02.04.2013 Views

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1125<br />

QUESTION 99<br />

OF SACRILEGE<br />

(FOUR ARTICLES)<br />

We must now consider the vices which pertain to irreligion, whereby<br />

sacred things are treated with irreverence. We shall consider<br />

(1) Sacrilege;<br />

(2) Simony [i.e., the buying and selling of positions in the Church].<br />

Under the first head there are four points of inquiry:<br />

(1) What is sacrilege?<br />

(2) Whether it is a special sin?<br />

(3) Of the species of sacrilege;<br />

(4) Of the punishment of sacrilege.<br />

P(2b)-Q(99)-A(1)<br />

Whether sacrilege is the violation of a sacred thing?<br />

P(2b)-Q(99)-A(1)-O(1) — It would seem that sacrilege is not the violation<br />

of a sacred thing. It is stated (XVII, qu. iv [*Append. Gratian, on can. Si<br />

quis suadente]): “They are guilty of sacrilege who disagree about the<br />

sovereign’s decision, and doubt whether the person chosen by the<br />

sovereign be worthy of honor.” Now this seems to have no connection<br />

with anything sacred. Therefore sacrilege does not denote the violation of<br />

something sacred.<br />

P(2b)-Q(99)-A(1)-O(2) — Further, it is stated further on [*Append.<br />

Gratian, on can. Constituit.] that if any man shall allow the Jews to hold<br />

public offices, “he must be excommunicated as being guilty of sacrilege.”<br />

Yet public offices have nothing to do with anything sacred. Therefore it<br />

seems that sacrilege does not denote the violation of a sacred thing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!