04.03.2013 Views

2005 Proceedings - ASNR

2005 Proceedings - ASNR

2005 Proceedings - ASNR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paper 101 Starting at 3:16 PM, Ending at 3:24 PM<br />

Positron Emission Tomography/CT of Cystic Neck<br />

Masses: Trust Your CT<br />

Branstetter,IV, B. F. · Ferris, R.<br />

University of Pittsburgh<br />

Pittsburgh, PA<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT has become an<br />

accepted means of staging and monitoring head and neck<br />

cancer. In the setting of a neck mass without a histopathologic<br />

diagnosis, PET/CT also can be useful to distinguish<br />

benign from malignant cases. However, the PET component<br />

of the examination can be misleading in the setting of a cystic<br />

neck mass because the cystic component of the mass will<br />

not have FDG uptake. The purpose of this study is to determine<br />

whether PET/CT is a valuable modality for the evaluation<br />

of cystic neck masses.<br />

MATERIALS & METHODS<br />

Four consecutive patients with cystic neck masses equivocal<br />

for malignancy were included in this study. After equivocal<br />

fine needle aspiration, each patient underwent a combined<br />

PET/CT evaluation. The PET component of each exam was<br />

evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician, and the CT component<br />

was evaluated by a head and neck radiologist; each<br />

had access to the full fused dataset. Discrepancies between<br />

the PET and CT readings were noted and compared to final<br />

pathology.<br />

RESULTS<br />

One of the four patients had a benign branchial cleft cyst,<br />

and three had squamous cell carcinoma. In each of the four<br />

cases, the PET reading was either equivocal or misleading,<br />

whereas the CT reading suggested the correct diagnosis.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Before a diagnosis of malignancy has been established, combined<br />

PET/CT of a cystic neck mass is of little value over CT<br />

alone. Cystic lymphadenopathy is evaluated inadequately<br />

with PET alone.<br />

KEY WORDS: PET/CT, neck cyst, neck mass<br />

Paper 102 Starting at 3:24 PM, Ending at 3:32 PM<br />

Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map in<br />

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Parotid Tumors<br />

Abdel Razek, A. A. · Elhawarey, G. · Albadrawey, A. ·<br />

Elserougy, L. · Kamel, Y.<br />

Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine<br />

Mansoura, EGYPT<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To determine the role of apparent diffusion coefficient map<br />

in differentiating benign from malignant parotid tumors.<br />

MATERIALS & METHODS<br />

This study included 41 patients (21M, 20F aged 10-72 years:<br />

mean 47 years) with parotid mass. They underwent routine<br />

pre and postcontrast MR imaging and diffusion-weighted<br />

imaging on a 1.5 T MR unit (Symphony-Siemens). Diffusion<br />

51<br />

MR imaging was done using spin-echo type of single-shot<br />

echo-planar imaging (EPI) with a diffusion-weighted factor,<br />

factor b of 0.500 and 1000 sec/mm 2 . The apparent diffusion<br />

coefficient (ADC) map was reconstructed. The signal intensity<br />

was assessed visually on ADC maps and ADC value was<br />

measured in parotid lesion. The mean ADC values correlated<br />

with histopathologic results.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Adequate ADC maps were obtained in 39 patients. The<br />

benign tumors shows high SI (n = 23) or mixed SI (n = 4)<br />

and malignant tumors showed low SI (n = 11) or mixed SI (n<br />

= 3). The mean ADC values of benign tumors was 1.49 ±<br />

0.18 X 10 -3 mm 2 /sec and in malignant tumors was 0.89 ± 0.12<br />

X 10 -3 mm 2 /sec. The mean ADC value of the malignant<br />

tumor was significantly different than that of benign parotid<br />

tumors (P < 0.004).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Apparent diffusion coefficient map is a new imaging modality<br />

for differentiating benign from malignant parotid tumors.<br />

Also, it can be used for characterization of parotid tumors.<br />

KEY WORDS: Parotid, tumors, diffusion<br />

Paper 103 Starting at 3:32 PM, Ending at 3:40 PM<br />

Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map in<br />

Differentiating Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors from<br />

Postradiation Changes<br />

Abdel Razek, A. A. · Soliman, N. · Kandeel, A. · Kamel, Y ·<br />

Elshenshawy, H.<br />

Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine<br />

Mansoura, EGYPT<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)<br />

map in differentiating recurrent head and neck tumors from<br />

postradiation changes.<br />

MATERIALS & METHODS<br />

This study included 29 patients (21M, 8F aged 53-72 years:<br />

mean 67 years) with suspected clinically recurrent head and<br />

neck tumor after complete course of radiotherapy. Ten of<br />

these patients underwent previous operation. They underwent<br />

routine postcontrast MR imaging. Diffusion-weighted<br />

imaging was done on a 1.5 T whole body scanner<br />

(Symphony, Siemens) using spin-echo type of single-shot<br />

echo-planar imaging. The parameters used were TR/TE:<br />

4200/38 msec, B value = 0, 500 and 1000 sec/mm 2 . From<br />

these images apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps<br />

were generated. The signal intensity was assessed visually<br />

on ADC maps and ADC value was measured in suspected<br />

lesion. The mean ADC values correlated with histopathologic<br />

results. Statistical analysis was done.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Adequate ADC maps were obtained in 28 patients. The<br />

smallest recurrent tumor detected was 1.2 cm. On ADC map,<br />

the recurrent tumor showed low (n = 17) or mixed (n = 4)<br />

signal intensity and postradiation changes revealed relatively<br />

high (n = 5) or mixed (n = 3) signal intensity. The mean<br />

ADC value of the recurrent tumor (1.19 ± 0.23 X 10 -3<br />

mm 2 /sec) was smaller than that of postradiation changes<br />

Monday

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!