INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT
INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT
INfusion 47 ebook - Summer 2012 - NMIT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>INfusion</strong> <strong>47</strong><br />
Warm regards,<br />
George Nagelmackers<br />
Publisher, Windmill Books<br />
From: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />
To: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />
CC: publisher@windmillbooks.com.au<br />
Subject: The Bourgeois Collective<br />
Dear Kathy,<br />
* * *<br />
Just touching base; George said to contact you directly — he sounds very busy,<br />
the Frankfurt Book Fair must have been exhausting. I was wondering if you<br />
have had a chance to review the manuscript yet? I know it has only been three<br />
weeks (twenty-three days, to be exact) so please excuse my impatience, but I<br />
haven’t really worked with an editor before and am very keen to receive professional<br />
feedback.<br />
I’m really looking forward to working together on this.<br />
Regards,<br />
Devin<br />
* * *<br />
From: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />
To: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />
Subject: M/s<br />
Dear Devin,<br />
Sorry I haven’t gotten back to you earlier but we had three books going to print<br />
so we were all very busy. I’ve almost finished reading the m/s but perhaps it is<br />
12<br />
13<br />
<strong>Summer</strong> Edition ‘12<br />
best that we wait until I finish it completely before I pass on my suggestions.<br />
Maybe you could drop by the office sometime next week? Say, Friday 1:30pm? I<br />
will be able to provide more direction on the ms then.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Kathy<br />
Senior Editor, Windmill Books<br />
From: dev074@fastmail.com.au<br />
To: kathy@windmillbooks.com.au<br />
CC: publisher@windmillbooks.com.au<br />
Subject: Revisions<br />
Hi Kathy,<br />
* * *<br />
It was interesting to read your comments on the manuscript, although some<br />
of your handwriting was a little difficult to understand and you sure seem to<br />
spill a lot of coffee. I must admit I was shocked by the scale of the revisions<br />
you’ve suggested. Do you really think the whole of Part One needs to go? It<br />
seems to me that the backstory of Frank’s relationship with Matilda is central<br />
to the narrative; if the reader doesn’t know their history then they won’t<br />
understand their actions and conversations in Part Two. I guess it is just a<br />
little confronting receiving such direct, professional — and very constructive<br />
— criticism. It’s great though. I see an editor as a helicopter surveying the<br />
whole literary landscape while the author is crouched in a cave with a pen.<br />
I think you are probably right about the character of Jeff. He doesn’t add a lot<br />
to the story — it’s a little sad, but I’ll snuff him out.<br />
I have taken six weeks off work (I’m an arts teacher at the local TAFE) so I can<br />
devote myself to fixing up the manuscript and incorporating your suggestions.<br />
I will email you my revisions when they are done. Would you like them