02.04.2013 Views

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

Aquinas - Summa Theologica v.3 - Theology Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

P(2b)-Q(10)-A(2)-O(3) — Further, a gloss [*Augustine, Enchiridion lx.]<br />

on 2 Corinthians 11:14 “Satan... transformeth himself into an angel of<br />

light,” says that if “a wicked angel pretend to be a good angel, and be taken<br />

for a good angel, it is not a dangerous or an unhealthy error, if he does or<br />

says what is becoming to a good angel.” This seems to be because of the<br />

rectitude of the will of the man who adheres to the angel, since his<br />

intention is to adhere to a good angel. Therefore the sin of unbelief seems<br />

to consist entirely in a perverse will: and, consequently, it does not reside<br />

in the intellect.<br />

P(2b)-Q(10)-A(2) — On the contrary, Things which are contrary to one<br />

another are in the same subject. Now faith, to which unbelief is opposed,<br />

resides in the intellect. Therefore unbelief also is in the intellect.<br />

P(2b)-Q(10)-A(2) — I answer that, As stated above (P(2a), Q(74),<br />

AA(1),2), sin is said to be in the power which is the principle of the sinful<br />

act. Now a sinful act may have two principles: one is its first and universal<br />

principle, which commands all acts of sin; and this is the will, because<br />

every sin is voluntary. The other principle of the sinful act is the proper<br />

and proximate principle which elicits the sinful act: thus the concupiscible<br />

is the principle of gluttony and lust, wherefore these sins are said to be in<br />

the concupiscible. Now dissent, which is the act proper to unbelief, is an<br />

act of the intellect, moved, however, by the will, just as assent is.<br />

Therefore unbelief, like faith, is in the intellect as its proximate subject.<br />

But it is in the will as its first moving principle, in which way every sin is<br />

said to be in the will.<br />

Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear.<br />

P(2b)-Q(10)-A(2)-RO(2) — The will’s contempt causes the intellect’s<br />

dissent, which completes the notion of unbelief. Hence the cause of<br />

unbelief is in the will, while unbelief itself is in the intellect.<br />

P(2b)-Q(10)-A(2)-RO(3) — He that believes a wicked angel to be a good<br />

one, does not dissent from a matter of faith, because “his bodily senses are<br />

deceived, while his mind does not depart from a true and right judgment”<br />

as the gloss observes [*Augustine, Enchiridion lx]. But, according to the<br />

same authority, to adhere to Satan when he begins to invite one to his<br />

abode, i.e. wickedness and error, is not without sin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!