Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1
Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1
Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>Cuneiform</strong> <strong>Texts</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Translations</strong> <strong>Part</strong> 1: Neo-Sumerian tablets from Drehem<br />
total: 77 woven garments,<br />
their ……. wool 3 talents 51 [minas];<br />
total: 44 ordinary quality linen (garments),<br />
their thread 880 balls.<br />
{space}<br />
Grand total: 286 (wool) and linen garments;<br />
grand total: 21 talents 8⅔ minas of ……wool;<br />
grand total: 3 talents 51 minas of …….wool;<br />
grand total 880 balls of thread;<br />
total 90½ female worker-(months).<br />
{space}<br />
Weaving work over 11 months,<br />
(and) 4 talents 38 minas 8 shekels of poor quality wool,<br />
brought to the palace<br />
(as) tribute textiles on the account of the city<br />
(by) Ea-Bani, governor of Eresh.<br />
Intercalary month of cutting barley (month 12bis),<br />
Year after Simurrum was raided for the third time (Shulgi 33).<br />
Verified by Mashgula, the officer.<br />
Note<br />
The accounting maths used in this text may need some explanation.<br />
Interpret the first four lines as: it takes a team of 4 women 2 months to make 2 nilamgarments<br />
using 3⅓ minas of wool for each garment.<br />
Line 31 tells us that the weaving work was done over 11 months.<br />
Therefore in 11 months this team of 4 women would make 11 garments (as per the<br />
total in line 18) and use 36⅔ minas of wool (as per the total in line 19).<br />
The rest of the totals follow this same pattern and are correct.<br />
The grand totals in lines 26-29 are simple summations of the relevant materials.<br />
The total for the female workers however is incorrect as this should be 143 for the<br />
amount of work done. The scribe seems not to have used the 11 month period to<br />
calculate the total but rather seems to have multiplied the size of the team by the<br />
monthly production, respectively 16, 56, 7 and 16 (i.e. 95) minus 1½ and 2 for the<br />
PA.URU and those who were ill which would leave 91½ as opposed to the scribe’s<br />
90½. Thus he seems to have made a mathematical error as well as an accounting<br />
error!<br />
BCT1, 135 = 1982A1392<br />
Surplus: 7 gur 200 sila of barley in the royal-gur measure;<br />
barley allowance of the stewards<br />
and barley of the DU.U encampment<br />
to be returned to the carriers(?).<br />
{space}<br />
Month of the lamentation of Ninazu (month 4),<br />
Year Amar-Sin became king (Amar-Sin 1).<br />
BCT1, 136 = 1982A1377<br />
20 gur of barley in the royal-gur measure<br />
for the first time;<br />
53