27.03.2013 Views

Chapter 15 | Multi-Staining Immunohistochemistry - Dako

Chapter 15 | Multi-Staining Immunohistochemistry - Dako

Chapter 15 | Multi-Staining Immunohistochemistry - Dako

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Staining</strong> <strong>Immunohistochemistry</strong><br />

Pre-treatment<br />

<strong>Multi</strong>ple staining, like single staining, can be performed on both<br />

formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, frozen sections,<br />

cell smears and cytospin preparations. <strong>Multi</strong>ple staining is constrained<br />

by the fact that it may not be possible to find one tissue pre-treatment<br />

protocol that is optimal for all targets. often protocols optimized for<br />

individual stainings differ from one target to the other, e.g. different<br />

target retrieval methods may be used. In this case, it may be necessary<br />

to determine a method that allows all targets to be stained, although<br />

the method may be sub-optimal for some targets.<br />

In cases where targets of different abundance are to be stained, a<br />

method must be selected to best balance the signals. Combining<br />

ISH and IHC on one slide is particularly challenging because targets<br />

require very different pre-treatment protocols. Since ISH processes<br />

such as dna denaturing are not compatible with the presence of the<br />

antibodies for IHC, the ISH protocol is normally performed first.<br />

<strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Staining</strong> Method Selection<br />

to ensure success, IHC staining must be carefully planned. this is<br />

even more important with multi–staining. If primary antibodies, both<br />

directly-labeled and unlabeled and from different host-species, are<br />

commercially available, there are several different staining methods<br />

that one can choose. However, very often the choice may be limited<br />

by the reagents available (3). Care must be taken to avoid crossreactivity<br />

between reagents. a flow chart or similar aid might prove<br />

useful in selecting the best method.<br />

In general, staining methods can be divided into the following classes:<br />

Sequential staining: By this method, one staining procedure<br />

succeeds another. For example, the first primary antibody is applied<br />

to the tissue section followed by a labeled detection system such as<br />

streptavidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase (HRP), with a chromogen<br />

such as daB. the second primary antibody is applied only after the<br />

excess daB is rinsed off, followed by labeling with a streptavidinbiotin<br />

alkaline phosphatase (aP) detection system and a colored<br />

chromogen. the biggest advantage of sequential staining is that by<br />

this procedure problems related to cross-reactivity are avoided.<br />

104 | IHC StaInIng MetHodS, FIFtH edItIon<br />

a sequential staining is shown in Figure 1. Here, the primary and<br />

secondary antibodies from the first staining were eluted before the<br />

staining of the next target was performed. the disadvantages of<br />

sequential staining are: the method cannot be used for co-localized<br />

targets, the technique often leads to a long staining protocol<br />

and carries an inherent risk of incorrect double staining due to<br />

insufficient elution of one set of reagents before application of the<br />

next reagent.<br />

Figure 1. Sequential double staining method performed with the EnVision TM G⎜2<br />

Doublestain Kit using polyclonal anti-kappa light chains (red) and polyclonal<br />

anti-lambda light chains (brown) as primary antibodies. Formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded<br />

tissue sections from tonsils.<br />

elution may become an issue with some high-affinity primary<br />

antibodies as these may remain at their binding site, leading to<br />

spurious double stained structures. elution also risks denaturing<br />

epitopes of antigens to be visualized subsequently. Furthermore, for<br />

some chromogens there is a risk that the first chromogen (daB in<br />

particular) may shield other targets. this technique is, therefore, not<br />

recommended for evaluation of mixed colors at sites of co-localization,<br />

because not all reaction products are capable of surviving the rigorous<br />

washing required to remove the antibodies. to avoid such problems<br />

and blurry staining results, it is recommended to use the most “robust”<br />

dyes such as daB, Fast Red, aeC and X-gal first followed by other<br />

less “robust” dyes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!