24.03.2013 Views

Practical Sustainment Concepts for the Non-Linear Battlespace

Practical Sustainment Concepts for the Non-Linear Battlespace

Practical Sustainment Concepts for the Non-Linear Battlespace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>for</strong> sustainment doctrine will permit a more comprehensive planning ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>for</strong> future<br />

operations.<br />

Functional and Integrated Command and Control<br />

Though <strong>the</strong> administration and management of nodes may vary from one<br />

organization to ano<strong>the</strong>r, resources lodging on <strong>the</strong> node tend to maintain command,<br />

control and administration along functional lines. <strong>Sustainment</strong> detachments deployed on<br />

nodes are most effective when pooling <strong>the</strong>ir resources toge<strong>the</strong>r in a collective approach<br />

to sustainment, while providing service generally to lodging units. It would be inefficient<br />

to consider <strong>the</strong> establishment of separate kitchens, medical stations and maintenance<br />

detachments <strong>for</strong> each unit that has a section sized organization deployed in a given<br />

node. Even sustainment organizations controlled by units o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> NSE, be <strong>the</strong>y<br />

temporary or permanent attributions, tend to combine <strong>the</strong>ir ef<strong>for</strong>ts with o<strong>the</strong>r in-situ<br />

sustainment detachments to provide service generally to all lodging units. The<br />

combination of ef<strong>for</strong>t of collocated resources can lead to better success in achieving<br />

priorities at <strong>for</strong>mation level.<br />

The mounting and initial establishment in a non-contiguous <strong>the</strong>atre would likely<br />

follow <strong>the</strong> same logic. Where <strong>the</strong> organization is deployed across few, larger nodes, <strong>the</strong><br />

chain of command would consequently follow functional lines, and <strong>the</strong> employment<br />

would be coordinated largely on a technical level. As development progresses,<br />

manoeuvre units establish nodes across <strong>the</strong> sustainment network, each requiring a task<br />

tailored sustainment detachment. The generation of <strong>the</strong>se integrated sustainment<br />

teams (IST) can only be coordinated centrally by Log Ops, as <strong>the</strong> functional<br />

Commanders lack <strong>the</strong> situational awareness with supported units. However, Log Ops<br />

nei<strong>the</strong>r commands nor administers, so some parallel command structure is required in<br />

order to manage resources that are deployed in <strong>the</strong> various nodes. IST, which may be<br />

at section or platoon level, can be grouped geographically into sub-units in a completely<br />

separate command structure. The functional chain of command must still exist, in order<br />

to coordinate and advise <strong>the</strong> commander from a technical or functional point of view.<br />

As was suggested earlier, COIN operations could lend <strong>the</strong>mselves to <strong>the</strong> division of<br />

organization between nodes and links. Consequently, it could be possible to generate a<br />

separate link organization that would be responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> tactical movement between<br />

<strong>the</strong> FOBs. It would have elements of <strong>for</strong>ce protection, transport, recovery, medevac and<br />

mobility resources that would focus on <strong>the</strong> conduct of manoeuvre operations, all<br />

coordinated by Log Ops along <strong>the</strong> operational chain. Figure 11 shows <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between <strong>the</strong> functional chain of command <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> technical generation of sustainment<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t, which is not at all based on any point in time or space, and <strong>the</strong> integrated chain<br />

that is responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> application of sustainment in specific times and spaces.<br />

Canadian Army Journal Vol. 11.2 Summer 2008 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!