21.03.2013 Views

Enforcing Financial Reporting Standards: The Case of White ...

Enforcing Financial Reporting Standards: The Case of White ...

Enforcing Financial Reporting Standards: The Case of White ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

case, these requirements mean that the entity needs to increase their amount recognized as<br />

intangible assets by 55 million Euros. Also, their retained earnings should be increased by the<br />

same amount. In addition, IAS 8 requires an entity to disclose the nature <strong>of</strong> the prior period<br />

error and, for each prior period presented, the amount <strong>of</strong> the correction for each line item and<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> the correction at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the earliest prior period presented. <strong>White</strong><br />

would have to present these disclosures in their annual report to let investors know the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> the misinterpretation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> central decision that Peter has to make revolves around the subsequent<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> the intangible asset. If <strong>White</strong> applies the cost model to their intangible assets,<br />

Peter needs to determine the useful life <strong>of</strong> the asset and the yearly amortization charges. If,<br />

however, <strong>White</strong> uses the revaluation model for their intangibles, Peter also needs to<br />

determine the fair value <strong>of</strong> the transdermal patch. Nevertheless, in calculating the fair value,<br />

Peter has to consider IAS 38.76, which prohibits a revaluation <strong>of</strong> intangibles that have<br />

previously not been recognized as assets. In addition to the fair value, Peter also has to<br />

calculate yearly amortization charges when using the fair value model. What’s more, Peter<br />

can also determine possible impairment losses that the transdermal patch may have been<br />

subject to. When considering the discretion potential laid out above, one has to realize that<br />

the net effect <strong>of</strong> recognizing the intangible asset three years after its acquisition may not be as<br />

severe as expected.<br />

When letting investors know, <strong>White</strong> needs to determine how much information they<br />

want to disclose. Considering the fact that the error correction was due to a misinterpretation,<br />

<strong>White</strong> may want to issue a press release covering the transaction and <strong>White</strong>’s motivation in<br />

detail. On the other hand, if a company committed something close to fraud, they probably<br />

choose a more restrictive investor communication strategy without disclosing many details on<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!