24.03.2013 Views

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Organized</strong> <strong>Felony</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Folly</strong><br />

Louis rioters in a speech at Carnegie Hall where he became<br />

involved in a tilt with the late <strong>The</strong>odore Roosevelt.<br />

But these do not exhaust Mr. Gompers' utterances on the<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> lav/.<br />

When the question <strong>of</strong> an eight-hour day for railroad employes<br />

was being agitated in Congress, Mr. Gompers said:<br />

"We are looking to the railroad brotherhoods to see<br />

that the eight-hour day goes into effect, law or no law."<br />

On the face <strong>of</strong> it, this is an innocent looking statement,<br />

but it might easily hearten a thug to dynamite a bridge during<br />

a railroad strike to enforce the eight-hour day.<br />

Another public utterance <strong>of</strong> Mr. Gompers is more<br />

pertinent, for in it he not only counsels the violation <strong>of</strong> injunctions<br />

but asserts that he himself would have no<br />

hesitancy in doing so. Following an application for an in-<br />

junction by the Bucks Stove & Range Co., Mr. Gompers, in a<br />

Labor Day address at the Jamestown Exposition, said:<br />

"I desire to be clearly understood that when any court<br />

undertakes without warrant <strong>of</strong> law by the injunction pro-<br />

cess to deprive me <strong>of</strong> my personal rights <strong>and</strong> my personal<br />

liberty guaranteed by the Constitution, I shall have no<br />

hesitancy in asserting <strong>and</strong> exercising those rights."<br />

This statement, it seems clear, the speaker wished to have<br />

interpreted as placing him <strong>and</strong> his followers above the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> injunction. After the order had been issued, Mr. Gompers,<br />

writing in the "Federationist," said:<br />

"<strong>The</strong>y have a lawful right to do as they wish, all the Van<br />

Cleaves, all the injunctions, all the fool or vicious opponents<br />

to the contrary notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing. * * * Go to with your<br />

injunctions."<br />

<strong>The</strong> two foregoing statements refer to injunction pro-<br />

cesses, but Mr. Gompers had something to say respecting the<br />

enactment <strong>and</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> all law when he testified as a<br />

witness before the Lockwood Investigating Committee. He<br />

admitted many abuses on the part <strong>of</strong> labor unions, <strong>and</strong> when<br />

it was suggested to him that they might be corrected by law,<br />

he protested. <strong>The</strong> follov/ing extracts from his testimony pre-<br />

sent some <strong>of</strong> the shifts that Mr. Gompers would substitute for<br />

law:<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!