21.03.2013 Views

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2 FREEDOM<br />

surplus belongs. Those who hold that private property rights grant them the<br />

right to keep that surplus are obviously in disagreement with those who hold<br />

that the surplus goods belong to those who do not produce them.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are only two methods by which the surplus of individuals A, B,<br />

and C can be divided: either with their consent or without it. Either the<br />

property belongs to those who produce it or it doesn't.<br />

Presume that the four individuals, D, E, F, and G, ask A, B, and C to<br />

divide their surplus voluntarily, and the latter refuse. Does that refusal grant<br />

the right to D, E, F and G to take the goods from them?<br />

If property rights have any meaning, the answer must surely be in the<br />

negative. Does the right to property include the right to protect it from the<br />

plundering acts of those who come to take it by force? Does an individual<br />

have the right to protect his property against the acts of another individual?<br />

Does the individual have the right to protect his property against the acts of<br />

a group of individuals? Does the group have the right to protect their<br />

property against the acts of another group?<br />

Realizing that the property of the productive A, B, and C cannot be<br />

taken from them by force, it behooves the less productive to find another way<br />

to acquire the surplus. Presume that they develop a new strategy. <strong>The</strong>y call<br />

a meeting to discuss the question of the surplus, and all seven individuals<br />

attend. <strong>The</strong> question of how to handle the surplus is discussed and then acted<br />

upon, allowing the majority to decide how to divide the property. In this<br />

case, D, E, F, and G vote to divide the property equally, and A, B and C vote<br />

against it.<br />

Do D, E, F and G have the right to vote away the property rights of the<br />

minority. Does it make it right because all were given an equal opportunity<br />

to express their opinion?<br />

Does it make it right if they call the meeting a government? Does it make<br />

it right if the majority says that whatever the majority decides will be what<br />

the entirety will do? Does the minority have any rights?<br />

If the majority votes to take the minority's property, what is it called?<br />

It is called a Democracy!<br />

Next, presume that the majority is able to create a government to take<br />

the surplus from the producers, and that the producers decide among<br />

themselves to only produce what they consume the next year, in this case 500<br />

units apiece. Would the minority have mat right?<br />

That means that A, B, and C will only produce what they consumed the<br />

previous year, or 500 units apiece. <strong>The</strong> remainder of the people continue to<br />

produce what they did the year before. <strong>The</strong> figures for the second year will be<br />

as follows:<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!