21.03.2013 Views

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

PDF, Epperson, The-Unseen-Hand - 9 11 truth Switzerland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2 FREEDOM<br />

<strong>The</strong> key to production is the incentive of the marketplace, the right to<br />

keep what is produced, the Right to Private Property! <strong>The</strong> right of the<br />

individual to better his life by producing more than he consumes and to keep<br />

what he produces.<br />

This economic model has many illustrations in the world today. One is<br />

occurring today in the Soviet Union, where the basic philosophy that<br />

motivates the government is the proposition that whatever is produced in the<br />

society belongs to all in that society. However, even in Russia, there is a small<br />

percentage of the country where the individual can keep what he produces:<br />

According to the government's own figures..., private plots<br />

with a mere three percent of the nation's own acreage accounted for<br />

30 percent of the gross harvest, other than grains, 40 percent of all<br />

cattle-breeding, 60 percent of the country's potato crops, 40 percent<br />

of all vegetables and milk, 68 percent of all meat products.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir fruit yields... are double those of state orchards for<br />

equivalent areas, its potato harvest per hectare two-thirds higher<br />

than on collective farms.<br />

Even in grain, which is a very minor element in the private<br />

sector, it produces one-third more per sown unit than an average<br />

socialized farm. 1<br />

Why is just a small percentage of cultivated land area able to out-<br />

produce the remainder? It is because the producers can keep what they<br />

produce! <strong>The</strong> producer has the right to Private Property! Governments can<br />

not take what has been produced in this free market environment, for any<br />

reason.<br />

People who are allowed to keep what they have produced will always<br />

out-produce those who have their production taken from them for the benefit<br />

of society. And no one can force the producer to equal his peak production<br />

in a free market.<br />

Even Communist China has discovered the <strong>truth</strong> of this proposition,<br />

according to an article in Time magazine on the Jun Tan brigade. It is here<br />

that China allows the workers to keep for themselves all the produce over the<br />

government set quota.<br />

<strong>The</strong> brigade's leader is quoted as saying: "All the peasants feel happy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y work twice as hard as they used to because they know that if they work<br />

harder, they can make more money."<br />

<strong>The</strong> article cited the results of China's experiment with the right to<br />

Private Property: "Its per-person annual revenue of $201 is well above the<br />

national rural average of only $91." 2<br />

But even with these glaring examples of the wisdom of the right to<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!