27.03.2013 Views

Second North American Sea Duck Conference - Patuxent Wildlife ...

Second North American Sea Duck Conference - Patuxent Wildlife ...

Second North American Sea Duck Conference - Patuxent Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECOND NORTH AMERICAN SEA DUCK CONFERENCE<br />

INCUBATION BEHAVIOR OF KING EIDERS<br />

ON ALASKA’S COASTAL PLAIN<br />

Rebecca McGuire, Abby Powell, and Robert Suydam<br />

USGS Alaska Cooperative Fish and <strong>Wildlife</strong> Research Unit, University of Alaska, Fairbanks;<br />

ftrlm@uaf.edu<br />

The patterns and constancy of incubation are unknown in king eiders (Somateria spectabilis).<br />

Incubating females face conflicting selection pressures; maintaining a favorable thermal environment<br />

for embryo development, maintaining a favorable energy balance for themselves, and minimizing<br />

the risk of predation on themselves and their eggs. As a response to these discrepant demands, large<br />

waterfowl species have apparently developed the capacity to accumulate such significant fat reserves<br />

before nesting that they can rely predominantly on endogenous reserves to sustain themselves during<br />

incubation. King eiders are near the extremes of the waterfowl continuum in severity of climate and<br />

reliance on nutrient reserves and thus an interesting species in which to study the incubation behavior.<br />

We located and monitored king eider nests at two sites on Alaska’s <strong>North</strong> Slope, Teshekpuk and<br />

Kuparuk, from 2002-2005. We placed artificial eggs containing HOBO data loggers in a sample of<br />

these nests (n = 10/site/year). We set the data loggers to record nest temperature every 2 minutes.<br />

Additionally, we weighed females upon arrival to the breeding grounds and again near hatch. In 2005,<br />

females were also weighed during mid-incubation. Incubation constancy was significantly higher at<br />

Kuparuk (99%) than it was at Teshekpuk (95%). Most recesses occurred between 2:26PM and 3:<br />

37PM. Females nesting on islands in lakes took fewer, slightly longer breaks than mainland nesters.<br />

There is some indication that females may arrive on the breeding grounds in slightly better condition<br />

at the Kuparuk study site. Nest success was not significantly different between sites but tended to be<br />

higher at Kuparuk. We relate the incubation constancy of individuals to environmental and nest habitat<br />

characteristics. We examine the variation in incubation constancy, nest success, and spring condition<br />

of females between the two sites.<br />

NOV. 7-11, 2005 ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND, USA<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!