26.03.2013 Views

4. The Draw a Person Test for Ghana

4. The Draw a Person Test for Ghana

4. The Draw a Person Test for Ghana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9<br />

“ to meet the need <strong>for</strong> a modernized, recently normed, and objective scoring<br />

system to be applied to human figure drawings produced by children<br />

and adolescents” (1988,2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> test has been used in various differing cultural settings such as Brazil<br />

(Brito et al, 1998), India (Narchal & Juneija ,1986), Germany (Ziler<br />

1949,2000), Greece ( Bardos & Petrogiannisc ,1989), West Africa (Ebigbo<br />

& Izuora, 1981; D’Hondt, Cambier & Vandekrie, 1989) and even with<br />

Alaskan Eskimos (Harris, 1963) just to give a few examples.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Basic Concept of the <strong>Draw</strong> a <strong>Person</strong> <strong>Test</strong><br />

Harris (1963) assumes that changes in the child’s drawings of a man or a<br />

woman represent the development of cognitive complexity or intellectual<br />

maturity expressed by increasingly complex representations of the human<br />

figure. He regards the child’s concept of a human figure as “an index or<br />

sample of their concept generally” (Harris, 1963, 5).<br />

According to Harris (1963, 5) intellectual maturity can be considered as<br />

“the ability to <strong>for</strong>m concepts of increasing abstract character” and he lists<br />

the requirements of intellectual activity or concept <strong>for</strong>mation as:<br />

1. “ the ability to perceive, i.e., to discriminate likenesses and differences;<br />

2. the ability to abstract, i.e., to classify objects according to such likenesses<br />

and differences; and<br />

3. the ability to generalize, i.e., to assign an object newly experienced<br />

to a correct class, according to discriminated features, properties, or<br />

attributes.” (Harris,1963,5)<br />

It may be added that in using the drawing of a human figure as a method<br />

of judging the extent to which the child has acquired the conception of an<br />

observed object, the child must also dispose of the necessary visual-motor<br />

coordination to put the object in his mind on paper.<br />

We can there<strong>for</strong>e conclude that the drawing of a human figure by a child<br />

gives a sample of the extent in which he has assimilated the concept of<br />

the human figure. In the words of Harris (1963, 7): “this concept of a frequently<br />

experienced object, such as a human being, becomes a useful index<br />

to the growing complexity of his concepts generally”. Or as Cherney,<br />

Seiwert, Dieckey & Flichtbeil (2006) state, numerous studies suggest that<br />

children’s drawings illustrate an array of mental representations and cognitive<br />

abilities which move from simple (i.e., stick figures) to complex representations<br />

(such as individuals in clothing of different styles with detailed<br />

facial features). As Cox (1993,1) in a comprehensive review notes<br />

in Western cultures “children progress from a period of scribbling to the<br />

production of tadpole <strong>for</strong>ms and then on to conventional <strong>for</strong>ms, at first<br />

composed of segmented body parts, and then later of more contoured and<br />

integrated sections”. <strong>Draw</strong>ings at an early age consist of what seems to be<br />

a head on two sticks and sometimes facial features. With advancing age<br />

progressively more details such as a trunk are added and the proportion<br />

of body parts become more realistic.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following statements are excerpts from a review by Cox (1993) on the<br />

evolution of children’s drawings of the human figure and are illustrated by<br />

drawings of the <strong>Ghana</strong>ian children of our sample:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!