25.03.2013 Views

Department

Department

Department

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It may lack glamour, but the<br />

role of a special adviser at<br />

the DfT is packed and varied,<br />

recalls Claire MacAleese<br />

The role of special adviser at the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> for Transport (DfT) is<br />

not the most glamorous of political<br />

jobs, though a previous occupant of<br />

my post had created quite a stir when<br />

she suggested 9/11 was a “good day to bury<br />

bad news”. The scar left by the fallout from that<br />

moment of madness made the civil servants I<br />

met in my first week as a new adviser to Geoff<br />

Hoon more determined to stress their political<br />

neutrality. Some even invoked Jo Moore’s<br />

memory, presumably as a reminder of what<br />

could happen to me if I stepped out of line.<br />

Yet during my time at the DfT I found that<br />

the most effective civil servants understood<br />

that transport is often intensely political, if<br />

not always party political. Few subjects can<br />

galvanize grass-roots support or opposition<br />

more than a new runway, road or rail line, or<br />

the removal of a local service. When I started,<br />

my excellent fellow Special Advisor David<br />

Leam told me that when an MP called he could<br />

usually predict their issue before they spoke,<br />

and within months I was playing this politician<br />

transport bingo too.<br />

As an advisor, part of my job was<br />

understanding and communicating the<br />

Secretary of State’s objectives and removing<br />

distraction. It involved fielding political and<br />

personal press enquiries, following-up on<br />

passing conversations with journalists or<br />

MPs, and delegating visits to junior ministers.<br />

We would resolve the political implications<br />

of poorly-drafted answers to Parliamentary<br />

Questions before they reached Ministers’<br />

desks. All to ensure that an important<br />

announcement did not coincide with the<br />

publication of tricky statistics that might<br />

distract from the Government’s agenda.<br />

Another part of my role was to intercept<br />

potentially damaging stories. After a day<br />

of meetings and speaking to journalists,<br />

politicians, Labour Party staff and Unions<br />

it was not unusual to read an unsolicited<br />

document from officials proposing to close an<br />

A road for months on end or put restrictions on<br />

drivers that would make a damaging response<br />

to a freedom of information request and news<br />

story.<br />

You got an insight into the prejudices<br />

that reside in the Government machine. No<br />

documents bemused me more than those<br />

about my native North East; in answer to<br />

questions about a lack of investment and<br />

the cancellation of a traffic scheme in the<br />

region, papers came back describing an<br />

area unburdened by the need for roads,<br />

March 2013 | THE HOUSE MAGAZINE | 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!