Tobacco use in shisha: Studies on waterpipe smoking
Tobacco use in shisha: Studies on waterpipe smoking
Tobacco use in shisha: Studies on waterpipe smoking
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 3.1 Age, sex and residence distributi<strong>on</strong> of sample subjects and estimated represented<br />
populati<strong>on</strong><br />
Age and sex<br />
Group 1: current <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> smokers<br />
Rural Urban<br />
Sample Estimated populati<strong>on</strong> Sample Estimated populati<strong>on</strong><br />
Male 18 years and older 751 8 678 336 750 8 742 049<br />
Female 18 years and older 970 9 074 143 897 9 737 041<br />
Male younger than 18 years 255 2 158 328 214 1 435 342<br />
Female younger than 18 years 273 2 731 193 180 1 586 576<br />
Total 2249 22 642 002 2041 21 501 009<br />
The next series of tables describes pers<strong>on</strong>s who stated they had tried <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> and were<br />
current <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> smokers at the time of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview (any day dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the four weeks prior to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview<br />
day). Tables 3.2 present some basic f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs of this group. The prevalence of <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>use</str<strong>on</strong>g> am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
males was somewhat higher <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the rural areas compared to urban areas, although the c<strong>on</strong>fidence<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tervals of the two estimates overlap (Table 3.2c).<br />
The follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g data (Table 3.3) apply <strong>on</strong>ly to the sampled <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals (not to be projected<br />
to the nati<strong>on</strong>al level). Am<strong>on</strong>g the 212 current smokers of <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> the follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g parameters give<br />
an idea about the number of korsi or hagar (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 1 for term<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ology) they smoke <strong>on</strong><br />
the day of <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>use</str<strong>on</strong>g>. No statistically significant differences <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> these parameters were found<br />
between rural and urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>use</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs (us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Mann–Whitney U and Wilcox<strong>on</strong> tests). The exposure<br />
level of <strong>waterpipe</strong> tobacco smok<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> terms of average number of hagar per day is <strong>on</strong>ly 2.8<br />
+2.7 ( range 1–20/day).<br />
Table 3.2a Prevalence of <str<strong>on</strong>g>shisha</str<strong>on</strong>g> smok<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g distributed by age, sex and residence<br />
Age and sex<br />
Rural Urban<br />
No. % No. %<br />
Male 18 years and older 115 15.3 82 10.9<br />
Female 18 years and older 1 0.1 2 0.2<br />
Male younger than 18 years 8 3.1 4 1.9<br />
Female younger than 18 years 0 0.0 0 0.0<br />
Total 124 5.5 88 4.3<br />
33