2010 review - Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - University ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SF-20: MOS 20-item Short Form Health Survey (20) SF-12: MOS 12-item Short Form Health Survey (12) Sickness Impact Profile, SIP (136) Bodily pain (BP) (1), General health (GH) (5), Mental health (MH) (5), Physical functioning (PF) (6), Role functioning (RF) (2), Social functioning (SF) (1) Bodily pain (BP) (1), Energy/Vitality (VT) (1), General health (GH) (1), Mental health (MH) (2), Physical functioning (PF) (2), Role limitation-emotional (RE) (2), Role limitation-physical (RP) (2), Social functioning (SF) (1) Alertness Behaviour (AB) (10), Ambulation (A) (12), Body Care and Movement (BCM) (23), Communication (C) (9), Eating (E) (9), Emotional Behaviour (EB) (9), Home Management (HM) (10), Mobility (M) (10), Recreation and Pastimes (RP) (8), Sleep and Rest (SR) (7), Social Interaction (SI) (20), Work (W) (9) 40 Recall: standard 4 weeks, acute 1 week Categorical: 3-6 options Recall: standard 4 weeks, acute 1 week Categorical: 2-6 options Current health Applicable statements ticked. Items weighted: higher weights indicate increased impairment Algorithm Summation Domain profile (0-100, 100 best health) Algorithm Domain profile (0-100, 100 best health) Summary: Physical (PCS), Mental (MCS) (mean 50, sd 10) Algorithm Domain profile (0-100%, 100 worst health); Index (0-100%) Summary: Physical (A, BCM, M), Psychosocial function (AB, C, EB, SI) Interview, telephone or self (5-7) Interview or self Interview (range: 21-33) Telephone: PF only (11.5) Self (19.7)
Table iv: summary of content and scoring of condition-specific instruments Instrument name (total items) Domains (no. items) Response options Scoring Administration Completion time, where reported Cardiac Symptom Survey (40) 10 symptoms: Symptoms over 7 days Mean of frequency & severity Angina Shortness of breath Fatigue Depression Symptom evaluation 0-10: 0=absence of symptom, 10=very frequent/severe calculated for each item; responseto-symptom items are single-item scores Sleeping difficulty Symptom response Incisional pain 0-10: 0=no interference, 10=a Leg swelling Palpitations Anxiety Poor appetite great deal of interference Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (33-52) Each rated for: - frequency| symptom - severity | evaluation - interference with PF | symptom - interference with QoL| response 32 core items: Symptoms (7) Physical functioning (8) Psychosocial functioning (14) Cognitive functioning (3) Plus, 1 descriptive item (not scored) Post-op version, added items: Satisfaction with treatment (6) 2 descriptive items: Anxiety - return of symptoms Hospital readmission CROQ-CABG_Post (52) Adverse effects (11) CROQ-PTCA_Post (47) Adverse effects (6) 3- to 6-point response options Self-administration 41 Items in each scale summed, transformed 0-100 scale, where 0=worst, 100=best outcome 10 mins
Page 1: PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASUREMEN
Page 5: A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPO
Page 8 and 9: Fifteen cardiovascular-specific mea
Page 10 and 11: Heart disease in the UK Coronary he
Page 12 and 13: Hand-searching of titles of key jou
Page 14 and 15: 2. PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES Four p
Page 16 and 17: Response rates of 93% and above wer
Page 18 and 19: 3. GENERIC PROMs Six generic measur
Page 20 and 21: Responsiveness of the NHP was suppo
Page 22 and 23: The PF subscale discriminated betwe
Page 24 and 25: neuropsychologic deficits, and mood
Page 26 and 27: (2009), with women having significa
Page 28 and 29: 4. CARDIOVASCULAR-SPECIFIC PROMs Ca
Page 30 and 31: larger than for the SF-36 SF and MH
Page 32 and 33: Responsiveness of the DASI was illu
Page 34 and 35: satisfaction with various aspects o
Page 36 and 37: the SAQ AF and QL scales showed sig
Page 38 and 39: Content of the SOIS was based on fa
Page 40 and 41: undergoing ECP. However, it is (int
Page 42 and 43: Table 3: Summary of instruments: he
Page 44 and 45: Table ii: Appraisal criteria Apprai
Page 48 and 49: Duke Activity Status Index, DASI (1
Page 50 and 51: Appendix C Table v: Summary of card
Page 52 and 53: Control Attitudes Index* *Moser & D
Page 54 and 55: Appendix D Membership, methods of w
Page 56 and 57: CROQ This suite of instruments was
Page 58 and 59: Patient-reported Outcome Measure Ra
Page 60 and 61: Appendix E: Abbreviations and acron
Page 62 and 63: Barnason S, Zimmerman L, Nieveen J,
Page 64 and 65: Department of Health, London, March
Page 66 and 67: Höfer S, Lim L, Guyatt GH, Oldridg
Page 68 and 69: Lee GA. Patients reported health-re
Page 70 and 71: Penckofer S, Ferrans CE, Fink N, Ba
Page 72 and 73: Spertus JA, Winder JA, Fihn SD, Dew
Page 74: Zhang Z, Spertus JA, Mahoney EM, Bo

2010 review - Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - University ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?