSMP</strong> program elements since the last program audit;<br />
• The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> implementing <strong>SSMP</strong> elements;<br />
• A description <strong>of</strong> the additions and improvements to the sanitary sewer collection<br />
system facilities since the previous program audit;<br />
• A description <strong>of</strong> the additions and improvements to the sanitary sewer collection<br />
system facilities planned for the next year.<br />
The draft report should then be distributed to all interested <strong>Port</strong> staff members for review<br />
and approval.<br />
May 2010 11-7<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
All appropriate <strong>Port</strong> staff comments should then be incorporated into a final <strong>SSMP</strong> program<br />
audit report. Copies <strong>of</strong> the program audit should be kept on file at the <strong>Port</strong> should the<br />
SWRCB or RWQCB request a copy.<br />
May 2010 11-8<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch11 (FinalA)
Chapter 12<br />
COMMUNICATION PROGRAM AND FINAL CERTIFICATION<br />
This chapter presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the steps to be taken by the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong> (<strong>Port</strong>) to<br />
communicate with the public on the development, implementation, and performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (<strong>SSMP</strong>). This chapter also contains the final certification<br />
<strong>of</strong> this <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
12.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
12.1.1 San Francisco Bay Area RWQCB Requirements<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) does not<br />
have specific requirements for this element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>.<br />
12.1.2 SWRCB Requirements<br />
State General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-0003 (GWDRs), issued by<br />
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), specifies the following:<br />
• The Enrollee shall communicate on a regular basis with the public on the<br />
development, implementation, and performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SSMP</strong>. The communication<br />
system shall provide the public the opportunity to provide input to the Enrollee as the<br />
program is developed and implemented.<br />
• The Enrollee shall also create a plan <strong>of</strong> communication with systems that are tributary<br />
and/or satellite to the Enrollee’s sanitary sewer system.<br />
To certify the <strong>SSMP</strong>, the GWDRs specify the following:<br />
• Both the <strong>SSMP</strong> and the Enrollee’s program to implement the <strong>SSMP</strong> must be certified<br />
by the Enrollee to be in compliance with the requirements set forth (in the previous<br />
sections) and must be presented to the Enrollee’s governing board for approval at a<br />
public meeting. The Enrollee shall certify that the <strong>SSMP</strong>, and subparts there<strong>of</strong>, are in<br />
compliance with the GWDRs within the time frames identified in the time schedule<br />
provided (in Chapter 1).<br />
• In order to complete the certification, the Enrollee’s authorized representative must<br />
complete the certification portion in the Online Sanitary <strong>Sewer</strong> Overflow (SSO)<br />
Database Questionnaire by checking the appropriate milestone box, printing and<br />
signing the automated form, and sending the form to:<br />
State Water Resources Control Board<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Water Quality<br />
Attn: SSO Program Manager<br />
P.O. Box 100<br />
Sacramento, CA 95812<br />
May 2010 12-1<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch12 (FinalA)
The <strong>SSMP</strong> must be updated every five years, and must include any significant<br />
program changes. Re-certification by the governing board <strong>of</strong> the Enrollee is required<br />
(as specified above) when significant updates to the <strong>SSMP</strong> are made. To complete<br />
this re-certification process, the Enrollee shall enter the data in the online SSO<br />
Database and mail the form to the State Water Board, as described above.<br />
12.2 COMMUNICATION PLAN<br />
In accordance with the GWDRs, the <strong>Port</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> Commissioners held a public<br />
hearing to formally approve and adopt the final <strong>SSMP</strong>. A copy <strong>of</strong> the resolution to formally<br />
approve and adopt the <strong>SSMP</strong> is included in Appendix P.<br />
To provide the public with the chance to review the <strong>SSMP</strong>, an electronic copy is available<br />
upon request. Additionally, a copy <strong>of</strong> the report is available at the <strong>Port</strong>’s main <strong>of</strong>fice, located<br />
at 530 Water Street in <strong>Oakland</strong>, CA 94607, for review by the public prior to and following<br />
final approval.<br />
12.3 FINAL CERTIFICATION<br />
The <strong>Port</strong>’s Legally Responsible Official (LRO) is required to certify that all sections <strong>of</strong> this<br />
report comply with the applicable GWDRs and the RWQCB requirements. This was<br />
accomplished by completing the certification portion in the Online SSO Database<br />
Questionnaire and sending the appropriate signed form to the SWRCB. A copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
SWRCB certification is included in Appendix Q <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
The <strong>Port</strong> shall update and re-certify the <strong>SSMP</strong> when significant changes are made. At a<br />
minimum, the <strong>Port</strong> will update and re-certify this report every five years.<br />
May 2010 12-2<br />
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/Ch12 (FinalA)
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX A - SWRCB GWDR ORDER NO. 2006-0003
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX B - <strong>SSMP</strong> PLAN AND SCHEDULE
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX C - PORT RESOLUTION ADOPTING <strong>SSMP</strong> PLAN<br />
AND SCHEDULE
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX D - ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CONTACT<br />
INFORMATION
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX E - PORT SEWER USE ORDINANCE
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX F - CITY OF OAKLAND SEWER USE ORDINANCE
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX G - EBMUD ORDINANCE NO. 311A-03
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX H - COLLECTION SYSTEM MAP
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
Appendix H intentionally left blank.
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX I - EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT PARTS<br />
INVENTORY
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX J - SANITARY SEWER DESIGN AND<br />
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX K - OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX L - FOG CONTROL PLAN
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX M - SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY<br />
ASSURANCE PLAN
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX N - PORT STAFF NOTES RELATED TO THE <strong>SSMP</strong><br />
Note to Reader: The intent <strong>of</strong> this appendix is that when <strong>Port</strong> staff identify an important<br />
change related to the <strong>Sewer</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, they can place their notes or other<br />
relevant documents into this appendix for easy reference.
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX O - SSO DATA TABLE
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX P - <strong>SSMP</strong> ADOPTING RESOLUTION
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
Appendix P intentionally left blank.
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong><br />
APPENDIX Q - SWRCB <strong>SSMP</strong> CERTIFICATION FORM
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/<strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oakland</strong>/8239A00/Deliverables/App (A)<br />
Appendix Q intentionally left blank.