24.03.2013 Views

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

A History of Organized Felony and Folly - The Clarence Darrow ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Organized</strong> <strong>Felony</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Folly</strong><br />

a firm <strong>of</strong> auditors attempted to check the investments, they<br />

found they had no authority to examine the lawyer's books.<br />

<strong>The</strong> brotherhood sued the lawyer <strong>and</strong> the case was settled<br />

out <strong>of</strong> court, but it was testified in the Barker case that the<br />

union lost money on the investments, if, indeed, any testimony<br />

on the subject were necessary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> Barker was begun by four employes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the brotherhood's headquarters in Detroit, who questioned<br />

the regularity <strong>of</strong> checks being issued to the president under<br />

the head <strong>of</strong> "special organization." In this connection, it may<br />

be pointed out that money appropriated by unions for "special<br />

organization" rarely finds its way into the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> "Sunday<br />

school teachers." When the employes consulted the brother-<br />

hood's attorney, they w^ere threatened with arrest for<br />

attempted blackmail <strong>and</strong> dismissed from their positions. This<br />

should be a warning to any honest unionist who may become<br />

inspired with an ambition to right union wrongs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dismissed employes finally got their charges before<br />

the executive board, which began an investigation <strong>and</strong> later<br />

reinstated the four. <strong>The</strong> board hired a new attorney at a<br />

salary <strong>of</strong> $100 a day—another living wage— ^with the stipula-<br />

tion that he should receive further recompense if his negotiations<br />

resulted in recovering any union funds. But Barker<br />

was negotiation-pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> suit was entered against him. He<br />

resigned under fire in March, 1920, <strong>and</strong> two months later the<br />

executive board ordered his successor, E. F. Grable, to dis-<br />

continue the suit <strong>and</strong> not to enter another without the authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> the board.<br />

In October, 1922, the brotherhood held a national con-<br />

vention at Detroit <strong>and</strong> turned the old administration out. It<br />

also began a campaign <strong>of</strong> economy by reducing the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> gr<strong>and</strong> vice presidents from 14 to 5 <strong>and</strong> cutting their<br />

salaries from $6,000 to $4,200. Thus, the convention took<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial notice <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> deflation, <strong>and</strong> were it possible<br />

to induce the Railroad Labor Board to order a commensurate<br />

cut in wages, the railroads w^ould earn next year at least<br />

10% on their property accounts.<br />

Incidental to the suit against Barker, it was brought out<br />

that union funds aggregating hundreds <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> dollars<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!