Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“There is no question<br />
that whenever dentists<br />
“bash” each other in public,<br />
it lowers the image of the<br />
dentist doing it and the<br />
image of our profession<br />
in general.”<br />
simplest and most obvious truth if it would be such as would oblige them to<br />
admit the falsity of conclusion which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues,<br />
which they have proudly taught to other, and which they have woven,<br />
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”<br />
Q: It appears that within Dentistry, significant change is<br />
often met with ridicule and bitterness. Why is that?<br />
Dr. Jackson: This is not unique to dentistry. I might add to my answer above<br />
that Galileo wouldn’t allow his book to be published until after his death, for<br />
fear of being burned at the stake. At least it’s not that bad in dentistry today.<br />
Dr. Reed: It’s the nature of man! I recall Thomas Jefferson saying “When a significant<br />
event brings change, it is first met with ridicule, then vitriolic bitterness...and<br />
then after negotiation, finally acceptance.”<br />
Q: In your opinion, how do public bashings affect the<br />
general public’s view about dentistry and dentists?<br />
Dr. Jackson: There is no question that whenever dentists “bash” each other in<br />
public, it lowers the image of the dentist doing it and the image of our profession<br />
in general. You only have to look at how the public views politicians who<br />
do this all the time.<br />
It’s not ethical and it’s the ethics and maturity of the individual making personal<br />
attacks on another professional that is brought into question. Also it damages dentistry<br />
as a profession because the public begins to wonder if this is typical behavior.<br />
Our profession is based on trust and this gets jeopardized when we behave badly.<br />
Dr. Reed: The dentist, in all the famous movie scenes, is cast as the village idiot.<br />
When this message arrives, it diminishes our professional image. Fortunately,<br />
public bashing is not the leading headline of the day to the general public.<br />
Q: Why are people down on things they are not up on?<br />
Dr. Jackson: There can be a lot of reasons. By definition, a new idea threatens<br />
the natural order. For some, the amount they are down on any new idea often<br />
depends on how much they have invested in the status quo. By the way, this is<br />
a form of self-protection and to an extent, normal. For others, it’s a matter of<br />
change. A new idea can bring change and change can be difficult. It is challenging,<br />
risky, takes a lot of effort, and can be chaotic.<br />
Dr. Reed: As early as 1551, a fellow by the name of Machiavelli commented<br />
on this phenomenon. “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous<br />
to conduct, more uncertain in its success than to take the lead in intro-<br />
64 <strong>LVI</strong> VISIONS • JANUARY • FEBRUARY • MARCH • APRIL 2008