23.03.2013 Views

Marine Occurrence report 232 - Australian Transport Safety Bureau

Marine Occurrence report 232 - Australian Transport Safety Bureau

Marine Occurrence report 232 - Australian Transport Safety Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 ANALYSIS<br />

2.1 Evidence<br />

On 15 and 16 September 2006, investigators from the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong> (ATSB) attended Creciente while it was at anchor off Port Hedland. The<br />

master and directly involved crew members were interviewed and they provided<br />

accounts of the incident. Copies of relevant documents were obtained, including log<br />

book entries, statutory certificates, maintenance records, procedures and permits.<br />

Information relating to the incident was also obtained from the Port Hedland Port<br />

Authority and the Port Hedland pilots. The draught surveyor, the harbour master<br />

and the involved port pilots were also interviewed.<br />

2.2 Breakaway<br />

At about 0245 on 12 September 2006, Creciente’s mooring lines failed to hold the<br />

ship alongside the wharf against a strong ebb tide, which resulted in the ship<br />

breaking away from its berth.<br />

2.2.1 Mooring arrangements<br />

Construction work was being undertaken on the Finucane Island berth C and a<br />

construction barge was positioned close to the berth D number nine berthing<br />

dolphin. To facilitate this, the mooring arrangements for all ships using berth D<br />

were changed from the usual configuration and the new arrangement (Figure 8) was<br />

assessed as equivalent and acceptable by the port pilots.<br />

The effective static load holding capacities of Creciente’s mooring lines was<br />

calculated by the ATSB investigators for the normal berth D mooring arrangement<br />

and compared with the modified arrangement that was used on 10 September 2006.<br />

For this comparison, the pitting on the brake drums was disregarded and the brakes<br />

were assumed to have been applied by tightening fully. The calculations considered<br />

the length of each mooring line and the number of layers of unused line remaining<br />

on each winch drum.<br />

The total athwartships holding capacity using the normal mooring arrangement was<br />

calculated to be 181.2 tonnes and the static load holding capacity in the fore and aft<br />

direction was 642 tonnes. The modified mooring arrangement had a total<br />

athwartships holding capacity of 211.0 tonnes and a fore and aft capacity of 611.9<br />

tonnes.<br />

The modified mooring arrangement provided greater holding athwartships at the<br />

expense of some holding capacity in the fore and aft direction. The comparison<br />

indicates that the modified mooring arrangement is unlikely to have contributed to<br />

Creciente’s stern breaking away from the berth.<br />

2.2.2 Winch brakes<br />

Of the sixteen lines used to hold Creciente alongside Finucane Island berth D, four<br />

of the aft mooring lines parted when the ship broke away from the berth; two<br />

- 13 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!