21.03.2013 Views

“A Fragment of Lost Words”: Narrative Ellipses in The ... - Salem Press

“A Fragment of Lost Words”: Narrative Ellipses in The ... - Salem Press

“A Fragment of Lost Words”: Narrative Ellipses in The ... - Salem Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While the voice <strong>in</strong> the second passage is still Nick’s, it is Nick’s voice<br />

as lent to Gatsby. <strong>The</strong> third-person pronoun does not change (“he” becomes<br />

“they” as Daisy jo<strong>in</strong>s Gatsby for a moonlit walk), nor does Nick<br />

lose his characteristic lyricism. Yet because the scene is set five years<br />

before Nick met Gatsby, Nick himself is effaced; he is no longer a witness,<br />

but an amanuensis. Stephen Dedalus, Joyce’s young artist, argues<br />

that a narrator should be “ref<strong>in</strong>ed out <strong>of</strong> existence” (Joyce 2000, 119).<br />

Nick approaches such ref<strong>in</strong>ement here. Without chang<strong>in</strong>g pronouns,<br />

Nick changes his relationship to the pronoun. He is not just repeat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the story Gatsby told him, but retell<strong>in</strong>g that story by apply<strong>in</strong>g some <strong>of</strong><br />

the techniques <strong>of</strong> first person narration to a third person passage, as<br />

here: “His heart beat faster and faster as Daisy’s white face came up to<br />

his own. He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable<br />

visions to her perishable breath, his m<strong>in</strong>d would never romp<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> like the m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> God” (110). <strong>The</strong> diction and syntax are Nick’s,<br />

but they are bent toward recreat<strong>in</strong>g and br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to life an event from<br />

Gatsby’s life. This is not quite an <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> free <strong>in</strong>direct discourse, for<br />

the “he knew” makes it clear that a narrator is relay<strong>in</strong>g Gatsby’s <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

thoughts. Nor would it be quite fair to say that the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view has<br />

changed, for Nick is the narrator and Gatsby the character <strong>in</strong> both the<br />

conversation before the ellipses and the imbedded narrative that the ellipses<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce. Perhaps a better term to apply to the passage is one<br />

co<strong>in</strong>ed by critic Mieke Bal: “focalization.” <strong>The</strong> narrative is focalized<br />

or filtered through Gatsby’s consciousness, and the effect is to elide the<br />

difference between the “I” <strong>of</strong> the narrator and the “he” <strong>of</strong> the character,<br />

so that the one briefly gives way to the other.<br />

Five years ago, Gatsby kissed Daisy and “wed his unutterable visions<br />

to her perishable breath,” while <strong>in</strong> the present day, Nick listens to<br />

Gatsby’s story and f<strong>in</strong>ds some unutterable vision <strong>of</strong> his own flitt<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

the edge <strong>of</strong> his consciousness:<br />

<strong>“A</strong> <strong>Fragment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>Words”</strong> 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!