29.03.2013 Views

INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT

INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT

INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>INfusion</strong> <strong>47</strong><br />

Warm regards,<br />

George Nagelmackers<br />

Publisher, Windmill Books<br />

From: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />

To: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />

CC: publisher@windmillbooks.com.au<br />

Subject: The Bourgeois Collective<br />

Dear Kathy,<br />

* * *<br />

Just touching base; George said to contact you directly — he sounds very busy,<br />

the Frankfurt Book Fair must have been exhausting. I was wondering if you<br />

have had a chance to review the manuscript yet? I know it has only been three<br />

weeks (twenty-three days, to be exact) so please excuse my impatience, but I<br />

haven’t really worked with an editor before and am very keen to receive professional<br />

feedback.<br />

I’m really looking forward to working together on this.<br />

Regards,<br />

Devin<br />

* * *<br />

From: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />

To: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />

Subject: M/s<br />

Dear Devin,<br />

Sorry I haven’t gotten back to you earlier but we had three books going to print<br />

so we were all very busy. I’ve almost finished reading the m/s but perhaps it is<br />

12<br />

13<br />

<strong>Summer</strong> Edition ‘12<br />

best that we wait until I finish it completely before I pass on my suggestions.<br />

Maybe you could drop by the office sometime next week? Say, Friday 1:30pm? I<br />

will be able to provide more direction on the ms then.<br />

Cheers,<br />

Kathy<br />

Senior Editor, Windmill Books<br />

From: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />

To: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />

CC: publisher@windmillbooks.com.au<br />

Subject: Revisions<br />

Hi Kathy,<br />

* * *<br />

It was interesting to read your comments on the manuscript, although some<br />

of your handwriting was a little difficult to understand and you sure seem to<br />

spill a lot of coffee. I must admit I was shocked by the scale of the revisions<br />

you’ve suggested. Do you really think the whole of Part One needs to go? It<br />

seems to me that the backstory of Frank’s relationship with Matilda is central<br />

to the narrative; if the reader doesn’t know their history then they won’t<br />

understand their actions and conversations in Part Two. I guess it is just a<br />

little confronting receiving such direct, professional — and very constructive<br />

— criticism. It’s great though. I see an editor as a helicopter surveying the<br />

whole literary landscape while the author is crouched in a cave with a pen.<br />

I think you are probably right about the character of Jeff. He doesn’t add a lot<br />

to the story — it’s a little sad, but I’ll snuff him out.<br />

I have taken six weeks off work (I’m an arts teacher at the local TAFE) so I can<br />

devote myself to fixing up the manuscript and incorporating your suggestions.<br />

I will email you my revisions when they are done. Would you like them

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!