25.03.2013 Views

Department

Department

Department

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Photoshot/Niklas Halle’n<br />

appears glad to ditch the system, noting that<br />

“I’d always thought after my arrival in the<br />

department that the approach it took was<br />

unusual – and given the experience that we’d<br />

had in franchising it was clear to me that it<br />

wasn’t only unusual; it was in some ways<br />

unwise.” Rutnam is, he adds, “completely<br />

confident that we can make the change in the<br />

way in which we do procurements without<br />

compromising their integrity”.<br />

Worries about procurements’ integrity<br />

have, though, spread across the civil service<br />

since the high-profile collapse of the WCM<br />

franchise. Civil Service World has heard<br />

several examples of procurement processes<br />

being restarted, altered and strengthened as<br />

46 | THE HOUSE MAGAZINE | march 2013<br />

officials seek to guard<br />

against challenges from<br />

rejected bidders – and<br />

the obvious danger<br />

is that the Cabinet<br />

Office’s attempts to<br />

make civil service<br />

procurements faster,<br />

more flexible and less<br />

onerous will suffer.<br />

Rutnam insists that<br />

the DfT “can’t shy<br />

away” from its duty to<br />

“do things which are<br />

difficult and innovative<br />

and challenging”,<br />

adding that the<br />

inevitable dangers<br />

should be controlled<br />

and minimised by<br />

officials being “very<br />

methodical, very<br />

thoughtful, very<br />

thorough about the<br />

way we reduce those<br />

risks”. Yet it would be<br />

odd if civil servants don’t react to the WCM<br />

saga by making their procurements bulletproof;<br />

and that is bound to add cost and time<br />

into the process.<br />

Officials might be a bit more confident<br />

about exactly what they can and can’t do<br />

if it was clear precisely which individuals’<br />

mistakes had fatally undermined the WCM<br />

franchise; but Bill Stowe’s HR report will<br />

remain secret. “All I’ll say is that following<br />

its conclusion, I initiated some disciplinary<br />

proceedings against a number of members<br />

of staff,” says Rutnam. It’s not surprising he<br />

won’t go further: early on the department<br />

was accused of hanging some officials out<br />

to dry, and it’s already been the subject of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!