Metallography: Principles and Practices - ASM International
Metallography: Principles and Practices - ASM International
Metallography: Principles and Practices - ASM International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Metallography</strong>: <strong>Principles</strong> <strong>and</strong> Practice (#06785G)<br />
Author(s): George F. V<strong>and</strong>er Voort<br />
1-4 MACROSTRUCTURE REVEALED BY MACHINING<br />
Copyright © 1984 <strong>ASM</strong> <strong>International</strong> ®<br />
All rights reserved.<br />
www.asminternational.org<br />
MACROSTRUCTURE 41<br />
The macrostructure of certain metals <strong>and</strong> alloys can be revealed by machining.<br />
This was first shown by Dewrance in 1927, but no details were provided.<br />
Subsequently, Ljunggren showed that the grain structure of soft iron was revealed<br />
when the surface was scribed with closely spaced ruled lines just as if it had been<br />
etched [26]. Ljunggren also showed that the macrostructure of relatively pure lead<br />
was revealed by planing with a microtome. Best results were obtained with the<br />
knife blade inclined at an angle of about 4.5° (see Fig. 109, Ref. 26).<br />
Clarebrough <strong>and</strong> Ogilvie used machining to study the macrostructure of pure<br />
lead [27]. The samples were annealed to produce an average grain size of about 5<br />
mm. Orthogonal cuts were made with a high-speed steel microtome with a depth<br />
of cut of 0.001 in. Examination of the cut surfaces revealed transverse marks<br />
extending across some grains in a direction perpendicular to that of the cut. Grain<br />
boundaries were revealed by a change in pitch of these marks. Maximum contrast<br />
was obtained when a grain with strong markings was adjacent to a grain without<br />
marks. Etch pit techniques, which were used to determine the orientations of<br />
grains with strong markings <strong>and</strong> those without marks, showed that grains with a<br />
[100] direction close to the direction of machining formed strong surface marks<br />
while grains with a [111] direction close to the direction of machining did not<br />
produce marks.<br />
Hanson <strong>and</strong> Pell-Walpole state that the machining method is the best method<br />
for revealing the macrostructure of cast bronzes [28]. They recommend using a<br />
sharp, square tool 0.01 in across at the tip, with a depth of cut of 0.01 in <strong>and</strong> a feed<br />
of 0.01 inch.<br />
1-5 THE FRACTURE TEST<br />
Examination of test sample fractures is a well recognized, simple test for evaluating<br />
the quality of metals. Indeed, such tests have been conducted since the<br />
production of metals first began. In this section, the use of macroscopic examination<br />
of sample fractures to evaluate the macrostructure <strong>and</strong> microstructure of<br />
quality control specimens is reviewed.<br />
The breaking of test pieces for examination can be a very crude operation, or<br />
it can be carefully controlled in test machines. The simplest procedure is to<br />
support the sample on its ends <strong>and</strong> strike the center with a sledgehammer. In the<br />
fracturing of hardened steel discs, a mold can be designed to support the specimen<br />
edges, while a top cover is used to locate a chisel over the center of the specimen.<br />
The chisel is struck with a sledgehammer to make the break. The mold prevents<br />
the broken pieces from striking personnel in the area. If the fracture is desired at a<br />
particular spot, it is useful to nick the specimen at the desired spot, <strong>and</strong> a fracture<br />
press is a very useful tool for such work. One end of a specimen can also be placed<br />
in a sturdy vise <strong>and</strong> the specimen struck on the other end. Body-centered cubic<br />
metals are occasionally refrigerated in dry ice or liquid nitrogen to facilitate