23.03.2013 Views

What is the research evidence on writing? - Department for Education

What is the research evidence on writing? - Department for Education

What is the research evidence on writing? - Department for Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

level 2C and 6 per cent achieving a level 1 in <strong>writing</strong>. Overall, 44 per cent of pupils<br />

achieving level 2B in reading are achieving a lower level in <strong>writing</strong>.<br />

Table 6<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

KS1 Reading Level by KS1 Writing Level<br />

A D IN W 1 2C 2B 2A 3 4<br />

KS1 Reading<br />

KS1 Writing Level A<br />

KS1 Writing Level D<br />

KS1 Writing Level IN<br />

KS1 Writing Level W<br />

KS1 Writing Level 1<br />

KS1 Writing Level 2C<br />

KS1 Writing Level 2B<br />

KS1 Writing Level 2A<br />

KS1 Writing Level 3<br />

KS1 Writing Level 4<br />

The same pattern occurs with pupils achieving level 2A and 3 in reading. More than<br />

half of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se pupils (who are per<strong>for</strong>ming above <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected level in reading) are<br />

achieving a lower level in <strong>writing</strong>. Girls are more likely to per<strong>for</strong>m better than boys,<br />

with over half of girls achieving level 3 or above in both reading and <strong>writing</strong><br />

compared to <strong>on</strong>ly 38 per cent of boys. FSM and SEN pupils are less likely to per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

as well in <strong>writing</strong> as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y do in reading compared to pupils not eligible <strong>for</strong> FSM and<br />

without SEN respectively.<br />

Children whose first language was ‘o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than Engl<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g>h’ are slightly more likely to<br />

per<strong>for</strong>m as well in <strong>writing</strong> as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y do in reading compared to children whose first<br />

language was Engl<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g>h. The per<strong>for</strong>mance of most ethnic groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g> similar <strong>for</strong> reading<br />

and <strong>writing</strong> outcomes.<br />

Key Stage 2<br />

In 2012, 81 per cent of pupils achieved <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected level (level 4 or above) based <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>writing</strong> teacher assessment, compared to 75 per cent of pupils achieving <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

expected level in 2011, based <strong>on</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al tests. Eighty seven per cent of pupils<br />

achieved <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected level in reading and 84 per cent in ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>matics. Some<br />

difference between test and teacher assessment results can be expected as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

outcomes are measured in different ways. Reading and <strong>writing</strong> teacher assessments<br />

are not available prior to 2012, but a compar<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>on</strong> of Engl<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g>h test and Engl<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g>h teacher<br />

assessment outcomes since 2007 suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y differed by no more than 2<br />

percentage points in any year (DfE, 2012b).<br />

Looking at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>writing</strong> results in more detail, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender gap still pers<str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g>ts, with 76 per<br />

cent of boys achieving <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected level compared to 87 per cent of girls. The<br />

gender gap <str<strong>on</strong>g>is</str<strong>on</strong>g> less pr<strong>on</strong>ounced in reading, ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>matics and science.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!