24.03.2013 Views

Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1

Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1

Birmingham Cuneiform Texts – Translations Part 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>Cuneiform</strong> <strong>Texts</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Translations</strong> <strong>Part</strong> 1: Neo-Sumerian tablets from Drehem<br />

total: 77 woven garments,<br />

their ……. wool 3 talents 51 [minas];<br />

total: 44 ordinary quality linen (garments),<br />

their thread 880 balls.<br />

{space}<br />

Grand total: 286 (wool) and linen garments;<br />

grand total: 21 talents 8⅔ minas of ……wool;<br />

grand total: 3 talents 51 minas of …….wool;<br />

grand total 880 balls of thread;<br />

total 90½ female worker-(months).<br />

{space}<br />

Weaving work over 11 months,<br />

(and) 4 talents 38 minas 8 shekels of poor quality wool,<br />

brought to the palace<br />

(as) tribute textiles on the account of the city<br />

(by) Ea-Bani, governor of Eresh.<br />

Intercalary month of cutting barley (month 12bis),<br />

Year after Simurrum was raided for the third time (Shulgi 33).<br />

Verified by Mashgula, the officer.<br />

Note<br />

The accounting maths used in this text may need some explanation.<br />

Interpret the first four lines as: it takes a team of 4 women 2 months to make 2 nilamgarments<br />

using 3⅓ minas of wool for each garment.<br />

Line 31 tells us that the weaving work was done over 11 months.<br />

Therefore in 11 months this team of 4 women would make 11 garments (as per the<br />

total in line 18) and use 36⅔ minas of wool (as per the total in line 19).<br />

The rest of the totals follow this same pattern and are correct.<br />

The grand totals in lines 26-29 are simple summations of the relevant materials.<br />

The total for the female workers however is incorrect as this should be 143 for the<br />

amount of work done. The scribe seems not to have used the 11 month period to<br />

calculate the total but rather seems to have multiplied the size of the team by the<br />

monthly production, respectively 16, 56, 7 and 16 (i.e. 95) minus 1½ and 2 for the<br />

PA.URU and those who were ill which would leave 91½ as opposed to the scribe’s<br />

90½. Thus he seems to have made a mathematical error as well as an accounting<br />

error!<br />

BCT1, 135 = 1982A1392<br />

Surplus: 7 gur 200 sila of barley in the royal-gur measure;<br />

barley allowance of the stewards<br />

and barley of the DU.U encampment<br />

to be returned to the carriers(?).<br />

{space}<br />

Month of the lamentation of Ninazu (month 4),<br />

Year Amar-Sin became king (Amar-Sin 1).<br />

BCT1, 136 = 1982A1377<br />

20 gur of barley in the royal-gur measure<br />

for the first time;<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!